|
STATE OF
INDIANA |
) |
|
BEFORE THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT |
||
|
|
|||||
|
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT Complainant, v. TDY
INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a ATI
CASTING SERVICE,, Respondent. |
) |
2014-22375-A |
|||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does
not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order
shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which
Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except
a proceeding to enforce this order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana
Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent
is TDY Industries, LLC, d/b/a ATI Casting Service (“Respondent”), which
owns/operates the stationary gray and ductile iron foundry with Plant ID No. 091-00018,
located at 300 Philadelphia Street, in La Porte, La Porte County, Indiana
(“Site”).
3.
IDEM
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) on July 12, 2013 via
Certified Mail to:
|
Mr.
Joe Walker, President |
CT Corporation System, Registered Agent |
|
Casting
Service 300
Philadelphia Street La
Porte, IN 46360 |
251 E. Ohio Street Suite 1100 |
5.
On
May 8, 2014, IDEM issued an Enforcement Action Letter to Respondent, which
listed additional violations.
6.
On
August 7, 2014, Respondent submitted a signed NOV Waiver to IDEM. The submittal
of this document by Respondent waives issuance of an additional Notice of
Violation and the settlement period of sixty (60) days as provided for by IC
13-30-3-3, for the violations listed in the Enforcement Action Letter, as well
as violations reported by Respondent in the NOV Waiver.
7.
During
an investigation conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following
violations were found:
a. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1 (k) and 326 IAC
2-2 (PSD BACT Limit), Respondent is required to limit Particulate Matter (PM)
emissions from the Cleaning and Grinding Operations, Process P13 (Dust
Collector C15) to 0.012 lb/ton of metal throughput.
Stack testing performed by Respondent on July 7, 2011, demonstrated a measured
PM emission rate for the Cleaning and Grinding Operations, Process P13 (Dust
Collector C15) of 0.039 lb/ton of metal throughput, in violation of Part 70
Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(k) and 326 IAC 2-2 (PSD
BACT Limit).
b. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.6(e), Respondent
is required to determine compliance with the PM10 emission limit for
the Cleaning and Grinding Operations, Process P13 (Dust Collector C.15), within
one hundred eighty (180) days after issuance of this permit.
Respondent
failed to perform a valid PM10 emission limit test of the Cleaning and
Grinding Operations, Process P13 (Dust Collector C15) within one hundred eighty
(180) days after issuance of this permit, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T
091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.6(e).
c. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: C.15(b), Respondent is
required to perform a retest to demonstrate compliance no later than one
hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the test.
Respondent
failed to perform a retest of the Cleaning and Grinding Operations, Process P13
(Dust Collector C15) within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date of the
initial test, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition
No.: C.15 (b).
d. Retesting
performed by Respondent on May 23, 2013, demonstrated a measured PM emission
rate for the Cleaning and Grinding Operations, Process P13 (Dust Collector C15)
of 0.032 lb/ton of metal throughput, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T
091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(k) and 326 IAC 2-2 (PSD BACT Limit).
e. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(l) and 326 IAC
2-2 (PSD BACT Limit), Respondent is required to limit Particulate Matter less than ten microns (PM10)
emissions from the Cleaning and Grinding Operations, Process P13 (Dust Collector
C15) to 0.013 lb/ton of metal throughput.
Stack
testing performed by Respondent on May 23, 2013, demonstrated a measured PM10
emission rate for the Cleaning and Grinding Operations, Process P13 (Dust
Collector C15) of 0.056 lb/ton of metal throughput, in violation of Part 70
Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(l) and 326 IAC 2-2 (PSD
BACT Limit).
f. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: C.15(b), Respondent is
required to perform a retest to demonstrate compliance no later than one
hundred eighty (180) days after the date of a non-compliant test.
Respondent
failed to perform a retest within one hundred eighty (180) days of the
non-compliant May 23, 2013 test for the Cleaning and Grinding Operations,
Process P13 (Dust Collector C15), in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T091-29549-00018,
Condition No.: C.15(b).
g. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1 (r) and 326 IAC
2-2 (PSD BACT Limit), Respondent is required to limit Particulate Matter less than ten microns (PM10)
emissions from the Thermal Sand Reclaim System, Process P11 (Dust Collector
C05) to 0.370 lb/ton of sand throughput.
Stack testing performed by Respondent on November 14, 2012, demonstrated a
measured PM10 emission rate for the Thermal Sand Reclaim System,
Process P11 (Dust Collector C05) of 0.867 lb/ton of sand throughput, in
violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(r) and
326 IAC 2-2 (PSD BACT Limit).
h. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.:C.8(c), Respondent is
required to deliver the test report to IDEM, OAQ no later than forty-five (45)
days after the completion of the testing.
The
stack test report for the November 14, 2012 testing was not received by IDEM,
OAQ within forty-five (45) days after completion of the testing; in violation
of Part 70 Permit No.: T
091-29549-00018, Condition No.: C.8(c).
i. Retesting
performed by Respondent on May 21, 2013, demonstrated a measured PM10
emission rate for the Thermal Sand Reclaim System, Process P11 (Dust Collector
C05) of 0.565 lb/ton of sand throughput, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T
091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(r) and 326 IAC 2-2 (PSD BACT Limit).
j. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T091-29549-00018, Condition No.: C.15(a),
when the results of a stack test performed in conformance with Section C –
Performance Testing, of this permit exceed the level specified in any condition
of this permit, Respondent shall submit a description of its response actions
to IDEM, OAQ, no later than seventy-five (75) days after the date of the test.
Respondent
failed to submit a description of its response actions within seventy-five (75)
days to IDEM, OAQ, for the non-compliant stack test of the Thermal Sand Reclaim
System, Process P11 (Dust Collector C05), performed on May 21, 2013, in
violation of Condition No.: C.15(a) of Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018.
k. Pursuant
to Part 70 Permit No.: T 091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1 (q) and 326 IAC
2-2 (PSD BACT Limit), Respondent is required to limit Particulate Matter (PM)
emissions from the Thermal Sand Reclamation System, Process P11 Dust Collector
C05) to 0.412 lb/ton of sand throughput.
Testing
performed by Respondent on March 31, 2014, demonstrated a measured PM emissions
rate for the Thermal Sand Reclaim System, Process P11 (Dust Collector C05) of
1.567 lb/ton of sand throughput, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T
091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(q) and 326 IAC 2-2 (PSD BACT Limit).
l. Retesting
performed by Respondent on March 31, 2014, demonstrated a measured PM10
emission rate for the Thermal Sand Reclaim System, Process P11 (Dust Collector
C05) of 0.66 lb/ton of sand throughput, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T
091-29549-00018, Condition No.: D.2.1(r) and 326 IAC 2-2 (PSD BACT Limit).
m. Respondent
failed to submit a description of its response actions within seventy-five (75)
days to IDEM, OAQ, for the non-compliant stack tests of the Thermal Sand
Reclaim System, Process P11 (Dust Collector C05), performed on March 31, 2014,
in violation of Part 70 Permit No.: T091-29549-00018, Condition No.: C.15(a).
7.
Respondent
reported to IDEM that the ATI Casting Services – La Porte County site will
permanently close by October 1, 2014.
8.
In
recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to
administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This
Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent
shall comply with the statutes, rules, and permit conditions listed in the
findings above at issue.
3.
As
of October 1, 2014, TDY Industries, LLC, d/b/a ATI Casting Service will no
longer operate at 300 Philadelphia Street, in La Porte, La Porte County,
Indiana (Site).
4.
Respondent
is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Fifty-seven Thousand Dollars
($57,000). Said penalty amount shall
be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30)
days of the Effective Date; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.
5.
Civil
penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number of this
action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Office
of Legal Counsel IGCN,
Rm N1307 |
|
100
North Senate Avenue |
|
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
6.
This
Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors
and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they
are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party
they represent. No change in ownership,
corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its
status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
7.
In
the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not
paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid
balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1.
The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until
the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. Such interest shall be payable to the
Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the
manner specified in Paragraph 5, above.
8.
In
the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
9.
Respondent
shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent
owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent
shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work
under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
10.
This
Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a
modification of an existing permit. This
Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent
pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its
obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permits or any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
11.
Complainant
does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner
that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result
in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable
Federal or State law or regulation.
Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held
liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of
Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
12.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties
or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in this Agreed Order.
13.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from
communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters
relating to this enforcement action.
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs
or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the
EPA or any other agency or entity.
14.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all
terms and conditions of this Agreed Order and IDEM issues a Resolution of Case
letter to Respondent.
|
TECHNICAL
RECOMMENDATION: |
|
RESPONDENT: |
|||||
|
Department
of Environmental Management |
|
TDY
Industries, LLC d/b/a ATI Casting Service |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
,
Chief |
|
Printed: |
|
|||
|
|
Compliance
and Enforcement Section |
|
Title: |
|
|||
|
|
Office
of Air Quality |
|
|
|
|||
|
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
COUNSEL
FOR RESPONDENT: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||
|
MANAGEMENT THIS |
|
DAY OF |
|
,
2015. |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
For
the Commissioner |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Signed
on March 18, 2015 |
||||||
|
|
Keith
Baugues, Assistant Commissioner |
||||||
|
|
Office
of Air Quality |
||||||
|
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
||||||