STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

Central Indiana Ethanol, LLC,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2019-26876-W

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to Indiana Code (IC) 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.               Complainant is the Commissioner (Complainant) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.               Central Indiana Ethanol, LLC (Respondent) owns/operates an industrial grade ethanol production facility located at 2955 West Delphi Pike, Marion, Grant County, Indiana (the Site). The Site is adjacent to another facility, Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (Air Products), which leases property owned by Respondent.

 

3.               Respondent is authorized by its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. IN0062782 (the Permit), to discharge wastewater treated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES Permit from its Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) into Pipe Creek from Outfall 001.

 

4.               The Permit does not authorize the discharge of any wastewater from Air Products. Air Products’ building roof downspouts are connected to a black perforated plastic pipe that goes into the ground to a PVC pipe. The PVC pipe connects to the effluent line of Respondent, which ultimately discharges into the receiving stream out of Outfall 001.

 

5.               During an inspection on September 12, 2019, IDEM discovered that Air Products dumped an unknown amount of ammonia-laden wastewater on the ground next to the roof drainpipe. The wastewater flowed into Respondent’s effluent line, and discharged out of Outfall 001 contributing to a fish kill.

 

6.               IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action pursuant to IC 13-30-3.

 

7.               Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) via Certified Mail/personal service to:

 

Ryan Drook, President & CEO

Steve Berry, Registered Agent

Central Indiana Ethanol, LLC

Central Indiana Ethanol, LLC

2955 W Delphi Pike

2955 Delphi Pike

Marion, IN 46952

Marion, IN 46952

 

8.               During an investigation including an inspection on September 12, 2019, conducted by a representative of IDEM, violations were found, as described below.

 

9.               327 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 5-2-8(1), states the permittee shall comply with all terms and conditions of the Permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and Indiana Code (IC) 13 and is grounds for enforcement action by IDEM.

 

10.           Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, a person may not: (1) throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose; or (2) cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed; into any of the streams or waters of Indiana any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any of the streams or waters of Indiana.

 

Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), it is unlawful for any person to discharge, emit, cause or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources in the environment in any form that causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

 

Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1) and Part 1.B.2 of the Permit, all surface waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices or other discharges that do any of the following:

 

a.       will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits;

b.       are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious;

c.       produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;

d.       are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses; and

e.       are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants, or humans.

 

During the inspection on September 12, 2019, IDEM staff observed and documented dead fish still present following the fish kill event on September 11, 2019. Field tests of the receiving stream showed Chlorine was undetectable upstream of Outfall 001 and field tests of the receiving stream downstream of Outfall 001 showed 3+ mg/L for Chlorine. Field tests of water in the Respondent sampling manhole showed 4+ mg/L for Chlorine. On September 11, 2019, Respondent determined that a chlorine pump was dosing more chlorine than it should have been and immediately turned it off. The Respondent allowed Chlorine to discharge from Outfall 001 into the receiving stream and contribute to a fish kill, in violation of IC 13-18-4-5, IC 13-30-2-1(1), 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), and Part 1.B.2 of the Permit.

 

11.           Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(9) and Part II.B.1 of the Permit, permittee shall at all times maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all facilities and systems for the collection and treatment which are installed or used by the permittee and which are necessary for achieving compliance with the terms and conditions of the Permit.

 

During the inspection on September 12, 2019, IDEM learned that Respondent had been in a planned seasonal maintenance shutdown since September 8, 2019, which ceased water flow to the ethanol process but continued water flow through the non-contact cooling system to dissipate residual heat from fermenters. A chlorine pump that normally uses data from a flow meter to flow-proportion the correct amount of chlorine had been set to manual during the recent seasonal maintenance shutdown therefore dosing more chlorine than necessary. The Respondent failed to properly operate the chlorine pump, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-8(9) and Part II.B.1 of the Permit.

 

12.           Pursuant to Part I.A.1 of the Permit, the permittee is required to comply with the monitoring requirements contained in the Permit, including effluent limitations.

 

Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Monthly Reports of Operation (MROs) submitted by Respondent for the period of September 2019 revealed violations of effluent limitations contained in Part I.A.1 of the Permit as follows:

A.         The daily maximum average concentration limitation for chlorine was exceeded during September 2019.

B.         The monthly average concentration limitation for Chlorine was exceeded during September 2019.

 

Respondent failed to comply with the effluent limitations from Outfall 001 contained in the Permit, in violation of Part I.A.1 of the Permit.

 

13.           A Settlement Conference was held on May 28, 2020, to settle on Order Actions.

 

14.           Orders of the Commissioner are subject to administrative review by the Office of Environmental Adjudication under IC 4-21.5; however, in recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent acknowledges notice of this right and waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II. ORDER

 

1.               This Agreed Order shall be effective (Effective Date) when it is adopted by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate (as evidenced by signature), and the adopted Agreed Order has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date. In addition to addressing the violations cited in Paragraphs 9 through 12 of the Findings of Fact above, this Agreed Order also addresses any additional violations of these same rules that may have occurred subsequent to the issuance of the NOV and prior to the Effective Date.

 

2.               Respondent shall comply with the Permit, rules and statutes listed in the findings above at issue.

 

3.               Within 30 days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall implement actions to achieve and maintain compliance with effluent limitations contained in the Permit, specifically Chlorine.

 

4.               Within 30 days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall improve and implement Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), particularly for during shutdowns.

 

5.               Within 10 days of each required action in Order Paragraphs 3 and 4, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a notification of completion for each item.

 

6.               Beginning on the Effective Date and continuing until the successful completion of the actions in Order Paragraphs 3 and 4, Respondent shall, at all times, operate its existing WWTP as efficiently and effectively as possible.

 

7.               Within 45 days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit detailed narrative descriptions, including flow diagrams, of all sources of process wastewater, non-process wastewater, and storm water exposed to industrial activity originating from the Air Products facility and connected to Respondent’s effluent lines. IDEM’s Permits Branch will evaluate the information and may require Respondent to submit applicable NPDES Permit Applications.

 

8.               All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

David Koehler, Enforcement Case Manager

Office of Water Quality – IGCN 1255

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

9.               Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Twenty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($28,200). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the “Environmental Management Special Fund” within 30 days of the Effective Date, the 30th day being a “Due Date.”

 

10.           In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, IDEM may assess and Respondent shall pay the corresponding stipulated penalty:

 

Paragraph

Violation

Stipulated Penalty

3

Failure to implement actions to maintain compliance with effluent limitations contained in the Permit within the required time period.

$250 per week late, or part thereof.

4

Failure to improve and implement SOPs within the required time period.

$250 per week late, or part thereof.

5

Failure to submit to IDEM a notification of completing actions in Order Paragraphs 3 and 4.

$150 per week late, or part thereof.

6

Failure to operate the WWTP as efficiently and effectively as possible prior to completing actions in Order Paragraphs 3 and 4.

$200 per violation.

7

Failure to submit narrative descriptions of all flows originating from Air Products within the required time period.

$250 per week late, or part thereof.

 

11.           Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable no later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written notice that IDEM has determined a stipulated penalty is due, the 30th day being a “Due Date.” IDEM may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a timely manner of a stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive IDEM’s right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated penalties shall preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief against Respondent for a violation of this Agreed Order. Such additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

12.           Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number 2019-26876-W of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Accounts Receivable

IGCN, Room 1340

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 

13.           This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent, its successors and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

14.           In the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance and any accrued interest at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1. The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. The interest shall continue to accrue on the first of each month until the civil penalty and any interest accrued are paid in full. Such interest shall be payable to the “Environmental Management Special Fund,” and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified above.

 

15.           In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

16.           Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

17.           This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of their obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

18.           Complainant does not, by his approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

19.           Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the Notice of Violation.

 

20.           Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM (or anyone acting on its behalf) from communicating with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action. IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the US EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

21.           This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with the terms and conditions of this Agreed Order and IDEM issues a Resolution of Case (close out) letter to Respondent.

 

REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

Central Indiana Ethanol, LLC

 

By:__________________________

By:________________________

Samantha K. Groce, Chief

 

Water Enforcement Section

 

Surface Water, Operations &

Printed:_____________________

Enforcement Branch

 

Office of Water Quality

Title:_______________________

 

 

Date:________________________

Date:_______________________

 

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

 

 

 

By:________________________

 

 

 

Date:______________________

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS ___________ DAY OF ________________, 20___.

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

Signed on July 15, 2020

 

Martha Clark Mettler

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Water Quality