|
STATE OF
INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
|
) |
|
|
||||
|
COUNTY OF
MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
|
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No.
2015-23134-U |
|||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Basra and chohan llc, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does
not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order
shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which
Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except
a proceeding to enforce this order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”)
of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of
the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent is Basra and Chohan
LLC (“Respondent ”), which owns the Phillips 66 Gas
Station and UST system with Facility ID No.16987, located at 2909 E Highway 12,
in Michigan City, LaPorte County, Indiana (“Site”).
3. Respondent owns three 8,000 gallon
steel USTs; each installed in November of 1966.
4. IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties
and the subject matter of this action.
5.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a
Notice of Violation (NOV) to Gobinder S Basra,
registered agent for Basra and Chohan LLC and Chris K
Ball, registered agent for Reese Holdings I, LLC.
6.
Owner as defined in IC 13-11-2-150(a)(1)(A)
means, for an UST that was in use on November 8, 1984 or brought into use after
November 8, 1984 for the storage, use, or dispensing of regulated substances, a
person who owns the UST or the real property that is the UST site, or both. According to the Trustee’s Deed, Respondent is
the owner of the Site.
7.
A Violation Letter was issued to Respondent on
March 13, 2015 which required Respondent to submit a
Notification form within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Violation
Letter. Respondent failed to respond to
the Violation Letter.
8.
During an investigation including an
inspection on September 3, 2014, conducted by a representative of IDEM, the
following violations were found:
a.
Pursuant to 329 Indiana Administrative Code (“IAC”) 9-2-2,
(a) all notifications required to be submitted under this section must be
submitted on a form prescribed by the commissioner; (b) any person who owns an
UST system or tank shall, within thirty (30) days of owning such an UST system
or tank or bringing such tank or UST system into use, submit notice to the
agency to register the tank or UST system.
Bringing a tank or UST system “into use” means the
tank or UST system contains or has contained a regulated substance and not been
closed under 329 IAC 9-6; and (d) an owner required to submit notice under this
section shall provide all the information required by the form provided by the
agency for each tank for which notice is submitted.
As noted in the Violation Letter,
Respondent, as owner of the Site, failed to submit notice to IDEM within thirty (30) days of owning the UST system. No notification signed by Respondent, as
owner, has been submitted to IDEM.
b.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-7-2(1), the owner and
operator of a petroleum UST system shall provide release detection for tanks
and piping as follows: tanks must be monitored at least every thirty (30) days for
releases using one (1) of the methods listed in section 4(4) through 4(8) of
329 IAC 9-7.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent failed to perform an appropriate method of monthly release detection
for the underground storage tank system at the Site.
c.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-3.1-4(a), the owner and
operator of an UST system shall ensure that repairs and maintenance prevent
releases due to structural failure or corrosion as long as the UST system is
used to store regulated substances.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent failed to ensure that repairs and maintenance prevent releases due
to structural failure of corrosion.
Respondent failed to maintain and repair the ATG leak detector, the
rectifier box, and test the cathodic protection system.
d.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-3.1-2(1), (2), and (3),
the owner and operator of a steel UST system with corrosion protection shall
comply with the following requirements to ensure that releases due to corrosion
are prevented for as long as the UST system is used to store regulated
substances:
(1)
All corrosion protection systems must be
operated and maintained to continuously provide
corrosion protection to the metal components of that portion of the tank and
piping that routinely contain regulated substances and are in contact with the
ground.
(2)
All UST systems equipped with galvanic
cathodic protection systems must be inspected for proper operation by a
qualified cathodic protection tester under the following requirements: (A) all galvanic cathodic protection systems
must be tested within six (6) months of installation and at least every three
(3) years thereafter; and (B) Nace International
(formerly the National Association of Corrosion Engineers) Standard RP0285-95
“Corrosion Control of Underground Storage Tank Systems by Cathodic Protection”,
revised 1995 NACE International, P.O. Box 218340, Houston Texas 77218-8340.
(3)
All UST systems with impressed cathodic protection
systems must be: (A) inspected every
sixty (60) days to ensure the equipment is running according to manufacturer’s
specifications; and (B) tested within six (6) months of installation and at
least every three (3) years thereafter.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent failed to provide corrosion protection for the steel UST system at
the Site. Specifically, Respondent failed
to conduct the required inspections and testing for the impressed cathodic
protection system.
9.
In recognition of the settlement reached,
Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this
Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This Agreed Order shall be effective
(“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s
delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent shall comply with the statutes,
rules, and/or permit conditions listed in the findings above.
3.
Within sixty (60) days
of the Effective Date, Respondent shall permanently close the underground
storage tanks in accordance with the requirements of 329 IAC 9-6-1, through 329
IAC 9-6-4, including the applicable requirement for corrective action under 329
IAC 9-5-1, through 329 IAC 9-5-8.
4.
At least thirty (30) days
before beginning closure, Respondent shall notify IDEM using the notification
form required by 329 IAC 9-2-2(a), and the office of the state fire marshal of
intent to close the underground storage tanks.
5.
At least seven (7) days prior to scheduled
closure activities, Respondent shall notify IDEM’s
Underground Storage Tank Section to permit an agent of IDEM to view and inspect
the activities performed pursuant to closure of the UST systems.
6.
Within thirty (30) days
of closing the UST system, Respondent shall submit a closure report to IDEM,
which shall include the notification form required by 329 IAC 9-2-2(a).
7.
All submittals required by this Agreed Order,
unless Respondent are notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
|
Trent Lindley, Enforcement Case
Manager |
|
Office of Land Quality |
|
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
|
100 North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
8.
Respondent is assessed
and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Seventeen Thousand Forty Dollars ($17,040.00). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund within thirty (30) days of
the Effective Date; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.
9.
In the event the terms and conditions of the
following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall
pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
|
Order
Paragraph 3 |
$1000 for
late closure |
|
Order
Paragraph 6 |
$200 per
week late |
10.
Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable
no later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written notice
that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due; the 30th
day being the “Due Date”. Complainant
may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a
timely manner of stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s
right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking
additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated
penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against
Respondent for a violation of this Agreed Order; such additional relief
includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including,
but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
11.
Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by
check to the “Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number of this
action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
|
Office of Legal Counsel |
|
IGCN, Room N1307 |
|
100 North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204 |
12.
In the event that the monies due to IDEM
pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or
before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at
the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1. The
interest shall be computed as having accrued from the
Due Date until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. Such interest shall be payable to the Underground
Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner
specified in Paragraph 11, above.
13.
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be
binding upon Respondent and their successors and assigns. Respondent’s
signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully
authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they
represent. No change in ownership,
corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any
way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
14.
In the event that any terms of this Agreed
Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms
shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if
this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
15.
Respondent shall provide a copy of this
Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership
rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
16.
This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of
an existing permit. This Agreed Order,
and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to
this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve
Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable
permits or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
17.
Complainant does not, by its approval of this
Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with
any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions
of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or
regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone
acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties
Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s
efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
18.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or
limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and
hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same
violations specified in the NOV.
19.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM
or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any other
agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action. IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not
be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other
agency or entity.
20.
This Agreed Order shall remain in effect
until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.
|
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Department of
Environmental Management |
|
||||
|
By:
_________________________ |
By: _________________________ |
||||
|
|
Nancy
Johnston, Section Chief |
|
|||
|
|
Enforcement
Section |
Printed:
______________________ |
|||
|
Office of
Land Quality |
|
||||
|
|
Title: ________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Date: __________________ |
Date:
_______________________ |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
By:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Date:
______________________ |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||
|
MANAGEMENT
THIS |
______ |
DAY
OF |
_________________, |
20__. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
For the
Commissioner: |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Signed on
April 14, 2016__ |
||||
|
|
Bruce H Palin |
||||
|
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
||||
|
|
Office of
Land Quality |
||||