STATE OF INDIANA

)

SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF

 

)

 

 

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT

)

 

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Complainant,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

 

v.

 

)

Case Nos. 2018-25594-A

 

 

)

                  2020-26744-A

CHIYODA USA CORPORATION,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Respondent.

 

)

 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.               Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.               Respondent is Chiyoda USA Corporation (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the stationary plastic automotive trim molding and surface coating facility with Plant ID No. 133-00019, located at 2200 State Road 240 East, in Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana (“Site”).

 

3.               IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.               Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) on April 30, 2021 via Electronic Mail to:

 

Kevin Redding, President                      Corporation System Corporation,

Chiyoda USA Corporation                      Registered Agent

2200 State Road 240 East,                    251 East Ohio, Suite 500

PO Box 494                                          Indianapolis, IN 46204

Greenfield, IN 46135                             sop@scsglobal.com

kredding@chiyoda-usa.com

 

5.               During an investigation including an inspection on August 8, 2018, and report reviews conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

Based on the Enforcement Action Letter issued to Respondent on August 31, 2018, case number 2018-25594-A contains the following violations:

 

a.               Pursuant to Part 70 Operating Permit No. 133-37638-00019 (“Permit”), condition D.1.8(b)(5), Respondent shall maintain records of the volume weighted average volatile organic content ("VOC”) of coatings and solvents used each day for robot paint system PT541.

 

Respondent failed to maintain records of the volume weighted average VOC content of coatings and solvents used each day for robot paint system PT541 from November 1, 2016 to August 31, 2018, February 28, 2019, and March 30, 2019, in violation of Permit condition D.1.8(b)(5).

 

b.               Pursuant to Permit condition E.1.2 and 40 CFR 63.4520(a), Respondent shall submit semiannual compliance reports for each affected source according to the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) through (7) of this section.

 

Respondent failed to submit the semiannual compliance reports in a timely manner for the second half of 2016, the first half of 2017, the second half of 2017, and the first half of 2018, in violation of Permit condition E.1.2 and 40 CFR 63.4520(a).

 

c.               Pursuant to Permit condition C.15, Respondent shall submit by July 1 of each year an emission statement covering the previous calendar year. The emission statement shall contain, at a minimum, the information specified in 326 IAC 2-6-4(c) and shall meet the following requirements: (1) Indicate estimated actual emissions of all pollutants listed in 326 IAC 2-6-4(a); and (2) Indicate estimated actual emissions of regulated pollutants as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(33) (“Regulated pollutant, which is used only for purposes of Section 19 of this rule”) from the source, for purpose of fee assessment.

 

Respondent failed to identify all pollutants listed in 326 IAC 2-6-4(a) on the 2016 emission statement, in violation of Permit condition C.15.

 

d.               Pursuant to Permit condition D.5.4, in order to verify compliance with 326 IAC 2-7, not later than sixty (60) days after achieving maximum capacity, but not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after initial startup of the fluidized cleaning bed, the Permittee shall conduct PM, PM10, and PM2.5 testing for the fluidized cleaning bed.

 

Respondent failed to conduct compliance testing on the fluidized cleaning bed within one hundred eighty (180) days of initial startup, in violation of Permit condition D.5.4.

 

e.               Pursuant to Permit condition E.2.2 and 40 CFR 63.7545(c), as specified in §63.9(b)(4) and (5), if you startup your new or reconstructed affected source on or after January 31, 2013, you must submit an Initial Notification not later than fifteen (15) days after the actual date of startup of the affected source.

 

Respondent failed to submit Initial Notifications of startup of affected units HWB-01 and HWB-02 within fifteen (15) days of startup, in violation of Permit condition E.2.2 and 40 CFR 63.7545(c).

 

f.                 Pursuant to Permit condition E.2.2 and 40 CFR 63.7545(e), for the initial compliance demonstration for each boiler or process heater, you must submit the Notification of Compliance Status, including all performance test results and fuel analyses, before the close of business on the 60th day following the completion of all performance tests and/or other initial compliance demonstrations for all boiler or process heaters at the facility according to §63.10(d)(2).

 

Respondent failed to submit the Notification of Compliance Status of affected units before the close of business on the 60th day following the completion of all performance tests and/or other initial compliance demonstrations for affected units HWB-01 and HWB-02, in violation of Permit condition E.2.2 and 40 CFR 63.7545(e).

 

g.               Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-10.5, an owner or operator of a Part 70 source proposing to construct new emission units, modify existing emission units, or otherwise modify the source as described in this section shall submit a request for a modification approval in accordance with this section.

 

Respondent failed to submit a request for a modification to add twenty-five (25) injection molding machines, two (2) blow molding machines, and three (3) granulators, in violation of 326 IAC 2-7-10.5.

 

h.               Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-12, an owner or operator of a Part 70 source must submit a permit application prior to operation of regulated emission units.

 

Respondent failed to submit a permit application prior to the operation of twenty-five (25) injection molding machines, two (2) blow molding machines, and three (3) granulators, in violation of 326 IAC 2-7-12.

 

i.                 Pursuant to Permit condition D.1.8(a)(2)(B), Respondent shall maintain records of the amount of coating material and solvent less water used on monthly basis. Solvent usage records shall differentiate between those added to coatings and those used as cleanup solvents for units PT 531, PT 532, PT 536, PT 537, PT 538, and PT 539.

 

Respondent failed to maintain records of solvent usage that differentiated between solvents added to coatings and those used for cleanup for units PT 531, PT 532, PT 536, PT 537, PT 538, and PT 539 for a total of seventy-two (72) days during the first quarter of 2019, in violation of Permit condition D.1.8(a)(2)(B).

 

j.                 Pursuant to Permit condition D.1.8(b)(2)(B), Respondent shall maintain records of the amount of coating material and solvent-less water used on monthly basis. Solvent usage records shall differentiate between those added to coatings and those used as cleanup solvents for unit PT 541.

 

Respondent failed to maintain records of solvent usage that differentiated between solvents added to coatings and those used for cleanup for unit PT 541, during the first and second quarters of 2019, in violation of Permit condition D.1.8(b)(2)(B).

 

k.               Pursuant to Permit condition E.1.2(5) and 40 CFR 63.4490(b)(1), for each existing general use coating affected source, Respondent shall limit organic hazardous air pollutant (“HAP”) emissions to no more than 0.16 kg (0.16 lb) organic HAP emitted per kg (lb) coating solids used during each 12-month compliance period.

 

Respondent exceeded the 0.16 kg (0.16 lb) HAP emission limit eleven (11) times from January 2017 to May 2018 for unit PT 536 and one (1) time during March 2018 for unit PT 539, in violation of Permit condition E.1.2(5) and 40 CFR 63.4490(b)(1).

 

Based on the Enforcement Action Letter issued to Respondent on January 13, 2020, case number 2020-26744-A contains the following violations:

 

l.                 Pursuant to Permit condition B.10, a Preventive Maintenance Plan meet the requirements of 326 IAC 1-6-3 and shall be implemented.

 

Respondent failed to implement the required Preventative Maintenance Plan from January 1, 2019 to June 6, 2019, in violation of Permit condition B.10.

 

m.             Pursuant to 326 IAC 8-1-6 and Permit condition D.1.1(d)(2) and corresponding conditions in subsequent permits, the daily volume-weighted average VOC content of all coatings used in the robot paint spray system PT-541 shall not exceed 4.35 pounds of VOC per gallon of coating, excluding water.

 

Respondent exceeded the daily volume-weighted average of all coatings used in the robot paint spray system PT-541 a total of 138 days from July 1, 2019 through September 17, 2020, in violation of 326 IAC 8-1-6 and Permit condition D.1.1(d)(2) and corresponding conditions in subsequent permits.

 

n.               Pursuant to Permit condition D.1.8(d)(2) and corresponding conditions in subsequent permits, in order to document the compliance status with Condition D.1.1(d), the Permittee shall maintain records of the amount of coating material and solvent less water used on a daily and monthly basis.

 

Respondent failed to properly calculate the amount of coating material and solvent-less water for unit PT-541 on twenty (20) days during third quarter of 2019, in violation of Permit condition D.1.8(d)(2) and corresponding conditions in subsequent permits.

 

6.               Respondent tested fluidized cleaning bed on April 2, 2019, with the results that were received on May 16, 2019, indicating compliance.

 

7.               Respondent was issued Part 70 Significant Permit Modification 133-41195-00019 on October 16, 2019, in order to permit the previously unpermitted equipment.

 

8.               On September 17, 2020, Respondent replaced the high VOC coatings being used at unit PT-541 to comply with the daily volume-weighted average of 4.35 pounds of VOC per gallon of coating, excluding water limit.

 

9.               Orders of the Commissioner are subject to administrative review by the Office of Environmental Adjudication under IC 4-21.5; however, in recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent acknowledges notice of this right and waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II. ORDER

 

1.               This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.               Respondent shall comply with Part 70 Operating Permit 133-42904-00019 unless superseded by modification or renewal.

 

3.               All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless IDEM notifies the Respondent otherwise in writing, shall be sent to:

 

Jennifer Bailey, Senior Enforcement Case Manager

Office of Air Quality

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

Jbailey2@idem.in.gov

 

4.               Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($115,200.00).  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of the Agreed Order, Respondent shall pay a portion of this penalty in the amount of Twenty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($28,800.00).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.

 

In lieu of payment of the remaining civil penalty, Respondent shall pay Eighty-Six Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($86,400.00) to Quail Forever West Central Indiana Chapter 3183 to fund a Supplemental Environmental Project (“SEP”) for activities related to the conservation of pheasants, quail, and other wildlife in west central Indiana.  Respondent shall make monthly payments to Quail Forever West Central Indiana Chapter 3183 with the final payment to be made no later than December 31, 2021.

 

Implementation of this SEP will benefit Indiana communities by educating youth and communities on the importance of habitats for all wildlife. By helping plant quality pollinator project habitats, participants learn firsthand the needs of pheasants, quail, bees, butterflies, and other upland wildlife.

 

The SEP proceeds will be spent on habitat improvements, public access, education, and conservation advocacy.

 

In the event that Respondent does not make its final monthly SEP payment by no later than December 31, 2021, the full amount of the civil penalty as stated in this paragraph, plus interest established by IC 24-4.6-1-101 on the remaining amount, less the portion of the civil penalty Respondent has already paid, will be due to IDEM within fifteen (15) days from Respondent’s receipt of IDEM’s notice to pay.  Interest, at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101, shall be calculated on the amount due from the date which is thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this Agreed Order until the full civil penalty is paid.

 

Payments for the SEP are payable by check to “Quail Forever West Central Indiana Chapter 3183.”  The Case Number of this action shall be included in the memo line of the check. 

 

Respondent shall provide Complainant with documentation of payment to Quail Forever West Central Indiana Chapter 3183 within one (1) week of each payment.

 

5.               Respondent agrees to pay avoided Title V fees in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty-Four Dollars and Twenty-Nine Cents ($254.29).  Avoided Title V fees are assessed for the period of January 2017 to December 2018, during which time Respondent failed to identify all pollutants listed in 326 IAC 2-6-4(a).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Title V Investments Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.

 

6.               Civil penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Accounts Receivable

IGCN, Room 1340

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204

 

7.               Title V permit fees are payable by check to the “Title V Investments Fund.”  A cover letter shall accompany the check specifying that the Title V fees shall be deposited into the Title V Investments Fund.  The check and cover letter shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Accounts Receivable

IGCN, Room 1340

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204

 

8.               In the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1. The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. Such interest shall be payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraphs 6 and 7, above.

 

9.               Signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.

 

10.           This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and all successors and assigns. Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners, successors, or assigns before ownership rights are transferred.

 

11.           No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter the Respondent’s status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

12.           Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms, and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

13.           In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

14.           This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of the obligation to comply with the requirements of any applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State laws or regulations.

 

15.           Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

16.           Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the violations specified in the NOV.

 

17.           Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action. IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the U.S. EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

18.           This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all terms and conditions of this Agreed Order and IDEM has issued a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.

 

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

Chiyoda USA Corporation

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

David P. McIver, Chief

 

Printed:

 

 

Enforcement Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Air Quality

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

For the Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 2021.

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on July 22, 2021

 

Matthew Stuckey

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Air Quality

Indiana Department of Environmental Management