|
STATE OF INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
|
) |
|
|
||||
|
COUNTY OF MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
|
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No. 2012-21122-S |
|||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
M G food
mart 2 llc, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED
ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does
not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order
shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent
may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a
proceeding to enforce this order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana
Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2. Respondent is Luke Oil Co., Inc., which
owns and/or operates an Underground Storage Tank (“UST”) system with UST
Facility ID Number 10935, located at 2 West US Route 6 in Valparaiso, Porter
County, Indiana (the “Site”).
3. IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties
and the subject matter of this action.
4. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a
Notice of Violation (“NOV”) via Certified Mail to:
|
Thomas M. Collins, President and Registered Agent |
|
Luke Oil Co., Inc. |
|
3592 North Hobart Road |
|
Hobart, IN
46342 |
5. According to the Porter County tax
records, Respondent is listed as the current owner of the Site which is no
longer active. Records indicate that
Respondent has owned the property since June 29, 2001.
6. On February 25, 2007, IDEM received a
report that a release had occurred during UST closure activities at the Site
conducted on February 17, 2007. The
release was assigned LUST incident number 200709514.
7. According to IDEM records, two (2)
gasoline tanks (one 6,000 gallon and one 10,000 gallon) were removed in
2007. IDEM records indicate that two (2)
additional gasoline tanks (both 2,000 gallon) were included on a notification
form from 1995 and again noted in a 2002 inspection. However, IDEM has no records indicating that
the two 2000-gallon tanks have been removed from the Site.
8. Despite multiple requests by IDEM for
Respondent to submit an adequate Initial Site Characterization (“ISC”), a
complete and adequate ISC was not submitted to IDEM. IDEM’s requests for Respondent to submit a
Further Site Investigation (“FSI”) had gone unanswered until after the Notice
of Violation was issued.
9. During an investigation including a record
review on August 15, 2012, conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following
violations were found:
a. Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-5-5.1(a) and (b),
upon detection of a release from a tank or UST system, an owner and operator
shall conduct an initial site characterization according to the requirements of
the rule and shall submit the report to IDEM within sixty (60) days of release
confirmation.
As noted during the
record review, after the reported release, Respondent failed to submit a
complete and adequate ISC report despite numerous request letters from
IDEM. An ISC report was submitted to
IDEM on January 11, 2010. That ISC
report was deemed inadequate.
b. Pursuant to 329 IAC 9-5-6, in order to
determine the full extent and location of soils contaminated by the release and
the presence and concentrations of dissolved product as a contaminant of the
ground water, the owner and operator shall conduct a further site investigation
of the release, the release site, and the surrounding area possibly affected by
the release if the following, but not limited to, condition exists:
(1)
Information
collected and submitted under section 5.1 of this rule is incomplete or fails
to define the nature and extent of contamination in the soil or ground water.
As noted during the
record review, Respondent’s ISC report was incomplete and/or failed to define
the nature and extent of contamination in the soil or ground water, but
Respondent failed to respond to IDEM’s request for an FSI despite multiple
requests from IDEM.
10. Sampling results submitted by Respondent’s
consultant indicates that the soil and possibly the groundwater have been
impacted by operations at the Site.
11. The parties met via teleconference on
November 15, 2012 to discuss this matter.
At that time, Respondent stated that a Further Site Investigation Report
would be submitted the next day. The
report was received by IDEM on November 16, 2012. Initial review of the report indicates that
further site investigation is needed to adequately delineate the extent of
contamination.
12. In recognition of the settlement reached,
Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this
Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent
shall comply with the rules listed in the findings here and/or above at issue.
3. Within sixty (60) days of the Effective
Date, Respondent shall submit a Further Site Investigation Plan (“FSIP”) to
IDEM setting forth in detail the actions Respondent shall take to complete and
submit an FSI that meets the requirements of 329 IAC 9-5-6. The FSIP shall be subject to review,
modification and approval by IDEM. The
FSIP must be approved by IDEM prior to implementation. In the even IDEM determines that the FSIP
submitted by Respondent is deficient or otherwise unacceptable, Respondent
shall revise and resubmit the FSIP to IDEM in accordance with IDEM’s
notice. Upon notification of
deficiencies in the FSIP, Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days to revise and
resubmit a FSIP to IDEM which addresses the deficiencies. After three (3) submissions of the FSIP by
Respondent, IDEM may modify and approve any such FSIP, and Respondent must
implement the FSIP as modified by IDEM.
The approved FSIP shall be incorporated into the Agreed Order and shall
be deemed an enforceable part thereof.
4. Upon IDEM approval of the FSIP,
Respondent shall implement the approved FSIP in accordance with the schedule
contained therein and submit the results of the FSI to IDEM. Respondent shall submit and implement
additional FSI plans at IDEM’s request if IDEM determines that further site
investigation is needed to adequately delineate the extent of contamination.
5. Respondent shall, within sixty (60)
days of receiving written notice from IDEM, submit a Corrective Action Plan
(“CAP”) as described in 329 IAC 9-5-7.
The CAP shall be subject to review, modification and approval by
IDEM. In the event IDEM determines that
the CAP submitted by Respondent is deficient or otherwise unacceptable,
Respondent shall revise and resubmit the CAP to IDEM in accordance with IDEM’s
notice. Upon notification of
deficiencies in the CAP, Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days to revise and
resubmit a CAP to IDEM which addresses the deficiencies. After three (3) submissions of the CAP by
Respondent, IDEM may modify and approve any such CAP, and Respondent must
implement the CAP as modified by IDEM.
The approved CAP shall be incorporated into this Agreed Order and shall
be deemed an enforceable part thereof.
6. Upon IDEM approval of the CAP,
Respondent shall implement the approved CAP in accordance with the schedule
contained therein.
7. Respondent shall apply for and obtain
all necessary permits pertaining to testing and remediation on-site and
off-site prior to any remediation activities being performed.
8. Respondent shall permit an agent of
IDEM to view and inspect the activities performed pursuant to the approved FSIP
and/or CAP. In order to facilitate such
an inspection, Respondent shall notify IDEM’s Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Section at least seven (7) days prior to any scheduled events.
9. Within twenty (20) days of the
Effective Date, Respondent shall provide information to IDEM detailing the
status (including any closure, removal records) of the two (2) 2000-gallon
tanks which were included on a notification form from 1995 and again noted in a
2002 inspection.
10. All submittals required by this Agreed
Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be
sent to:
|
Brenda
Lepter, Enforcement Case Manager |
|
Office
of Land Quality – Mail Code 60-02L |
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
100
North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
11. Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay
a civil penalty of Seven Thousand Forty Three Dollars ($7,043). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund in four quarterly
installments of $1,760.75 each. The
first installment will be due within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date;
the second installment shall be due on or before April 30, 2013; the third
installment shall be due on or before July 31, 2013; and the final installment
shall be due on or before October 31, 2013.
12. In the event the terms and conditions of
the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent
shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
|
Failure to comply
with Order paragraph no. 3 |
$500 per week |
|
|
|
|
Failure to comply
with Order paragraph no. 4 |
$500 per week |
|
|
|
|
Failure to comply
with Order paragraph no. 5 |
$500 per week |
|
|
|
|
Failure to comply
with Order paragraph no. 6 |
$500 per week |
|
|
|
|
Failure to comply
with Order paragraph no. 7 |
$500 per week |
|
|
|
|
Failure to comply
with Order paragraph no. 8 |
$500 per week |
13. Stipulated penalties shall be due and
payable no later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written
notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due; the 30th
day being the “Due Date”. Complainant
may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a
timely manner of stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s
right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking
additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated
penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against Respondent
for a violation of this Agreed Order; such additional relief includes any
remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not
limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
14. Civil
and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the Underground Petroleum
Storage Tank Trust Fund. Checks shall
include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Cashier
– Mail Code 50-10C |
|
100
North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
15. In the event that the monies due to IDEM
pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1. The interest shall be
computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent pays
any unpaid balance. Such interest shall
be payable to the Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund, and shall be
payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 14, above.
16. This Agreed Order shall apply to and be
binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order
certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally
bind the party they represent. No change
in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way
alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
17. In the event that any terms of this Agreed
Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force
and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not
contain the invalid terms.
18. Respondent shall provide a copy of this
Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership
rights are transferred. Respondent shall
ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this
Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
19. This
Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a
modification of an existing permit. This
Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent
pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its
obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permits or any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
20. Complainant
does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner
that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result
in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable
Federal or State law or regulation.
Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held
liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of
Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
21. Nothing in
this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or
injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.
22. Nothing in
this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from
communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters
relating to this enforcement action.
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with
the EPA or any other agency or entity.
23. This Agreed Order shall remain in effect
until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.
|
TECHN ICAL
RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
Department of
Environmental Management |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
By:
_________________________ |
By: _________________________ |
||||
|
|
Nancy
Johnston, Section Chief |
|
|||
|
|
Enforcement
Section |
Printed:
______________________ |
|||
|
Office of
Land Quality |
|
||||
|
|
Title:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Date: __________________ |
Date:
_______________________ |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
By:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Date:
______________________ |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||
|
MANAGEMENT
THIS |
_____ |
DAY
OF |
______________, |
20__. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
For the Commissioner: |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Signed on 2/6/2013 |
||||
|
|
Bruce
H Palin |
||||
|
|
Assistant Commissioner |
||||
|
|
Office of Land Quality |
||||