STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

BoWYER BROTHERS, llc,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2005-15373-W




 

AGREED ORDER

 

The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  The Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this Order.

 

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  The Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  The Respondent is Bowyer Brothers, LLC (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the sanitary sewer construction project having its main office located at 2653 S 400 W, Peru, Indiana.  The Respondent was developing a residential subdivision known as Bent Creek Subdivision, located at 1805 E. Sycamore, Kokomo, Howard County, Indiana, (the “Site”) at the time the violations occurred.

 

3.                  The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”) has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, on March 21, 2006, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to the Respondent at the address below:

 

Mark L. Bowyer, President and Registered Agent

Bowyer Brothers, LLC

Bent Creek Subdivision

2653 S 400 W

Peru, Indiana 46970

 

5.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 3-2-1, no person shall cause or allow the construction, installation, or modification of any water pollution treatment/control facility or sanitary sewer, without a valid construction permit issued by the commissioner.

 

6.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 3-2-2(d), construction shall not commence until all necessary state approvals and permits are obtained.

 

7.                  On October 13, 2004, IDEM received the construction permit application for a sanitary gravity sewer and force main construction project to serve 63 new three-bedroom condominiums, with an average flow of 19,530 gallons per day.  The original construction permit application was submitted to IDEM approximately seven months prior to the installation of the directionally bored force main.

 

8.                  On November 16, 2004, and January 31, 2005, IDEM sent notices of deficiency to the Respondent, which requested an alternate to the Technical Standards for directional bore method of installation of portions of the proposed force main, a revised Design Summary Form, and revised plan drawings with correct information.

 

9.                  On April 5, 2005, IDEM denied the construction permit application and returned the submitted plans, specifications, and application to the Respondent, based on the fact that IDEM did not receive the information requested on November 16, 2004, and January 31, 2005.

 

10.             On or about May 23, 2005, the Respondent began construction of the force main portion of the sanitary sewer at the Site.  The scope of the project included the installation of approximately 1,330 feet of 6-inch DDPE, ASTM F714, DR 11, diameter pipe force main by directional bore and open cut methods of installation.  The force main started from Sycamore Road and was not connected to the lift station, then ran to a point adjacent to, but not connecting, to a manhole with an existing 10-inch diameter sanitary sewer at Touby Pike approximately 1,250 feet north of Sycamore Road, which flows to the City of Kokomo’s sanitary sewer system to the wastewater treatment plant (“WWTP”).

 

11.             On May 25, 2005, the Respondent resubmitted the construction permit application to IDEM, including plans and specifications for review and approval of the sanitary sewer system project at the Site.

 

12.             On June 23, 2005, IDEM sent a notice of deficiency to the Respondent, for an incomplete construction permit application.  The notice specified that certain items were needed to complete the application and advised that the deficiencies needed to be addressed within 60 days of the date of the June 23, 2005 correspondence or the application would be denied.

 

13.             On August 3, 2005, after IDEM received the required information, noted in its June 23, 2005 notice of deficiency, it issued the sanitary sewer construction permit for the Site, Approval No. 17434.  IDEM was then notified by an affected party that construction had commenced prior to issuing the construction permit for the Site.

 

14.             According to the Respondent’s engineer, the construction at the Site, including the connection of the force main at both the lift station and gravity line ends, with the exception of the force main, was completed after IDEM issued the sanitary sewer construction permit, Approval No. 17434, on August 3, 2005, which was prior to IDEM being notified by an affected party that any construction had commenced before IDEM issued the construction permit for the Site.

 

15.             On August 8, 2005, a representative of IDEM conducted a record review that indicated the Respondent had not submitted a construction permit application for the sanitary gravity sewer construction project at the Site prior to commencing construction on or before May 23, 2005.  As part of the August 8, 2005 review, IDEM’s representative contacted the Respondent who confirmed that the work on the force main portion of the sanitary sewer was complete.  IDEM determined that a sanitary sewer construction permit should not have been issued for this project because construction started prior to the issuance of the construction permit.

 

16.             The Respondent commenced construction of the directionally bored portion of the sanitary sewer project for the Site prior to obtaining a construction permit, in violation of 327 IAC 3-2-1 and 327 IAC 3-2-2(d).

 

17.             On August 15, 2005, IDEM received the Respondent’s application for “as-built” plans and specifications approval.

 

18.             On August 19, 2005, IDEM issued an “as-built” notice of deficiency letter to the Respondent, in which IDEM noted that “as-built” plans and specifications failed to provide the record drawings portion of the constructed force main and requested a signed, dated, and an engineer stamped copy of the drawings.

 

19.             On October 19, 2005, IDEM sent the plans and specifications review “as-built” letter notifying the Respondent that a construction permit could not be issued for the sanitary sewer project at the Site due to the fact that the construction had started prior to issuance of the permit.  According to the “non-objection” letter issued by IDEM, the cursory review of the “as-built” plans indicated that they appeared to be acceptable.  IDEM did not object to the use of the sewers provided that the pressure/leakage testing requirement for the force main to be completed in accordance with 327 IAC 3-6-19 and the pipe manufacturer.

 

20.             On January 6, 2006, the pressure/leakage test was complete.  The test results were submitted to IDEM, in accordance with 327 IAC 3-6-19 and the non-objection “as-built” letter, which meets the requirements of 327 IAC 3-2-1 and 327 IAC 3-2-2(d).

 

21.             According the Respondent’s engineer, the force main was not in use prior to IDEM issuing its non-objection “as-built” letter.  Therefore at the time IDEM issued its non-objection letter, no actual harm to the environment was noted.

 

22.             In recognition of the settlement reached, the Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II. ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by the Complainant or his delegate, and has been received by the Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  The Respondent shall maintain compliance with all requirements of 327 IAC 3 and all other applicable rules and statutes.

 

3.                  The Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of One Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within 30 days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order.

 

4.                  In the event that the civil penalty required by Order Paragraph 3, is not paid within 30 days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order, the Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

5.                  The civil penalty is payable by check to the Environmental Management Special Fund.  Payments shall include the Case Number 2005-15373-W, of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashiers Office-Mail Code 50 - 10C

100 N. Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

6.                  This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its successors, and assigns.  The Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this document and legally bind the parties they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

7.                  In the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

8.                  The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  The Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

9.                  This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by the Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve the Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of any applicable permit or order or with any other applicable federal or state law or regulation.

 

10.             The Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that the Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit or order or any applicable federal or state law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties the Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

11.             Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable federal or state law or regulation, except that IDEM may not seek additional civil penalties for the violations specified in the Notice of Violation.

 

12.             Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties the Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

13.             This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until the Respondent has complied with Paragraphs 3 through 5 of this Agreed Order and IDEM has issued a close-out letter to the Respondent.

 

The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

Bowyer Brothers, LLC

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Mark W. Stanifer, Chief

 

Printed:

 

 

Water Enforcement Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Enforcement

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Legal Counsel

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

 DAY OF

 

, 200

 

.

 

 

For The Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on November 17, 2006

 

Matthew T. Klein

 

Assistant Commissioner for

 

Compliance and Enforcement