STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

KENROCK, INC.,
            and
FRANK LISA, INDIVIDUAL,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2003-12661-W




 

 

NOTICE AND ORDER OF THE

COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

 

Via Certified Mail #:

 

 

 

To:

Mr. Frank Lisa, President and Registered Agent

Kenrock Inc.
702 Modrell Blvd.
Elkhart, Indiana 46514

 

 

Via Certified Mail #:

 

 

 

To:

Mr. Frank Lisa, Individual
24790 Christina Lane
Elkhart, Indiana 46514-8119

 

 

This Notice and Order of the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“Order”) is issued against Kenrock Inc. and Frank Lisa for violations of the Indiana Environmental Management Act.  This Order is issued pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-30-3-4, IC 13-30-3-10, and IC 13-30-3-11, and is based on violations found during an investigation conducted by designated representatives of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “COE”).  During the investigation, it was determined that Kenrock Inc. and Frank Lisa are in violation of IC 13-18-4-5, IC 13-30-2-1, 327 Indiana Administrative Code (“IAC”) 2-1.5-4(a), 327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1), and 327 IAC 5-2-2, as specified below:

 

FINDINGS OF VIOLATION

 

1.                  The Complainant is the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the State of Indiana, created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  The Respondents are Kenrock Inc. and Frank Lisa, (“Respondents”) which own and/or develop approximately 126 acres of property, including upland and forested wetland, bordering Simonton Lake (the “Site”).  The Site is located 0.5 mile north of the intersection of County Roads 11 and 4, in Elkhart, Elkhart County, Indiana.

 

3.                  IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1.5-2(91)(A), “Waters of the State” means either the accumulations of water, surface and underground, natural or artificial or public and private; or a part of the accumulations of water; that are wholly or partially within, flow through, or border upon Indiana.

 

5.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1), all waters within the Great Lakes system at all times and at all places, including waters within the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges that do any of the following:

 

a.                  Will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits.

b.                  Are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious.

c.                  Produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance.

d.                  Are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.

e.                  Are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants, or humans.

 

6.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), a person may not discharge, emit, cause, allow or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment in any form that causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

7.                  Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of Indiana; or cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters; any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under sections 1 and 3 of this chapter.

On or before
January 13, 2003, IDEM discovered that the Respondents dredged and/or placed fill material on approximately 0.5 acre within a wetland bordering Simonton Lake.  The fill material settled to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits and was in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1).  By discharging fill material, a contaminant or waste, into the environment in violation of 327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1), the Respondents were also in violation of IC 13-30-2-1(1).  By disposing fill material, an organic or inorganic matter, into waters in a manner that contributed to a polluted condition of the waters in violation of  327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1), the Respondents were also in violation of IC 13-18-4-5.  To date, the Respondents remain in violation of IC 13-18-4-5, IC 13-30-2-1(1), and 327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1).

 

8.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1.5-4(a), for all surface waters of the state within the Great Lakes system, existing in-stream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect existing uses shall be maintained and protected.  Where designated uses of the water body are impaired, there shall be no lowering of the water quality with respect to the pollutant or pollutants that are causing the impairment.

The Respondents caused or contributed to cause earthen fill material, a pollutant, to enter surface waters of the state at the Site, thus impairing existing beneficial uses, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1.5-4(a).  To date, the Respondents remain in violation of 327 IAC 2-1.5-4(a).

 

9.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the state as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit obtained prior to discharge.

The Respondents discharged earthen fill material, a pollutant, into a wetland, which are waters of the state, at the Site.  This discharge was not authorized by an NPDES permit or a water quality certification.  Therefore, none of the exceptions set forth in 327 IAC
5-2-4 apply, and the Respondents are in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-2.

 

10.             On April 12, 2004, a Notice of Violation was issued, pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, to the Respondents for violations of IC 13-18-4-5, IC 13-30-2-1, 327 IAC 2-1.5-4(a), 327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1), and 327 IAC 5-2-2.  The Respondents received this Notice of Violation on or about April 16, 2004, via certified mail #7002 0510 0004 0443 2741.

 

11.             The Notice of Violation contained an offer to enter into an Agreed Order containing actions required to correct the violation.

 

12.             More than 60 days have elapsed since the Respondents were offered the opportunity to enter into an Agreed Order.

 

13.             The Respondents have not entered into an Agreed Order resolving this violation.

 

ORDER

 

1.                  The Respondents shall immediately cease and desist violations of IC 13-18-4-5, IC 13-30-2-1, 327 IAC 2-1.5-4(a), 327 IAC 2-1.5-8(b)(1), and 327 IAC 5-2-2.

 

2.                  Within 30 days of the Effective Date of this Order, the Respondents shall develop and submit to IDEM a compliance plan (“CP”) for IDEM’s approval that will describe the actions the Respondents shall take to restore the forested wetlands at the Site.  The actions set forth in the CP shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

 

a.                  Development of a wetlands restoration plan that will restore the Site, as delineated by the COE on April 15, 2003, and describes appropriate method(s) to compensate for the unauthorized fill;

b.                  Removal of unauthorized fill material, as necessary, that washes into the existing forested wetland area(s);

c.                  Stabilization and re-vegetation of any area(s) disturbed during the forested wetland restoration project;

d.                  Monitoring to ensure that the restoration wetland meets all of the general conditions, success criteria, as outlined below, for two consecutive years within five years of the creation of the wetland; and

e.                  The CP shall include a reasonable schedule and timetable with specific commencement and completion milestone dates for each action outlined in paragraph 3.A. through 3.D., above.

 

These actions, and all others set forth in the CP, shall comply with the requirements set forth in Attachment A of this Order.  Attachment A is hereby incorporated into this Order and deemed an enforceable part thereof.

 

3.                  The CP is subject to the approval of IDEM.  If IDEM deems the CP inadequate, a revised CP shall be submitted within 15 days of receipt of notice from IDEM of the inadequacies thereof.  If, after submission of the revised document, IDEM still finds the document to be inadequate, then IDEM will request further modification of the CP as necessary to meet IDEM’s requirements.  If the subsequently submitted modification of the CP does not meet IDEM’s approval, IDEM will suggest specific modifications to be made to the CP and require re-submittal by a specific date.  If the IDEM-suggested modifications are not incorporated into the CP by the Respondents (or an alternative plan is not submitted by the Respondents) by the specified date or are not approved by IDEM, the Respondents shall be subject to stipulated penalties, as described below.  The Respondents, upon receipt of written notification from IDEM, shall immediately implement the approved CP and adhere to the milestone dates therein.

4.                  The approved CP shall be incorporated into the Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof.  The Respondents shall submit documentation of completion of approved CP milestones within 10 days after each milestone date.

 

5.                  Upon implementation of the approved CP, the Respondent is required to monitor the Site for a minimum of three years, to ensure compliance with the success criteria set forth in Attachment A.  The monitoring of the mitigation wetland shall begin during the first growing season following the construction of the mitigation area, and occur during the growing season (June – August), and continue, once per year, until the mitigation wetland has achieved compliance with the success criteria set forth in Attachment A.  Following the third monitoring year, and upon determination of compliance with success criteria, the Respondent shall be given the opportunity to request, in writing, permission from IDEM to cease monitoring.

 

6.                  If the Respondent does not achieve compliance with the success criteria within five years of completion of the approved CP, the Respondent shall, within 60 days of becoming aware that compliance with the success criteria cannot be achieved, develop and submit to IDEM for review and approval an Action Plan (“AP”) that identifies the additional actions that the Respondent will take to comply with the success criteria.  The AP, if required, shall include a new implementation and completion schedule, including specific milestone dates.

 

7.                  The AP is subject to the approval of IDEM.  If IDEM deems the plan inadequate, a revised AP shall be submitted within 15 days of receipt of notice from IDEM of the inadequacies thereof.  If, after submission of the revised AP, IDEM still finds the document to be inadequate, then IDEM will request further modification of the AP as necessary to meet IDEM’s requirements.  If the subsequently submitted modification of the AP does not meet IDEM’s approval, IDEM will suggest specific modifications to be made to the CP and require re-submittal by a specific date.  The Respondent is required to incorporate the IDEM-suggested modifications (or subsequent alternative plant that is acceptable to IDEM) within the prescribed time frames.  The Respondent, upon receipt of written notification from IDEM, shall immediately implement the approved AP and adhere to the milestone dates therein.

 

8.                  The AP, if required, shall, upon approval by IDEM, be incorporated into this Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof.

 

9.                  On or before December 31st of each monitoring year, the Respondent shall submit to IDEM a wetland mitigation monitoring report.

 

10.             All submittals required by this Order, unless notified otherwise in writing, shall be sent to:

Ms. Aletha Lenahan, Enforcement Case Manager
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Office of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02
100 N. Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

And

Mr. Jason Randolph, Environmental Manager
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Section 401 Water Quality Certification Program
Mail Code 65-42
100 N. Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

11.             The Respondents shall pay a civil penalty of Thirty One Thousand, Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($31,250) for the violations cited above.  This penalty shall be remitted to the Department of Environmental Management within 30 days of the Effective Date of this Order.  Checks shall be made payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, with the Case Number 2003-12661-W, indicated on the check and mailed to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Cashier’s Office – Mail Code 50-10C
100 N. Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

12.             This Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondents, their successors and assigns.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondents shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Order.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDER

 

Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-5, this Order takes effect 20 days following receipt unless you request review of this Order, before the 20th day after receipt, by filing a written request for review with the Office of Environmental Adjudication, and serving a copy of the request for review upon the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management.  You may request that the Office of Environmental Adjudication conduct a hearing to review this Order, under IC 4-21.5, in its entirety, or you may limit your request for review to specific findings of fact and/or orders contained in this Order.  Requests for review must be submitted to the Office of Environmental Adjudication and the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management at the following addresses:

 

 

Director
Office of Environmental Adjudication
100 N. Senate Avenue
IGCN Room N1049
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251

Commissioner
IDEM - Mail Code
50-10
100 N. Senate Avenue

IGCN Room N1301
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251

 

Failure to properly submit a request for review, before the 20th day following receipt of this Order of the Commissioner, waives your right to administrative review of this Order and your right to judicial review of the Order.  The petition for administrative review must contain the following information:

1.                  Name, address, and telephone number of each person filing the petition.

2.                  Identification of the interest of each petitioner in the subject of the petition.

3.                  Statement of facts demonstrating that the petitioner is:

 

A.                 a person to whom the order is directed;

B.                 aggrieved or adversely affected by the order; or

C.                entitled to review under any law.

 

4.                  Statement with particularity the legal issues proposed for consideration in the proceedings.

 

The petition for administrative review should also contain the following information:

 

1.                  Identification of any persons represented by the person making the request.

2.                  Statement identifying the person against whom administrative review is sought.

3.                  A copy of the notice of the commissioner’s action issued by the department of environmental management which is the basis of the petition for administrative review.

4.                  Statement indicating the identification of petitioner’s attorney or other representative.

 

If you have procedural or scheduling questions regarding your request for review you may contact the Office of Environmental Adjudication at (317) 232-8591.

 

Dated at Indianapolis, Indiana, this _______ day of _________________, 2005.

 

 

 

Signed on June 1, 2005

Thomas W. Easterly

Commissioner

 

cc:       Elkhart County Health Department
Indiana Department of Natural Resources
U.S. EPA, Region 5, Office of Water
U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
www.state.in.us/idem

 

 

ATTACHMENT A

 

 

COMPLIANCE PLAN FOR:

KENROCK INC. AND FRANK LISA, INDIVIDUAL

WETLAND RESTORATION

REQUIREMENTS

 

 

I.       Pursuant to this Order, the Respondents shall meet the following wetland restoration conditions:

 

1.              Deposit any dredged material in a contained upland disposal area to prevent soil run-off to any water body, including Lake Simonton.  The Respondents' project information shall be forwarded to IDEM’s Office of Water Quality, Wetland Section for review.

 

2.              Install erosion control methods prior to any soil disturbance to prevent soil from leaving the construction site and/or causing run-off to any water body, including Lake Simonton.  Appropriate erosion control methods include, but are not limited to, straw bale barriers, silt fencing, erosion control blankets, phased construction sequencing, and earthen berms.  Monitor and maintain erosion control structures and devices regularly, especially after rain events, until all soils disturbed by construction activities have been permanently stabilized.

 

3.              Clearly mark the construction area shown in the restoration plan, as required by Order Paragraph 3.  Allow the Commissioner of IDEM or an authorized representative of the Commissioner (including an authorized contractor), upon the presentation of credentials:

 

(a)           to enter upon the Respondents' property;

(b)           to have access to and copy at reasonable times any records that must be kept under the conditions of this Order;

(c)           to inspect, at reasonable times, any monitoring or operational equipment or method; collection, treatment, pollution management or discharge facility or device; practices required by this Order; and any wetland restoration site; and

(d)           to sample or monitor any discharge of pollutants or any restoration site.

 

 

II.         Pursuant to this Order, the Respondents shall meet the following wetland restoration site specific conditions:

 

a.       Within six months of the Effective Date of this Order, the Respondents shall complete all activities necessary to create the restoration wetland, unless IDEM grants a written extension upon request.  These activities include excavation, grading, installation of hydrologic controls, and planting specified hydrophytic vegetation species.

 

b.            Clearly identify on-site all restoration wetlands after construction of the restoration wetland.  Install survey markers to identify the boundaries of the wetlands.  If the restoration wetlands being created are adjacent to or near existing wetlands, then the survey markers must distinguish the created wetland from the existing wetland.

 

c.             Annually monitor the compensatory restoration wetland for a minimum of three years to determine whether it is achieving the success criteria contained in this site specific restoration project and complete corrective actions as necessary to ensure this restoration wetland project will achieve the success within the required period.  These corrective actions may include additional grading, plantings, or relocation of the restoration wetland, along with extended monitoring.  Describe in the monitoring reports any corrective actions taken to ensure success of the restoration site.

 

d.            Submit annual monitoring reports of the compensatory restoration wetland to IDEM at the addresses located in Order Paragraph 9 below, by December 31st of each year until the Respondents are released from monitoring by IDEM.  These reports shall contain information concerning what steps the Respondents have taken to create the compensatory restoration wetland and whether the wetland is achieving each of the success criteria outlined in this Order.  The reports shall include the following:

 

i.         As-built plans (in the first annual monitoring report).

ii.       Discussion of hydrology at the restoration site.

iii.      Discussion of plant community development at the restoration site.

iv.                 Discussion of methods or means used to determine compliance with the success criteria.

v.                   Photographs representative of the restoration site and sampling points.

vi.                 Identification of any problems with meeting the success criteria.

vii.                Recommendations for correcting any problems identified.

viii.              Wetland delineation for the restoration wetland in the final report.

 

e.             Monitor the restoration wetland for a minimum period of three years.  In order to be released from monitoring, the Respondents must demonstrate to IDEM, through the monitoring reports, that the success criteria specified in the CP have been met for two consecutive years within a five year period.  Once the Respondents believe that this requirement has been met, they may submit a proposed final monitoring report to IDEM and suspend monitoring unless notified otherwise by IDEM.  If IDEM determines that the success criteria have not been met, then the Respondents shall resume monitoring.  If IDEM confirms that the success criteria have been met, then the Respondents may permanently discontinue monitoring after it receives written notification of this determination from IDEM.

 

f.              Include a delineation of all restoration wetlands in the final monitoring report.  The delineation must be conducted on-site using the hydrology and vegetation parameters from the United States Army COE of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (January 1987).  The delineation report must include but not be limited to data sheets and a survey, map or drawing with area measurements (in acres) of all restoration wetland boundaries.

g.             Ensure that the restoration wetland meets all of the following success criteria for two consecutive years within five years of the creation of the wetland:

 

i. Greater than 50% of the dominant vegetation species must be classified as hydrophytic.

ii.                 The hydrology at the restoration site must meet the wetland hydrology criteria contained in the United States Army COE of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (January, 1987).

iii.                The wetland vegetation total percent cover must be at least 70%.

iv.               The wetland restoration is free of the following exotic species: Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife), Phragmites australis (common reed), and Myriophyllum spicatum (water milfoil).

v.                 No more than 10% of the surface area coverage of the emergent zone of the restoration wetland may be open water, bare ground, or a combination of the two.  Open water and bare ground are defined as areas with less than 10% vegetative cover.

vi.               The restoration wetland consists of 0.5 acres of forested wetland.

 

 

III.                Pursuant to this Order, the Respondents shall meet the following wetland restoration success criteria:

 

(1)         Greater than 50% of the dominant vegetation species must be classified as hydrophytic.

(2)         The hydrology at the restoration site must meet the wetland hydrology criteria contained in the United States Army COE of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (January, 1987).

(3)         The wetland vegetation total percent cover must be at least 70%.

(4)         The restoration wetland is free of the following exotic species: Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife), Phragmites australis (common reed), and Myriophyllum spicatum (water milfoil).

(5)         No more than 10% of the surface area coverage of the emergent zone of the restoration wetland may be open water, bare ground, or a combination of the two.

(6)         Open water and bare ground are defined as areas with less than 10% vegetative cover.