|
STATE OF |
) |
|
BEFORE THE INDIANA
DEPARTMENT |
||
|
|
|||||
|
COMMISSIONER OF THE
DEPARTMENT Complainant, v. GRAIN PROCESSING
CORPORATION, Respondent. |
) |
|
|||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and Respondent
desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of
any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of
Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC
13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an
admission of any violation contained herein.
Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver
of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future
administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this
order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is
the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management
(“IDEM”), a department of the State of
2.
Respondent is
Grain Processing Corporation (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the
stationary corn processing facility with Plant ID No. 027-00046, located at 1443
South 300 West in Washington, Daviess County, Indiana (“Site”).
3.
IDEM has
jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC
13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation on July 20, 2001 via Certified
Mail to:
|
J.
T. Kautz, President |
Grain
Processing Corporation |
|
Grain
Processing Corporation |
c/o
C T Corporation System, Registered Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Pursuant to IC
13-30-3-3, IDEM issued an Amended Notice of Violation on September 26, 2002 via
Certified Mail to:
|
J.
T. Kautz, President |
Grain
Processing Corporation |
|
Grain
Processing Corporation |
c/o
C T Corporation System, Registered Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Respondent
waives issuance of a Notice of Violation for violations not listed in the
Notices of Violation and addressed in this Agreed Order and to the settlement
period of sixty (60) days as provided for by IC 13-30-3-3.
7.
Based on
investigations by designated representatives of the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) and compliance testing conducted on January
29-30, 2001, February 6, 7, and 12, 2001, March 19 - 20, 2001, May 31, 2001,
June 1, 2001, July 2, 2001, October 16, 2001, January 24, 2002, March 14, 2002,
November 12, 2002, Respondent has been found in violation of the following
environmental statutes, rules, and/or permits:
a. Pursuant
to Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 14(b), the amount
of biogas to be burned in the biogas flare shall be limited to 8,858,400 cubic
feet per 365 consecutive day period.
Beginning in August 2000, SO2 Emission Reports show the emissions of
biogas emitted through the biogas flare to be in excess of the permitted limit,
in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 14(b).
Respondent continues to operate in excess of the biogas limit. Respondent has submitted a request for permit
modification to increase allowable levels of biogas that can be emitted through
the biogas flare.
b. Pursuant
to Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 19, the biogas
flare is to be in operation at all times when biogas is released from the
wastewater treatment plant.
A record review of the second, third, and forth quarter 2000 SO2
Emission Reports show that from approximately April 2000 to September 2000, the
biogas flowing through the biogas flare was not combusted, in violation of Construction
Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 19.
c. Pursuant
to Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12, the Corn Unloading Area Baghouse (CP01) has
an allowable PM10 emission limit of 2.57 lbs/hr.
A compliance test on January 29, 2001 showed average PM10 emissions
of 4.78 lbs/hr, in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation
condition 12.
A re-test performed on May 29, 2001, demonstrated compliance with the PM10
limit.
d. Pursuant
to Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12, the Elevator Leg Aspiration Baghouse (FP05)
has an allowable PM10 emission limit of 0.17 lbs/hr.
A compliance test on January 30, 2001 showed average PM10 emissions
of 0.31 lbs/hr, in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation
condition 12.
A re-test performed on May 30, 2001, demonstrated compliance with the PM10
limit.
e. Pursuant
to 326 IAC 2-2, any source implementing a modification at one of the major
stationary sources listed under 326 IAC 2-2-1(p) which is located in an
attainment or unclassifiable area as designated in 326 IAC 1-4, and which would
result in a net emissions increase of actual or potential emissions that would
equal or exceed one hundred (100) tons per year for carbon monoxide (CO), forty
(40) tons per year for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), oxides of nitrogen
(NOx), and sulfur dioxide (SO2), or more than twenty-five (25) or
fifteen (15) tons per year for particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter
of less than ten (10) microns (PM10), respectively, shall apply best
available control technology (BACT).
f. Pursuant to Construction Permit
CP-027-7239-00046 operation condition 14a, the Germ Dryer Scrubber (FP12) has an allowable SO2 emission limit of 0.28 lbs/hr.
A compliance test conducted on March 19 – 20, 2001, showed average SO2
emissions of 11.0 lbs/hr, in violation of 326 IAC 2-2 and Construction Permit
CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 14a.
A compliance test on July 2, 2001 showed average SO2 emissions of
9.32 lbs/hr, in violation of 326 IAC 2-2 and Construction Permit CP
027-7239-00046 operation condition 14a.
A compliance test on October 16, 2001 showed average SO2 emissions
of 0.49 lbs/hr, in violation of 326 IAC 2-2 and Construction Permit CP
027-7239-00046 operation condition 14a.
Respondent has failed to demonstrate compliance with the SO2 limit
in Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 14a.
Respondent has submitted a request for permit modification.
g. Pursuant
to Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12, the Germ Dryer Scrubber (FP12) has an
allowable PM emission limit of 1.37 lbs/hr.
A compliance test conducted on March 19 – 20, 2001, showed average PM emissions
of 3.20 lbs/hr, in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation
condition 12.
A compliance test on July 2, 2001 showed average PM emissions of 4.80 lbs/hr, in
violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
A subsequent test performed on March 13, 2002, demonstrated compliance with the
PM limit.
h.
Pursuant to Construction
Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12, the Gluten Dryer Scrubber (FP13) has an allowable PM emission limit of
3.65 lbs/hr.
A compliance test conducted on February 6, 7 and 12, 2001, showed average PM emissions
of 14.9 lbs/hr, in violation of 326 IAC 2-2 and Construction Permit CP
027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
A compliance test on March 14, 2002 showed average PM emissions of 9.20 lbs/hr,
in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
A compliance test on November 12, 2002 showed average PM emissions of 21.91 lbs/hr,
in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
Respondent has failed to demonstrate compliance with the PM limit in
Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
Respondent has submitted a request for permit modification for FP13 along with
a BACT analysis.
i.
Pursuant to
Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12, the Dry Gluten Transport Baghouse (FP14) has an allowable PM10
emission limit of 0.085 lbs/hr.
A compliance test on January 24, 2002 showed average PM10 emissions
of 0.400 lbs/hr, in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046
operation condition 12. A compliance
test conducted on February 7, 2001 was invalid due to high water blank
values. No valid re-test has been
conducted. Respondent has failed to
demonstrate compliance with the PM10 limit in Construction Permit CP
027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
Respondent has submitted a request for permit modification.
j.
Pursuant to
Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 7, testing, including
the Corn Cleaning Baghouse (FP20) shall
be performed no later than 180 days after initial start-up of the entire
source.
Compliance tests conducted on February 13, 2001 and October 16, 2001 were
invalid due to high water blank values.
Respondent has failed to perform testing of FP20 within 180 days after
initial start-up of the source, in violation of Construction Permit CP
027-7239-00046 operation condition 7.
Respondent has submitted a request for permit modification.
k.
Pursuant to
Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12, the CGF Pellets, Dry Germ and Gluten Meal
Loadout Baghouse (FP26) has an allowable PM10 emission limit of
0.17 lbs/hr.
A compliance test on February 7, 2001 was invalid due to high water blank
values. A compliance test on May 31,
2001 and June 1, 2001 showed average PM10 emissions of 0.45 lbs/hr,
in violation of Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
No valid re-test has been conducted.
Respondent has failed to demonstrate compliance with the PM10
limit in Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 12.
Respondent has submitted a request for permit modification.
l.
Pursuant to
Construction Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 14(a), the amount of
corn processed shall be limited to 26,280,000 bushels per 365 consecutive day
period.
Beginning in August 2004, SO2 Emission Reports show the corn
processed to be in excess of the permitted limit, in violation of Construction
Permit CP 027-7239-00046 operation condition 14(a).
Respondent continues to operate in excess of the permitted corn processed
limit. Respondent has submitted a
request for permit modification.
8.
In recognition
of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and
judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II.
ORDER
1.
This Agreed
Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant
or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
IDEM recognizes
that an application for a PSD permit modification was submitted in February
2007, and that several previous permit modifications were submitted in order to
address permitting issues set forth in paragraphs 7a, f, h, i, j, k, and l
described in the Findings of Fact above.
Regarding the permit conditions referenced in those paragraphs, this
Agreed Order shall resolve noncompliance with those conditions through and
including the time when a permit decision is issued in response to the February
2007 application.
3.
All submittals
required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in
writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
|
Lynne
Sullivan, Enforcement Case Manager |
|
Office
of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02 |
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
|
|
4.
Respondent is
assessed a civil penalty of Two Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($280,000). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date. In the event that the
civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall
continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
5.
Civil penalties
are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number of this
action and shall be mailed to:
|
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Cashier
– Mail Code 50-10C |
|
|
|
|
6.
This Agreed
Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and
assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are
fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they
represent. No change in ownership,
corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its
status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
7.
In the event
that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining
terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced
as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
8.
Respondent shall
provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or
successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent
shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work
under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
9.
This Agreed
Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of
an existing permit. This Agreed Order,
and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to
this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to
comply with the requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable
Federal or State law or regulation, except as noted in paragraph 2 above.
10.
IDEM or anyone
acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties
Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this
Agreed Order.
11.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or
injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in this Agreed Order.
12.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating
with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this
enforcement action. IDEM or anyone
acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties
Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any
other agency or entity.
13.
This Agreed
Order shall remain in effect until Respondent satisfies the requirements
contained in paragraph 4 of this Agreed Order, and a permit decision is
rendered in response to the PSD applications submitted by Respondent in
February 2007.
14.
This Agreed
Order, and compliance with its terms, shall resolve all violations set forth in
the Findings of Fact of this Agreed Order.
|
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
RESPONDENT: |
|||||
|
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Grain Processing Corporation |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
Craig Henry |
|
Printed: |
|
|||
|
|
Chief, Air Section |
|
Title: |
|
|||
|
|
Office of Enforcement |
|
|
|
|||
|
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: |
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
|||||
|
For the Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Deputy Attorney General |
|
|
|
|||
|
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||
|
MANAGEMENT THIS |
|
DAY
OF |
|
, 2007. |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
For the Commissioner: |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Signed on September 10, 2007 |
||||||
|
|
Robert B. Keene |
||||||
|
|
Assistant Commissioner |
||||||
|
|
Office of Legal Counsel and Enforcement |
||||||