NOTICE OF VIOLATION

 

Via Certified Mail# _______________ Via Certified Mail# _______________

 

To: Robert Rayner, President C. T. Corporation System, Registered Agent ESSROC Cement Corp. ESSROC Cement Corp.

3251 Bath Pike 1 N. Capital Ave, Suite 700

Nazareth, Pennsylvania 18064 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 

Case No. 2003-13096-W

Based on investigation by designated representatives of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) on March 18, 2003, ESSROC Cement Corp., owner of the ESSROC Cement Corp. facility which manufactures portland cement, located at on Highway 31 near Speed, in Clark County, Indiana, has violated the following environmental statutes, rules and provisions of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit No. IN 0002071 (the "Permit"):

A. Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), a person may not discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment in any form that causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the state as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid NPDES permit obtained prior to the discharge.

Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(1) and Part II.A.1 of the Permit, ESSROC Cement Corp. is required to comply with all terms and conditions of the Permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and IC 13 and is grounds for enforcement action.

Pursuant to Part I.A.1 of the Permit, ESSROC Cement Corp. is required to comply with the effluent limitations applicable to the discharge from the WWTP Outfalls 001, 002, 004, and 005, contained in Part I.A.1 of the Permit.

Discharge Monitoring Reports and Monthly Reports of Operation submitted by ESSROC Cement Corp. to IDEM for the period from July 2000 through March 2003, reveal that ESSROC Cement Corp. failed to meet the effluent limitations contained in Part I.A.1 of the Permit as follows:

For Outfall 002, the maximum pH limitation was violated during March, July, and August of 2001, during July and December of 2002, and during February and March of 2003.

For Outfall 002, the daily maximum concentration effluent limitation for TSS was violated during July, August, and September of 2001, during July and September of 2002, and during February of 2003.

For Outfall 002, the monthly average concentration effluent limitation for TSS was violated during July of 2000, during July, August, September, and November of 2001, and during July and September of 2002.

For Outfall 004, the maximum pH limitation was violated during October and December of 2000, during February, November, and December of 2001, during December of 2002, and during January and February of 2003.

For Outfall 004, the daily maximum concentration effluent limitation for TSS was violated during October and November of 2000, during February of 2001, and during February and September of 2002.

For Outfall 004, the monthly average concentration effluent limitation for TSS was violated during October, November, and December of 2000, during February and December of 2001, during February, March, June, September, and December of 2002, and during February of 2003.

For Outfall 005, the maximum pH limitation was violated during July of 2002.

For Outfall 005, the daily maximum concentration effluent limitation for TSS was violated during February and July of 2001, and during February, July, September, and November of 2002.

For Outfall 005, the monthly average concentration effluent limitation for TSS was violated during August of 2000, during February, April, May, July, and September of 2001, and during February, July, September, and October of 2002.

These failures to meet effluent limitations contained in the Permit are in violation of IC 13-30-2-1(1), 327 IAC 5-2-2, 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), Part II.A of the Permit, and Part I.A of the Permit.

B. Pursuant to IC 13-18-11-14, it is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, both municipal and private, to operate a water or wastewater treatment plant or a water distribution system unless the operator in responsible charge is duly certified by the commissioner under the provisions of this chapter.

Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-22, among the requirements to operate a Class A-SO wastewater treatment plant is for the operator to have at least a Class A-SO operator certification from IDEM.

Part II.A.10 of the Permit provides that ESSROC Cement Corp. shall have the waste treatment facilities under the supervision of an operator certified by the Commissioner as required by IC 13-18-11 and 327 IAC 8-12-3 (recodified as 327 IAC 5-22).

MROs submitted by ESSROC Cement Corp. indicate that ESSROC Cement Corp. has utilized Brian Graf as the certified operator for the ESSROC Cement Corp. facility since at least June 30, 2001 through March 18, 2003. As noted in letters sent to Brian Graf on July 5, 2001, and November 28, 2001, Brian Graf's operator certification (A-SO operator certification No. 10259) expired on June 30, 2001, and has not been renewed since that date because IDEM did not receive documentation that Brian Graf completed the required continuing education credit hours.

Therefore, ESSROC Cement Corp. operated the ESSROC Cement Corp. facility since at least June 30, 2001 through March 18, 2003, without an operator in responsible charge that was duly certified by the commissioner, in violation of IC 13-18-11-14 and Part II.A.10 of the Permit.

In accordance with IC 13-30-3-3, the Commissioner is required to notify an alleged violator in writing that a violation may exist and offer an opportunity to enter into an Agreed Order providing for the actions required to correct the violations and for the payment of a civil penalty. The Commissioner is not required to extend this offer for more than 60 days.

Entering into an Agreed Order will prevent the issuance of a Notice and Order of the Commissioner under IC 13-30-3-4, or the filing of a civil court action under IC 13-14-2-6. IDEM encourages settlement by Agreed Order, thereby saving time and resources. Timely settlement by Agreed Order may result in a reduced civil penalty. Settlement discussions will also allow the opportunity to present any mitigating factors that may be relevant to the violations. In addition, as provided in IC 13-30-3-3, an alleged violator may enter into an Agreed Order without admitting that the violation occurred.

If settlement is not reached within 60 days of receipt of this Notice of Violation, the Commissioner may issue a Notice and Order containing the actions that must be taken to achieve compliance, the required time frames, and an appropriate civil penalty. Pursuant to IC 13-30-4-1, the Commissioner may assess penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each violation.

 

 

 

 

 

To discuss this matter further, please contact Terry Ressler at 317/232-8433 within 15 days after receipt of this Notice to request a conference. If settlement is reached, an Agreed Order will be prepared and sent for review and signature.

 

For the Commissioner:

 

Date: _______________ __Signed 9/19/03_________

Felicia A. Robinson

Deputy Commissioner

for Legal Affairs

 

 

cc: Pat Kuefler, U.S. E.P.A., Region 5

Clark County Health Department