NOTICE OF VIOLATION

 

 

Via Certified Mail #:

 

 

 

 

To:

Mr. Max Rynearson, Owner

Tall Timbers Mobile Home Park

16840 Little Eagle Creek Way

Westfield, IN 46074

 

 

 

Case No. 2006-16330-W

 

Based on an investigation on August 31, 2006, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”) has reason to believe Max Rynearson, owner of the Tall Timbers Mobile Home Park (“Respondent”) has violated environmental statutes, rules and/or permit.  The violations are based on the following:

 

1.                  Respondent owns and/or operates the Tall Timbers Mobile Home Park wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located at 15042 East State Road 32, approximately one mile east of Durbin in Hamilton County, Indiana (the “Site”).

 

2.                  The Respondent is authorized by National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number IN 0025526 (Permit) to discharge 0.012 MGD of wastewater treated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES Permit from his WWTP into Receiving Waters consisting of a field tile to E.O. Michaels Drain to an unnamed tributary to Stoney Creek via Outfall 001.

 

3.                  Pursuant to 327 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 5-2-8(1) and Part II.A.1 of the Permit, the permittee shall comply with all terms and conditions of its permit.

 

Part I.A.1 of the Permit contains numeric effluent limitations and monitoring requirements applicable to the discharge from the WWTP via Outfall 001.  The Respondent failed to meet the numeric effluent limitations contained in the Permit, as reported by the Respondent on Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) submitted from March 2004 through September 2006 and specified below, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-8(1) and Parts I.A.1 and II.A.1 of the Permit:

A.                 The monthly and weekly average loading limitations for ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) for the months of March 2004; January and February 2005; and January, February, April, May, June, and September 2006.

B.                 The monthly and weekly average concentration limitations for NH3-N for the months of March, August, and December 2004; and February, March, April, May, June, July, August, and September 2006.

C.                The monthly and weekly average loading limitations for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) for the months of November 2004; January and December 2005; and January, February, and March 2006.

D.                The monthly and weekly average concentration limitations for TSS for the months of September and December 2005; and January, March, May, June, July, August, and September 2006.

E.                 The monthly and weekly average loading limitations for Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD) for the months of June and November 2004; and March 2006.

F.                 The monthly and weekly average concentration limitations for CBOD for the months of June 2004; November 2005; and March, May 2006.

G.                The minimum daily concentration limitation for Dissolved Oxygen (DO) for the month of August 2006.

 

4.         Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(8), the permittee shall at all times maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all facilities and systems (and related appurtenances) for collection and treatment that are:

A.                 Installed or used by the permittee; and

B.                 Necessary for achieving compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit.

 

Pursuant to Part II.B.1 of the Permit, all waste collection, control, treatment, and disposal facilities shall be operated in a manner such that, among other requirements, at all times, all facilities are operated as efficiently as possible and in a manner which will minimize upsets and discharges of excessive pollutants.

 

The Respondent failed to maintain its WWTP in good working order and/or to operate its WWTP as efficiently as possible, evidenced as specified below, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), 327 IAC 5-2-8(8), and Parts II.A.1 and II.B.1 of the Permit:

A.                 The NH3-N, TSS, and CBOD effluent limitation violations specified in Item 3 above;

B.                 IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of thick solid scum covering the clarifier, overflowing the weirs, and in excess in the filter and contact tank, and there were no indications that a disinfection system was operating on June 29, 2005;

C.                IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of heavy scum cover on the secondary clarifier and no disinfection of the effluent on August 31, 2006;

D.                IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of grab sample results that exceeded maximum permit effluent limits for NH3, DO, TSS, CBOD, and E.coli on August 31, 2006;

E.                 IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of the WWTP not having adequate operating staff because the conditions observed and grab sample analysis indicated the facility was not being properly maintained on August 31, 2006.

F.                 The Indiana State Department of Health documentation on its inspection report of raw sewage discharged on the ground surface from at least two 4-inch cleanouts around lots 38, 49 and the nearby dumpster area on November 1, 2006.

5.        

Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1) and Part I.A.2 of the Permit, all waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet certain minimum conditions, including but not limited to, being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges:

A.                 That will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits;

B.                 That are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious; or

C.                That produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance.

 

The Respondent allowed wastewater sludge solids to enter the Receiving Waters from Outfall 001 that was in an amount sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious, and/or that produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance, as evidenced in IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of observations and grab sample analysis results on August 31, 2006, and Respondent’s Discharge Monitoring Reports as referenced in Item 3 above.

 

6.         Pursuant to Part I.A. 1, Table 2 of the Permit, E.coli monitoring is required as a weekly grab sample.  Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-14(a) and Part I.B.6 of the Permit, for each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of the permit, the Respondent must record the following information:

 

a.         The exact place, date, and time of sampling;

b.         The person(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;

c.         The dates the analyses were performed;

d.         The person(s) who performed the analyses;

e.         The analytical techniques or methods used; and

f.          The results of all required analyses and measurements.

A review by IDEM representatives of the Respondent's Discharge Monitoring Reports and Monthly Reports of Operation during April through October 2006 revealed that the Respondent failed to record the required E.coli sampling and analysis results.  The Respondent's failure to provide required analysis results is in violation of Part I.A.1 and Part I.B.6 of the Permit, 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), and 327 IAC 5-2-14(a).

 

In accordance with IC 13-30-3-3, the Commissioner herein provides notice that violations may exist and offers an opportunity to enter into an Agreed Order providing for the actions required to correct the violations and, as necessary and appropriate, for the payment of a civil penalty.  The Commissioner is not required to extend this offer for more than sixty (60) days.

 

As provided in IC 13-30-3-3, an alleged violator may enter into an Agreed Order without admitting that the violations occurred.  IDEM encourages settlement by Agreed Order, thereby resulting in quicker correction of the environmental violations and avoidance of extensive litigation.  Timely settlement by Agreed Order may result in a reduced civil penalty.  Also, settlement discussions will allow the opportunity to present any mitigating factors that may be relevant to the violations.

 

If an Agreed Order is not entered into within sixty (60) days of receipt of this Notice of Violation, the Commissioner may issue a Notice and Order under IC 13-30-3-4 containing the actions that must be taken to correct the violations and requiring the payment of an appropriate civil penalty.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-4-1, the Commissioner may assess penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each violation.

 

Please contact Paul Cluxton at 317/232-8432 within fifteen (15) days after receipt of this Notice to discuss resolution of this matter or to schedule a settlement conference.

 

 

 

For the Commissioner:

Date:

 

 

Signed January 23, 2007

 

Lori Kyle Endris
Chief
Office of Enforcement

 

 

cc:       William R. Goodner, Operator

Hamilton County Health Department

http://www.in.gov/idem/enforcement/