Link to original WordPerfect Document here


STATE OF INDIANA    )        BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
                )    SS:    OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COUNTY OF MARION    )

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT    )
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,    )
                            )
        Complainant,                )
                            )
            v.                )    CAUSE NO. H-13530
                            )
UNIVERSAL TOOL & ENGINEERING, INC.,    )
                            )
        Respondent.                )

AGREED ORDER

    The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

    1.    Complainant is the Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant") of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

    2.    Respondent is Universal Tool & Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Respondent"), a company doing business at 7601 E. 88th Place, Indianapolis, Indiana.

    3.    The Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.


    4.    Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to:

            Mr. Francie Jenkins, President    Mr. Carl A. Grummann,
            Universal Tool & Engineering, Inc.    Resident Agent for
            7601 E. 88th Place            Universal Tool & Engineering, Inc.
            Indianapolis, IN 46256        7601 E. 88th Place
                                Indianapolis, IN 46256

    5.    Respondent manufactures prototype batteries for Delco-Remy. Hazardous waste is generated after the plate run process and during the tear-down of batteries that are engineering samples. Respondent notified as a Large Quantity Generator (LQG) on August 18, 1980, and operates with the U.S. EPA identification number IND 000 816 116.

    6.    Based upon an investigation of the facility on July 24, 1997, by the Office of Solid and Hazardous Management (hereinafter referred to as the "OSHWM") of the IDEM, the IDEM contends that the following violations were in existence or observed at the time of the inspection.

        a.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(4) referencing 40 CFR 265.16(d)(2), the owner or operator must maintain a written job description for each position at the facility related to hazardous waste and the name of the employee filling each job. The job description must include the requisite skill, education, or other qualifications, and duties of facility personnel assigned to each position. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent did not have job descriptions which included the required skills, education, or other qualifications and duties of facility personnel assigned to the management/operation of hazardous waste.

        b.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(4) referencing 40 CFR 265.16(c), facility personnel must take part in an annual review of the initial training which teaches facility personnel hazardous waste management procedures. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent's environmental coordinator, Robert Rossetter, did not receive the required annual training for 1997.

        c.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2), a generator must mark each container of hazardous waste with the start of accumulation date. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent failed to mark four (4) 55- gallon containers with lead oxide wastewater in the generator's container storage area with the start of accumulation date. This violation was corrected at the time of the inspection.


        d.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(c)(1)(ii), a generator may accumulate as much as 55 gallons of hazardous waste in containers at or near the point of generation as long as he marks the containers with the words "Hazardous Waste" or other words that identify the contents of the containers. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent failed to label three (3) satellite accumulation containers with the words Hazardous Waste or with other words that identified the contents. This violation was corrected at the time of the inspection.

        e.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(c)(1)(i) referencing 40 CFR 265.173(a), a container holding hazardous waste must always be closed during storage, except when it is necessary to add or remove waste. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent stored open three (3) containers in the UTE Building 3 and one (1) cardboard tote with cracked batteries in the analysis lab. This violation was corrected at the time of the inspection.

        f.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(ii) referencing 40 CFR 265.192(a), the owner or operator must obtain a written assessment reviewed and certified by an independent, qualified, registered professional engineer attesting that the system has sufficient structural integrity and is acceptable for the storage and treatment of hazardous waste. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent does not have a written tank integrity assessment for its 3,800-gallon hazardous waste tank in the analysis lab. Specifically, the tank is used to store lead oxide water from a rinse sink.

        g.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(ii) referencing 40 CFR 265.195(a), the owner or operator must conduct daily inspections of the overfill/spill control equipment, aboveground portions of the tank system to detect corrosion or releases of waste, data gathered from monitoring and leak- detection equipment, and the secondary equipment structures to detect erosion or signs of releases of hazardous waste. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent has failed to conduct daily inspections of its hazardous waste tank.

        h.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(ii) referencing 40 CFR 265.193, a generator must have secondary containment that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 265.193. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent does not have secondary containment for its waste lead oxide tank located in the MG Building.


        i.    Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(ii) referencing 40 CFR 265.194(b), the owner or operator must use appropriate controls and practices to prevent spills and overflows from tank or secondary containment systems, including spill prevention controls, overfill prevention controls, and maintenance of sufficient freeboard in uncovered tanks to prevent overtopping. Based upon information gathered by the IDEM, Respondent does not have overfill preventions or controls present and in operation for its 3,800-gallon waste lead oxide tank located in the MG Building.

    7.    In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

    8.    Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.

II. ORDER

    1.    This Agreed Order shall be effective ("effective date") when it is approved by the Complainant or his delegate, and has been received by the Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the effective date.

    2.    Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a written job description for each position at the facility related to hazardous waste management/operation pursuant to 40 CFR 265.16(d)(2). The job description(s) shall include the required skills, education, or other qualifications and duties of facility personnel.

    3.    Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall provide the required annual training for Robert Rossetter pursuant to 40 CFR 265.16(c).

    4.    Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall submit to IDEM the design plan for the installation of a new, double-walled tank.

    5.    Upon IDEM's approval of the design plan referenced in Order No. 4, Respondent shall implement the plan as approved, and in accordance with the time frames contained therein.

    6.    Upon the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall conduct daily inspections of its hazardous waste tank pursuant to 40 CFR 265.195(a). Respondent shall shall keep documentation on file at its facility for future inspections.

    7.    Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a closure plan for the 3,800-gallon hazardous waste tank located in the analysis lab, as specified in 40 CFR 265.197.

    8.    Upon IDEM's approval of the closure plan reference in Order No. 7, Respondent shall implement the plan as approved, and in accordance with the time frames contained therein.

    9.    All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless notified otherwise in writing, shall be sent to:

        Ms. Dianna Schlicher
        Office of Enforcement
        Hazardous Waste Section
        Indiana Department of Environmental Management
        100 N. Senate Avenue
        P. O. Box 6015
        Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015

    10.    Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy- Five Dollars ($7,875). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order.

    11.    In the event the following terms and conditions are violated, the Complainant may assess and the Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amounts:

            Violation                    Penalty
    
        Failure to comply with the requirements    $500 per day per violation
        of Orders numbered 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8

    12.    Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent receives written notice that the Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due. Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties shall not preclude the Complainant from seeking any additional relief against the Respondent for violation of the Agreed Order. In lieu of assessment of any of the stipulated penalties given above, the Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of Respondent's violation of this Agreed Order, or Indiana law, including but not limited to civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4-1.

    13.    Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the Environmental Management Special Fund. Checks shall include the Cause Number of this action and shall be mailed to:


            Cashier
            IDEM
            100 N. Senate Avenue
            P. O. Box 7060
            Indianapolis, IN 46206-7060

    14.    In the event that the civil penalty required by paragraph 10 is not paid within specified time frames of this Agreed Order, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

    15.    This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its officers, directors, principals, agents, successors, subsidiaries, and assigns. The signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this document and legally bind the parties they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

    16.    In the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

    17.    The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall, by contract, require that all contractors, firms and other persons acting for it comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

    18.    This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Cause letter to Respondent.

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:        RESPONDENT:
Department of Environmental Management

By: _________________________            By: _________________________
Nancy L. Johnston, Section Chief
Hazardous Waste Section            Printed: ______________________
Office of Enforcement
                            Title: ________________________

Date: ________________________            Date: ________________________


COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:            COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:
Department of Environmental Management

By: _________________________            By: ________________________
Office of Legal Counsel

Date: _______________________            Date: ______________________

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT THIS _____ DAY OF ____________________, 1998.

                            For the Commissioner:

                            Signed on 1/7/98
                            David J. Hensel
                            Director
                            Office of Enforcement

Converted by Andrew Scriven