|
STATE OF
INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
|
) |
|
|
||||
|
COUNTY OF
MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
|
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No. 2022-28701-U |
|||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
BADESHA BROTHERS iNC. ALL STAR OIL INC., |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Respondents. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this
Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained
herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver
of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future
administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this
order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”)
of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of
the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent, Badesha Brothers Inc. (“Badesha”),
owns Underground Storage Tank (“UST”) system(s), with UST Facility ID 169,
located at 2166 Perry Road, parcel # 32-15-01-400.000-012, in Plainfield, Hendricks
County, Indiana (the “Site”).
3. Respondent,
All Star Oil Inc. (“All Star”), operates the UST systems located at 2166 Perry
Road, parcel # 32-15-01-400.000-012, in Plainfield, Hendricks County, Indiana
(the “Site”).
4.
Respondent, Badesha, owns and Respondent, All
Star, operates three (3) first generation Owens Corning fiberglass USTs,
installed in 1970.
5. Owner as defined in IC
13-11-2-150(a)(1)(A) means, for an UST that was in use on November 8, 1984 or brought into use after November 8, 1984 for the
storage, use, or dispensing of regulated substances, a person who owns the UST
or the real property that is the UST site, or both. According to the Hendricks County Assessor’s
Office, Respondent, Badesha is the owner of the Site.
6. IDEM issued a “40 CFR 280.34 Records
Request” letter to Respondent on January 24, 2022.
7. IDEM issued a Violation Letter to
Respondent on February 7, 2022 regarding the
violations noted during the January 25, 2022 inspection. To date, IDEM has not received a response.
8. IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties
and the subject matter of this action.
9.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, on September 6, 2022,
IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) via Certified Mail to:
|
Harjinder
Kaur Badesha |
Harjinder
Kaur Badesha |
|
President
and Registered Agent |
President
and Registered Agent |
|
Badesha Brothers Inc. |
All
Star Oil Inc. |
|
1237
American Avenue |
1237
American Avenue |
|
Plainfield,
Indiana 46168 |
Plainfield,
Indiana 46168 |
10.
During an investigation including a record
review on January 24, 2022 and an inspection on
January 25, 2022, conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following
violations were found:
a. Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-2-2(c), an owner
required to submit a notification under this section shall provide:
(1) a notification for each UST owned;
(2) complete information required on the form
for each UST owned; and
(3) if applicable, a separate notification
form for each separate place of operation at which the USTs are located.
As noted
during the record review and inspection, Respondents failed to submit a
complete and accurate notification form with required attachments. A
“Notification for Underground Storage Tanks” form submitted on July 7, 2016,
was determined to be incomplete. A “Notification for Underground Storage Tanks”
form submitted on July 7, 2016, was determined to be incomplete via a letter
issued on July 12, 2016.
b. Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-8-11(b), an owner
or operator of:
(1) twelve (12) or fewer USTs shall
demonstrate the ability to pay the applicable deductible amount under IC
13-23-9-1.3; or
(2) more than twelve (12) USTs shall
demonstrate the ability to pay two (2) times the applicable deductible amount
under IC 13-23-9-1.3.
As noted
during the record review and inspection, Respondents failed to demonstrate a
current Financial Responsibility mechanism.
c. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.31(b), all UST
systems equipped with cathodic protection systems must be inspected for proper
operation by a qualified cathodic protection tester in accordance with the
following requirements:
(1) Frequency. All cathodic protection
systems must be tested within 6 months of installation and at least every 3
years thereafter or according to another reasonable time frame established by
the implementing agency; and
(2) Inspection criteria. The criteria that
are used to determine that cathodic protection is adequate as required by this
section must be in accordance with a code of practice developed by a nationally
recognized association.
As
noted during the record review and inspection, Respondents failed to have the
cathodic protection systems tested by a qualified cathodic protection tester as
required. Specifically, flex connectors with pencil anodes, were observed in
contact with soil during the inspection which would require testing every three
(3) years to ensure proper corrosion protection for the flex connectors.
d. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.32(b)(1), owners and
operators with UST systems storing regulated substances must demonstrate
compatibility of the UST system (including the tank, piping, containment sumps,
pumping equipment, release detection equipment, spill equipment, and overfill
equipment).
As noted during the record review and
inspection, the three (3) first generation Owens Corning fiberglass USTs,
installed in 1970, are not rated for and therefore not compatible with gasoline
containing 10% ethanol. Per the July 7, 2016
Notification Form, the UST, currently storing diesel, contained gasoline with
10% ethanol, in 2016.
e. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.34(a)(3), owners
and operators must submit the following information to the implementing agency:
reports of all releases including suspected releases (§ 280.50), spills and
overfills (§ 280.53), and confirmed releases (§ 280.61).
As noted
during the record review and inspection, Respondent failed to submit to IDEM the
required release report after a dispenser had been struck by a vehicle.
f. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.35(a)(1), spill
prevention equipment (such as a catchment basin, spill bucket, or other spill
containment device) and containment sumps used for interstitial monitoring of
piping must prevent releases to the environment by meeting one of the
following:
(i) The
equipment is double walled and the integrity of both
walls is periodically monitored at a frequency not less than the frequency of
the walkthrough inspections described in §280.36. Owners and operators must
begin meeting paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section and conduct a test within 30
days of discontinuing periodic monitoring of this equipment;
or
(ii) The spill prevention equipment and
containment sumps used for interstitial monitoring of piping are tested at
least once every three years to ensure the equipment is liquid tight by using
vacuum, pressure, or liquid testing in accordance with one of the following
criteria:
(A) Requirements developed by the
manufacturer (Note: Owners and operators may use this option only if the
manufacturer has developed requirements);
(B) Code of practice developed by a
nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory; or
(C) Requirements determined by the
implementing agency to be no less protective of human health and the
environment than the requirements listed in paragraphs (1)(1)(ii)(A) and (B) of
this section.
As noted during the record review and
inspection, Respondents failed to ensure spill prevention equipment and
containment sumps used for interstitial monitoring of piping were operating
properly to prevent releases to the environment.
g. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.35(a)(2),
overfill prevention equipment must be inspected at least once every three
years. At a minimum, the inspection must ensure that overfill prevention
equipment is set to activate at the correct level specified in § 280.20(c) and
will activate when regulated substance reaches that level. Inspections must be
conducted in accordance with one of the criteria in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(A)
through (C) of this section.
As noted during the record review and
inspection, Respondents failed to inspect overfill prevention equipment at
least once every three years.
On September 23, 2022, Respondent tested
the overfill prevention equipment. The premium and regular UST systems failed
the test.
h. Pursuant to 40
CFR 280.36(a)(1)(i), to properly operate and maintain
UST systems, not later than June 28, 2021, owners and operators must conduct a
walkthrough inspection every 30 days that, at a minimum, checks spill
prevention equipment and release detection equipment (Exception: spill
prevention equipment at UST systems receiving deliveries at intervals greater
than every 30 days may be checked prior to each delivery).
As noted during the record review and
inspection, Respondents failed to conduct a walkthrough inspection every 30
days, at a minimum, to check spill prevention equipment and release detection
equipment.
i. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.40(a)(3)(i), owners and operators of UST systems must provide a
method, or combination of methods, of release detection that beginning on October
13, 2018, is operated and maintained, and electronic and mechanical components
are tested for proper operation, in accordance with one of the following:
manufacturer's instructions; a code of practice developed by a nationally
recognized association or independent testing laboratory; or requirements
determined by the implementing agency to be no less protective of human health
and the environment than the two options listed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of
this section. A test of the proper operation must be performed at least
annually and, at a minimum, as applicable to the facility, cover the following
components and criteria: automatic tank gauge and other controllers: test alarm;
verify system configuration; test battery backup.
As noted during the Records Request and
subsequent inspection, Respondent failed to perform an annual proper operation
test (components and criteria) of the automatic tank gauge and other controllers.
j. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.40(a)(3)(ii),
owners and operators of UST systems must provide a method, or combination of
methods, of release detection that beginning on October 13, 2018, is operated
and maintained, and electronic and mechanical components are tested for proper
operation, in accordance with one of the following: manufacturer's
instructions; a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized
association or independent testing laboratory; or requirements determined by
the implementing agency to be no less protective of human health and the
environment than the two options listed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section. A test of the proper operation must be performed at least annually
and, at a minimum, as applicable to the facility, cover the following
components and criteria: probes and sensors: inspect for residual buildup;
ensure floats move freely; ensure shaft is not damaged; ensure cables are free
of kinks and breaks; test alarm operability and communication with controller.
As noted during the Records Request and
subsequent inspection, Respondent failed to perform an annual proper operation
test (components and criteria) of the probes and sensors.
k. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.41(b)(1)(i)(A), pressurized underground piping installed on or
before April 11, 2016 that routinely contains
regulated substances must be equipped with an automatic line leak detector
conducted in accordance with § 280.44(a).
As noted during the record review and
inspection, Respondents failed to
provide appropriate leak detection testing for pressurized piping containing a
regulated substance.
l. Pursuant to 40 CFR 280.41(b)(1)(i)(B), pressurized underground piping installed on or
before April 11, 2016 that routinely contains
regulated substances must have an annual line tightness test conducted in
accordance with § 280.44(b) or have monthly monitoring conducted in accordance
with § 280.44(c).
As noted during the record review and
inspection, Respondents failed to have piping containing a regulated amount of
product tightness tested. A January 8, 2022, line tightness test stated that
piping of the UST, containing diesel, could not be isolated and was not tested.
11. On September 23, 2022, Respondent
completed the requirements to return Findings of Fact # 10f, 10h, 10i, 10k, and
10l to compliance.
12. Orders of the Commissioner are subject to
administrative review by the Office of Environmental Adjudication under IC
4-21.5; however, in recognition of the settlement reached, Respondents acknowledge
notice of this right and waives any right to administrative and judicial review
of this Agreed Order.
II.
ORDER
1.
This Agreed Order shall be effective
(“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed
Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondents shall comply with the listed in the
findings of fact above.
3.
Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondents shall comply with 329 IAC 9-2-2(c). Specifically, Respondents shall
download and submit the “Notification
Form for Underground Storage Tanks,” State Form from IDEM webpage: https://www.in.gov/idem/5157.htm,
under “Underground Storage Tank (UST) Program.” Once downloaded the form may be
completed on-line or by hand and emailed to USTRegistration@idem.in.gov.
The completed form will not be accepted by mail.
4.
Within
the thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondents shall comply with 329
IAC 9-8-11(b). Specifically, Respondents shall submit documentation of financial responsibility to IDEM.
5.
Within
the thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondents shall comply with 40
CFR 280.31(b). Specifically, Respondents shall submit the required documents or
have their UST systems fully inspected by a qualified cathodic protection
tester.
6.
Within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondents shall comply with 40 CFR
280.32(b)(1). Specifically, Respondents shall submit documentation proving the
required UST system(s) components are fully compatible with the product found
stored in the tanks during the inspection.
If compatibility cannot be proved, Respondents must immediately cease
storing the substance in the UST system(s) until such a time as compatibility
can be proved, upgrade the UST system, switch the product to one that is compatible,
or permanently close the affected UST system(s). If the affected UST system(s)
must be permanently closed it shall be closed as required by 329 IAC 9-6.
7.
Within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondents shall comply with 40 CFR
280.34(a)(3). Specifically, Respondents shall submit to IDEM all required release
reports.
8.
Within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondents shall comply with 40 CFR
280.35(a)(2). Respondents shall contract with a certified contractor to
inspect, repair, and test all overfill prevention equipment for the regular
and premium UST systems. Respondents shall submit documentation, to include
photographs, inspection, repair, measurements and testing results, showing the
overfill prevention equipment is fully functional.
9.
All submittals required by this Agreed Order,
unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
|
Linda McClure, Enforcement Case
Manager |
|
Office of Land Quality |
|
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
|
100 North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
10.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-4-1, Respondent, All Star
Oil, Inc., is assessed and agrees to a civil penalty of Zero Dollars ($0). This penalty reflects a significant reduction from the original proposed
civil penalty based upon evidence submitted to IDEM by Respondent which
adequately demonstrated Respondent’s inability to pay the original proposed
civil penalty.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-4-1, Respondent,
Badesha Brothers Inc., is assessed and agrees to a civil penalty of Thirty-Five
Thousand Four Hundred and Forty Dollars ($35,440). Said penalty amount shall be
due and payable in one (1) monthly installment of Two Thousand Nine Hundred and
Fifty-Seven Dollars ($2,957) and (11) monthly installments of Two Thousand Nine
Hundred and Fifty-Three Dollars ($2,953). Respondent shall pay the first
installment by the due date printed on the Invoice, as attached. Respondent
shall pay by the due date printed on subsequent invoices in accordance with the
agreed upon payment plan.
Civil and stipulated penalties are
payable to the “Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund” by:
Mail:
Civil penalties are payable by check to
the “Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund.” Checks shall include
the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Accounts
Receivable |
|
IGCN,
Room 1340 |
|
100
North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis,
IN 46204 |
Online:
Accounts Receivable is accepting
payments online by e-Check, Master Card, Visa or Discover. Please visit www.IN.gov/IDEM.
Under Online Services, click Online Payment options and follow the prompts. A
processing fee of $1 plus 1.99% will be charged for credit card payments.
A processing fee of $1.00 will be charged for eCheck
payments.
The Case Number is required to complete
the process.
Phone:
You may also call us at 317-234-3099 and
follow the instructions for Master Card, Visa or Discover payments. A
processing fee of $1 plus 1.99% will be charged for credit card payments.
A processing fee of $1.00 will be charged for eCheck
payments.
The Case Number is required to complete
the process.
11.
In the event the terms and conditions of the
following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess
and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
|
Paragraph |
Penalty |
|
Order
paragraph #3 |
$100 per
week |
|
Order
paragraph #4 |
$100 per week |
|
Order
paragraph #5 |
$200 per
week |
|
Order
paragraph #6 |
$300 per
week |
|
Order
paragraph #7 |
$100 per
week |
|
Order
paragraph #8 |
$200 per
week |
12.
Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable
no later than the thirtieth day after Respondents receive written notice that Complainant has determined a
stipulated penalty is due; the thirtieth day being the “Due Date.” Complainant
may notify Respondents at any
time that a stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondents in writing in a timely manner of a
stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s right to collect
such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief
against Respondents for
violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated
penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against
Respondents for a violation of
this Agreed Order; such additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions
available pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil
penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
13.
In the event that the monies
due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due
Date, Respondents shall pay an
additional penalty of 10 percent, payable to the “Underground Petroleum Storage
Tank Trust Fund” and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified in
Paragraph 10, above.
14.
Signatories to this Agreed Order certify that
they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the
party they represent.
15.
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding
upon Respondents and all successors and assigns. Respondents shall provide a
copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners, successors,
or assigns before ownership rights are transferred.
16.
No change in ownership, corporate, or
partnership status of Respondents shall in any way alter the Respondents’ status or responsibilities under this
Agreed Order.
17.
Respondents shall ensure that all contractors,
firms, and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with
the terms of this Agreed Order.
18.
In the event that any terms of
this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in
full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed
Order did not contain the invalid terms.
19.
This Agreed Order is not and shall not be
interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit. This Agreed
Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondents
pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondents of the
obligation to comply with the requirements of any applicable permits or any
applicable Federal or State laws or regulations.
20.
Complainant does not, by its approval of this
Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondents’ compliance with any
aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of
any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for
any costs or penalties Respondents may incur as a result of
Respondents’ efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
21.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or
limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and
hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the violations specified in the NOV.
22.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM
or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) or any other agency or entity about any matters
relating to this enforcement action. IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall
not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondents may incur as a result of such communications with the U.S. EPA or any
other agency or entity.
23.
This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until
IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondents.
|
TECHNICAL
RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||||
|
Department
of Environmental Management |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
Jennifer
Reno, Chief |
Printed: |
|
||||
|
|
Land
Enforcement Section |
Title: |
|
||||
|
|
Compliance
Branch |
|
|
||||
|
|
Office
of Land Quality |
|
|
||||
|
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENT: |
|||||
|
|
|
By: |
|
||||
|
|
|
Printed: |
|
||||
|
|
|
Date: |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||
|
MANAGEMENT
THIS |
|
DAY
OF |
|
,
20_____ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
For
the Commissioner: |
|||||
|
|
|
Signed
11/30/2022 |
|||||
|
|
|
Peggy
Dorsey |
|||||
|
|
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
|||||
|
|
|
Office
of Land Quality |
|||||