STATE OF INDIANA ) BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
) §§: OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COUNTY OF MARION )
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF )
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, )
)
Complainant, )
) CAUSE NO. H-12035
v. ) 90-S-E-332
)
FINISH CORPORATION, INC., )
)
Respondent. )
The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action
without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of
the following Findings of Fact and Order.
2. Respondent is Finish Corporation, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Respondent")
who owns a company doing business at 625 West 15th Street, Auburn, Indiana.
3. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) has
jurisdiction over the Respondent and the subject matter of this action.
4. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3 (formerly IC 13-7-11-2(b)), IDEM issued a Notice of
Violation via Certified Mail to:
Mr. Gerald Fry, President and Resident Agent
Finish Corporation, Inc.
625 West 15th Street
Auburn, Indiana 46706
5. Respondent's predecessor corporation, Bastian Plating, Inc. (Bastian Plating),
notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of hazardous
waste activity on June 30, 1980 and was assigned EPA I.D. No. IND
005 224837.
6. Bastian Plating notified as a hazardous waste generator of the following
hazardous waste codes: D003, F006, F007, F008, F009, K002, K004, K005,
K006, K066, K067, K068, P106, and P121.
7. Bastian Plating did not notify for treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous
waste, or submit a Part A application. Therefore, the facility did not attain
interim status.
8. Based upon investigations of the facility on June 28, 1988, July 28, 1988, and
October 17, 1990, by staff of the Office of Solid and Hazardous Waste
Management (OSHWM) of IDEM, IDEM contends that numerous violations
were in existence at the time of the inspections. A Partial Agreed Order (Cause
90-S-E-332) was reached between the parties and adopted by the Commissioner
of IDEM on March 15, 1994. The Partial Agreed Order, by agreement of the
parties, did not address civil penalties and RCRA closure of the facility. The
remaining issues, by agreement of the parties, were to be addressed in a
subsequent Partial Agreed Order. This Agreed Order addresses all the issues
not addressed in the Partial Agreed Order adopted on March 15, 1994.
9. On June 9, 1994, Mr. John Crawford of IDEM inspected the facility to
determine Respondent's compliance with the Partial Agreed Order 90-S-E-332.
Based on this inspection, IDEM contends that the following violations were in
existence or observed:
a. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(3), while being accumulated on-site, each
container holding hazardous waste must be labeled or marked clearly
with the words "Hazardous Waste." Based on information gathered by
IDEM, one hopper of F006 plating sludge at the sludge press was not
labeled or marked with the words "Hazardous Waste."
b. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(c)(1)(i) referencing 40 CFR 265.173(a), a container holding hazardous waste must always be closed during storage except when necessary to add or remove waste. Based on information
gathered by IDEM, one hopper of F006 plating sludge at the sludge
press was stored open, to which waste was neither being added nor
removed.
10. In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to
administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order and agrees not to contest
the jurisdiction of Complainant to enter into this Order.
1. This Agreed Order shall be effective (effective date) when it is approved by the
Complainant or his delegate, and has been received by the Respondent. This
Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the effective date.
2. Upon the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall ensure that, while being
accumulated on-site, each container of hazardous waste is labeled or clearly
marked with the words "Hazardous Waste."
3. Upon the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall store closed all
containers holding hazardous waste, except when it is necessary to add or
remove waste.
4. Within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the Order, Respondent shall
submit to IDEM a Closure Plan for storage areas 1, 2, 3, and 4, as depicted on
the map included as Exhibit A of this Agreed Order.
5. Upon notice of IDEM's approval of the Closure Plan, Respondent shall
implement the Closure Plan in accordance with the time frames contained
therein.
6. All submissions required by this Agreed Order, unless notified otherwise in
writing, shall be sent to:
Ms. Aubrey N.Sherif, Enforcement Case Manager
Office of Enforcement
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
100 North Senate Avenue
P.O. Box 6015
Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015
7. Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). The cash portion of this penalty, fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000), shall be divided into and paid in twelve equal installments of $1,250 dollars.
The first payment of $1,250 shall be due within thirty (30) days of the effective
date of this Order, with the remaining payments due every thirty (30) days
thereafter. All payments shall be submitted to the Environmental Management
Special Fund, as directed by paragraph 11. In lieu of payment of the remaining
civil penalty, Respondent shall perform and complete the Supplemental
Environmental Projects (SEP), as described in Exhibit B. Exhibit B is hereby
incorporated and made a part of this Agreed Order. The total funds expended
on the SEPs shall be a minimum of one hundred twenty thousand dollars
($120,000). If the SEPs are not completed in accordance with this agreement by
July 1, 2001, the Respondent agrees to pay the remaining amount of the civil
penalty due, plus interest at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101, to the
Environmental Management Special Fund. Payment of the remaining civil
penalty shall be submitted within fifteen (15) days from receipt of a notice to
pay from IDEM. Interest on the remaining civil penalty shall be submitted
within fifteen (15) days from receipt of a notice to pay from IDEM. Interest on
the remaining civil penalty shall be paid from the effective date of this Agreed
Order.
8. Within ninety (90) days of the effective date of the Order, and for every quarter
thereafter until project completion, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a
quarterly progress report on implementation of the SEPs.
9. In the event the following terms and conditions are violated, the Complainant
may assess and the Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following
amounts:
Violation Penalty
Failure to comply with the requirements $1000/day
of Order #4 and #5.
10. Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after
Respondent receives written notice that the Complainant has determined a
stipulated penalty is due. Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties shall
not preclude the Complainant from seeking any additional relief against the
Respondent for violation of the Agreed Order. In lieu of any of the stipulated
penalties given above, the Complainant may seek any other remedies or
sanctions available by virtue of Respondent's violation of this Agreed Order,
including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-7-13.
11. Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the Environmental
Management Special Fund. Checks shall include the cause number and shall be
mailed to:
Cashier
IDEM
100 North Senate Avenue
P.O. Box 7060
Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-7060
12. This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its
officers, directors, principals, employees, agents, successors, subsidiaries, and
assigns. The signatories to this Order certify that they are fully authorized to
execute this document and legally bind the parties they represent. No change in
ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way
alter its status or responsibilities under this Order.
13. In the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and
enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
14. The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Order, if in force, to any
subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.
Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms, and other persons acting for
it comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
15. "Force Majeure", for purposes of this Agreed Order, is defined as any event
arising from causes beyond the control of the Respondent that delays or prevents
the performance of any obligation under this Agreed Order despite Respondent's
best efforts to fulfill the obligation. The requirement that the Respondent
exercise "best efforts to fulfill the obligation" includes using best efforts to
anticipate any potential force majeure event and best efforts to address the
effects of any force majeure event (1) as it is occurring, and (2) following the
force majeure event, such that the delay is minimized to the greatest extent
possible. "Force Majeure" does not include financial inability to complete the
work required by this Agreed Order or increases in cost to perform the work.
The Respondent shall notify Complainant by calling within three calendar days
and by writing no later than seven calendar days after any event which the
Respondent contends is a force majeure. Such notification shall describe the
anticipated length of the delay, and the timetable by which these measures will
be implemented. The Respondent shall include with any notice all available
documentation supporting their claim that the delay was attributable to a force
majeure. Failure to comply with the above requirements shall preclude
Respondent from asserting any claim of force majeure for that event. The
Respondent shall have the burden of demonstrating that the event is a force
majeure. The decision of whether an event is a force majeure shall be made by
Complainant. Complainant's decision shall be communicated in writing to the
Respondent. If a delay is attributable to a force majeure event, Complainant
shall extend, in writing, the time period for performance under this Agreed
Order, by the amount of time that is attributable to the event constituting the
force majeure. Denial of a force majeure claim is reviewable under IC 4-21.5.
16. This Agreed Order, and compliance with its terms, shall be final adjudication of
all claims asserted in the Notices of Violation issued to Respondent as a result of
inspections by representatives of IDEM on June 28 and July 28, 1988; October
7, 1990; and June 6, 1994. This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until
IDEM issues a Resolution of Cause letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: RESPONDENT
By: ___________________________ By: _________________________
Nancy L. Johnston, Chief
Hazardous Waste Section Date: _________________________
Office of Enforcement
Date: __________________________
ATTORNEY FOR COMPLAINANT ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT
By: __________________________ By: _________________________
Office of Legal Counsel
Dept. of Environmental Mgt. Date: _________________________
Date: __________________________
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT THIS DAY OF , 1998.
For the Commissioner:
Signed May 27, 1998
David J. Hensel
Director
Office of Enforcement
EXHIBIT B
FINISH CORP.
PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS
1. Reverse Osmosis Filtration System
Culligan/Watcon, Inc.
Estimated Cost $45,000
Estimated Hazardous Waste Reduction: 30,000 lbs/yr.
Description: This system will be installed to reduce the hardness of the incoming
water. This will reduce the amount of hazardous waste produced by
removing the hardness chemicals that precipitate out of the water in the
wastewater pretreatment facility.
2. "One Shot" spray rinse and controller
Hardwood Line Mfg.Co.
Estimated Cost $30,000
Estimated Hazardous Waste Reduction: 40,000 lbs/yr.
Description: This system is designed to deliver a certain amount of water during
specified intervals. It will be controlled by using limit switches to
activate spray nozzles. By doing this, water consumption will be
reduced by 30%. This in turn will reduce sludge generated in the
wastewater pretreatment facility.
3. Pure Cycle Acid Recovery System
Pure Cycle Environmental Technologies
Estimated Cost $30,000
Estimated Hazardous Waste Reduction: 20,000 lbs/yr.
Description: The system is designed to efficiently remove up to 90% of the
contaminants in the acid. The acid is then returned to the process for
continued use. The contaminants and a small amount of acid end up as a
hazardous waste.
Estimated Installation Costs: $40,000
Estimated Total Cost: $145,000
Converted by Andrew Scriven