STATE OF INDIANA

)

 

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT

 

)

SS:

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF,

)

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

)

 

 

)

 

Complainant,

)

 

 

)

 

v.

)

CASE NO.2004-14313-W

 

)

JAY COUNTY BOARD OF

)

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,

)

 

)

 

Respondent.

)

 

AGREED ORDER

 

The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding except a proceeding to enforce this Order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  Complainant is the Commissioner (Complainant) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  Respondent is the Jay County Board of County Commissioners, (Respondent), which has jurisdiction over and responsibility for the septic tank systems and county ditches and drains in the unincorporated area surrounding the Foxfire Subdivision, County Road 125 South, and State Route 67 located in Jay County, near Portland, Indiana (Site).

 

3.                  IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation, on January 26, 2005, via Certified Mail to:

 

Mr. Milo Miller, President

Jay County Board of Commissioners

120 West Main Street

Portland, IN 47371

 

5.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1, no person may discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment or into any publicly owned treatment works in any form which causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

 

6.                  Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of Indiana; or cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters; any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under IC 13-18-4-1 and IC 13-18-4-3.

 

7.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into the waters of the state as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid NPDES permit obtained prior to the discharge.

 

8.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), all waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges:

 

(A)                                      that will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits;

(B)                                      that are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious;

(C)                                     that produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;

(D)                                     which are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants or humans; and

(E)                                      which are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such a degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.

 

9.                  An investigation by IDEM on August 25, 2004, which included a review of the record of results of a sample obtained August 18, 2004, indicates that the septic tank systems of the unincorporated area surrounding Foxfire Subdivision, County Road 125 South, and State Route 67 in Jay County discharge sewage into waters of the state, without an NPDES permit. Therefore, the Jay County Board of County Commissioners are in violation of IC 13-30-2-1, IC 13-18-4-5, and 327 IAC 5-2-2.  The investigation further indicates that the discharge causes the receiving stream to contain E. coli bacteria concentrations in amounts sufficient to be deleterious.  Therefore, the Jay County and the Jay County Board of County Commissioners are in violation of  IC 13-30-2-1, IC 13-18-4-5, and 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1).

 

10.             A settlement conference was held on April 6, 2005, at which it was determined that there is a need for planning for solution(s) and consideration of formation of a Jay County Regional Sewer District to address the problem septic systems that continue to discharge to waters of the state in the unincorporated area surrounding Foxfire Subdivision, County Road 125 South, and State Route 67 in Jay County.

 

11.             In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II. Order

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective (Effective Date) when it is approved by the Complainant or his delegate and has been received by the Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  The Respondent shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Indiana Code (IC), and the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), including, but not limited to, IC 13-30-2-1, IC 13-18-4-5, and 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), and 327 IAC 5-2-2.

 

3.                  Within 180 days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order, the Respondent shall develop and submit to IDEM, for approval, a compliance plan (CP) that describes the actions that the Respondent will take to eliminate the unlawful discharge of untreated sewage to waters of the state. Such actions shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the following:

 

Signing a petition for the formation of a County Regional Sewer District for the purpose of planning and coordination with the local entities resulting in implementation of a means to cease the inadequately treated discharges from septic tank systems from discharging to the ground surface, entering ditches or other surface waters.

The CP shall include an implementation and completion schedule, including specific milestone dates.

 

4.                  Upon completion of the CP required pursuant to Paragraph 3 above, the Respondent shall be subject to the stipulated penalties provided for in Order Paragraph 10 below for any continuing violations.

 

5.                  The Respondents shall, within nine months of the completion of the portion of the CP required by Paragraph 3 (Performance Period), demonstrate a period of six consecutive months of compliance (Compliance Demonstration) of no continuing unauthorized discharges.

In the event that the Respondents fail to make the Compliance Demonstration, the Respondents shall, within 60 days becoming aware that the Compliance Demonstration cannot be achieved, develop and submit to IDEM, for approval, an “Action Plan” that identifies the additional actions that the Respondents will take to comply with all applicable environmental regulations.  The “Action Plan”, if required, shall include a new implementation and completion schedule, including specific milestone dates.

 

6.                  The plans required pursuant to Order Paragraphs 3 and 5 above are subject to IDEM approval.  If IDEM deems any plan inadequate, a revised plan shall be submitted within 15 days of receipt of notice from IDEM of the inadequacies thereof.  If, after submission of the first revised plan, IDEM still finds the plan to be inadequate, then IDEM will request further modification of the plan as necessary to meet IDEM’s requirements, and require re-submittal of the plan by a specific date.  If the subsequently submitted second revised plan does not meet IDEM’s approval, IDEM will suggest specific modifications to be made to the plan and require re-submittal by a specific date. If, by the specified date, the Respondents does not submit a third revised plan that incorporates the IDEM-suggested modifications or submit an alternative adequate plan (as determined by IDEM), the IDEM-suggested modifications will be deemed incorporated into the plan. 

 

7.                  The plans required pursuant to Order Paragraphs 3 and 5 above shall, upon approval by IDEM, be incorporated into this Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof.  The Respondents, upon receipt of written approval from IDEM, shall immediately implement the approved plan and adhere to the milestone dates therein.  Failure to achieve compliance at the conclusion of work under an “Action Plan” will subject the Respondents to additional enforcement action.

 

8.                  The Respondents shall notify IDEM, in writing, within 10 days of the completion of each action contained in any approved plan.  The notification shall include a description of the action completed and the date it was completed.

 

9.                  All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless specified otherwise in writing, shall be sent to:

 

Dave Knox, case manager

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Office of Enforcement – Mail code 60-02

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251

 

10.             In the event that any of the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, the Complainant may assess and the Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Paragraph Number

Violation

Penalty Amount

3

Failure to timely submit the CP.

$500 per each week or part thereof late

4

Failure to cease unauthorized discharges subsequent to completion of the CP.

$1000 per violation event

5

Failure to timely submit the Action Plan, if necessary.

$500 per each week or part thereof late

5

Failure to demonstrate six consecutive months of compliance

within the nine months of completing the performance monitoring period.

$500 per month, or part thereof

6

Failure to timely revise and re-submit plan, if necessary

$500 per each week or part thereof late

7

Failure to meet any milestone date set forth in any approved plan

$500 per each week or part thereof late

8

Failure to timely submit notification to IDEM

$250 per each week or part thereof late

 

11.             Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within 30 days after Respondent receives written notice that the Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due.  Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties shall not preclude the Complainant from seeking any additional relief against the Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.  In lieu of assessment of the stipulated penalty given above, the Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of Respondent’s violation of this Agreed Order, or Indiana law, including but not limited to civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

12.             Stipulated penalties are payable by check to the Environmental Management Special Fund.  Checks shall include the Case Number (2004-14313-W) of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashiers Office – Mail Code 50-10C

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251

 

13.             In the event that any stipulated penalty amount assessed pursuant to Paragraph 10 is not paid within 30 days of receipt of notice that it is due, the Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the stipulated penalty is paid in full.

 

14.             This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its officers, directors, principals, agents, successors, subsidiaries, and assigns.  The signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the parties they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

15.             “Force Majeure”, for purposes of this Agreed Order, is defined as any event arising from causes totally beyond the control and without fault of the Respondent that delays or prevents the performance of any obligation under this Agreed Order despite the Respondent’s best efforts to fulfill the obligation.  The requirement that the Respondent exercise “best efforts to fulfill the obligation” includes using best efforts to anticipate any potential force majeure event and best efforts to address the effects of any potential force majeure event (1) as it is occurring and (2) following the potential force majeure event, such that the delay is minimized to the greatest extent possible. “Force Majeure” does not include changed business or economic conditions, financial inability to complete the work required by this Agreed Order, or increases in costs to perform the work.

The Respondent shall notify IDEM by calling the case manager within three calendar days and by writing no later than seven calendar days after it has knowledge of any event which the Respondent contends is a force majeure.  Such notification shall describe the anticipated length of the delay, the cause or causes of the delay, the measures taken or to be taken by the Respondent to minimize the delay, and the timetable by which these measures will be implemented.  The Respondent shall include with any notice all available documentation supporting its claim that the delay was attributable to a force majeure.  Failure to comply with the above requirements shall preclude the Respondent from asserting any claim of force majeure for that event.  The Respondent shall have the burden of demonstrating that the event is a force majeure.  The decision of whether an event is a force majeure shall be made by IDEM. If a delay is attributable to a force majeure, IDEM shall extend, in writing, the time period for performance under this Agreed Order, by the amount of time that is directly attributable to the event constituting the force majeure.

 

16.             In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

17.             This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a Permit, nor shall it in any way relieve the Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of any applicable federal or state law or regulation.

 

18.             The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners of successors before ownership rights are transferred.  Respondent shall by contract require that all contractors, firms, and other persons acting for it comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

19.             The Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that the Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, its Permit, federal, or state law.

 

20.             This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until the Respondent has complied with all terms and conditions of Order Paragraphs 3 through 13 of this Agreed Order, and Complainant has issued a close-out letter.

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

 

 

By:

___________________

 

By:

Milo Miller, President

 

Mark W. Stanifer, Chief

 

 

Jay County Board of

 

Water Enforcement Section

 

 

Commissioners

 

Office of Enforcement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

____________________

 

Date:

____________________

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

 

 

By:

______________________

 

By:

________________

 

Office of Legal Counsel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

_____________________

 

Date:

________________

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 200

 

.

 

 

For The Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed 11/16/05

 

Matthew T. Klein

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

of Compliance and Enforcement