|
STATE
OF |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE
THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
|
) |
|
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
|
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
v. |
|
) |
CASE
NO. 2005-14553-W |
|||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
PETE
BEYL, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
The Complainant and the
Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is the Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant")
of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the
State of
2.
The Respondent is Pete Beyl ("Respondent"), who is
the individual lot owner of individual building lot number 15 in the Crestwood
Manor development, located in or near Floyds Knobs, in Floyd County, Indiana
(the "Site").
3.
The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”)
has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, on May 12, 2005, IDEM issued a
Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to:
|
Pete
Beyl |
|
|
|
|
5.
The operator of the Crestwood Manor development submitted
and received approval of a Notice of Intent ("NOI") and an Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan ("ESCP") for the Crestwood Manor
development in 2002, as required by 327 IAC 15-5 effective at that time.
6.
All references to 327 IAC 15-5 and its various subparts are
to the version in effect prior to the rule change on November 26, 2003.
7.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b), the following requirements
shall be met on all sites during the period when active land disturbing
activities occur:
A.
Public and private roadways shall be kept clear of
accumulated sediment.
B.
All on-site storm drains shall be protected against
sedimentation by appropriate and acceptable methods.
C.
Run-off from a disturbed area shall be controlled by either
appropriate vegetative practices, the implementation of an erosion control plan
that includes appropriate erosion control measures, or both.
8.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-7(c), during the period of
construction at a site, all erosion control measures necessary to meet the
requirements of 327 IAC 15-5-7 shall be maintained by the operator. The Respondent submitted the Notice of Intent
("NOI") prior to November of 2003, and has not submitted another NOI
for the Site. Therefore the above noted
provisions remain in effect.
9.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-10(b), all persons engaging in land
disturbing activity on a site shall be responsible for complying with the soil
erosion control plan for that site and the provisions of 327 IAC 15-5.
10.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-10(c), upon investigation by IDEM,
any person causing or contributing to a violation of any provisions of 327 IAC
15-5 shall be subject to enforcement and penalty under IC 13-14-10, IC 13-15-7,
and IC 13-30.
11.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-10(d), if remaining erosion control
measures are not properly maintained by the person occupying or owning the
property, the department may pursue enforcement against that person for
correction of deficiencies under 327 IAC 15-1-4.
12.
During an inspection conducted on December 3, 2004, Indiana
Department of Natural Resources ("IDNR") staff observed that the
Respondent had failed to ensure that erosion control measures were implemented
and maintained at the Site. IDNR staff
observed that lot number 15 was out of compliance with 327 IAC 15-5 due to
unsatisfactory maintenance of erosion control measures. The silt fence was in a state of disrepair,
and rock bags around storm drain inlet needed to be replaced/repositioned, and
soil was entering
13.
During an inspection conducted on February 4, 2005, IDNR
staff observed that there had been insufficient improvements since the previous
on-site evaluation.
14.
Based on the inspections conducted by the IDNR Division of Soil
Conservation on December 3, 2004, and February 4, 2005, the Respondent caused
or contributed to the failure to implement and maintain erosion control
measures at the Site. Specifically:
A.
Public and private roadways were not kept clear of accumulated
sediment.
B.
All on-site storm drains were not protected against
sedimentation by appropriate and acceptable methods.
C.
Run-off from a disturbed area was not controlled by either
appropriate vegetative practices, the implementation of an erosion control plan
that includes appropriate erosion control measures, or both.
Therefore, the Respondent caused or contributed to the violation of 327 IAC
15-5-7(b), 327 IAC 15-5-10(b) and 327 IAC 15-5-10(d).
15.
On May 20, 2005, Division of Soil Conservation conducted an
inspection at lot number 15 and observed that permanent erosion control had
been established by placement of sod and construction had been completed.
16.
In recognition of the settlement reached, the Respondent
waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This Agreed Order shall be effective ("Effective Date")
when it is approved by the Complainant or his delegate, and has been received
by the Respondent. This Agreed Order
shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.
2.
The Respondent shall comply with 327 IAC 15-5-7 and 327 IAC
15-5-10.
3.
The Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of One Thousand
Three Hundred and Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,375). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Environmental Management Special Fund within 30 days of the Effective
Date of this Agreed Order.
4.
The civil penalty is payable by check to the Environmental
Management Special Fund. The check shall
include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana Department of
Environmental Management |
|
Cashiers Office – Mail Code
50-10C |
|
|
|
|
5.
In the event that the civil penalty required by Order
Paragraph 3 is not paid within thirty days of the Effective Date of this Agreed
Order, the Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate
established by IC 24-4.6-1-101. The
interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
6.
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the
Respondent, its successors, and assigns.
The Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are
fully authorized to execute this document and legally bind the parties they
represent. No change in ownership,
corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter its
status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
7.
In the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to
be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall
be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid
terms.
8.
The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if
in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.
9.
This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be
a permit or a modification of an
existing permit, and shall not in any way relieve the Respondent of its
obligation to comply with the requirements of any applicable permit or order or
with any other applicable federal or state law or regulation.
10.
The Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed
Order, warrant or aver in any manner that the Respondent's compliance with any
aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of
any permit or order or any applicable federal or state law or regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its
behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties the Respondent may
incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
11.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s
rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable federal or
state law or regulation, except that IDEM may not seek additional civil
penalties for the violations specified in the Notice of Violation.
12.
This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until the
Respondent has complied with all terms and conditions of Paragraphs 3-5 of this
Agreed Order and until IDEM issues a Close-Out letter to the Respondent.
|
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
RESPONDENT: |
||||||||
|
Department of
Environmental Management |
|
Pete Beyl |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
By: |
___________________ |
|
By: |
_____________ |
||||||
|
|
Mark W. Stanifer, Chief |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Water Section |
|
Printed: |
Pete Beyl |
||||||
|
|
Office of Enforcement |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Title: |
_____________ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Date: |
__________________ |
|
Date: |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
By: |
_____________ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Printed: |
_____________ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Title: |
_____________ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Date: |
____________ |
|
Date: |
____________ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: |
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||||||
|
Department of
Environmental Management |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
By: |
______________________ |
|
By: |
|
||||||
|
|
Joseph H. Merrick,
Attorney |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Office of Legal Counsel |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Date: |
____________ |
|
Date: |
____________ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY
THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
||||||||||
|
MANAGEMENT THIS
|
|
DAY OF |
|
, 200 |
|
. |
||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
For The Commissioner: |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Signed 9/1/05 |
|||||||||
|
|
Matthew T. Klein |
|||||||||
|
|
Assistant Commissioner |
|||||||||
|
|
of Compliance and
Enforcement |
|||||||||