|
STATE OF
INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
|
) |
|
|
||||
|
COUNTY OF
MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
|
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
v. |
|
) |
Case Nos.
2013-21493-H |
|||
|
|
|
) |
&
2013-21502-S |
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
NX ENTERPRISES, INC., |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does
not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order
shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which
Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except
a proceeding to enforce this order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is the Commissioner
(“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”),
a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent is NX Enterprises, Inc.
(“Respondent”), who owns/operates a storage warehouse and plastic grinding
facility located at 2839 County Road 72, in Auburn, DeKalb County, Indiana (the
“Site”).
3.
IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and
the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a
Notice of Violation (NOV) via Certified Mail to:
|
Robert
Owen Vegeler, Registered Agent |
Marcia A.
Nix, President |
|
NX
Enterprises, Inc. |
NX
Enterprises, Inc. |
|
110 W.
Berry St., Suite 1200 |
10620
Monte Vista Court |
|
Fort
Wayne, IN 46802 |
Fort
Wayne, IN 46809 |
5.
329 Indiana Administrative Code (“IAC”) 3.1
incorporates certain federal hazardous waste management requirements found in
40 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Parts 260 through 270 and Part 273,
including those identified below.
6.
During an investigation including an
inspection on February 7, 2013, conducted by a representative of IDEM, the
following violations were found:
a.
Pursuant to 326 IAC 4-1-2, open burning is prohibited unless exempted by rule or an approval is
obtained.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent had a 30 yard roll off container full of burned waste and ash from
open burning at the Site in violation of 326 IAC 4-1.
b.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.11, a person who
generates a solid waste, as defined in 40 CFR 261.2, must determine if that
waste is hazardous.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent did not make a hazardous waste determination on the fluorescent
bulbs the facility generates from bulk replacement.
c.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-2-181, “storage” means
the retention, containment, or accumulation of solid waste on a temporary basis
in such a manner that it does not threaten or potentially threaten human health
or impact or potentially impact the environment, for a period of more than
twenty-four (24) hours, in such a manner as not to constitute disposal of the
waste. It must be a rebuttable presumption
that storage of waste for more than six (6) months constitutes disposal.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent stored ground plastic chips, various material brought on site for
grinding and dust collector fines from grinding plastics and rubber for greater
than six (6) months and did not rebut the presumption that the storage
constituted disposal. During the inspection a facility representative stated
that the facility sold some fines approximately 1.5 years ago; however, the
documentation was not available at the time of the inspection. During a previous inspection conducted on
December 12, 2012, a facility representative stated that the fines had not been
disposed or sold since they began grinding operations in approximately 2003. The fines, ground chips, and other waste brought
on site for grinding had been stored in the East and Center Building for more
than 5 years.
d.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-3-1(9), the final
disposal of solid waste in surface impoundments at the end of their operation
is subject to approval by the commissioner.
As
noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to properly close two (2)
surface impoundments that contained water at the facility.
e.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-4-2, no person shall
cause or allow the storage, containment, processing, or disposal of solid waste
in a manner which creates a threat to human health or the environment,
including the creating of a fire hazard, vector attraction, air or water
pollution, or other contamination.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent caused and/or allowed solid waste, including, but not limited to
pallets, roofing shingles, demolition debris and waste tires to be disposed at
the Site in a manner which creates a threat to human health or the environment.
f.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-4-3, open dumping and open dumps, as those
terms are defined in IC 13-11-2-146 and IC
13-11-2-147, are prohibited.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent caused and/or allowed pallets, roofing shingles, demolition debris
and waste tires, to be open dumped at the Site.
g.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 11-9-1(a), unless
excluded in 329 IAC 11-3, any person who constructs or operates a solid waste
processing facility as defined under 329 IAC 11-2-43
shall have a solid waste processing facility permit under this article.
As
noted during the inspection, Respondent was processing solid waste including
various types of plastics and rubber at the Site without a valid solid waste
processing facility permit.
h.
Pursuant to 329 IAC 13-4-3(d), generators
must label all used oil containers and aboveground tanks with the words “Used
Oil.”
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent did not label two containers of used oil and 5-55 gallon drums of
used oil containers with the words “Used Oil.”
i.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(4), no person shall
deposit or cause or allow the deposit of contaminants or solid waste upon the
land, except through the use of sanitary landfills, incineration, composting,
garbage grinding, or another method acceptable to the solid waste management
board.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent deposited or caused and/or allowed the deposit of contaminants
and/or solid waste, including, but not limited to, wash water from pallet,
tray, and tote cleaning to be discharged from a pipe onto the ground outside
the Center Building, in a method which has not been determined by the solid
waste management board to be acceptable.
The discharge flows northwest and west down slope from the building
toward a wetland area and a lagoon which discharges through drainage pipes
under the road along the west side of the facility to a nearby ditch. Respondent also washes engine parts,
forklifts and bobcats in another room in the Center Building and has allowed
the wash water to be released to floor drains that
lead outside to a ditch.
7.
During a record review on April 15, 2013,
conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following violation was found:
a.
Pursuant to IC 13-20-14-4(a), A source of
waste tires shall dispose of waste tires in the source’s possession by one (1)
or more of the following means:
(1)
Delivery to a wholesaler or to an agent of a
wholesaler.
(2)
Delivery to a manufacturer of tires.
(3)
Delivery to a facility that retreads tires.
(4)
Delivery to a permitted final disposal
facility regulated under environmental management laws.
(5)
Delivery to a registered waste tire storage
site.
(6)
Delivery to a registered waste tire
processing operation.
(7)
Collection by a registered waste tire
transporter.
Respondent submitted documentation for
the disposal of waste tires that were at the Site. The tires were taken to a business for disposal
that was not a wholesaler or an agent of a wholesaler, a manufacturer of tires,
a facility that retreads tires, a permitted final
disposal facility regulated under environmental management laws, a registered
waste tire storage site, a registered waste tire processing operation, or
collected by a registered waste tire transporter.
8.
Respondent submitted documentation regarding
a hazardous waste determination the facility made on the fluorescent bulbs the
facility generates. Respondent will
treat both their “green lights” and “hazardous lamps” as hazardous and recycle
the bulbs.
9.
Respondent submitted documentation after the
February 7, 2013, inspection that showed the drums had been
labeled and were picked up by Crystal Clean the next day. The 5-55 gallon drums of used oil had been transported to Crystal Clean on February 8, 2013.
10.
On August 1, 2013, Respondent submitted
documentation that the roofing shingles, trash, demolition debris, plastic, ash
and tires have been removed from the Site and disposed of at
a permitted solid waste management facility. The pallets were sold
to a recycling facility.
11.
In recognition of the settlement reached,
Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this
Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This Agreed Order shall be effective
(“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s
delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent shall not cause and/or allow the
deposit of any regulated solid waste at the Site, and/or operate a solid waste
disposal or processing facility unless permitted under 329 IAC 10 or 329 IAC
11.
3.
Upon the Effective Date, Respondent shall
comply with IC 13-30-2-1(1).
Specifically, Respondent shall cease allowing wash water from pallet,
tray, and tote cleaning to be discharged from a pipe
onto the ground outside the Center Building toward a wetland area and lagoon
which discharges through drainage pipes to a nearby ditch, allowing the release
of contaminants into the environment.
4.
Within ninety (90) days of the Effective
Date, Respondent shall submit a plan for proper closure of the two (2) surface
impoundments that contain water at the facility, which shall include an
implementation and completion schedule.
All questions regarding surface impoundments shall be
directed to Mr. John Hale at 317/232-8871.
5.
All written correspondence required by Order
paragraph 4 above, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM,
shall be sent to:
|
John Hale,
Senior Environmental Manager |
|
Office of
Land Quality |
|
Solid
Waste Permits |
|
Mail Code
65-45, IGCN 1101 |
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
100 North
Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
6.
Upon the Effective Date of this Agreed Order,
Respondent shall comply with 326 IAC 4-1-2.
Specifically, Respondent shall cease open burning at the Site.
7.
Upon the Effective Date of This Agreed Order,
Respondent shall comply with IC 13-20-14-4(a).
Specifically, Respondent shall dispose of waste tires in its position by
one or more of the means allowed in accordance with IC 13-20-14-4(a).
8.
All submittals required by this Agreed Order,
other than Order paragraph 4, and unless Respondent is notified otherwise in
writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
|
Janet Arnold, Technical
Environmental Specialist |
|
Office of Land Quality – Mail Code
60-02L |
|
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
|
100 North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
9.
Respondent is assessed
and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Zero Dollars ($0). This penalty reflects a significant reduction
from the original proposed civil penalty based upon evidence submitted to IDEM
by Respondent which adequately demonstrated Respondent’s inability to pay the original proposed
civil penalty.
10.
In the event the terms and conditions of the
following paragraph is violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall
pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
|
Failure
to comply with Order Paragraph 4 |
$500 per
week |
11.
Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable
no later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written notice
that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due; the 30th
day being the “Due Date”. Complainant
may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a
timely manner of stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s
right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking
additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated
penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against
Respondent for a violation of this Agreed Order; such additional relief
includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law,
including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
12.
Stipulated penalties are payable by check to
the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”
Check shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed
to:
|
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
|
Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C |
|
100 North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
13.
In the event that the monies due to IDEM
pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before
their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate
established by IC 24-4.6-1. The interest
shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date
until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. Such interest shall be payable to the
Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the
manner specified in Paragraph 12, above.
14.
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be
binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order
certify that they are fully authorized to execute this
Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or
partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or
responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
15.
In the event that any terms of this Agreed
Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms
shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if
this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
16.
Respondent shall provide a copy of this
Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership
rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
17.
This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of
an existing permit. This Agreed Order,
and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this
Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to
comply with the requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable
Federal or State law or regulation.
18.
Complainant does not, by its approval of this
Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with
any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions
of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or
regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone
acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to
comply with this Agreed Order.
19.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or
limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and
hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations
specified in the NOV.
20.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any
other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement
action. IDEM or anyone acting on its
behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or
penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA
or any other agency or entity.
21.
This Agreed Order shall remain in effect
until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.
|
TECHNICAL
RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
Department of
Environmental Management |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
By:
_________________________ |
By: _________________________ |
||||
|
|
Nancy
Johnston, Section Chief |
|
|||
|
|
Enforcement
Section |
|
|||
|
Office of
Land Quality |
Title:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Date: __________________ |
Date:
_______________________ |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
By:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Date:
______________________ |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||
|
MANAGEMENT
THIS |
______ |
DAY
OF |
_______________, |
20__. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
For the
Commissioner: |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Signed May
13, 2014_ |
||||
|
|
Bruce H Palin |
||||
|
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
||||
|
|
Office of
Land Quality |
||||