|
STATE OF INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||
|
|
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT |
||
|
COUNTY OF MARION |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||
|
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||
|
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
) |
||||
|
|
) |
||||
|
Complainant, |
) |
||||
|
|
) |
||||
|
v. |
) |
Case No. 2015-22903-Q |
|||
|
|
) |
|
|||
|
boyd and
company contruction, llc, |
) |
||||
|
|
) |
||||
|
Respondent. |
) |
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to Indiana Code (IC) 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this
Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained
herein. Respondent's entry into this
Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable,
which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding,
except a proceeding to enforce this order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (Complainant) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC
13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent
is Boyd and Company Construction, LLC (Respondent), which owns the property
located at 1987 Troy Road, in Washington, Daviess County, Indiana (the Site).
3.
IDEM
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action
pursuant to IC 13-30-3.
4.
On
or about July 21, 2013, Respondent commenced construction and/or authorized
construction of a building at the Site.
The construction activity consists of land disturbance, which occurred
in order to complete construction of the building, expansion of an existing
retention pond, and transporting fill material to/from an adjacent farmland,
which Respondent also owns. IDEM assigned
the General Industrial Storm Water Permit No. INR10G738 to the Site, as
required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
Program.
5.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, on August 18, 2015, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via
Certified Mail to Boyd and Company Construction, LLC.
6.
During
an investigation conducted by representatives of IDEM, violations were found,
as described below.
7.
Pursuant
to 327 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 15-5-2(a)(1-3), storm water run-off
associated with construction activity, applies to all persons who do not obtain
an individual NPDES permit under 327 IAC 15-2-6, who meet the general permit
rule applicability requirement under 327 IAC 15-2-3, and are involved in
construction activity, except operations that result in the land disturbance of
less than one (1) acre of total land area as determined under subsection (h)
and are not part of a larger common plan of development or sale.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-2(d)(1-3), the project site owner has responsibilities to
complete a sufficient notice of intent letter (NOI), ensure that a sufficient
construction plan (CP) is completed and submitted in accordance with section 6
of this rule, and ensure compliance with this rule during the construction
activity; and implementation of the construction plan.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-2(d)(4-5), the project site owner has
responsibilities to notify the department with a sufficient notice of
termination letter, and ensure that all persons engaging in construction
activities on a permitted project site comply with the applicable requirements
of this rule and the approved construction plan.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-5, the information set forth in this rule must be submitted by
the project site owner with a complete NOI under this rule.
Pursuant
327 IAC 15-5-6(a), after the project site owner has received notification from
the reviewing agency that the construction plans meet the requirements of the
rule or the review period outlined in subsection (b)(3)
has expired, all NOI information required under 327 IAC 15-5-5 shall be
submitted to the commissioner at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the
initiation of land disturbing activities at the site. A copy of the completed NOI must also be
submitted to all Soil Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs), or other entity
designated by the department, where the land disturbing activities are to
occur. If the NOI is determined to be
deficient, the project site owner must address the deficient items and submit
an NOI to the commissioner, as specified by section 5 of this rule.
Based
on an inspection conducted by Daviess County SWCD staff on December 8, 2014,
and inspections conducted by IDEM’s representative on January 16, 2015, April
30, 2015, and August 31, 2015, it was determined that Respondent failed to
submit the NOI to IDEM prior to initiating additional land disturbing
activities at the Site that were beyond the scope of the original IDEM-approved
construction project, and failed to submit a copy of the NOI to Daviess County
SWCD where the land disturbing activities have occurred, in violation of 327
IAC 15-5-2(d), 327 IAC 15-5-5, and 327 IAC 15-5-6(a).
8.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-6(b)(1), for a project site where the proposed land disturbance
is one (1) acre or more as determined under section 2 of this rule, the
following requirements must be met:
A
construction plan must be submitted according to the following:
A.
Prior
to the initiation of any land disturbing activities.
B.
Sent
to the appropriate SWCD or other entity designated by the department for:
1) Review
and verification that the plan meets the requirements of the rule; or
2) A
single coordinated review in accordance with subsection (d)(3)
if:
AA. The
construction activity will occur in more
than one (1) SWCD; and
BB. The
project site owner has made a request for a single coordinated review.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-6.5(a), for project sites that do not meet the criteria in
subsection (b), the project site owner shall develop a set of construction
plans. Storm water quality measures
included in the plan must achieve the minimum project site requirements
specified in 327 IAC 15-5-7, and must include the information set forth in 327
IAC 15-5-6.5(a).
Based
on an inspection conducted by Daviess County SWCD staff on December 8, 2014,
and inspections conducted by IDEM’s representative on January 16, 2015, April
30, 2015, and August 31, 2015, it was determined that Respondent failed to
develop and submit a CP for the additional construction at the Site beyond the
original scope of the project, and failed to send a CP to Daviess County SWCD
prior to commencing the additional land disturbing activities at the Site, each
in violation of 327 IAC 15-5-6(b)(1) and 327 IAC 15-5-6.5(a).
9.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-6(b)(2), if the CP required by subdivision (1) is determined to
be deficient, the reviewing agency may require modifications, terms, and
conditions as necessary to meet the requirements of the rule. The initiation of construction activity
following notification by the reviewing agency that the plan does not meet the
requirements of the rule is a violation and subject to enforcement action. If notification of a deficient plan is
received after the review period outlined in subdivision (3) and following
commencement of construction activities, the plans must be modified to meet the
requirements of the rule and resubmitted within fourteen (14) days of receipt
of the notification of deficient plans.
Based
on an inspection conducted by Daviess County SWCD staff on December 8, 2014,
and inspections conducted by IDEM’s representative on January 16, 2015, April
30, 2015, and August 31, 2015, it was determined that Respondent initiated land
disturbance prior to any CP submission, and continued to extend the scope and
extent of land disturbing activities following IDEM’s notifications of plan
deficiencies on December 8, 2014, January 16, 2015, April 30, 2015, and August
31, 2015. Therefore, as of August 31,
2015, Respondent had not submitted a CP sufficient to meet the requirements of
the rule, and continued to expand the scope and extent of land disturbance, in
violation of 327 IAC 15-5-6(b)(2).
10.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-7(a), all storm water quality measures and erosion and sediment
controls necessary to comply with this rule must be implemented in accordance
with the CP and sufficient to satisfy 327 IAC 15-5-7(b).
Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b), a
project site owner shall, at least meet the requirements set forth in this
section.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(6), the project site owner shall
post a notice near the main entrance of the project site.
Based
on inspections conducted by IDEM’s representative on June 20, 2014, January 16,
2015, and April 30, 2015, and an inspection conducted by Daviess County SWCD
staff on December 8, 2014, it was observed that Respondent failed to post a
notice near the main entrance of the project Site throughout the construction
activities at the Site, in violation of 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(6).
11.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(1), a project site owner shall,
at least, meet the following requirement:
Sediment-laden water which otherwise would flow from the project site
shall be treated by erosion and sediment control measures appropriate to
minimize sedimentation.
Pursuant to
327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), all surface waters at all times and at all places,
including waters within the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of
being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum
attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use
practices, or other discharges that do any of the following:
A.
Will settle to form putrescent or otherwise
objectionable deposits;
B.
Are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or
deleterious;
C.
Produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or
other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;
D.
Are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic
to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals,
plants, or humans; and
E.
Are in concentrations or combinations that
will cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such
degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the
designated uses.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-2-1, a person may not discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to
discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any
noxious odor either alone or in combination with contaminants from other
sources, into the environment in any form that causes or would cause pollution
that violates or would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission
requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental
management laws.
Based
on inspections conducted by IDEM staff on August 9, 2013, October 16, 2013, and
December 23, 2013, it was observed that Respondent allowed sediment-laden water
to leave the Site on the south and west ends of the Site, which migrated to an
adjacent farm field. Respondent also
allowed sediment to leave the Site from several locations on the north and west
ends of the Site, which migrated to the unnamed tributary of Veale Creek, in violation
of 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(1) and 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), and thus in violation of IC
13-30-2-1.
12.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(2), a project site owner shall, at least, meet the
following requirement: Appropriate
measures shall be implemented to minimize or eliminate wastes or unused
building materials, including garbage, debris, cleaning wastes, wastewater,
concrete truck washout, and other substances from being carried from a project
site by run-off or wind. Identification
of areas where concrete truck washout is permissible must be clearly posted at
appropriate areas of the site. Wastes
and unused building materials shall be managed and disposed of in accordance
with all applicable statutes and regulations.
Based on inspections
conducted by IDEM staff on October 16, 2013, December 23, 2013, March 20, 2014,
and January 16, 2015, Respondent failed to construct a concrete truck washout
at the Site. It was observed that the
concrete leachate had been deposited upon the ground. Respondent failed to construct the concrete
truck washout, failed to contain the concrete leachate, and failed to prevent
it from being deposited upon the ground, all of which are in violation of 327
IAC 15-5-7(b)(2).
13.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(13), collected run-off leaving a
project site must be either discharged directly into a well-defined, stable
receiving channel or diffused and released to adjacent property without causing
an erosion or pollutant problem to the adjacent property owner.
Based
on Site inspections conducted by IDEM and Daviess County SWCD staff from August
9, 2013 through August 31, 2015, it observed that Respondent failed to take
appropriate action to manage run-off and prevent the discharge of pollutants,
principally sediment to an adjacent property.
Respondent left areas without vegetation for more than 15 days at the
south and west ends of the property that caused sediment deposition in culverts
and migration to an adjacent farm field.
In addition, gullies formed along the silt fences positioned on the hill
and provided channel run-off from the slope, silt fences overtopped with
sediment, and the side slopes around the retention basin have not been
protected with stabilization, in violation of 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(13).
14.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(18), a self-monitoring program that includes the following
must be implemented:
A. A trained individual shall perform a
written evaluation of the project site:
(i) By the end of the next business day
following each measurable
storm event; and
(ii) At a minimum of one (1) time per week.
B. The evaluation must:
(i) Address the maintenance of existing storm
water quality measures
to ensure they are functioning properly;
and
(ii) Identify additional measures necessary to
remain in compliance
with all applicable statutes and rules.
C. Written evaluation reports must include:
(i) The name of the individual performing the
evaluation;
(ii) The date of the evaluation;
(iii) Problems identified at the project site;
and
(iv) Details of corrective actions recommended and
completed.
D. All evaluation reports for the project
site must be made available to the
inspecting authority within forty-eight (48)
hours of a request.
During
inspections on August 9, 2013, October 16, 2013, December 23, 2013, March 20,
2014, June 20, 2014, January 16, 2015, April 30, 2015, and August 31, 2015, and
a records review conducted by IDEM staff, it was determined that Respondent
completed its self-monitoring Erosion and Sediment Control Inspection reports
for the project on January 1, 11, 18, and 25, 2014, and February 1, 8, 15, and
22, 2014. Respondent left the Pollution
Control Measure Checklist blank on its Erosion and Sediment Control Inspection
report dated March 1, 2014, and was therefore, deemed incomplete. From on or about July 21, 2013 to August 31,
2015, based on violations noted in Respondent’s inspection reports, Respondent
failed to employ a trained individual that is qualified to implement a
self-monitoring program at the Site in order to meet all of the above
provisions of subdivision (18) of this rule, in violation of 327 IAC
15-5-7(b)(18).
15.
In
recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to
administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (Effective Date) when it is adopted by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate (as evidenced by signature), and the
adopted Agreed Order has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date. In
addition to addressing the violations cited in Paragraphs 7 through 14 of the
Findings of Fact above, this Agreed Order also addresses any additional
violations of these same rules that may have occurred subsequent to the
issuance of the Notice of Violation and prior to the Effective Date.
2.
On
December 4, 2015, IDEM issued the Notice of Sufficiency (Permit No. INR10L087),
which addresses the violations cited in Paragraphs 7 through 9 of the Findings
of Fact above, which is in accordance with 327 IAC 15-5-2(d),
327
IAC 15-5-5, and 327 IAC 15-5-6(a).
3.
Immediately
upon the Effective Date, Respondent shall continue to monitor and maintain corrective
erosion and sediment measures at the Site until all provisions of this Order
have been met, and the Site has been deemed by IDEM to be permanently
stabilized, in accordance with 327 IAC 15-5.
Respondent shall not initiate any further land disturbing
activities at the Site unless Respondent completes the following requirements:
A.
Submit
a complete revised CP, including a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3)
that meets the minimum requirements of 327 IAC 15-5 and addresses current site
conditions, to IDEM, as required by 327 IAC 15-5-5, 327 IAC 15-5-6, 327 IAC
15-5-6.5, and 327 IAC 15-5-7, and
B.
Submit
a complete, revised, and approvable NOI to IDEM that contains all the information
required pursuant to 327 IAC 15-3, 327 IAC 15-4, and 327 IAC 15-5-5.
Respondent
shall implement the erosion and sediment control measures contained in the
approved revised CP for the Site and any other necessary erosion and sediment
control measures.
For
the purposes of this Agreed Order, a CP is defined as a representation of a
project site and all activities associated with the project. The CP includes the location of the project
site, buildings and other infrastructure, grading activities, schedules for
implementation, and other pertinent information related to the project site, as
required by 327 IAC 15-5-6.5. A SWP3 is
a part of the CP, pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-4(5) and 327 IAC 15-5-4(35).
4.
The
revised CP required by Order Paragraph 3.B. shall include a detailed
description of corrective actions that Respondent shall take to ensure
implementation of storm water quality measures for the project Site, and all
measures necessary to adequately prevent the discharge of polluted storm water
run-off. The revised CP shall include
the following:
A.
The
requirements for a CP as identified in 327 IAC 15-5-6.5 and any other
applicable modifications as required by IDEM; and
B.
A
response to all deficiencies noted in previous on-site evaluations, inspection
reports, and comments from past technical reviews provided by IDEM.
5.
Immediately
upon the Effective Date, Respondent shall implement an adequate self-monitoring
program as required by 327 IAC 15-5-7(b)(18), including assuring that a trained
individual performs a written evaluation of the project site at a minimum of
one time per week, and by the end of the next business day following each
measurable storm event, in order to determine whether the erosion and sediment
controls are:
A.
Properly
installed and maintained; and
B.
Adequate
to ensure compliance with the requirements of 327 IAC 15-5-7, and to prevent
sediment from leaving the site and entering, or threatening to enter, waters of
the State.
For
the purposes of this Agreed Order, a “measurable storm event” is defined as a
precipitation event that results in a total measured precipitation accumulation
equal to or greater than 0.5 inches of rainfall.
6.
In
the event that deficiencies are found during the inspections of the Site
conducted pursuant to Order Paragraph 5 above, Respondent shall immediately
take all actions necessary to correct the deficiencies. Such actions may include, but are not
necessarily limited to, correction of any installation inadequacies,
implementation of necessary maintenance actions to ensure proper function of
the control measures, and installation of additional control measures to
address erosion and sediment control site needs as necessary.
7.
Respondent
shall maintain records of the inspections conducted pursuant to Order Paragraph
5 above and corrective actions taken pursuant to Order Paragraph 5 above. Respondent shall make the records available
for inspection and copying by representatives of IDEM, and Daviess County SWCD. The records shall include, but not
necessarily be limited to:
A.
The
date and time of inspection;
B.
The
weather conditions at the time of the inspection;
C.
The
name of the individual conducting the inspection;
D.
A
description of observations made during the inspection, specifically of any
deficiencies that were found; and
E.
A
description of the corrective actions taken as a result of deficiencies found
during the inspection, and the date of completion for the corrective actions.
8.
In
the event the revised NOI, revised CP, and/or supporting information, submitted
in accordance with Order Paragraph 3 above, do not satisfy IDEM requirements
pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-6(b), then Respondent shall revise and resubmit an
additional NOI, CP, and/or supporting information to meet IDEM requirements by
the deadline indicated in IDEM’s notification.
Should the additional revised CP not be complete, or should the
modifications proposed not meet IDEM requirements, Respondent shall be subject
to stipulated penalties, as described in Order Paragraph 17 of this Agreed
Order.
9.
Immediately
upon receipt of verification that the revised CP satisfies IDEM requirements, Respondent
shall implement the erosion and sediment control measures contained in the
revised CP for the Site and any other erosion and sediment control measures
necessary to:
A.
Ensure
compliance with the requirements of 327 IAC 15-5-7 and 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), and
B.
Prevent
sediment from leaving the site and entering or threatening to enter waters of
the State.
All
measures shall be properly constructed, adequately sized and located to manage run-off,
and to prevent off-site sedimentation or discharges of other pollutants from
the site. This effort should include
sediment basins and sediment traps as identified in the on-site evaluations in
accordance with the CP, and the methods outlined in the Indiana Storm Water
Quality Manual. This manual is currently
available from the IDEM Storm Water Program and can be accessed via the
internet at http://www.in.gov/idem/4899.htm. Respondent will be deemed to have satisfied
the requirements of this paragraph when IDEM verifies that adequate storm water
management principles and erosion and sediment control measures have been
implemented and Respondent has no “unsatisfactory” inspection ratings
from IDEM or the local SWCD for one (1) year or until the project termination
conditions of 327 IAC 15-5-8 have been met at the Site and a notice of
termination letter has been submitted and accepted.
10.
Within
15 days of receipt of verification that the revised CP satisfies IDEM
requirements, Respondent shall provide written notification to all parties with
access to the Site, including contractors and subcontractors, of the
requirements contained in the CP.
11.
Within
30 days of receipt of verification that the revised CP satisfies IDEM
requirements, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a copy of the notification
required pursuant to Order Paragraph 10 above and a statement certifying that
the notification was provided to all parties with access to the Site.
12.
Within
10 days of the completion of the milestone dates above, Respondent shall submit
documentation of completion of each milestone to IDEM’s Office of Enforcement
at the address in Order Paragraph 15.
13.
The
requirements of Order Paragraphs 3 through 12 above shall remain in effect
until:
A.
Respondent
submits the Notice of Termination (NOT) letter of construction activity,
pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-11 for the Site, and
B.
A
representative of IDEM approves the adequacy of the remaining permanent storm
water measures, in accordance with 327 IAC 15-5-8(b).
14.
The
above noted plan(s) are subject to IDEM review and a determination of adequacy. In the event IDEM determines that any plan
submitted by Respondent is deficient or otherwise unacceptable, Respondent
shall revise and resubmit the plan to IDEM in accordance with IDEM’s notice. Respondent shall not commence any work until
IDEM determines the plan(s) meet the minimum requirements of 327 IAC 15-5.
Upon
receipt of written notification from IDEM, Respondent shall immediately
implement the plan(s) and adhere to the milestone dates therein. The final plan(s) shall be incorporated into
the Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof. Failure by Respondent to submit any plan by
the specified date, or to meet any of the milestones in the final plan, will
subject Respondent to stipulated penalties as described below.
15.
All
submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified
otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
|
Aletha
Lenahan, Enforcement Case Manager |
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Surface
Water, Operations & Enforcement Branch |
|
Office
of Water Quality – Mail Code 60-02W |
|
100
North Senate Avenue, Room 1255 |
|
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
16.
Respondent
is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Thirty-Five Thousand, Two Hundred
Dollars ($35,200). The first payment of
Four Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars ($4,400) shall be due and payable to the
“Environmental Management Special Fund” within 30 days of the Effective Date,
the 30th day being a “Due Date.”
The remaining seven (7) equal and consecutive payments of Four Thousand,
Four Hundred Dollars ($4,400) shall be made by the 10th day of each
of the seven (7) remaining months that follow the initial payment. Interest shall accrue on any amount past due
under this schedule or remaining after the eight (8)-month payment period at a
rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101. The
interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
17.
In
the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, IDEM
may assess and Respondent shall pay the corresponding stipulated penalty:
|
Paragraph |
Violation |
Stipulated Penalty |
|
3 |
Failure
to monitor and maintain corrective erosion and sediment measures until the
Site has been deemed by IDEM to be permanently stabilized. |
$500
per violation |
|
3 |
Failure
to submit a NOI and revised CP, as required prior to commencing further land
disturbing activities at the Site. |
$500
per week late, or part thereof |
|
4 |
Failure
to implement the revised CP and/or take appropriate corrective action,
including the selection and implementation of additional/alternative erosion
and sediment control measures beyond those specified in the SWP3 necessary to
adequately prevent the discharge of polluted storm water run-off. |
$250
per violation |
|
5 |
Failure
to implement an adequate self-monitoring program. |
$250
per violation |
|
6 |
Failure
to take all actions necessary to correct deficiencies noted during Site inspections. |
$500
per violation |
|
7 |
Failure
to maintain required records at the Site, and/or failure to make required
records available to IDEM and Daviess County SWCD. |
$500
per violation |
|
8 |
Failure
to timely submit an additional NOI, CP and/or supporting documentation to
IDEM’s requirements. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof |
|
9 |
Failure
to timely implement the erosion and sediment control measures contained in
the revised CP for the Site and any other erosion and sediment control
measures necessary to comply with the rule. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof |
|
9 |
Unsatisfactory
rating for erosion and sediment control measures during inspections conducted
by IDEM and/or Daviess County SWCD. |
$250
per violation |
|
11 |
Failure
to timely submit certification statement and copy of notice provided pursuant
to Order Paragraph 10 to IDEM. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof |
|
12 |
Failure
to submit documentation of completion of milestones to IDEM, within the
required time period. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof |
|
13 |
Failure
to timely submit NOT letter to IDEM, as required. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof |
|
14 |
Failure
to implement the plan(s) and/or adhere to the milestone dates. |
$250
per violation |
18.
Stipulated
penalties shall be due and payable no
later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written
notice that IDEM has determined a stipulated penalty is due, the 30th day being a “Due
Date.” IDEM may notify Respondent at any
time that a stipulated penalty is due.
Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a timely manner of a
stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive IDEM’s right to collect such
stipulated penalty or preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief against
Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.
Neither assessment nor payment
of stipulated penalties shall preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief against Respondent for a violation of this Agreed Order. Such
additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including,
but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
19.
Civil
and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management
Special Fund.” Checks shall include the
Case Number 2015-22903-Q of this action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Cashier
– Mail Code 50-10C |
|
100
North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
20.
This
Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors
and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to
this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed
Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or
partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or
responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
21.
In
the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not
paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid
balance and any accrued interest at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1. The interest shall be computed as having
accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid
balance. The interest shall continue to
accrue on the first of each month until the civil penalty and any interest
accrued are paid in full. Such interest
shall be payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable
to IDEM in the manner specified above.
22.
In
the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
23.
Respondent
shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent
owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
24.
This
Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a
modification of an existing permit. This
Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent
pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its
obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
25.
Complainant
does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that
Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in
compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation.
Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable
for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s
efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
26.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties
or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the Notice of Violation.
27.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM [or anyone acting on its behalf] from
communicating with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)
or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement
action. IDEM or anyone acting on its
behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur
as a result of such communications with US EPA or any other agency or entity.
28.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all
terms and conditions of this Agreed Order and IDEM issues a Resolution of Case
(Case Close Out) letter to Respondent.
REMAINDER OF
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
|
|
Department of Environmental
Management |
Boyd and Company Construction, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: ____________________________ |
By:_________________________ |
|
|
Brian
Wolf, Branch Chief |
|
|
|
Surface
Water, Operations & |
Printed:______________________ |
|
|
Enforcement
Branch |
|
|
|
Office
of Water Quality |
Title:________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:___________________________ |
Date: _______________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:_________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT THIS ______
DAY OF ________________________, 20___. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Commissioner: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed on June 27, 2016 |
|
|
|
Martha
Clark Mettler |
|
|
|
Assistant Commissioner |
|
|
|
Office of Water Quality |
|