|
STATE OF |
) |
|
BEFORE THE INDIANA
DEPARTMENT |
||
|
|
|||||
|
COMMISSIONER OF THE
DEPARTMENT Complainant, v. ELSA, LLC, Respondent. |
) |
|
|||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and Respondent
desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of
any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of
Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC
13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an
admission of any violation contained herein.
Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver
of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future
administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this
order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is
the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of
2.
Respondent is ELSA,
LLC (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the stationary fuel tank and
exhaust systems manufacturing plant with ID No. 095-00048, located at
3.
IDEM has
jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC
13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation on June 5, 2007 via Certified Mail
to:
|
Kiyokazu
Sakamoto, President |
Yasuhiko
Matsuoka, Registered Agent |
|
ELSA
Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Based on an
investigation conducted by representatives of IDEM and the Anderson Office of
Air Management (“AOAM”), the following violations were found:
a.
Pursuant to 326
IAC 8-2-9 and condition D.2.1 of Title V Permit Nos. 095-7668-00048 and
095-16479-00048, no owner or operator of a facility engaged in the surface
coating of miscellaneous metal parts and products may cause, allow, or permit
the discharge into the atmosphere of any volatile organic compounds in excess
of three and five-tenths (3.5) pounds per gallon of coating, excluding water,
delivered to a coating applicator that applies extreme performance coatings.
Based on the ongoing investigation, the Respondent was found to be using a high
performance coating with a VOC content of 4.91 pounds per gallon of coating
from May 2003 through June 2007, in violation of 326 IAC 8-2-9 and condition
D.2.1 of Title V Permit No. 095-7668-00048.
Respondent contends that it believed that its coating was in compliance based
on various communications regarding the proper method for determining VOC
content.
b.
Pursuant to 326 IAC
2-7-10.5(c)(1)(D)(i), any person proposing to make a modification shall submit
an application to the commissioner concerning the modification. Information on the nature and amount of the
pollutant to be emitted, including an estimate of the potential to emit any
regulated air pollutants is needed to assure all reasonable information is
provided to evaluate compliance consistent with the permit terms and
conditions, the underlying requirements of this title and the Clean Air Act
(CAA), the ambient air quality standards set forth in 326 IAC 1-3, or the
prevention of significant deterioration maximum allowable increase under 326
IAC 2-2.
Respondent did not provide the correct VOC calculations or updated 2003 MSDS
for the high performance coating to IDEM in the 2003 permit modification
application, in violation of 326IAC2-7-10.5(c)(1)(D)(i).
Respondent contends that it provided the MSDS that was available to it as of
the time it submitted the application.
c.
Pursuant to
condition D.2.9 of the Significant Title V Permit Modification No. 095-20388-00048
and condition D.2.11 of Title V Permit No. 095-16479-00048, source shall
perform daily inspections to verify the placement, integrity and particle
loading of the filters from the surface coating booth stacks (S14, S15, S16,
S17, S34, S35, S42 and S44).
Based on an inspection on March 9, 2006 and a review of the Respondent’s logs,
it was determined that inspections for stacks S34, S35, S42 and S44 were not
performed from November 2006 through March 9, 2007, in violation of condition D.2.9 of the Significant Title V
Permit Modification No. 095-20388-00048 and condition D.2.11 of Title V Permit
No. 095-16479-00048.
Respondent contends that inspections were performed, but logs were not
maintained.
d.
Pursuant to
condition D.2.10 of the Significant Title V Permit Modification No.
095-20388-00048 and condition D.2.12 of Title V Permit No. 095-16479-00048, to
document compliance with condition D.2.10 of the Significant Title V Permit
Modification No. 095-20388-00048 and condition D.2.12 of Title V Permit No.
095-16479-00048, the Permittee shall maintain a log of daily inspections.
Based on an inspection on March 9, 2006 and a review of the Respondent’s logs,
it was determined that no logs were maintained for stacks S34, S35, S42 and S44
from November 2006 through March 9, 2007, in violation of condition D.2.10 of the Significant Title V
Permit Modification No. 095-20388-00048 and condition D.2.12 of Title V Permit
No. 095-16479-00048.
6.
In recognition
of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and
judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II.
ORDER
1.
This Agreed
Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant
or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent shall
comply with 326 IAC 8, 326 IAC 2, Part 70 Permit No. 095-16479-00048 and any
subsequent permit modifications.
3.
Within Three
Hundred Sixty Five (365) days of the Effective Date of the Agreed Order,
Respondent shall perform its annual compliance audits under its ISO 14000
procedures.
4.
Within Three
Hundred Ninety Five (395) days of the Effective Date of the Agreed Order, Respondent
shall submit an independent ISO 14000 report verifying the compliance of all
coatings utilized in the facility.
5.
All submittals
required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in
writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
|
Matthew
Chaifetz, Enforcement Case Manager |
|
Office
of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02 |
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
|
|
6.
Respondent is
assessed a civil penalty of Seventy Eight Thousand Dollars ($78,000.00). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date. In the event that the
civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall
continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
7.
In the event the
terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may
assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
|
Paragraph |
Violation |
Stipulated
Penalty |
|
3 |
Annual compliance audit under ISO 14000 |
$500 per week or part thereof |
|
4 |
Submission of ISO 14000 report to verify compliant
coatings are utilized |
$500 per week or part thereof |
8.
Stipulated
penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent
receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is
due. Assessment and payment of
stipulated penalties shall not preclude Complainant from seeking any additional
relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. In lieu of any of the stipulated penalties
set out above, Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available
by virtue of Respondent’s violation of this Agreed Order or Indiana law,
including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
9.
Civil and
stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management
Special Fund.” Checks shall include the
Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Cashier
– Mail Code 50-10C |
|
|
|
|
10.
This Agreed
Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and
assigns. Respondent’s signatories to
this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed
Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership
status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under
this Agreed Order.
11.
In the event
that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining
terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced
as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
12.
Respondent shall
provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or
successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
13.
This Agreed
Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of
an existing permit. This Agreed Order,
and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to
this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to
comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation.
14.
Complainant does
not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that
Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in
compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation.
Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held
liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of
Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
15.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or
injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.
16.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from
communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters
relating to this enforcement action.
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with
the EPA or any other agency or entity.
17.
This Agreed
Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to
Respondent.
|
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
RESPONDENT: |
|||||
|
Department of Environmental Management |
|
ELSA, LLC |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
Craig Henry |
|
Printed: |
|
|||
|
|
Chief, Air Section |
|
Title: |
|
|||
|
|
Office of Enforcement |
|
|
|
|||
|
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: |
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
|||||
|
For the Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Deputy Attorney General |
|
|
|
|||
|
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||
|
MANAGEMENT THIS |
|
DAY
OF |
|
, 2008. |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
For the Commissioner: |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Signed on February 29, 2008 |
||||||
|
|
Robert B. Keene |
||||||
|
|
Assistant Commissioner |
||||||
|
|
Office of Legal Counsel and Enforcement |
||||||