Table of Contents 

 
BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
INDIANA STATEWIDE SURVEY DATA, 2002
M14.6 WHICH STATEMENT BEST DESCRIBES THE RULES ABOUT SMOKING INSIDE YOUR HOME?

  PERCENTS  
CATEGORIES NOT ALLOWED ANYWHERE ALLOWED IN SOME AREAS ALLOWED IN ALL AREAS NO RULES ABOUT SMOKING UNK/REF TOTAL
AGE GROUP

      18-24
61.7 14.1 3.7 20.0 0.6 447
      25-34 65.4 13.1 3.7 17.4 0.4 949
      35-44 60.0 12.7 3.5 23.9 0 1,173
      45-54 58.7 14.0 4.3 22.3 0.6 1,117
      55-64 59.3 11.2 4.7 24.5 0.3 766
      65-74 58.9 10.3 1.7 28.9 0.2 554
      75 + 59.2 6.1 2.2 31.8 0.6 504
      UNK/REF *** *** *** *** *** 44
SEX

      MALE
60.7 11.1 4.1 23.9 0.2 2,180
      FEMALE 60.8 13.4 3.1 22.2 0.5 3,374
RACE GROUP

      WHITE, NON-HISPANIC
60.9 12.1 3.6 23.1 0.2 4,861
      BLACK, NON-HISPANIC 56.4 13.6 3.1 26.2 0.7 262
      OTH/MULTI RACE, NON-HISP. 47.8 21.1 4.3 25.4 1.4 194
      HISPANIC 71.1 6.6 2.2 19.0 1.2 176
      REFUSED 67.8 14.9 8.7 7.9 0.8 61
INCOME GROUP

      < $15,000
50.2 16.8 4.2 28.8 0.1 527
      $15-$24,999 52.9 12.6 3.4 30.7 0.3 880
      $25-$49,999 56.9 13.4 4.6 24.7 0.4 1,673
      $50-$74,999 65.7 12.9 2.4 18.9 0.1 922
      >=$75,000 76.2 7.4 2.5 13.9 0.1 849
      UNK/REF 59.9 11.5 4.2 23.1 1.4 703
EDUCATION

      < H S GRAD
44.8 14.9 4.7 34.9 0.7 617
      H S GRAD OR GED 52.6 14.1 4.7 28.2 0.4 2,039
      SOME COLLEGE/TECH SCH 63.5 13.2 3.3 19.8 0.1 1,399
      COLLEGE GRAD 76.4 7.7 1.9 13.6 0.4 1,491
      UNK/REF *** *** *** *** *** 8
MARITAL STATUS

      MARRIED
66.4 11.5 3.0 18.9 0.2 3,106
      UNMARRIED 51.8 13.5 4.5 29.6 0.5 2,437
      UNK/REF *** *** *** *** *** 11
EMPLOYMENT STATUS

      EMPLOYED
62.4 12.6 3.5 21.1 0.3 3,411
      NOT EMPLOYED 49.7 12.1 7.7 30.4 0 239
      STUDENT/HOMEMAKER 67.0 13.8 1.7 16.8 0.7 670
      RET/UNABLE TO WORK 54.2 10.3 3.9 31.2 0.4 1,223
      UNK/REF *** *** *** *** *** 11

--- ALL ---
60.7 12.3 3.6 23.0 0.4 5,554

 NOTES:      Percents are based on weighted data; totals are unweighted numbers.
                   *** Asterisks indicate too few cases to calculate a reliable percent.

 SOURCE:   Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002

Table of Contents