STATE OF INDIANA

)

SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF

 

)

 

 

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT

)

 

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Complainant,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

 

v.

 

)

Case No. 2009-18724-S

 

 

)

 

the indiana rail road company,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Respondent.

 

)

 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order. Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  Respondent is The Indiana Rail Road Company (“Respondent”), which owns and/or operates a railroad including the portion running parallel to CR 525 E. in Dugger, Sullivan County, Indiana (“Site”).

 

3.                  IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) via Certified Mail  to:

 

Thomas G Hoback, President & Registered Agent

The Indiana Rail Road Company

101 W. Ohio Street, Suite 1600

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 

5.                  During an investigation including field response conducted on July 8, 2009 by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

a.         Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7(3), any person who operates, controls, or maintains any mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the state, act as soon as possible, but within two (2) hours of discovery, communicate a spill report to the Department of Environmental Management, Office of Land Quality, Emergency Response Section: Area Code 1-888-233-7745 for in-state calls (toll free), (317) 233-7745 for out-of state calls.  If new or updated spill report information becomes known that indicates a significant increase in the likelihood of damage to the waters of the state, the responsible party shall notify the department as soon as possible but within two (2) hours of the time the new or updated information becomes known.

As noted during the investigation, Respondent failed to report to IDEM within two (2) hours of discovery of the spill of potash to the soil and surface waters of the state.  Twenty one (21) rail cars containing potash derailed on July 7, 2009 resulting in a spill of an undetermined amount of potash. The potash was transported and /or stored by Respondent and shipped by Mosaic Crop Nutrition, LLC.

b.         Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7(1), any person who operates, controls, or maintains any mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the state, contain the spill, if possible, to prevent additional spilled material from entering the waters of the state.

As noted during the investigation, Respondent did not take actions to physically contain the spill until July 9, 2009. However, Respondent did take actions on July 7 and July 8, 2009 to begin coordinating containment measures.

c.         Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7(2), any person who operates, controls, or maintains any   mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the state, undertake or cause others to undertake activities needed to accomplish a spill response.

 

As noted during the investigation, Respondent did not physically undertake activities needed to accomplish a spill response until July 9, 2009. Respondent did take actions on July 7 and July 8, 2009 to organize activities necessary to accomplish spill response.

 

d.         Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), all surface waters at all times and at all places,

including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices or other discharges:

 

(A)       that will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits,

 

(B)       that are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious,

 

(C)       that produce color, odor or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance.

 

(D)       which are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants, humans; and which are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the growth of algae to such degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.

 

As noted during the investigation, Respondent allowed an undetermined amount of potash to be deposited into an unnamed ditch, a wetland and Big Branch Creek, waters of the state.  The origin of the spill was a derailment of twenty one (21) rail cars containing potash which was transported and /or stored by Respondent and shipped by Mosaic Crop Nutrition, LLC.

 

e.         Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-2(1), for all waters of the state, existing beneficial uses shall be maintained and protected.  No degradation of water quality shall be permitted which     would interfere with or become injurious to existing and potential uses.

 

The release of potash caused the degradation of wetland, introduced objectionable deposits, failed to maintain and protect existing beneficial uses, and/or interfered with the existing and potential uses of the wetland at the Site, in violation of IAC 2-1-2(1).

 

6.          In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  Respondent shall comply with 327 IAC 2-6.1-7(3), 327 IAC 2-6.1-7(1), 327 IAC 2-6.1-7(2), 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), 327 IAC 2-1-2(1).

 

3.                  Within ten (10) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a narrative spill report that was previously requested via certified letter and signed for by the Indiana Rail Road Company on August 20, 2009.

 

4.                  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit an After-the Fact Individual 401 Water Quality Certification Application for the proposed project.  This permit application shall encompass all 401 aspects of the clean-up efforts.  A copy of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification application form which includes all list of required information is included as Attachment A.

 

5.                  On September 2, 2009, August Mack Environmental submitted a Ditch Completion Plan on behalf of Respondent.  However, the Ditch Completion was inadequate and must be revised. Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit a revised Ditch Completion Plan which must include two conceptual ditch cross-sections, pre-impacts contours and proposed contours of the proposed alternative ditch line. A plan view drawing showing the general layout of the proposed alternative ditch line shall be submitted. The plan shall be subject to the approval of IDEM.  If IDEM deems the plan to be inadequate, a revised plan shall be submitted within twenty (20) days of receipt of notice from IDEM of the inadequacies thereof.  If after submission of the first revised plan, IDEM still finds the plan to be inadequate, IDEM will request further modification of the plan as necessary to meet requirements, and would require re-submittal of the plan by a specific date.

 

a.                  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit pre and post contours of the proposed stream work, and a description of how and where all materials including excess spoil, and any recovered product will be managed onsite. The proposed stream work and/or the redirection of a tributary of Big Branch Creek shall be subject to the approval of IDNR and/or IDEM.  If the plan is deemed inadequate, a revised plan shall be submitted within twenty (20) days of receipt of notice from IDEM of the inadequacies thereof.  If after submission of the first revised plan, IDNR and/or IDEM still finds the plan to be inadequate, then IDEM will request further modification of the plan as necessary to meet requirements, and would require re-submittal of the plan by a specific date.

 

b.                  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall provide information on the staging area, access points, and the construction limits of the project. All of the proposed remedial projects shall be submitted to IDEM for approval including wetland delineation plan.

 

c.                  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall provide a detailed planting plan for the replacement of the woody riparian corridor along the stream as required by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR).   An approved IDNR’s Woody Riparian Vegetation planting list is included as Attachment B.  The planting plan shall be subject to the approval of IDNR.  If IDNR and/or IDEM deem the plan to be inadequate, a revised plan shall be submitted within twenty (20) days of receipt of notice from IDEM of the inadequacies thereof.  If after submission of the first revised plan, IDNR and/ or IDEM still finds the plan to be inadequate, then IDEM will request further modification of the plan as necessary to meet requirements, and would require re-submittal of the plan by a specific date.  Order paragraph 5(c) herein, shall become null and void if DNR and/or IDEM verify that the recovery of vegetation at the Site is adequate and sustainable.

 

d.                  Respondent shall apply and obtain all applicable permits from IDNR before commencing vegetation replacement.

 

6.                  Following the completion of the proposed east alternative drainage ditch, Respondent shall sample surface water in the east alternative drainage ditch monthly until three (3) consecutive months of sample results demonstrate that chloride levels are below Indiana Water Quality Standards as provided in 327 IAC 2-1-6.

 

7.                  Within fifteen (15) days of obtaining the analytical results required in Order paragraph 6 above, Respondent shall submit said results to IDEM.

 

8.                  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit a plan to IDEM for review which describes sampling, evaluation, and follow-up which will be conducted to ensure that contamination existing in the area west of the ballast does not cause further degradation to the environment and/or discharge contaminants above Indiana Water Quality Standards to Big Branch Creek.

 

9.                  Pursuant to IC 13-25-6-6, Respondent shall reimburse IDEM for the value of time and effort expended in the investigation of the spill event.  IDEM has determined this amount to be Three Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy Six Dollars and Ninety Seven Cents ($3,976.97).  This dollar amount is strictly for the purpose of cost recovery.  Payment shall be made to the Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

10.             All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Emmanuel Chike Okeke, Enforcement Case Manager

Office of Land Quality – Mail Code 60-02L

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

11.             Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Sixteen Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($16,250).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.  In the event that the civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

12.             In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Paragraph

Penalty

 

 

Order # 3  Failure to submit narrative spill report

$250 per day, submittal is late

 

 

Order #4  Failure to submit After-the Fact Individual 401

 

water Quality Certification Application

$100 per day, submittal is late

 

 

Order #5  Failure to submit revised Ditch Completion Plan

$100 per day, submittal is late

 

 

Order #5(a)  Failure to submit post contours of proposed

 

stream work

$100 per day submittal is late

 

 

Order #5(c)  Failure to submit planting plan for the

 

Replacement of the woody riparian corridor

$100 per day, submittal is late

 

 

Order #7  Failure to submit analytical result of chloride

 

levels

$250 per day, submittal is late

 

 

Order #8  Failure to submit a plan describing sampling

 

evaluation, and follow-ups to address

 

Contaminations in the area west of ballast

$250 per day, submittal is late

 

13.             Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due.  Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties shall not preclude Complainant from seeking any additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.  In lieu of any of the stipulated penalties set out above, Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of Respondent’s violation of this Agreed Order or Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

14.             Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

15.             This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

16.             In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

17.             Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.   Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

18.             This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

19.             Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

20.             Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.

 

21.             Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

22.             This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By: _________________________

By:  _________________________

 

Nancy Johnston, Section Chief

 

 

Enforcement Section

Printed: ______________________

Office of Land Quality

 

 

Title: ________________________

 

 

Date: __________________

Date: _______________________

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

For the Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By: ________________________

By: ________________________

 

Deputy Attorney General

 

 

 

Date: _______________________

Date: ______________________

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

______

DAY OF

_________________

, 20

___

.

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed, August 6, 2010__

 

Bruce H Palin

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Land Quality