CADDNAR


[CITE: Squaw Creek and Peabody v. DNR, 2 CADDNAR 20 (1985)]

 

[VOLUME 2, PAGE 20]

 

Cause #: 84-131R

Caption: Squaw Creek and Peabody v. DNR
Administrative Law Judge: Shadley
Attorneys: Joest; Spicker, DAG
Date: April 1, 1985

ORDER

 

1. Notice of Violation #N40620-S-00010, Violation 2 of 2 is vacated.

 

2. Notice of Violation #N40520-S-00008 is vacated.

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1. The Director of the Department of Natural Resources (the "Director") is included in the definition of agency as used in IC 4-22-1-2 and is duly empowered to conduct administrative hearings pursuant to IC 4-22-1.

 

2. The Director has jurisdiction over the subject matter and parties to these actions.

 

3. By letter dated June 26, 1984, Peabody Coal Company requested Administrative Review of Notice of Violation #N40620-S-00010, Violation 2 of 2.

 

4. Peabody Coal Company holds permit S-00010 which authorized it to conduct surface coal mining operations in accordance with IC 13-4.1 and 310 IAC 12 at its Hawthorne Mine in Sullivan County.

 

5. On July 3, 1984, the parties agreed to submit briefs according to a briefing schedule. The Hearing Officer agreed to base the recommendation on the briefs.

 

6. On June 26, 1984 Squaw Creek Coal Company requested administrative review of Notice of Violation #N40529-S-00008.

 

7. Squaw Creek Coal Company holds permit S-00008 which authorizes it to conduct surface coal mining operations in accordance with IC 13-4.1 and 310 IAC 12 at its Squaw Creek Mine North Area in Warwick County.

 

8. On July 18, 1984, the Hearing Officer ordered the submission of briefs in this cause, in lieu of a hearing. The parties had agreed that the Hearing Officer would render a recommended decision based upon the parties’ briefs.

 

9. Notice of Violation #N40620-S-00010, Violation 2 of 2 was issued by an authorized representative of the Director on June 20, 1984 and alleged a violation of 310 IAC 12-5-12(a) for failure to remove topsoil prior to mine related surface disturbance )laying cable lines and switching boxes.)

 

10. Notice of Violation #N40520-S-00008 was issued by an authorized representative of the Director on May 20, 1984 and alleged a violation of 310 IAC 12-5-12(a) for failure to remove topsoil prior to other mine related surface disturbances, i.e. power line replacement.

 

11. On December 21, 1983, the Natural Resources Commission preliminarily adopted a revision to 310 IAC 12-5-12 which would not require the removal of topsoil prior to laying cable lines.

 

12. On September 17, 1984, the Commission adopted that rule revision in final form.

 

13. On November 18, 1984, that rule revision was promulgated, but the effective date was delayed until approval of the Office of Surface Mining being published in the Indiana Register.

 

14. Upon promulgation of the rule revision, it has been clarified that removal of topsoil prior to laying cable is not necessary in order to implement the purposes of IC 13-4.1 and that interpretation has been found to be legal by the Indiana Attorney General.

 

15. Promulgation of this rule revision, constitutes good cause for altering the prior interpretation of the rule, and is good cause for purposes of vacating a Notice of Violation issued for failure to remove topsoil in