STATE OF INDIANA

)

SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF

 

)

 

 

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT

)

 

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Complainant,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

 

v.

 

)

Case No. 2017-24269-U

 

 

)

 

JAIPREET INVESTMENT CORP.,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Respondent.

 

)

 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.               Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.

 

2.               Respondent is Jaipreet Investment Corp. (“Respondent”), which owns/operates the Underground Storage Tank (“UST”) system, with UST Facility ID No. 245 and LUST Incident Nos. 199012563 and 199907516, located at 2319 National Road West, Parcel No. 029-07599-00, in Richmond, Wayne County, Indiana (“Site”).

 

3.       Respondent owns and operates four (4) steel underground storage tanks at the Site.  The underground storage tanks consist of three (3) ten thousand (10,000) gallon gasoline tanks, and a six thousand (6,000) gallon kerosene tank.  A ten thousand (10,000) gallon gasoline tank and the six thousand (6,000) gallon kerosene tank were installed on October 10, 1990.  Two (2) ten thousand (10,000) gallon gasoline tanks were installed on July 1, 1987 and October 16, 1984 respectively.

 

4.               According to Indiana Property Record Card, Parcel Number 029-07599-00, located at 2319 National Road West in Richmond, Wayne County, belongs to Herdrich Petroleum Corp.  The Wayne County Recorder recorded a Memorandum of Land Contract between Herdrich Petroleum Corp. and Jaipreet Investment Corp.  The Memorandum of Land Contract executed on April 17, 2014 specified the terms and conditions of the Land Contract.

 

5.               Owner as defined in IC 13-11-2-150(a)(1)(A) means, for an UST that was in use on November 8, 1984 or brought into use after November 8, 1984 for the storage, use, or dispensing of regulated substances, a person who owns the UST or the real property that is the UST site, or both.

 

6.               IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

7.               Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) via Certified Mail to:

 

Jasvir Singh, President

Jasvir Singh, Registered Agent

Jaipreet Investment Corp.

Jaipreet Investment Corp.

11863 E. CR 300 S.

6640 Silverthorne Way

Zionsville, Indiana 46077

Indianapolis, Indiana 46259

 

 

William J. Herdrich, Registered Agent

William J. Herdrich, President

Herdrich Petroleum Corp.

Herdrich Petroleum Corp.

296 E. Riverside Dr.

210 East US 52 STE. E.

Rushville, Indiana 46173

Rushville, Indiana 46173

 

8.               Based on an investigation including an inspection conducted on October 25, 2016 and a record review conducted on December 6, 2016, by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

a.       Pursuant to 329 Indiana Administrative Code (“IAC”) 9-3.1-2(1), (2), and (3), the owner and operator of a steel UST system with corrosion protection shall comply with the following requirements to ensure that releases due to corrosion are prevented for as long as the UST system is used to store regulated substances:

 

(1)      All corrosion protection systems must be operated and maintained to continuously provide corrosion protection to the metal components of that portion of the tank and piping that routinely contain regulated substances and are in contact with the ground.

(2)      All UST systems equipped with galvanic cathodic protection systems must be inspected for proper operation by a qualified cathodic protection tester under the following requirements: (A) all galvanic cathodic protection systems must be tested within six (6) months of installation and at least every three (3) years thereafter; and (B) Nace International (formerly the National Association of Corrosion Engineers) Standard RP0285-95 “Corrosion Control of Underground Storage Tank Systems by Cathodic Protection”, revised 1995 NACE International, P.O. Box 218340, Houston, Texas 77218-8340.

(3)      All UST systems with impressed cathodic protection systems must be: (A) inspected every sixty (60) days to ensure the equipment is running according to manufacturer’s specifications; and (B) tested within six (6) months of installation and at least every three (3) years thereafter.

 

As noted during the investigation, Respondent failed to perform corrosion protection testing for the steel UST system to ensure that releases due to corrosion are prevented.  The facility has been out of use for an unknown period of time.  While all USTs contained quantities of regulated product, there is no record of corrosion protection testing for the UST system at the Site.

 

b.       Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-7-2(1), the owner and operator of a petroleum UST system shall provide release detection for tanks as follows: tanks must be monitored at least every thirty (30) days for releases using one (1) of the methods listed in section 4(4) through 4(8) of 329 IAC 9-7.

 

As noted during the investigation, Respondent failed to perform an appropriate method of monthly release detection for the underground storage tank system at the Site.  According to the Notification For Underground Storage Tanks which Jaipreet Investment Corp. submitted to IDEM, the steel UST system is equiped with Automatic Tank Guage.  The electric power supply to the facility has been disconnected and the electric meter removed.  Electric power supply is generally  required for proper operation of Automatic Tank Guage.  Respondent failed to submit records of monthly release detection testing for the UST system.

 

c.               Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-7-2(2)(A), underground piping that conveys regulated substances under pressure must: (i) be equipped with an automatic line leak detector under section 5(1) of 329 IAC 9-7; and (ii) have an annual line tightness test conducted under 5(2) of 329 IAC 9-7 or have monthly monitoring conducted under section 5(3) of 329 IAC 9-7.

 

As noted during the investigation, Respondent failed to perform either an annual line tightness testing or a monthly release detection testing on the underground piping.  There are no records of an annual line tightness testing or a monthly release detection testing on the underground piping.

 

d.               Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-3-1(d), the owner and operator shall maintain the records required at: (1) the underground storage tank site and immediately available for inspection by the agency; or (2) a readily available alternative site and be provided for inspection to the agency upon request.

 

As noted during the investigation, Respondent failed to maintain the records required at the underground storage tank site, or a readily available alternative site.  IDEM requested for inspection, records of  corrosion protection testing and release detection testing, which are records required at the site or a readily available alternative site.  Respondent failed to make such records available to IDEM at the time of the inspection and did not respond to the Violation Letter dated November 23, 2016, requesting the records.

 

9.               On July 26, 2017, Respondent submitted to IDEM the results of  USTs’ cathodic protection testing and tank tightness testing performed on July 6, 2017.  Based on the test results, the cathodic protection of the tanks passed the test, and the tanks were tight.

 

10.     In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.               This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.               Respondent shall comply with the rules listed in the Findings of Fact above.

 

3.               Within fifteen (15) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall empty the USTs at the Site.  Specifically, Respondent shall completely remove regulated product contained in the USTs.

 

4.               Within fifteen (15) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit to IDEM an UST notification on a form and in a format prescribed by the commissioner requesting temporary closure of the tanks.

 

5.               Within thirty (30) days of re-opening the Site for business, Respondent shall fill out and submit to IDEM, a complete copy of State Form 45223, Notification for Underground Storage Tank Form.

 

6.               Respondent shall maintain operating records at the Site, and such records shall be immediately available for inspection upon request by IDEM.

 

7.               Within sixty (60) months of the Effective Date, Respondent shall permanently close the underground storage tank system in accordance with the requirements of 329 IAC 9-6-1 through 329 IAC 9-6-4, including the applicable requirements for corrective action under 329 IAC 9-5-1 through 329 IAC 9-5-8.

 

8.               At least thirty (30) days before beginning closure, Respondent shall notify IDEM using  the notification form required by 329 IAC 9-2-2(a), and the office of the state fire marshal of intent to close the underground storage tanks.

 

9.               At least seven (7) days prior to scheduled closure activities, Respondent shall notify IDEM’s Underground Storage Tank Section to permit an agent of IDEM to view and inspect the activities performed pursuant to closure of the UST system.

 

10.           Within thirty (30) days of closing the UST system, Respondent shall submit a closure report to IDEM which shall include the notification form required by 329 IAC 9-2-2(a).

 

11.           All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Chike Okeke, Enforcement Case Manager

Office of Land Quality

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

12.           Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($18,200).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund in three (3) installments.  The first installment of Six Thousand Sixty Six Dollars and Sixty Eight Cents ($6,066.68) shall be paid within one hundred twenty (120) days of the Effective Date.  Subsequent installments of Six Thousand Sixty Six Dollars and Sixty Six Cents ($6,066.66) shall be paid within two hundred forty (240) days of the Effective Date and three hundred sixty five (365) days of the Effective Date.

 

13.           In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Paragraph

Penalty

 

 

Order Paragraph #3

$100 per week late

Order Paragraph #4

$100 per week late

Order Paragraph #5

$200 per week late

Order Paragraph #7

$500 per week late

Order Paragraph #10

$200 per week late

 

14.           Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable no later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.  Complainant may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due.  Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a timely manner of stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.  Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against Respondent for a violation of this Agreed Order; such additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

15.           Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund.”  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Office of Legal Counsel

IGCN, Room N1307

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204

 

16.           In the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1.  The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance.  Such interest shall be payable to the Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 15, above.

 

17.           This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns.  Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

18.           In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

19.           Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

20.           This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

21.           Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

22.           Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.

 

23.           Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

24.           This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By: _________________________

By:  _________________________

 

Nancy Johnston, Section Chief

 

 

Enforcement Section

Printed: ______________________

Office of Land Quality

 

 

Title: ________________________

 

 

Date: __________________

Date: _______________________

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

 

 

 

 

 

By: ________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date: ______________________

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

_____

DAY OF

________________________,

20__.

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed 0n September 11, 2017

 

Peggy Dorsey,  Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Land Quality