STATE OF INDIANA             )                             BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF

                                                ) SS:                         ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

COUNTY OF MARION         )

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT         )
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,         )
                                                                                )

                Complainant,                                             )

                                                                                ) CASE NO. 2001-10745-W

                        v.                                                     )

                                                                                )
ROLL COATER, INC.                                             )
                                                                                )

            Respondent.                                                 )

AGREED ORDER

The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. The Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, that the Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding.
 
 

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Complainant is the Commissioner ("Complainant") of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM"), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.
 
 

2. The Respondent is Roll Coater, Inc. ("Respondent"), which owns and operates a Class C industrial wastewater treatment facility. The facility is authorized by NPDES Permit No. IN 0038172 ("Permit") to discharge to receiving waters named the Travis Ditch in accordance with stated effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions. The facility is located in Kingsbury, LaPorte County, Indiana.
3. IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.

4. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to:

    Mr. William K. Daniel, President                             C.T. Corporation System, Registered Agent
    Roll Coater, Inc.                                                     36 South Pennsylvania Street
    2135 West Maple Road                                         Suite 700
    Troy, MI 48084                                                     Indianapolis, IN 46204

5. Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1, a person may not discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to
discharge, emit, cause , or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment in any form that causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

6. Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(1) and Part II.A.1 of the Permit, Roll Coater, Inc. is required
to comply with all terms and conditions of the Permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and IC 13 and is grounds for enforcement action.

7. Part I.A.1 of the Permit contains the final effluent limitations applicable to the discharge
from Roll Coater, Inc.'s wastewater treatment plant Outfall 001, including limitations for Zinc, Hexavalent Chromium, Total Chromium, and Oil and Grease.

8. Discharge Monitoring Reports and Monthly Reports of Operation submitted by
Roll Coater, Inc. for January 2001 through January 2002 reveal that Roll Coater, Inc. failed to meet final effluent limitations contained in Part I.A.1 of the Permit as follows:

A. The daily maximum (concentration) effluent limitation for Zinc was violated in April, May, June 2001 and January 2002.

B. The monthly average (concentration) effluent limitation for Zinc was violated in April, May, and June 2001.

C. The daily maximum (concentration) effluent limitation for Hexavalent Chromium was violated in February 2001.

D. The daily maximum (concentration) effluent limitation for Total Chromium was violated in April 2001.

E. The daily maximum (concentration) effluent limitation for Oil and Grease was violated in June 2001.

F. The monthly average (concentration) effluent limitation for Oil and Grease was violated in June 2001.

9.The failure to meet effluent limitations contained in the Permit is in violation of IC 13-30-2-1, 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), Part II.A.1 of the Permit, and Part I.A.1 of the Permit.

10. In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

II. ORDER

1. This Agreed Order shall be effective ("Effective Date") when it is approved by the Complainant or her delegate, and has been received by the Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

2. The Respondent shall, within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, submit a complete,
updated NPDES permit renewal application to IDEM. The application shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:

a. A completed "General Information" application;

b. A completed "EPA Form 2C";

c. A completed "EPA Form 2F";

d. A completed "Application for Approval to Use Water Treatment Additives";

e. Design Specifications of the final effluent diffuser; and

f. A detailed description of the Respondent's wastewater treatment plant and process.

Compliance by the Respondent with the requirements of this Paragraph shall not relieve the Respondent of its obligation to provide any additional information requested by IDEM in the course of preparing the Respondent's renewal NPDES permit.

3.The Respondent shall, until the effective date of a renewal NPDES permit, operate its wastewater treatment plant in a manner that is consistent with the final effluent flow values upon which the effluent limitations contained in its existing NPDES permit are based. Specifically, the Respondent shall ensure that the monthly average final effluent flow rate does not exceed 100 gallons per minute.

4.The Respondent shall not use any wastewater treatment additive in a quantity sufficient to
pose a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to a violation of any water quality standard contained in 327 IAC 2, including the narrative water quality standards contained in 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1).

5. Beginning on the Effective Date, the Respondent shall, within six (6) months of the
Effective date (the "Performance Period") demonstrate six (6) consecutive months of compliance ("Compliance Demonstration") with the final effluent limitations contained in its Permit. During the Performance Period, the Respondent shall be subject to stipulated penalties, as specified in Paragraph 8 below, for violations of the final effluent limitations contained in its Permit. In the event that Respondent fails to make the Compliance Demonstration, Respondent shall, within sixty (60) days of becoming aware that the Compliance Demonstration cannot be achieved, develop and submit to IDEM a plan ("action plan") that identifies the corrective actions that Respondent will take to achieve and maintain compliance with the final effluent limitations contained in its Permit. The action plan, if required, shall include an implementation and completion schedule, including specific milestone dates.

The action plan shall be subject to the approval of IDEM. If the action plan is deemed inadequate by IDEM, a revised action plan shall be submitted within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from IDEM of the inadequacies thereof. If after submission of the revised documents(s) IDEM still finds that the document(s) are inadequate, then IDEM may require further modification of the action plan as necessary to meet IDEM's requirements. If further modification is not submitted within thirty (30) days of Respondent's receipt of IDEM's request or if said modification does not meet IDEM's approval, IDEM will suggest appropriate modification to be undertaken by the Respondent. If such modification is not undertaken or an alternative, adequate action plan is not submitted by the Respondent within thirty (30) days, the Respondent will be subject to stipulated penalties.

The approved action plan shall be incorporated into the Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof. The Respondent, upon written notification by IDEM, shall immediately implement the approved action plan, and complete the actions contained in the approved action plan in accordance with the schedule included in the approved action plan. Upon completion of each action contained in the approved action plan, the Respondent shall submit notification of completion of the action to IDEM. The notification shall include a description of the action completed, and the date it was completed.

6. All submittals required by this Agreed Order, with the exception of the submittal required pursuant to Order Paragraph 2, shall, unless notified otherwise in writing, be sent to:

Dave Knox, Case Manager
Water Enforcement Section
Office of Enforcement
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 6015
Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015

And

Michael Kuss, Environmental Engineer I
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Northwest Regional Office
504 North Broadway, Suite 418
Gary, Indiana 46402

The submittal required pursuant to Order Paragraph 2 shall, unless notified otherwise in writing, be sent to:

Christina Lowry, Environmental Manager II
Industrial NPDES Permits Section
Office of Water Quality
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 6015
Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015

7. Respondent is assessed a Civil Penalty of Twenty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($27,000).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.

8. In the event the following terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated the Complainant may assess and the Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Paragraph Violation Penalty
Order Paragraph 2 Failure to submit a complete, updated NPDES permit renewal application to IDEM in timely manner $250 per week late
Order Paragraph 3 Failure to ensure that the monthly average final effluent flow rate does not exceed 100 gallons per minute. $5000 per violation
Order Paragraph 4 Use of any wastewater treatment additive in a quantity sufficient to pose a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to a violation of any water quality standard. $5000 per day per violation
Order Paragraph 5 Failure to comply with any effluent limitation contained in Permit during Performance Period. $2000 per violation
Order Paragraph 5 Failure to submit or modify "action plan" as required. $250 per week late
Order Paragraph 5 Failure to meet any milestone date contained in the approved "action plan" $250 per week late
 
9. Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after the Respondent
receives written notice that the Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due.
Assessment and payment of a stipulated penalty shall preclude the Complainant from seeking
any additional monetary relief against the Respondent for the particular violation of the Agreed
Order that gave rise to the stipulated penalty. Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties
shall not preclude the Complainant from seeking or obtaining any injunctive relief against
Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. In lieu of assessment of any of the stipulated
penalties above, the Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of
Respondent's violation of this Agreed Order, including but not limited to, civil penalties
pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
 
 

 
  10. Civil and stipulated penalties are payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund. Payment shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

        Cashier
        IDEM
        100 N. Senate Avenue
        P.O. Box 7060
        Indianapolis, Indiana 46207-7060.

11. In the event that the civil penalty required by paragraph 7 is not paid within thirty (30)
days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid
balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall continue to accrue until
the civil penalty is paid in full.

12. "Force Majeure," for purposes of this Agreed Order, is defined as any event arising from causes totally beyond the control and without fault of the Respondent that delays or prevents the performance of any obligation under this Agreed Order despite the Respondent's best efforts to fulfill the obligation. The requirement that the Respondent exercise "best efforts to fulfill the obligation" includes using best efforts to anticipate any potential force majeure event and best efforts to address the effects of any potential force majeure event (1) as it is occurring and (2) following the potential force majeure event, such that the delay is minimized to the greatest extent possible. "Force Majeure" does not include changed business or economic conditions, financial inability to complete the work required by this Agreed Order, or increases in costs to perform the work. The Respondent shall notify IDEM by calling the case manager within three calendar days and by writing no later than seven calendar days after it has knowledge of any event which the Respondent contends is a force majeure. Such notification shall describe the anticipated length of the delay, the cause or causes of the delay, the measures taken or to be taken by the Respondent to minimize the delay, and the timetable by which these measures will be implemented. The Respondent shall include with any notice all available documentation supporting its claim that the delay was attributable to a force majeure. Failure to comply with the above requirements shall preclude the Respondent from asserting any claim of force majeure for that event. The Respondent shall have the burden of demonstrating that the event is a force majeure. The decision of whether an event is a force majeure shall be made by IDEM.

If a delay is attributable to a force majeure, IDEM shall extend, in writing, the time period for performance under this Agreed Order, by the amount of time that is directly attributable to the event constituting the force majeure. 13. This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its officers, directors, principals, agents, successors, subsidiaries, and assigns. The signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this document and legally bind the parties they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order. 14. This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a Permit, or a modification of an existing Permit, nor shall it in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable NPDES Permit or with any other applicable federal or state law or regulation.

15. The Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that the Respondent's compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, its NPDES Permit, or state law.

16. In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

17. The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall by contract require that all contractors, firms, and other persons acting for it comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

18. Upon the Effective Date, this Agreed Order supercedes and replaces Cause No. 2000-9471-W, which shall be deemed closed.

19. This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all terms and conditions of paragraphs 2 through 11 of this Order, and Complainant issues a close-out letter.

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

By: _________________________                                             By: _________________________
Mark Stanifer, Section Chief                                                             Norbert Satkoski Vice-President of
Office of Enforcement                                                                         Vice President of Engineering
                                                                                                            Roll Coater, Inc.

 
 
 
 
Date: _______________                                                             Date: _______________
 
 
 
 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:                                     COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

By: _________________________                                         By: _______________________
Hala Silvey                                                                                     Kari Evans
Office of Legal Counsel                                                                   Barnes & Thornburg
Department of Environmental Management

Date: _______________                                                         Date: _______________
 
 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS _______________________ DAY OF ____________________, 2002.
 
 
 
 

FOR THE COMMISSIONER:

Signed August 14, 2002

___________________________

Felicia A. Robinson

Deputy Commissioner for Legal Affairs