NOTICE OF VIOLATION

 

Via Certified Mail #:

 

 

To:

Mr. Kurt Keeney, President/CEO

 

SSK Company Communities, d/b/a Berkshire Pointe MHP

 

467 Erlanger Road

 

Erlanger, Kentucky  41018

 

Case No. 2004-13992-W

 

Based on an investigation, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) has reason to believe SSK Company Communities, d/b/a Berkshire Pointe MHP (Respondent) has violated environmental rules and its permit.  The violations are based on the following:

 

1.                  Respondent owns and operates a 0.03 million gallon per day wastewater treatment plant with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. IN0042005 (the "Permit") located off S.R. 64, 1.2 miles east of the intersection of S.R. 64 and S.R. 135, New Salisbury, Indiana, in Harrison County, Indiana (the "Site").  The Permit was modified March 6, 2000, to name SSK Company Communities as owner and permittee of the former Spring Meadows Mobile Home Park wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), now known as Berkshire Pointe Mobile Home Park.

2.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(1) and Part II.A.1. of the Permit, the Respondent is required to comply with all terms and conditions of the Permit.

Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of Indiana; or cause, permit or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters; any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under sections IC 13-18-4-1 and IC 13-18-4-3.

Part I.A.1 of the Permit contains the final effluent limitations, effective as of
June 1, 1998, applicable to the discharge from the Respondent’s WWTP Outfall 001 to receiving waters consisting of a sink hole.

Discharge Monitoring Reports and Monthly Reports of Operation submitted by the Respondent to IDEM for the period between March 2002 and December 2004 reveal that Respondent failed to meet final effluent limitations contained in Part I.A.1 of the Permit as follows:

 

The weekly average and monthly average concentration effluent limitations for Ammonia Nitrogen were exceeded during August 2002, December 2003, and January, February, March, April and June 2004.

The weekly average and monthly average concentration effluent limitations for Total Suspended Solids were exceeded during March, April, and October 2002, and March, April, August, October, November, and December 2004.

The weekly average and monthly average concentration effluent limitations for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) were exceeded during March 2002, and January, February, March, April, May, October, and November 2004.

The daily maximum E.coli effluent limitation was exceeded during March, April, May, June, July, and November 2004.

The minimum Dissolved Oxygen effluent limitation was violated during March 2004.

 

The Respondent's failure to meet effluent limitations contained in the Permit is in violation of IC 13-18-4-5, 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), Part II.A.1 of the Permit, and Part I.A.1 of the Permit.

 

3.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), Part II.A.1 of the Permit, 327 IAC 5-2-8(8), and Part II.B.1 of the Permit, the Respondent is required to, at all times, maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all waste collection, control, treatment, and disposal facilities.

During an inspection of the WWTP conducted by representatives of IDEM on
July 26, 2002, observations, which included the following, were made: unsatisfactory receiving water appearance and unsatisfactory sludge disposal as indicated by the sludge deposits in the sinkhole pond.

During an inspection of the WWTP conducted by a representative of IDEM on
November 26, 2003 IDEM, observations, which included the following, were made:  the raw influent pipe was broken with part of the pipe collapsed and obstructing influent flow.

During an inspection of the WWTP conducted by a representative of IDEM on May 2, 2003, observations, which included the following, were made: a) the flow meter is two months past due for calibration; b) the permit compliance schedule had not been complied with for implementing a new discharge point for the plant effluent if dye testing is not done as required for the sink hole discharge.

During an inspection of the WWTP conducted by a representative of IDEM on March 22, 2004, observations, which included the following, were made: a) high flow surges cause solids washouts to the sink hole, inflow and infiltration sources should be found and eliminated; b) fine straggler floc was going over the clarifier weirs and the chlorine contact tank contained sludge and was gassing, causing sludge to rise to the surface.

During an inspection of the WWTP conducted by a representative of IDEM on October 21, 2004, observations, which included the following, were made: a) the sinkhole pond had an accumulation of sludge; b) the effluent was turbid due to sludge clumps going over the final weirs; c) lightning was recorded to have struck a pump on October 18 resulting in the WWTP overflowing sludge onto the ground and into the sink hole; d) the WWTP is rusting away and the air line is leaking and needs to be replaced, as well as the sludge return lines; e) according to flow records, inflow/infiltration in the sewage collection is a problem.

These above noted failures to maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all waste collection, control, treatment, and disposal facilities are in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), Part II.A.1 of the Permit, 327 IAC 5-2-8(8) and Part II.B.1 of the Permit.

 

In accordance with IC 13-30-3-3, the Commissioner herein provides notice that a violation may exist and offers an opportunity to enter into an Agreed Order providing for the action required to correct the violation and for the payment of a civil penalty.  The Commissioner is not required to extend this offer for more than 60 days.

 

As provided in IC 13-30-3-4, an alleged violator may enter into an Agreed Order without admitting that the violation occurred.  IDEM encourages settlement by Agreed Order, thereby resulting in quicker correction of the environmental violation and avoidance of extensive litigation.  Timely settlement by Agreed Order may result in a reduced civil penalty.  Also, settlement discussions will allow the opportunity to present any mitigating factors that may be relevant to the violation.

 

If an Agreed Order is not entered into within 60 days of receipt of this Notice of Violation, the Commissioner may issue a Notice and Order under IC 13-30-3-4 containing the actions that must be taken to correct the violation and requiring the payment of an appropriate civil penalty.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-4-1, the Commissioner may assess penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each violation.

 

To discuss this matter further, please contact Paul Cluxton at 317/232-8432 within 15 days after receipt of this Notice to request a conference.

 

 

 

 

For the Commissioner:

Date:

 

 

Signed on March 22, 2005

 

 

 

Matthew T. Klein

 

 

 

Assistant Commissioner for Compliance

 

 

 

& Enforcement

 

Enclosure

 

cc:       Judy Phelps, Community Manager

Roger Hensley, Operator

Harrison County Health Department

http://www.IN.gov/idem