What are Racial and Ethnic Disparities (RED)?
According to the Juvenile Justice Reform Act (JJRA), Racial and Ethnic Disparities exists when “…minority youth populations are involved at a decision point in the juvenile justice system at disproportionately higher rates than nonminority youth at that decision point” 103(41). The different racial and ethnic groups are:
- American Indian or Alaska Native (Non-Hispanic)
- Asian (Non-Hispanic)
- Black or African American (Non-Hispanic)
- Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders (Non-Hispanic)
- Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
- Mixed or Other (Non-Hispanic)
- White (Non-Hispanic)
Decision point/Contact refers to the different decision points along the juvenile justice system continuum: arrests, delinquent findings, diversion, petition filed, probation, referrals, secure confinement, secure detention, and waived to adult court.
Juvenile Justice Equity Plan
Below is a link to the Indiana Juvenile Justice Equity Plan for FY20, as per the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention guidelines.
To supplement the plan, this dashboard was created by ICJI and includes data on the number of juvenile arrests on school property, provided by the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Schools submit this data to the IDOE per statute on an annual basis; data is not received from law enforcement. Data comprises of juveniles arrested on school property or resulting from a referral from the school, ages 0 – 17, from school year beginning in 2016 to the end of the school year in 2020. Arrests reported do not reflect arrests across all school corporations. These data reflect arrested individuals.
Click on the data elements below to filter the information.
- Dashboard Abbreviations
Abbreviations for the race and ethnic categories:
- American Indian or Alaska Native - AI/AN
- Black or African American - Black/ AA
- Native, Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islanders - NHOPI
2019 Disproportionate Minority Contact Report
The Indiana Office of Court Services enacted Judicial Administrative Rule 1G in May 2016. This rule requires all 92 Indiana counties to report DMC data into a statewide repository. ICJI’s research specialist analyzes county-reported data to determine if DMC exists and, if so, at what level. Relative Rate Index (RRI) is used to calculate DMC. RRI produces a value, which is an indicator of whether or not DMC exists. The rate of contact for the minority youth divided by the rate of contact for the majority youth is the RRI value. The RRI value provides information that could indicate potential DMC contributing factors, though not necessarily a disparate treatment of minority youth within a jurisdiction.
Indiana’s DMC Reduction Efforts
As Indiana's administering agency, ICJI routinely receives and allocates federal Formula Grant funding. ICJI is also tasked with ensuring that Indiana achieves and maintains compliance with the four core requirements. For additional information about the first three core requirements and how they are being addressed in Indiana, visit Youth Law T.E.A.M.
Statewide DMC Data Collection Project
Indiana is in compliance with the DMC core requirement. There has been increasing attention regarding the important issue of Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) among Indiana youth. Indiana has taken a multi-pronged approach to understand and quantify the extent of DMC.
In 2012, Phase 1 of a multi-step approach was initiated. This phase included a needs assessment to understand local issues that drive DMC as well as exploring local solutions to DMC. Focus groups and quantitative interviews with juvenile justice involved youth in three communities across the state of Indiana resulted in increased understanding of DMC among diverse communities and specific suggestions of how to mitigate DMC.
In order to best address DMC, it is vitally important to accurately quantify the extent of DMC across Indiana. As a result, Phase 2 focused on quantifying the data quality among a subsample of Indiana counties utilizing juvenile justice information systems across the state. The result of Phase 2 was a clearer picture of data quality as well as initiating steps to maintain and improve data quality measures.
Phase 3 includes an evaluation and data quality improvement project of all counties utilizing juvenile justice information systems in Indiana. This takes Indiana one step closer to providing consistent, universal DMC data for all Hoosier youth.
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative
Indiana was recently designated a statewide Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) site by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. JDAI, a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, is a detention reform and juvenile justice system improvement initiative that has demonstrated over 20 years, in urban and rural jurisdictions, that moving low-risk youth from secure detention into community-based alternative programs is excellent public policy. Guided by eight core principles, JDAI has established outstanding public safety outcomes, reduced racial and ethnic disparities, minimized detention over-crowding and the need to build more expensive facilities creating savings for taxpayers, improved efficiencies in the juvenile justice system operations, and produced better outcomes for youth and their families.
Through JDAI, ICJI is currently working with a number of counties to reduce racial and ethnic disparities and DMC in their communities. JDAI sites have received or are currently receiving funds to support local JDAI/DMC Coordinator positions and other initiatives related to JDAI and DMC. A number of counties are also working with the W. Haywood Burns Institute, an organization that provides jurisdictions with guidance and technical assistance as they work to reduce racial equity in their juvenile justice systems. Each JDAI site has established or is in the process of establishing a Racial and Ethnic/DMC subcommittee that will be charged with guiding the work in their respective jurisdiction. There is also a statewide RED/DMC subcommittee that is tasked with addressing cross-cutting DMC issues that arise from the county, as well as ensuring that the state maintains compliance with the JJDP Act. For additional information about Indiana’s JDAI journey, please visit http://www.youthlawteam.org/compliance.html.
- Indiana Juvenile Justice Detention Alternative Initiative
- Juvenile Justice Detention Alternative Initiative (JDAI)
- Models for Change
- OJJDP DMC Website
- W. Haywood Burns Institute
Manpreet Kaur, Youth Equity Program Manager