STATE OF INDIANA ) BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
) SS: OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COUNTY OF MARION )
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT )
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, )
)
Complainant, )
) CAUSE NO. A-3588
v. )
)
ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY )
CONSULTING CORPORATION, )
)
Respondent. )
The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action
without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this
Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.
1. Complainant is the Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant") of
the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the
State of Indiana created by IC
13-13-1-1 (IC 13-7-2-11 prior to July 1, 1996)
.
2. Respondent is Environment Technology Consulting Corporation
("Respondent"), an asbestos abatement contractor licensed in the State of
Indiana, located at 1524 Estella Avenue, in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
3. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") has
jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.
5. Respondent acquired the assets and liabilities of Environment Technology, Inc.,
in March 1996. Respondent is located at the same address as Environment
Technology, Inc., and is currently conducting business as Environment
Technology Consulting Corporation.
6. Respondent received the Notice of Violation and ackowledges that the Notice of
Violation sent to Environment Technology, Inc., has served as proper notice
under IC 13-30-3-3.
7. Respondent implemented an asbestos removal project at Northwest Indiana
Water Company, 650 Madison Street, Gary, Indiana, on or about March 29,
1996, to which the notification and emission control requirements of 326 IAC
14-10 applied, pursuant to 326 IAC 14-10-1(4).
8. Rule 326 IAC 14-10-4 requires each owner or operator of an applicable
renovation activity to follow the emission control procedures set out in the rule.
9.
Rule 326 IAC 14-10-4(9)
states, upon completion of stripping and removal
operations for demolition projects described in section 1(a) and renovation
projects described in section 1(c) through 1(f) of this rule, collect visible
contamination of asbestos by employing one (1) or both of the following
cleaning procedures: (A) Vacuum all surfaces in the work area using a vacuum
equipped with a HEPA filter and remove all standing water; (B) Wet wipe or
wet mop all surfaces in the work area and remove all standing water.
10.
Rule 326 IAC 14-10-4(10)
states, upon completion of the cleanup requirements
identified in subdivision (9), an Indiana accredited supervisor, prior to the
removal of the warning signs or other demarcation of the work area, shall
perform a final visual inspection of the work area for visible suspect RACM
debris. If visible suspect RACM debris is discovered, then the requirements of
subdivision (9) shall be repeated until all visible suspect RACM debris has been
removed. Upon completion of the above, the accredited supervisor shall certify
in writing that the final visual inspection was completed and the work area is
free of all visible suspect asbestos debris. This certification shall also include
the date of the final visual inspection, the location of the asbestos removal
project and the accredited supervisor's signature. The certification shall be
retained by the contractor for a period of at least three (3) years from the date of
the final visual inspection and must be made available upon request from
IDEM. A copy of the certification shall also be sent to the building owner.
11. On March 29, 1996, a representative of Complainant visited the site of the
above-mentioned asbestos abatement project. During the inspection, the
inspector observed dry visible asbestos-containing debris on the floor in the
work area after the project was completed, the supervisor had done a final
visual inspection and the warning signs had been removed, a violation of 326
IAC 14-10-4(9) and 326 IAC 14-10-4(10).
12. On April 1, 1996, Respondent returned to the project site and recleaned the area
to remove all visible RACM prior to reinsulating the pipes.
13. On October 3, 1996, representatives of the Respondent and Complainant met
for the purpose of discussing resolution to this matter.
14. The project supervisor for the asbestos removal project is Leemon Ward,
Indiana accreditation number 195616020.
15. For the purposes of this action, Cause No. A-3588, this agreement resolves all
violations listed in the Notice of Violation.
16. In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to
administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
1. This Agreed Order shall be effective ("Effective Date") when it is approved by
the Complainant or her delegate, and has been received by the Respondent.
This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.
2. Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty
Dollars ($3750). Said penalty amount shall be paid in three monthly
installments of One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1250) each. The
first installment shall be due within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this
Agreed Order.
By: By:
David P. McIver, Acting Air Section Chief
Office of Enforcement Printed:
Title:
Date: Date:
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:
Department of Environmental Management
By: By:
Office of Legal Counsel
Date: Date:
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
THIS DAY OF , 199 .
FOR THE COMMISSIONER:
Signed on 1/2/97
Patrick Carroll, Director
Office of Enforcement
Converted by Andrew Scriven