STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

PRINCE MINERALS, INC.,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2006-15756-W




 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent (also referred to each as the “Party”) desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Each Party’s entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any right or defense, legal or equitable, which either Party may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except the proceedings to enforce this Order.

 

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  Respondent is Prince Minerals, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns and/or operates Prince Manufacturing Company, which it acquired in 2004.  Prince Manufacturing Company’s main sales office located at 223 Hampshire Street, Suite 200, Quincy, Illinois.  Respondent through Prince Manufacturing Company, entered into a contract with Roberts & Dybdahl, Inc. to apply a road dust suppressant, on or about June 1, 2005, at Roberts’ lumber company, which is located at 601 Berryman Pike in Tipton, Tipton County, Indiana (the “Site”).  Roberts & Dybdahl, Inc. is a respondent in a separate enforcement action, Case No. 2006-15753-W, with IDEM pursuant to the violations alleged herein.

 

3.                  IDEM has jurisdiction over Respondent and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, on August 22, 2006, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via certified mail to:

 

Ted B. Roberts, President

National Registered Agents, Inc.

Roberts & Dybdahl, Inc.

320 N. Meridian Street

1660 E. Aurora Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Des Moines, IA 50313

 

 

 

Darryl Mayton, Secretary

Illinois Corporation Service

The Prince Manufacturing Company

801 Adlai Stevenson Drive

One Prince Plaza

Springfield, IL 62703-4261

Quincy, IL 62305

 

 

5.                  During an investigation conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

6.                  Pursuant to 327 Indiana Administrative Code (“IAC”) 2-1-6(a)(1), all waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges:

 

A.        that will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits,

B.        that are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious,

C.        that produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance,

D.        which are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants, or humans, and

E.        which are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or, contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such a degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.

 

7.                  On or about June 1, 2005, and continuing until on or about June 8, 2005, Respondent applied a mixture of water and lignin sulfonate (“Dust Suppressant”) and caused and/or allowed the discharge of approximately one thousand (1,000) gallons of Dust Suppressant to be released into storm sewers that flowed to Buck Creek, and ran to Cicero Creek, all of which are waters of the State, which caused the pollutant to settle to form objectionable deposits; in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious; which produced the pollutant ammonia nitrogen that caused the waters of the State to turn dark brown to black in color, and caused other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance.  The discharge was observed to have impacted the waters of the State for approximately five (5) miles from the Site, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1).

 

8.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, any person who operates, controls or maintains any mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the State, contain the spill, if possible, to prevent additional spilled material from entering the waters of the State; undertake, or cause others to undertake, activities needed to accomplish a spill response; and as soon as possible, but within two (2) hours of discovery, communicate a spill report to the Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response.

 

9.                  The reportable spill of approximately one thousand (1,000) gallons of Dust Suppressant at the Site into storm sewers that flowed to Buck Creek, and ran to Cicero Creek, all of which are waters of the State, commenced on or about June 1, 2005, and continued until on or about June 8, 2005, and was not properly contained, and/or responded to, and/or reported by Respondent, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7.

 

10.             Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the State as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid NPDES Permit obtained prior to the discharge.

 

11.             Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of approximately one thousand (1,000) gallons of Dust Suppressant, a pollutant, to be released from the Site from on or about June 1, 2005, to on or about June 8, 2005, to storm sewers that flowed to Buck Creek, and ran to Cicero Creek, all of which are waters of the State, the pollutant impact of the stream was observed up to five (5) miles from the Site where the discharge occurred, without a valid NPDES permit, and without meeting any of the exclusions in 327 IAC 5-2-4, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-2.

 

12.             Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of the State, or to cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters, any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under IC 13-18-4-1 and IC 13-18-4-3.

 

13.             Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of Dust Suppressant, an organic matter, from the Site from June 1, 2005 to on or about June 8, 2005, into storm sewers that drained to Buck Creek, and ran to Cicero Creek, all of which are waters of the State, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1) and 327 IAC 5-2-2, and thus violated IC 13-18-4-5.

 

14.             Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), no person may discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment or into any publicly owned treatment works in any form which causes or would cause pollution which violates or which would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

 

15.             Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of approximately one thousand (1,000) gallons of Dust Suppressant, a contaminant or waste, to spill into the environment from the Site, from on or about June 1, 2005 to on or about June 8, 2005, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1) and 327 IAC 5-2-2, and thus violated IC 13-30-2-1(1).

 

16.             On December 12, 2006, representatives of IDEM and Respondent held a settlement conference to discuss the Notice of Violation issued on August 22, 2006, and the actions Respondent has voluntarily undertaken to reduce the risk of future spills to the environment, which may result from the Dust Suppressant application.  Specifically, representatives of IDEM reviewed Respondent’s procedures for proper Dust Suppressant application, proposed revisions to Respondent’s model contract with customers, and the checklist that establishes procedures that are required to be followed prior to the Dust Suppressant application.

 

17.             In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II. ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  Immediately, Respondent shall maintain compliance with all provisions of the Indiana Code and the Indiana Administrative Code, including 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, 327 IAC 5-2-2, IC 13-30-2-1(1), and IC 13-18-4-5, and all other rules and statutes applicable when it applies Dust Suppressant.

 

3.                  Prior to the Dust Suppressant application on roads in the state of Indiana, Respondent shall provide its customers and its subcontractors who perform the Dust Suppressant application, with written instructions for properly conducting environmentally safe applications.

 

4.                  During the period that Respondent’s operations include but are not limited to, the sales, application, and transport of Dust Suppressant on roads in the state of Indiana, it shall take all necessary steps to, at all times, maintain in good working order, and efficiently and effectively operate its storage and transport equipment.  In the event of a spill or discharge from any portion of Respondent’s storage and transport equipment that impacts the soil and/or surface waters of the State, Respondent shall comply with 327 IAC 2-6.1, and the following:

 

a.                  take all reasonable actions to contain any spill, if possible, to prevent additional spilled material from entering the waters of the State as soon as possible;

b.                  undertake or cause others to undertake activities needed to accomplish a spill response to properly clean the area affected by the spill or discharge (“affected area”);

c.                  remove and properly dispose of pollutants from the affected area;

d.                  as soon as possible communicate a spill report to IDEM; and

e.                  report the spill or discharge event as follows:

 

(i)                 within two (2) hours of Respondent’s discovery of the discharge event, Respondent shall provide verbal notification of the event to IDEM, at (317) 232-8795 during regular business hours or (888) 233-7745 during non-business hours;

(ii)               within five (5) days of Respondent’s discovery of the discharge event, Respondent shall submit written notification of the event to IDEM.  The notification shall include the following information:

·                    the duration and cause of the discharge,

·                    the remedial action taken to eliminate it, and

·                    the actions that have been or that will be taken to prevent reoccurrence.

(iii)             for discharges Respondent shall report the duration and estimated volume of the discharge event to IDEM.

·                    document all actions taken to cease the discharge and to remediate the affected areas, retain copies of the documentation, and allow IDEM representatives to inspect and copy these records upon request.

 

5.                  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall develop and submit to IDEM, a plan and schedule to train any of Respondent’s employees who regularly transport and/or apply Dust Suppressant to comply with the Clean Water Act and all rules and statutes applicable to those activities.  Respondent shall submit to IDEM documentation of the plan and schedule to the address in Order Paragraph 8 below.

 

6.                  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit to IDEM, at the address in Order Paragraph 8, a copy of Respondent’s Spill Response Plan (“SRP”) template.  The SRP shall be completed for each Dust Suppressant application performed by Respondent or its subcontractors.  Attachment “A” of this Agreed Order outlines the elements that need to be included in a SRP.

 

7.                  The SRP template required pursuant to Order Paragraph 6 above shall, upon approval by IDEM, be incorporated into the Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof.  Respondent, upon receipt of written approval from IDEM, shall immediately implement the completed SRP at the time of an illegal discharge and adhere to its provisions contained therein.  Said SRP shall be provided to contracting firms and/or other persons performing Dust Suppressant application on behalf of Respondent.

 

8.                  All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is otherwise notified in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Aletha Lenahan, Enforcement Case Manager

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Office of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02

IGCN Room 1315

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

9.                  Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.  In the event that the civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

10.             In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Paragraph

Violation

Penalty Amount

3

Failure to provide written instructions to customers and subcontractors for properly conducting environmentally safe Dust Suppressant applications.

$500 per week late.

4

Failure to properly operate and maintain its storage and transport equipment of Dust Suppressant.

$1,000 per day per violation.

4

Failure to take all reasonable actions to cease any illegal discharges as soon as possible; properly clean the area affected by the illegal discharge (“affected area”); remove and properly dispose of the Dust Suppressant or other pollutant(s) from the affected areas; and report the illegal discharge event, as required, and failure to comply with the spill reporting and response requirements contained in 327 IAC 2-6.1.

$1,000 per day per violation.

5

Failure to submit a plan and schedule to properly train employees and document training, as required.

$500 per week late.

6

Failure to timely submit a SRP, as required.

$500 per week late.

7

Failure to timely implement the SRP, as required.

$500 per violation.

 

11.             Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due.  Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties shall not preclude Complainant from seeking any additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.  In lieu of any of the stipulated penalties set out above, Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of Respondent’s violation of this Agreed Order or Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

12.             The civil and stipulated penalties assessed for Respondent are payable by check to: “The Environmental Management Special Fund.”  Checks shall include Case Number 2006-15756-W for Respondent of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

13.             In the event that the civil penalty required by Order Paragraph 9, is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order, the Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

14.             This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns.  Respondent’s signatory to this Agreed Order certifies that he/she is fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and that such signature legally binds Respondent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

15.             In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

16.             Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  Respondent shall ensure that all contracting firms and/or other persons performing work on behalf of Respondent under the Agreed Order comply with the terms herein.

 

17.             This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of their obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

18.             The Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

19.             Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.

 

20.             Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

21.             This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all terms and conditions of Order Paragraph Numbers 5 through 13 and at that time IDEM shall issue a Resolution of Case letter.

 

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

Prince Minerals, Inc.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Mark W. Stanifer, Chief

 

Printed:

 

 

Water Enforcement Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Enforcement

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

For the Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deputy Attorney General

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 2007.

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on December 3, 2007

 

Robert B. Keene

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Legal Counsel and Enforcement

 

 

ATTACHMENT A

 

 

In accordance with 327 IAC 2-10-8, a Spill Response Plan (“SRP”) will include, but not be limited to, the following:

 

 

(1)               The names and telephone numbers of persons who are identified by Respondent as responsible for implementing the Spill Response Plan.

 

 

(2)               Identification of areas where potential spills can occur and their accompanying drainage points.

 

 

(3)               Procedures to be followed in the event of a spill, including the following:

 

(A)              Actions to contain or manage any type of spill.

(B)              Identification of the proper authorities to be contacted.

(C)             Mitigation of any adverse effects of the spill.

 

 

(4)               Identification of equipment and clean-up materials to be used in the event of a spill.

 

 

(5)               Procedures for reporting the spill to:

 

(A)              Any applicable local emergency or health authorities; and

(B)              IDEM, in accordance with 327 IAC 2-6.1.