STATE OF |
) |
|
BEFORE THE INDIANA
DEPARTMENT |
||
|
|||||
COMMISSIONER OF THE
DEPARTMENT Complainant, v. HOOSIER ENERGY REC INC., Respondent. |
) |
|
|||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and Respondent
desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of
any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of
Fact and Order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is
the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of
2.
Respondent is Hoosier
Energy REC (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the Frank E. Ratts Generating
Station, which discharges to the Main Stem of White River under National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit No. IN0004391 (the
“Permit”), and is located at
3.
IDEM has
jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC
13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to Charles
Meier, President, and J. Steven Smith, Registered Agent, Hoosier Energy REC
Inc.
5.
Respondent owns
and operates a 255 megawatt steam electric power plant.
6.
During an
investigation in response to a spill report conducted by a representative of
IDEM on September 15, 2006, the following violations were found:
A. Pursuant to 327 IAC
5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the state as a point source
discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in
conformity with a valid NPDES permit obtained prior to the discharge. On September 15, 2006, Respondent discharged
ash pond water into the Main Stem of White River and surrounding ditches, of a
nature and from a location not authorized by the Permit, in violation of 327
IAC 5-2-2.
B. Pursuant to 327 IAC
2-1-6(a) and Part I. B. of the Permit, all waters at all times and at all
places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being
free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to
municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other
discharges:
(A) that
will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits;
(B) that
are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious;
(C) that
produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as
to create a nuisance;
(D) which
are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or to otherwise severely
injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants, or humans; and
(E) which
are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the
growth of aquatic plants or algae to such degree as to create a nuisance, be
unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.
Respondent
caused or contributed to the contamination of waters of the State by allowing
the release of substances and materials from the ash pond on September 15,
2006, into the Main Stem of White River and surrounding ditches that were
unsightly and deleterious, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a) and Part I. B. of
the Permit.
C. Pursuant
to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or
otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of Indiana; or cause,
permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise
disposed into any waters; any organic or inorganic matter that causes or
contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of
the board adopted under sections 1 and 3 of this chapter.
Respondent
caused or contributed to a polluted condition of waters of the state by the
release from the ash pond on September 15, 2006, into the Main Stem of White
River and surrounding ditches, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-2 and 327 IAC
2-1-6(a), rules of the water pollution control board, in violation of IC
13-18-4-5.
D. Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1,
a person may not discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit,
cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor either alone
or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment in
any form that causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate
rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the
appropriate board under the environmental management laws.
Respondent
released a pollutant into the environment by the discharge from its ash pond on
September 15, 2006, into the Main Stem of White River and surrounding ditches,
in violation of 327 IAC 327 IAC 5-2-2 and 327 IAC 2-1-6(a), rules of the water
pollution control board, in violation of IC 13-30-2-1.
E. Pursuant
to Part II. B. 4 of NPDES permit, removed substances are to be managed in such
a manner as to prevent any pollutants from such from entering waters of the state.
The
events of September 15, 2006, allowed amounts of ash (a removed substance) to
enter waters of the state, in violation of Part II. B. 4 of the NPDES permit.
7. On
August 30, 2007, IDEM and Respondent met to discuss settlement of this
case. At that meeting Respondent
described its actions to date and its future plans for preventing further
breaches of its ash ponds.
8. In
recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to
administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II.
ORDER
1.
This Agreed
Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant
or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent shall
comply with the statutes, rules, and permit conditions listed in the findings
above at issue.
3.
Within thirty (30)
days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall develop and submit to IDEM for
approval a “Compliance Plan” (CP) which identifies actions that Respondent will
take to assure the integrity of its ash pond levees system-wide. Specifically the CP shall include:
·
A description of
steps Respondent has taken or plans to take to properly repair the ash pond(s)
that were damaged in the September 15, 2006 incident.
·
Plans for a
study into the nature and adequacy of ash pond construction techniques employed
by Respondent system-wide.
·
Plans for
routine inspection of ash pond levees system-wide.
·
Plans for
responding to identified needs for improvements to the ash ponds that may be
identified by any of the above actions.
·
A process to
notify IDEM within ten days of completion of each milestone.
The
CP shall include an implementation and completion schedule, including specific
milestone dates.
4.
The CP required
by Paragraph 3 above is subject to IDEM approval. In the event IDEM determines that the CP as
submitted by Respondent is deficient or otherwise unacceptable, Respondent
shall revise and resubmit the plan to IDEM in accordance with IDEM’s
notice. After three submissions of such
plan by Respondent, IDEM may modify and approve the CP and Respondent must
implement the plan as modified by IDEM.
Respondent,
upon receipt of written notification from IDEM, shall immediately implement the
approved CP and adhere to the milestone dates therein. The approved CP shall be incorporated into
the Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof. Failure by Respondent to submit any plan by
the specified date, or to meet any of the milestones in the approved CP will
subject Respondent to stipulated penalties as described below.
5.
Beginning on the
Effective Date and continuing until the completion of the CP provided for by
Paragraphs 3 and 4 above, Respondent shall, at all times, operate its existing wastewater
treatment facilities as efficiently and effectively as possible, and shall be
subject to stipulated penalties for its failure to do so.
6.
All submittals
required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in
writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
Mark
Stanifer, Section Chief |
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
Office
of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02 |
|
|
7.
Respondent is
assessed a civil penalty of Ten Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($10,200). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date. In the event that the
civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall
continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
8.
In the event the
terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may
assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
Paragraph |
Violation |
Stipulated Penalty |
3 |
Failure
to submit the CP within the required time period. |
$500
per week late, or part thereof. |
4 |
Failure to submit additional information or a
revised CP within the required time period. |
$500 per week late, or part thereof. |
4 |
Failure to implement the CP upon |
$500 per week late, or part thereof. |
|
approval or to comply with the milestone dates of
the approved CP. |
|
5 |
Failure to efficiently operate ash ponds during the
term of this Agreed Order. |
$500 per event, per day, or part thereof. |
9.
Stipulated
penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent
receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is
due. Assessment and payment of
stipulated penalties shall not preclude Complainant from seeking any additional
relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. In lieu of any of the stipulated penalties
set out above, Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available
by virtue of Respondent’s violation of this Agreed Order or Indiana law,
including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
10.
Civil and
stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management
Special Fund.” Checks shall include the
Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
Cashier
– Mail Code 50-10C |
|
|
11.
This Agreed
Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and
assigns. Respondent’s signatories to
this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed
Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership
status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities
under this Agreed Order.
12.
In the event
that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining
terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced
as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
13.
Respondent shall
provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or
successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
14.
This Agreed
Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of
an existing permit. This Agreed Order,
and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to
this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to
comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation.
15.
Complainant does
not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that
Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in
compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation. Additionally,
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or
penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply
with this Agreed Order.
16.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or
injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.
17.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from
communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters
relating to this enforcement action.
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a
result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.
18.
This Agreed
Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all terms and
conditions of Order Paragraph Nos. 3 through 10 and IDEM issues a Resolution of
Case letter.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
RESPONDENT: |
|||||
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Hoosier Energy REC, Inc. |
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
Mark W. Stanifer, Chief |
|
Printed: |
|
|||
|
Water Enforcement Section |
|
Title: |
|
|||
|
Office of Enforcement |
|
|
|
|||
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: |
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
|||||
For the Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Deputy Attorney General |
|
|
|
|||
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||
MANAGEMENT THIS |
|
DAY
OF |
|
, 2007. |
|||
|
|||||||
|
For the Commissioner: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Signed on September 26, 2007 |
||||||
|
Robert B. Keene |
||||||
|
Assistant Commissioner |
||||||
|
Office of Legal Counsel and Enforcement |
||||||