STATE OF INDIANA

)

 

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT

 

)

SS:

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

 

 

 

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT

)

 

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

)

 

 

)

 

 

Complainant,

)

 

 

)

 

 

v.

)

Case No. 2005-14702-A

 

)

 

METAL TECHNOLOGIES AUBURN, LLC

)

 

 

)

 

 

Respondent.

)

 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3; entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this Order.

 

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  Complainant is the Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant") of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  Respondent is Metal Technologies Auburn, LLC, ("Respondent" or "MTA"), which owns and operates a grey iron foundry at 1537 West Auburn Drive, a location formerly known as 2278 West County Road 48, Auburn, DeKalb County, Indiana (the "Site"). The Site was obtained by MTA as a part of the Bankruptcy proceedings of the former owner, Auburn Foundry, Inc. ("Auburn Foundry"), and is commonly referred to as Auburn Foundry Plant No.2. There is no legal, managerial, or common ownership relationship between Auburn Foundry and Respondent. Respondent is an unrelated bona fide third party purchaser of most of the assets of Auburn Foundry Plant No.2.

 

3.                  The Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Respondent waives issuance of a Notice of Violation and to the settlement period of sixty (60) days as provided for by IC 13-30-3-3.

 

5.                  Prior to commencing operation at the Site, Respondent has asked to have three (3) air operating permits transferred from Auburn Foundry to MT A. MT A intends to begin operating at the Site under those air operating permits described below:

 

a.                  Registered Construction and Operation Status CP 033-8728-0042

 

b.                  Construction Permit 033-5793-00042

 

c.                  Part 70 Minor Source Modification 033-10655-00042

 

6.                  Prior to commencing operation at the Site, Respondent voluntarily disclosed to IDEM in connection with IDEM's Environmental Audit and Self-Disclosure Policy that Respondent believes that it, upon acquisition of the Site as a part of the Bankruptcy proceedings of Auburn Foundry, that initiating operations would:

 

a.                  Be a major source of Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions pursuant to state and federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting rules as set forth at 326 lAC 2-2 et seq. and 40 CFR Part 52.21. As a result of the PSD major source status, Respondent would also be subject to PSD for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Particulate Matter (PM) and PM\o; and

 

b.                  Be subject to the requirements of326 lAC 8-1-6, Best Available Control Technology ("BACT").

 

7.                  Prior to commencing operation at the Site, Respondent has also voluntarily disclosed to IDEM that it believed that the process descriptions as set forth in the Auburn Foundry Plant No.2 air operating permits were probably inaccurate. MT A has provided IDEM with a document that it believes more accurately describes the processes at the Site. It is understood by the parties that the revised process description provided by MT A does not allow Respondent to emit greater levels of air contaminants than currently authorized by the existing air operating permits listed in Paragraph No.5 above.

 

8.                  Since the issuance of the air operating permits listed in Paragraph No.5 above, the requirement of326 lAC 2-6-3 for a source as described by the permits and MTA to provide to IDEM an emission statement was changed from annually to triennially. The air operating permits listed in Paragraph No.5 above do not reflect the change in emission statement submission obligation.

 

9.                  IDEM and Respondent are aware that, because of the information set forth in Paragraph Nos. 6-8 above, operation of the Site will result in violation of the current air operating permits listed in Paragraph No.5 above as well as violation of state and federal rules, notably 326 lAC 2-2 et seq., 326 lAC 8-1-6, 40 CFR 52.21, and 40 CFR 52.770.

 

10.             In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II. ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective ('Effective Date") when it is approved by Complainant or his delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  Respondent shall operate the Site as indicated by the revised process description submitted by Respondent to IDEM by letter dated June 15,2005. The revised process description is attached to this Agreed Order and marked as Exhibit "A."

 

3.                  Except as otherwise permitted by this Agreed Order, Respondent shall not emit greater levels of air contaminants than currently authorized by the existing air operating permits listed in Paragraph N{). 5 above.

 

4.                  Within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a PSD application for CO, VOC, PM and PM\o that addresses all emission units at the MT A Site. This application must include all necessary updates to the Part 70 permit application previously submitted by Auburn Foundry.

 

5.                  Within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall conduct emission testing using a method approved by IDEM for CO and VOC emissions from the pouring, cooling, and shakeout processes for production line Nos. 1 and 2. Respondent is unable to test the processes on production line Nos. 3 and 4 within this time period because those lines will likely not yet be in operation. The emissions testing shall be conducted in accordance with 326 lAC 3-6.

 

6.                  Respondent shall submit the results to IDEM of the emissions testing performed pursuant to Paragraph No.5 within forty-five (45) days after completion of the testing.

 

7.                  Within ninety (90) days after completion of the emission testing performed pursuant to Paragraph No.5, Respondent shall submit to IDEM all necessary updates to its PSD application, including but not limited to, revisions to the air quality analysis and revisions to the BACT analyses.

 

8.                  Until such time that Respondent has a PSD permit approved by IDEM, and in effect, for the Site, Respondent shall:

 

a.                  Limit PM emissions from Baghouse BH-3 to 5.7 pounds/hour;

 

b.                  Limit PMIO emissions from Baghouse BH-3 to 3.4 pounds/hour; and

 

c.                  Control, by internally vented dust collectors, all grinding operations that are not vented to Baghouse BH-3.

 

9.                  Respondent is not required to submit an emission statement on July 1,2005, because of the changes to 326 lAC 2-6-3(a)(2).

 

10.             All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless notified otherwise in writing, shall be sent to:

 

Office of Air Quality

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue, MC 61-50

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 

11.             In connection with IDEM's Self-Disclosure and Environmental Audit Policy and Respondent's self-reporting of the alleged violations, no civil penalty shall be assessed against Respondent.

 

12.             In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Violation

Penalty

 

 

Failure to comply with Order paragraph 4

$10,000 per week or part thereof

 

 

Failure to comply with Order paragraph 5

$5,000 per day or part thereof

 

 

Failure to comply with Order paragraph 6

$1,000 per day or part thereof

 

 

Failure to comply with Order paragraph 7

$1,000 per day or part thereof

 

13.             Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent receives written notice that the Commissioner has determined a stipulated penalty is due. Assessment and payment of a civil penalty shall not preclude Complainant from seeking any additional relief against Respondent for violation of the Agreed Order. In lieu of any of the stipulated penalties given above, Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of Respondent's violation of this Agreed Order or Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

14.             Stipulated penalties are payable by check to the Environmental Management Special Fund. Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Attn:  Cashier

100 North Senate Avenue, MC 50-10C

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 

15.             This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent, its successors and assigns. Respondent's signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this document and legally bind the party he/she represents. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

16.             In the event any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

17.             Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent

18.             owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

19.             This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM either issues the PSD permit for the Site, or denies the permit for the Site and Respondent has exhausted all administrative appeal rights.

 

20.             "Force Majeure", for purposes of this Agreed Order, is defined as any event arising from causes totally beyond the control and without fault of the Respondent that delays or prevents the performance of any obligation under this Agreed Order despite Respondent's best efforts to fulfill the obligation. The requirement that the Respondent exercise "best efforts to fulfill the obligation" includes using best efforts to anticipate any potential force majeure event and best efforts to address the effects of any potential force majeure event (1) as it is occurring and (2) following the potential force majeure event, such that the delay is minimized to the greatest extent possible. "Force Majeure" does not include changed business or economic conditions, financial inability to complete the work required by this Agreed Order, or increases in costs to perform the work.

The Respondent shall notify IDEM by calling the case manager within three (3) calendar days and by writing no later than seven (7) calendar days after it has knowledge of any event which the Respondent contends is a force majeure. Such notification shall describe the anticipated length of the delay, the cause or causes of the delay, the measures taken or to be taken by the Respondent to minimize the delay, and the timetable by which these measures will be implemented. The Respondent shall include with any notice all available documentation supporting its claim that the delay was attributable to a force majeure. Failure to comply with the above requirements shall preclude Respondent from asserting any claim of force majeure for that event. The Respondent shall have the burden of demonstrating that the event is a force majeure. The decision of whether an event is a force majeure shall be made by IDEM.

If a delay is attributable to a force majeure, IDEM shall extend, in writing, the time period for performance under this Agreed Order, by the amount of time that is directly attributable to the event constituting the force majeure.

 

FOR RESPONDENT:

Metal Technologies Auburn, LLC

 

 

By:

________________________

 

Rick L. James, Manager

 

Metal Technologies Auburn, LLC

 

 

FOR COMPLAINANT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

By:

____________________________

 

Commissioner Thomas W. Easterly

 

 

Date:

Signed July 13, 2005

 

 

 

Exhibit A

 

Current Permit Number

Current Permit Process Description

Amended Process Description

Registration
CP 033-8728-00042

One (1) reblast grey iron casting cleaning/finishing operation, processing a maximum of 2,334 pounds per hour of grey iron castings, utilizing one (1) steel shot blast machine (ID No. E16), controlled by one (1) baghouse and exhausting to one (1) stack (ID No. 16)

One (1) shotblast identified as EU-6, with a nominal capacity of 1.12 tons of iron castings per hour and a maximum capacity of 5 tons of iron casting per hour, controlled by baghouse DC-6 and exhausting through stack 6.

CP-033-5793-00042


Issued
May 22, 1998

One (1) sand mixing process, with PM controlled by a baghouse, designated as system 1.

One (1) sand handling system identified as emission unit EU-1 with a nominal capacity of 220 tons of sand per hour, and a maximum capacity of 250 tons/hour, and one sample blast machine, all controlled by baghouse DC-1, exhausting to stack S-1.

CP-033-5793-00042

One (1) melting process including the melting of gray iron by three (3) electric induction furnaces, charge handling, and pouring at maximum rate of 32 tons per hour, with PM controlled by a baghouse, designated as system 2.

One (1) furnace charging system identified as emission unit EU-2b, and one (1) holding furnace and ladle metallurgical station, with a nominal capacity of 36 tons of metal per hour and a maximum capacity of 45 tons/hour, all controlled by baghouse DC-2 and exhausting to stack S-2.

CP-033-5793-00042

One (1) gray iron foundry with a maximum metal melting rate of 32 (tons) per hour including one (1) 1.0 MMBtu/hr natural gas fired office boiler.

Four (4) pouring and mold cooling lines identified as emission unit EU-3, with a combined nominal capacity of 36 tons of metal per hour and 220 tons of sand molds and cores, and a maximum capacity of 45 tons of metal per hour and 250 tons of sand mold and cores.  The pouring process for lines 1 and 2 are exhausted to stack 3a.  The mold cooling process for lines 3 and 4 are exhausted to stack 3c.  The colloing process for lines 3 and 4 are exhausted to stack 3d.

Raw material delivery storage and handling located inside the building.

CP-033-5793-00042

One (1) shakeout process for two (2) individual molding lines, with PM controlled by a baghouse, designated as system 4, and

One 91) shakeout unit identified as emission unit EU-4, which serves production lines 3 and 4, with a nominal capacity of 18 tons per hour of metal and 110 tons per hour of sand molds and cores, and a maximum capacity of 22.5 tons per hour of metal and 125 tons/hour of sand molds and cores.  EU 4 is controlled by baghouse DC-4 exhausting to stack S-4.