|
STATE OF INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
|
) |
|
|
||||
|
COUNTY OF MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
|
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No. 2024-30349-U |
|||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
NJS FOOD
MART INC., |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and
Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”)
13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an
admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a
waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial
proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana
Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent NJS Food Mart Inc. owns and operates Underground Storage Tank (“UST”) systems, with UST
Facility ID 5573, located at 14 Beachway Drive, parcel #49-12-01-112-015.000-900,
in Indianapolis, Marion County,
Indiana (the “Site”)
3.
Respondent
owns and operates one
(1) 10,000-gallon regular unleaded (“RUL”), one (1) 6,000-gallon RUL, and one
(1) 8,000-gallon premium unleaded (“PUL”) gasoline tanks. The 10,000-gallon and
6,000-gallon tanks are manifolded together. It is unclear the tank construction
material due to conflicting information provided on historical notification
forms and inspections. The piping is pressurized and flex.
5. IDEM
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
6. Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) on November 25, 2024 via certified mail to:
|
Jasbir Singh,
President and Registered |
Jasbir Singh,
President of |
|
Agent for |
NJS Food Mart
Inc., Property Owner |
|
NJS Food Mart Inc. |
10584 Andrea Drive |
|
7030 Allegiance
Court |
Indianapolis,
Indiana 46231 |
|
Indianapolis,
Indiana 46259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. During
an investigation including an inspection on April 22, 2024, conducted by a
representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:
a. Pursuant to 329 Indiana Administrative Code (“IAC”) 9-2-2(c), an owner and operator required to submit a form under subsection (a)(2) shall provide all the information required in subsection (b) on a form approved by the Indiana archives and records administration for use by the department and shall indicate the type of notification on the form.
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to submit a complete notification form with all required information and/or failed to indicate the type of notification on the form. Specifically, tank construction material is unclear. The property was sold in 2023, and notification was not submitted.
On December 20, 2024, an updated notification form showing change of UST owner and operator was submitted.
b. Pursuant
to 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(“CFR”) 280.34, owners and
operators of UST systems must cooperate fully with inspections, monitoring and
testing conducted by the implementing agency, as well as requests for document
submission, testing, and monitoring by the owner or operator pursuant to
section 9005 of Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended.
As noted
during the inspection, Respondent
failed to cooperate with agency inspections, monitoring, and testing. IDEM
issued a Records Request on March 28, 2024, and Respondent failed to provide
testing documentation.
c. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.34(b)(3), owners and operators must maintain documentation of compatibility for UST systems (§ 280.32(c)).
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to maintain documentation of compatibility for the UST system(s). It is unclear what the tank construction material is and if compatible with the fuel stored within.
d.
Pursuant
to 40 CFR 280.20(b), the piping that routinely contains regulated
substances and is in contact with the ground must be properly designed,
constructed, and protected from corrosion in accordance with a code of practice
developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing
laboratory as specified within the regulation.
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to ensure the piping or metal components in contact with the ground were properly designed, constructed, and protected from corrosion in accordance with an authorized code of practice. Specifically, metal components in the PUL submersible turbine pump (“STP”) sump were in constant contact with the backfill due to fluid overflowing into the surrounding soil.
e. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.20(c)(1)(i), to prevent spilling and overfilling associated with product transfer to the UST system, owners and operators must use the following spill and overfill prevention equipment:
(i) Spill prevention equipment that will prevent release of product to the environment when the transfer hose is detached from the fill pipe (for example, a spill catchment basin).
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to maintain appropriate spill
prevention equipment. Specifically, the middle spill bucket was more than half
full of fluid and would not function as designed during fuel delivery.
f. Pursuant
to 40 CFR 280.35(a)(1), spill
prevention equipment (such as a catchment basin, spill bucket, or other spill
containment device) and containment sumps used for interstitial monitoring of
piping must prevent releases to the environment by meeting one of the
following:
(i) The
equipment is double walled and the integrity of both
walls is periodically monitored at a frequency not less than the frequency of
the walkthrough inspections described in §280.36. Owners and operators must
begin meeting paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section and conduct a test within 30
days of discontinuing periodic monitoring of this equipment;
or
(ii) The
spill prevention equipment and containment sumps used for interstitial
monitoring of piping are tested at least once every three years to ensure the
equipment is liquid tight by using vacuum, pressure, or liquid testing in
accordance with one of the following criteria:
(A) Requirements
developed by the manufacturer (Note: Owners and operators may use this option
only if the manufacturer has developed requirements);
(B) Code
of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent
testing laboratory; or
(C) Requirements determined by the implementing agency to be no less protective of human health and the environment than the requirements listed in paragraphs (1)(1)(ii)(A) and (B) of this section.
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to ensure spill prevention
equipment was operating properly to prevent releases to the environment.
Specifically, Respondent failed to provide documentation of spill bucket testing.
On January 8, 2025, documentation of spill
bucket testing dated July 27, 2022 was submitted;
however, the PUL result was a failure and no documentation of repair/retesting
submitted.
On January 13, 2025, documentation submitted
showing the PUL spill bucket was replaced and tested.
g. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.35(a)(2), overfill prevention
equipment must be inspected at least once every three years. At a minimum, the
inspection must ensure that overfill prevention equipment is set to activate at
the correct level specified in § 280.20(c) and will activate when regulated
substance reaches that level. Inspections must be conducted in accordance with
one of the criteria in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(A) through (C) of this section.
As
noted during the inspection, Respondent
failed to inspect overfill prevention equipment at least once every three
years.
On
January 8, 2025, documentation of overfill prevention equipment testing dated
July 27, 2022 was submitted.
h. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.40(a)(3)(i), as incorporated, owners
and operators of UST systems must provide a method, or combination of methods,
of release detection that, beginning
on June 28, 2021, is operated and maintained, and electronic and mechanical
components are tested for proper operation, in accordance with one of the
following: manufacturer's instructions; a code of practice developed by a
nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory; or
requirements determined by the implementing agency to be no less protective of
human health and the environment than the two options listed in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) of this section. A test of the proper operation must be
performed at least annually and, at a minimum, as applicable to the facility,
cover the following components and criteria: automatic tank gauge and other
controllers: test alarm; verify system configuration; test battery backup.
As noted
during the inspection, Respondent failed
to perform an annual proper operation test (components and criteria) of the
automatic tank
gauge and other controllers as specified. Specifically, Respondent failed to
provide documentation of the annual ATG functionality
test.
On January 8, 2025, documentation of ATG
functionality testing dated August 1, 2023 was
submitted.
i. Pursuant to
40 CFR 280.40(a)(3)(ii), as
incorporated, owners and operators of UST systems must provide a method, or
combination of methods, of release detection that, beginning on June 28, 2021,
is operated and maintained, and electronic and mechanical components are tested
for proper operation, in accordance with one of the following: manufacturer's
instructions; a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized
association or independent testing laboratory; or requirements determined by
the implementing agency to be no less protective of human health and the
environment than the two options listed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section. A test of the proper operation must be performed at least annually
and, at a minimum, as applicable to the facility, cover the following
components and criteria: probes and sensors: inspect for residual buildup;
ensure floats move freely; ensure shaft is not damaged; ensure cables are free
of kinks and breaks; test alarm operability and communication with controller.
As
noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to perform an annual proper
operation test (components and criteria) of the probes as specified.
On
January 8, 2025, documentation of probes testing dated August 1, 2023 was submitted.
j. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.40(a)(3)(iii), as incorporated,
owners and operators of UST systems must provide a method, or combination of
methods, of release detection that, beginning on June 28, 2021, is operated and maintained, and electronic
and mechanical components are tested for proper operation, in accordance with
one of the following: manufacturer's instructions; a code of practice developed
by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory; or
requirements determined by the implementing agency to be no less protective of
human health and the environment than the two options listed in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) of this section. A test of the proper operation must be
performed at least annually and, at a minimum, as applicable to the facility,
cover the following components and criteria: automatic line leak
detector: test operation to meet criteria in § 280.44(a) by simulating a leak.
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed
to perform an annual proper operation test (components and criteria) of the
automatic line leak detector as specified.
On January 8, 2025, documentation of leak
detector testing dated August 1, 2023 was submitted;
however, the RUL was a failed result and no indication of repair/retesting
provided.
Documentation of passing leak detector
testing dated January 13, 2025 submitted.
k. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.41(b)(1)(i)(B), taking into
consideration previous Indiana rules at 329 IAC 9-2-1(2)(D) and 329 IAC 9-3-1.3
(both repealed 2018), pressurized underground piping installed on or before September
2, 2009 that routinely contains regulated substances must have an annual line
tightness test conducted in accordance with § 280.44(b) or have monthly
monitoring conducted in accordance with § 280.44(c).
As
noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to have piping containing a
regulated amount of product tightness tested and failed to provide monthly
monitoring records for the piping.
On
January 8, 2025, documentation of line tightness testing dated August 1, 2023 was submitted.
l. Pursuant
to 40 CFR 280.36(a), as incorporated, to properly operate and maintain UST
systems, not later than June 28, 2021, owners and operators must meet one of
the following:
(1) Conduct a walkthrough inspection that, at a minimum, checks the
following equipment as specified below:
(i) Every 30 days (Exception: spill prevention equipment at UST systems
receiving deliveries at intervals greater than every 30 days may be checked
prior to each delivery):
(A) Spill prevention equipment—visually check for damage; remove liquid
or debris; check for and remove obstructions in the fill pipe; check the fill
cap to make sure it is securely on the fill pipe; and, for double walled spill
prevention equipment with interstitial monitoring, check for a leak in the
interstitial area; and
(B) Release detection equipment— check to make sure the release
detection equipment is operating with no alarms or other unusual operating
conditions present; and ensure records of release detection testing are
reviewed and current; and
(ii) Annually:
(A) Containment sumps—visually check for damage, leaks to the
containment area, or releases to the environment; remove liquid (in contained
sumps) or debris; and, for double walled sumps with interstitial monitoring,
check for a leak in the interstitial area; and
(B) Hand held release detection
equipment—check devices such as tank gauge sticks or groundwater bailers for
operability and serviceability;
(2) Conduct
operation and maintenance walkthrough inspections according to a standard code
of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent
testing laboratory that checks equipment comparable to paragraph (a)(1) of this
section; or
(3) Conduct operation and maintenance
walkthrough inspections developed by the implementing agency that checks
equipment comparable to paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed
to properly conduct walkthrough inspections to check equipment as specified.
Specifically, Respondent failed to provide monthly and annual walkthrough
inspection documentation.
Documentation of annual walkthrough submitted
January 21, 2025.
m. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.245, owners and operators of
underground storage tank systems must maintain a list of designated Class A,
Class B, and Class C operators with specified information and maintain appropriate
records including specified information verifying that training and retraining,
as applicable, have been completed, in accordance with § 280.34.
As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed
to maintain a list of designated Class A, Class B, and Class C operators with
complete information and to maintain appropriate records verifying that
training and retraining has been completed.
8. Orders of the Commissioner are subject to administrative review by the Office of Administrative Law Proceedings under IC 4-21.5; however, in recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent acknowledges notice of this right and waive any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate and has been received by Respondent. This
Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent shall comply with
the rules listed in the findings
of fact above.
3.
Effective
immediately, Respondent shall comply with 40 CFR 280.34. Specifically,
Respondent shall cooperate fully with inspections, monitoring and testing
conducted by the implementing agency, as well as requests for document
submission, testing, and monitoring by the owner or operator pursuant to
section 9005 of Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended.
4.
Within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall comply with 40 CFR
280.34(b)(3). Specifically, Respondent shall contract
with an appropriately certified contractor and have a structural integrity
assessment performed to determine the tank construction material and if there
is corrosion protection installed as well as identify if the UST systems are
compatible with the product stored in it and submit documentation to the IDEM
case manager at the address specified below.
5.
If the
tanks addressed in Paragraph 4 above are substandard and cannot be repaired
pursuant to 40 CFR 280.33, Respondent shall immediately cease using the
substandard UST systems and permanently close the systems in accordance with
329 IAC 9-6 within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date.
6.
Within thirty
(30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall
comply with 329 IAC 9-2-2(c). Specifically, Respondent
shall accurately complete the most recent version of the appropriate
state form with required attachments and submit to IDEM via email to USTRegistration@idem.IN.gov and jpisula@idem.IN.gov Include a Facility ID# in the subject line and
pdf file name of the email, so documents can be processed accordingly.
7.
Within fifteen
(15) days of notification from IDEM that the submitted form required in the
immediately preceding paragraph is inadequate, Respondent shall submit a
corrected form to be approved by IDEM. Stipulated penalties, as described below
may be assessed for continued submittal of inadequate
forms.
8.
Within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 280.20(b). Specifically, Respondent shall contract
with an appropriately certified contractor and corrosion expert to determine if
piping or metal components in contact with the ground are substandard and
perform any necessary repairs authorized under 40 CFR 280.33 and submit to the
IDEM case manager at address specified below, documentation of the work
performed.
9.
Within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall comply with 40 CFR
280.36(a). Specifically, Respondent shall conduct a monthly walkthrough
inspection for all UST systems at the site in accordance with 40 CFR
280.36(a)(1) and submit to the IDEM case manager at address specified below,
documentation of the work performed.
10.
Within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 280.245. Specifically, Respondent shall submit to the IDEM case manager at the address
specified below a list of those employees designated to be Class A, Class B and
Class C operators and training/retraining records with all necessary
information included.
11.
All
submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified
otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
|
Jodi Pisula, Enforcement Case Manager |
|
Office of Land Quality |
|
Indiana Department of Environmental Management |
|
100 North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
12.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-4-1, Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Twelve
Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars ($12,240.00). Said penalty amount shall be
due and payable in twelve (12) monthly installments of One Thousand Twenty Dollars
($1,020.00). Respondent shall pay the first installment by the due date printed
on the Invoice, as attached. Respondents shall pay by the due date printed on
subsequent invoices in accordance with the agreed upon
payment plan.
Civil and stipulated penalties are payable to
the “Indiana Department of Environmental Management” by:
Mail:
Civil penalties are payable by check to the “Indiana Department of
Environmental Management.” Checks shall include the Case Number of this action
and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana Department
of Environmental Management |
|
Accounts
Receivable |
|
P.O. Box 3295 |
|
Indianapolis, IN
46206 |
Online:
Accounts Receivable is accepting payments
online by e-Check, Master Card, Visa or Discover. Please visit www.IN.gov/IDEM. Under Online Services, click Online Payment
options and follow the prompts. A processing fee of $0.40 plus 2.06% will be
charged for credit card payments. A processing fee of $0.15 will be charged for
eCheck payments.
The Case Number is required to complete the process.
Phone:
You may also call us at 317-234-3099 and
follow the instructions for Master Card, Visa or Discover payments. A
processing fee of $0.40 plus 2.06% will be charged for credit card payments. A
processing fee of $0.15 will be charged for eCheck
payments.
The Case Number is required to complete the process.
13. In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess, and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
|
Paragraph |
Stipulated Penalty |
|
Order paragraph #4 |
$100.00 per
week |
|
Order paragraph #5 |
$100.00 per week |
|
Order paragraph #6 |
$100.00 per week |
|
Order paragraph #7 |
$100.00 per week |
|
Order paragraph #8 |
$100.00 per week |
|
Order paragraph #9 |
$100.00 per week |
|
Order paragraph #10 |
$100.00 per week |
Stipulated
penalties shall begin to be assessed on the date after the Effective Date and
shall continue until the documentation is submitted as required by the
associated paragraph.
14.
Stipulated
penalties shall be due and payable no later than the thirtieth day after Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is
due; at which time, a separate invoice will be issued. Complainant may
notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated
penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in
writing in a timely manner of a stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive
Complainant’s right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant
from seeking additional relief against Respondent for
violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated
penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against
Respondent for a violation of this Agreed
Order; such additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions available
pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties
pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
15.
In the
event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on
or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay an
additional penalty of 10 percent, payable to “Indiana Department of Environmental
Management,” and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 12, above.
16.
Signatories
to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this
Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.
17.
This
Agreed Order shall jointly and
severally apply to and be binding upon
Respondent and all successors and assigns.
Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed
Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners, successors, or assigns before
ownership rights are transferred.
18.
No
change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status
of Respondent shall in any way alter the
Respondent’s status
or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
19.
Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms, and other
persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this
Agreed Order.
20.
In the
event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
21.
This
Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a
modification of an existing permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or
approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant
to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of the obligation to comply with the requirements of
any applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State laws or regulations.
22.
Complainant
does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner
that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of
this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit,
order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation. Additionally, IDEM
or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or
penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed
Order.
23.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties
or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to seek additional civil
penalties for the violations specified in the NOV.
24.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from
communicating with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) or any
other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or
penalties Respondent may incur as a result of
such communications with the U.S. EPA or any other agency or entity.
25.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues
a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.
REMAINDER
OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
|
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
|||||||||
|
Department of
Environmental Management |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Jennifer Reno,
Chief |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Land Enforcement
Section |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Compliance Branch |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Office of Land
Quality |
|
|
|||||||
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
RESPONDENT: NJS Food Mart Inc. |
COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENT: |
|||||||||
|
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
||||||
|
Printed: |
|
|
Printed: |
|
||||||
|
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
APPROVED AND
ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
||||||||||
|
MANAGEMENT THIS |
|
DAY OF |
|
, 20_____ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
For the
Commissioner: |
||||||||
|
|
|
Signed
3/5/2025 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
Brian Wolff |
||||||||
|
|
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
||||||||
|
|
|
Office of Land
Quality |
||||||||