NOTICE OF VIOLATION

 

Via Certified Mail #:

Via Certified Mail #:

________________________

________________________

 

 

 

To:

ARC Communities 19, LLC, d/b/a

Corporation Service Company, Registered Agent

 

Broadmore MHC

for ARC Communities 19, LLC

 

600 Grant Steet, Suite 900

251 East Ohio Street, Suite 500

 

Denver, Colorado 80203

Indianapolis, IN 46204

 

Case No. 2005-14906-W

 

Based on an investigation, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) has reason to believe that ARC Communities 19, LLC, d/b/a Broadmore MHC (Respondent) has violated environmental statutes, rules, and its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.  The violations are based on the following:

 

1.                  The Respondent owns and operates the Broadmore Estates Mobile Home Court wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), located at 58874 SR 15, Goshen, Elkhart County, Indiana (Site).

 

2.                  The Respondent is authorized by NPDES Permit Number IN0038989 (the Permit) to discharge treated domestic wastewater from its WWTP via Outfall 001 into waters of the State named Pine Creek, in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth therein.

 

3.                  Pursuant to 327 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 5-2-8(1) and Part II.A.1 of the Permit, the permittee shall comply with all terms and conditions of its permit.

Part I.A.1 of the Permit contains numeric effluent limitations and monitoring requirements applicable to the discharge from the WWTP via Outfall 001.

The Respondent failed to meet the numeric effluent limitations contained in the Permit, as reported by the Respondent on Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) submitted from February 2004 through May 2005 and specified below, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-8(1) and Parts I.A.1 and II.A.1 of the Permit:

 

A.                 The monthly average effluent limitation for E.Coli for the months of April and October 2004.

B.                 The maximum weekly average effluent limitation for E.Coli for the months of April, June, and October 2004 and May 2005.

C.                The monthly average Total Suspended Solids percent removal was violated in December 2004.

 

4.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(8), the permittee shall at all times maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all facilities and systems (and related appurtenances) for collection and treatment that are:

 

A.                 Installed or used by the permittee; and

B.                 Necessary for achieving compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit.

Pursuant to Part II.B.1 of the Permit, all waste collection, control, treatment, and disposal facilities shall be operated in a manner such that, among other requirements, at all times, all facilities are operated as efficiently as possible and in a manner which will minimize upsets and discharges of excessive pollutants.

The Respondent failed to maintain its WWTP in good working order and/or to operate its WWTP as efficiently as possible, evidenced as specified below, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), 327 IAC 5-2-8(8), and Parts II.A.1 and II.B.1 of the Permit:

 

A.                 The E. coli effluent limitation violations specified in Item 3 above;

 

B.                 IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of  the final clarifier discharging solids to the tertiary lagoon because sludge had been allowed to accumulate at the weirs, one aeration blower was not operational and needed repair, the tertiary polishing pond had an excess accumulation of solids and sludge that was “gassing” and there were floating mats of sludge and duckweed, there was no disinfection of the effluent at the time of the inspection because the ultraviolet (UV) unit was not plugged in and there was no bulb unit in the UV trough on October 7, 2004; and

 

C.                IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of the final tertiary lagoon having excessive solids build up and its banks were not being maintained,  the North East corner of the lagoon had cement coated dirt walls that were breaking apart and leaking, there was weakness at other locations around the lagoon where bricks and dirt had been used to fill ground hog holes in the lagoon dike, a photograph was taken by the IDEM Inspector showing the clarifier with floating sludge mats and sludge being discharged over the effluent weirs, the UV control indicator lights showed low intensity and failure on October 20, 2004; and  

 

D.                IDEM’s documentation on its inspection report of ongoing concern of excessive solids and off-gassing from sludge solids in the final lagoon; and the lagoon was being bypassed on June 22, 2005. 

 

5.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), no person may discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment or into any publicly owned treatment works (POTW) in any form which causes or would cause pollution which violates rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

The Respondent’s violations of 327 IAC 5-2-8(1) by failing to meet the numeric effluent limitations contained in the Permit, as referenced in Item 3 above, and by failing to adequately treat discharges as referenced in Item 4 above, caused or would have caused pollution.  Because the Respondent violated 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), a rule adopted by the Water Pollution Control Board under the environmental management laws, in a manner that caused or would have caused pollution, the Respondent also violated IC 13-30-2-1.

 

In accordance with IC 13-30-3-3, the Commissioner herein provides notice that violations may exist and offers an opportunity to enter into an Agreed Order providing for the action required to correct the violations and for the payment of a civil penalty.  The Commissioner is not required to extend this offer for more than 60 days.

 

As provided in IC 13-30-3-3, an alleged violator may enter into an Agreed Order without admitting that the violations occurred.  IDEM encourages settlement by Agreed Order, thereby resulting in quicker correction of the environmental violations and avoidance of extensive litigation.  Timely settlement by Agreed Order may result in a reduced civil penalty.  Also, settlement discussions will allow the opportunity to present any mitigating factors that may be relevant to the violations.

 

If an Agreed Order is not entered into within 60 days of receipt of this Notice of Violation, the Commissioner may issue a Notice and Order under IC 13-30-3-4 containing the actions that must be taken to correct the violations and requiring the payment of an appropriate civil penalty.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-4-1, the Commissioner may assess penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each violation.

 

Please contact Mr. Paul Cluxton, Environmental Manager, at 317/232-8432 within 15 days after receipt of this Notice to discuss resolution of this matter.

 

 

 

FOR THE COMMISSIONER:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

(Signed January 19, 2006)

 

 

Matthew T. Klein

 

 

Assistant Commissioner for

 

 

Compliance and Enforcement

 

 

 

Enclosure

 

 

 

 

 

Cc:

Donald Stoeser, Maintenance Manager

 

Sorin Mihalache, ARC District 7 Manager

 

Mike Powell, Regional V.P.

 

Utility Services Corporation, Certified Operator

 

Elkhart County Health Department (NOV only)

 

http://www.state.in.us/idem  (NOV only)