Indiana Rules of
Court
Rules for Admission to the Bar
and the Discipline of Attorneys
Including Amendments Received Through July 1,
2024
Find
Admission & Discipline forms at courts.in.gov
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Rule
1.1. Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
Rule
3. Admission of Attorneys
Rule
5. Foreign Legal Consultants
Rule
6. Admission Without Examination
Rule
6.2. Pro Bono Publico License
Rule
8. [Vacated effective June 23, 1971]
Rule
9. State Board of Law Examiners
Rule
10. Expenses and Compensation of Members of Board
Rule
12. Committee on Character and Fitness
Rule
13. Educational Requirements For Admission To Examination
Rule
15. Applications, Filing Dates and Fees for Examination and Re-Examination
Rule
16. [Vacated effective January 1, 1998]
Rule
17. Admission Upon Examination
Rule
18. Report on Examinations
Rule
23. Disciplinary Commission and Proceedings
Rule
24. Rules Governing the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Rule
25. Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings
Rule
26. Group Legal Service Plans
Rule
27. Professional Corporations, Limited Liability Companies and Limited
Partnerships
Rule
28. Mandatory Continuing Judicial Education
Rule
29. Mandatory Continuing Legal Education
Rule
30. Indiana Certification Review Plan
Rule
31. Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program
PROGRAM
GUIDELINES FOR THE INDIANA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The bar of this state shall consist of
all attorneys in good standing who, prior to July 1, 1931, were duly admitted
to practice law by the circuit courts of this state, and all attorneys in good
standing who, subsequently thereto, have been or hereafter shall be admitted to
practice by this court.
Rule 1.1. Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
The Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education shall provide for the efficient management of the State Board of Law Examiners, the Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education, the registration of attorneys, and the Indiana roll of attorneys. The Supreme Court shall appoint the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education.
(a) Name and Address. All attorneys in active or inactive
good standing, duly admitted to the practice of law in the State of Indiana shall
file with the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and
Continuing Education, their correct name, office and residence address, office
telephone number, electronic mail address, and county of residence; provided,
however, such residence addresses and electronic mail addresses shall be
confidential and excluded from public access. Said attorneys shall notify the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education of any
change of address (including electronic mail address), change of telephone
number, or change of name within thirty (30) days of such change. A notice of a
change of name shall be accompanied by a copy of the court record or an
affidavit that states the name change. The names and addresses so filed shall
be effective for all notices involving licenses as attorneys and/or
disciplinary matters, and a failure to file same shall be a waiver of notice
involving licenses as attorneys and/or disciplinary matters. The Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education shall
annually send a certified list of attorneys, together with their non-confidential
addresses on file to the Indiana State Bar Association.
(b) Annual Registration Fee--Active
Attorneys. Except as
provided in sections (c) or (d), each attorney who is a member of the bar of
this Court on August 1 of each year shall, so long as the attorney is a member
of the Bar of this Court, pay a registration fee of one hundred eighty dollars
($180.00) on or before October 1 of such year. A delinquent fee in the amount
of one hundred thirty dollars ($130.00) shall be added to the registration fee
for fees paid after October 1 and on or before October 15 of each year; a
delinquent fee in the amount of one hundred eighty dollars ($180.00) shall be
added to the registration fee for fees paid after October 15 and on or before
December 31 of each year; and a delinquent fee in the amount of three hundred
thirty dollars ($330.00) shall be added to the registration fee for fees paid
after December 31 of each year. An attorney who has paid the registration fee
under this subsection and any applicable delinquent fees and who is otherwise
eligible to practice law in this state shall be considered to be in active good
standing.
Any
attorney admitted to practice law in this State on a date subsequent to August
1 of each year shall, within ten (10) days of the date of his or her admission
to the Bar of the Court, or by October 1 of said year, whichever date is later,
pay a registration fee of one hundred eighty dollars ($180.00).
(c) Annual Registration Fee--Inactive
Attorneys. One-half
(1/2) of the registration fee referred to in section (b) shall be required of
an attorney who files with the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education, on or before October 1 of each year, an
affidavit of inactivity, stating that he or she is currently in active good
standing or wishes to retain inactive standing, and that he or she neither
holds judicial office nor is engaged in the practice of law in this state,
except for practice permitted under Rule 6.2 Section 2(c). A delinquent fee in
the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) shall be added to the registration fee for
fees paid after October 1 and on or before October 15 of each year; and a
delinquent fee in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00) shall be added to
the registration fee for fees paid after October 15 of each year. An attorney
who has paid the registration fee under this section and any applicable
delinquent fees shall be considered to be in inactive good standing. An
inactive attorney shall promptly notify the Executive Director of the Indiana
Office of Admissions and Continuing Education of a desire to return to active
status, and pay the applicable registration fee for the current year, prior to
any act of practicing law.
(d) Annual Registration Fee--Retired
Attorneys. No
registration fee shall be required of an attorney who files with the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education, by
October 1 of any year, an affidavit of retirement, stating that he or she is
currently in active or inactive good standing, neither holds judicial office
nor is engaged in the practice of law in this state, and does not plan to
return to the practice of law, except for practice permitted under Rule 6.2
Section 2(c). An affidavit of retirement, once filed, shall be effective for
each succeeding year or until the attorney is reinstated pursuant to section
(e).
(e) Reinstatement of Retired
Attorneys. In the
event there is no basis for the suspension of the attorney’s license to
practice law, a retired attorney’s privilege to practice law shall be
reinstated upon submitting to the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education a written application for reinstatement and
payment of:
(1) the unpaid registration fee for
the year of reinstatement;
(2) registration fees, including
delinquent fees, in the amount referred to in section (b) for each year of
retirement; and
(3) an administrative reinstatement
fee of two hundred dollars ($200.00).
The
Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
shall deposit the administrative reinstatement fee referred to in subsection
(e)(3) into the “Attorney Services-Annual Fees” account, described in section
(m).
(f) IOLTA Certification. On or before October 1 of each
year, every attorney admitted to practice law in this state shall certify to
the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing
Education of this Court that all client funds that are nominal in amount or to
be held for a short period of time by the attorney so that they could not earn
income for the client in excess of the costs incurred to secure such income are
held in an IOLTA account (as that term is defined in Indiana Rules of
Professional Conduct, Rule 1.15(f)) of the attorney or law firm or that the attorney
is exempt under the provisions of Prof. Cond. R. 1.15(g)(2). Any attorney who
fails to make an IOLTA certification on or before October 1 of each year shall
be assessed a delinquent fee according to the schedule set forth in section (b)
if the attorney is active or section (c) if the attorney is inactive.
(g) Annual Registration Notice. On or before August 1 of each year,
the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing
Education of this Court shall mail a notice to or notify via electronic mail each
attorney then admitted to the bar of this Court who is in active or inactive
good standing that: (i) a registration fee must be paid on or before October 1;
and (ii) the certification required by section (f) of this rule and by Ind. Prof.
Cond. R. 1.15(g) must be filed with the Executive Director of the Indiana
Office of Admissions and Continuing Education on or before October 1. The Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education shall
also send such notice to the Clerk for each circuit and superior court in this State
for posting in a prominent place in the courthouse, the Indiana State Bar
Association, and such print and other media publishers of legal information as
the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing
Education reasonably determines appropriate. Provided, however, that the
failure of the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and
Continuing Education to send such notice will not mitigate the duty to pay the
required fee and file the required certification.
(h) Failure to Pay Registration Fee;
Reinstatement. Any
attorney who fails to pay a registration fee required under section (b) or (c)
or fails to file the certification required by section (f) of this rule and by
Ind.Prof. Cond. R. 1.15(g) shall be subject to suspension from the practice of
law and sanctions for contempt of this Court in the event he or she thereafter
engages in the practice of law in this State. In the event there is no basis
for the continued suspension of the attorney's license to practice law, such an
attorney's privilege to practice law shall be reinstated upon submitting to the
Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
a written application for reinstatement and payment of:
(1) the applicable unpaid registration
fee for the year of suspension;
(2) any delinquent fees for the year
of suspension due pursuant to section (b) or (c);
(3) the applicable unpaid
registration fee for the year of reinstatement, if different from the year of
suspension;
(4) a registration fee, including
delinquent fees, in the amount referred to in section (c) for all intervening
years of suspension;
(5) an administrative reinstatement
fee of two hundred dollars ($200.00); and
(6) the
certification required by section (f) of this rule.
The
Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
shall deposit the administrative reinstatement fee referred to in subsection
(h)(5) in to the “Attorney Services-Annual Fees” account, described in section
(m).
(i) Certification of Good Standing. The Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education shall
issue a certificate of active good standing or inactive good standing approved
by this Court to any attorney upon the receipt of the annual registration fee
and any applicable delinquent fees referred to in sections (b) and (c),
respectively. The certificate of active good standing shall include a statement
to the effect that the lawyer has filed the certification required by section
(f) of this rule.
(j) Annual Continuing Education Fee
-- Non-attorney Judges.
(1) On or before August 1, of each
year, the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing
Education shall mail or electronically mail to each non-attorney judge a notice
that an education fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) must be paid on or before
the first day of October. Failure to pay the education fee on or before October
1, will result in the imposition of a delinquency fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00).
(2) Any non-attorney judge who fails
to pay the education fee shall be subject to suspension from judicial office. A
non-attorney judge may resume office upon written application, payment of
unpaid education fees and payment of the delinquency fee set out in subsection
(1).
(1) The requirement in section (c)
that inactive attorneys pay an annual registration fee shall apply to all
inactive attorneys and shall be effective for the annual fee due on or before
October 1, 2002. Notwithstanding any other provision in this rule, any inactive
attorney who filed an affidavit of inactivity on or before October 1, 2001 and
who, after suspension for nonpayment of the annual registration fee referred to
in section (c), thereafter seeks reinstatement to active or inactive attorney
status pursuant to section (h), shall not be required to pay unpaid
registration or delinquent fees pursuant to (h)(4) for any year prior to
October 1, 2002.
(2) Notwithstanding any other
provision in this rule, any attorney who, after suspension for nonpayment of
the annual registration fee referred to in section (b), thereafter seeks
reinstatement to active or inactive attorney status pursuant to section (h),
shall not be required to pay unpaid registration or delinquent fees pursuant to
section (h)(4) for any year prior to October 1, 2002.
(3) Notwithstanding any other
provision in this rule, any retired attorney who seeks reinstatement to active
attorney status pursuant to section (e) shall not be required to pay unpaid
registration or delinquent fees pursuant to (e)(2) for any year prior to October
1, 2002.
(l) Affidavit of Permanent Withdrawal. An attorney in good standing, who
is current in payment of all applicable registration fees and other financial
obligations imposed by these rules, and who is not the subject of an
investigation into, or a pending proceeding involving, allegations of
misconduct, who desires to relinquish permanently his or her license to
practice law in the State of Indiana may do so by tendering an Affidavit of
Permanent Withdrawal from the practice of law in this State to the Executive
Secretary of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission. The Executive
Secretary shall promptly verify the eligibility of the attorney to resign under
this section, and if eligible, forward a certification of eligibility, together
with the Affidavit of Permanent Withdrawal to the Executive Director of the
Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education, and the Executive
Director shall show on the roll of attorneys that the attorney's Indiana law
license has been relinquished permanently and that the lawyer is no longer
considered an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana. An
attorney who permanently withdraws under this section shall not be eligible for
reinstatement under section (e) or (h), but may apply for admission under
Admission and Discipline Rules 3 through 21. In the event the attorney is not
eligible to permanently withdraw under this section, the Executive Secretary
shall promptly notify the attorney of all reasons for ineligibility.
(1) Deposit
of Funds. All funds
collected under this rule are deposited in an account to be maintained by the Office
of Judicial Administration and designated “Attorney Services-Annual Fees.”
(2) Use
of Funds. Funds from
this account may be used for the operation of the Office of Judicial and
Attorney Regulation, the Office of Admissions and Continuing Education, the
Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program, and such efforts to benefit and improve
the practice of law, the legal profession, or the delivery of legal services as
the Court may approve.
Section
1. Requirements
(a) A law student may serve as a legal intern when
the following requirements are met:
(i) The law student is enrolled in a school
accredited as set forth in Rule 13(1)(a).
(ii) The law student has satisfactorily completed
one-half of the educational requirements for a first professional degree in
law.
(iii) The law student has received permission from
the dean of the law school to participate in a legal intern program determined
to be beneficial to the law student’s training pursuant to the guidelines
jointly developed by the law schools of this state.
(iv) The law student has completed or is enrolled
in a legal ethics or professional responsibility course as set forth in Rule
13(1)(c).
(b) A law school graduate may serve as a legal
intern when the following requirements are met:
(i) The law school graduate is eligible to take
the bar examination under Rule 13.
(ii) The law school graduate has received
permission from an attorney who is a member of the Indiana bar to serve as a
legal intern under that attorney's direct supervision.
Section
2. Length of Intern Status
(a) A law student may serve as a legal intern
until graduation from law school or for a lesser period if designated by the
dean of the law school.
(b) A law school graduate may serve as a legal
intern from the date of graduation until the graduate has taken and been
notified of the results of the first bar examination for which the graduate is
eligible under Rule 13, or if successful on that examination, until the first
opportunity thereafter for formal admission to the Indiana bar.
Section
3. Certification
(a) The dean of a law school sponsoring a legal
intern program shall advise the State Board of Law Examiners of those students
who qualify to be legal interns and the length of that internship.
(b) An attorney who is a member of the Indiana bar
and who wishes to sponsor and supervise a graduate as a legal intern shall
advise the Board. And the dean of the law school from which the graduate
received their first professional degree in law shall advise the Board of both
the date of graduation and the date at which the graduate will be first
eligible for examination under Rule 13.
Section
4. Scope of Conduct
Except
as otherwise permitted in Section 4(b), a legal intern may practice law in
Indiana, provided such practice is supervised and approved by an attorney who
is a member of the Indiana bar. A legal intern shall inform each client of
their intern status and that they are not a licensed attorney.
(a) A legal intern shall not interview any person
represented by an attorney without the express permission of such attorney. In
no event may a person (including private corporations) be charged for the
services of a legal intern acting in a representative capacity. The personal
presence of a supervising attorney is required in any proceeding in open court.
(b) A law school graduate serving as a legal
intern under Section 2(b) who is otherwise qualified for admission and has been
notified of their successful results on the Indiana bar examination may
practice law in Indiana without the direct supervision of an attorney who is a
member of the Indiana bar, including appearing in any proceeding in open court
without the presence of a supervising attorney, if the law school graduate is
employed in any of the following capacities:
(i) A legal services organization or public
defender office that provides legal assistance to persons of limited means.
(ii) The Indiana Department of Child Services
where the law school graduate is providing litigation services in child welfare
cases.
(iii) The office of a prosecuting attorney.
The
law school graduate’s authority to practice law under this provision is limited
to matters assigned in the course and scope of their employment with the employers listed above. Law
school graduates practicing under this provision are not admitted to the
Indiana bar until the admission ceremony set out in Rule 21. Employers must
allow law school graduates practicing under this provision time to attend the
admission ceremony.
Rule 3. Admission of Attorneys
Section
1. Admission of Attorneys.
The Supreme Court shall have exclusive
jurisdiction to admit attorneys to practice in Indiana. Admission to practice
law by the Court pursuant to Rule 21 shall entitle attorneys to practice in any
of the courts of this state.
Section 2. Temporary Admission on Petition.
(a)
Requirements for Temporary Admission on Petition. Any court of the State of Indiana, in the exercise of
discretion, may permit a member of the bar of another state or territory of the
United States, or the District of Columbia, not admitted pursuant to Rule 21,
to appear in a particular case or proceeding, only if the court before which the
attorney wishes to appear or in the case of an administrative proceeding, the
Supreme Court, determines that there is good cause for such appearance and that
each of the following conditions is met:
(1) A member of the bar of this state has appeared and
agreed to act as co- counsel.
(2) The attorney is not a resident of the state of Indiana,
regularly employed in the state of Indiana, or regularly engaged in business or
professional activities in the state of Indiana.
(3) The attorney has made payment to the Executive Director of the Indiana
Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
a case specific registration fee of $300, accompanied by a copy of the Verified
Petition for Temporary Admission that the attorney intends to file pursuant to
subdivision (4) below. Upon receipt of the registration fee and petition, the Executive Director of the Indiana
Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
will issue a temporary admission attorney number and payment receipt to the
attorney seeking admission. If the attorney's verified petition for temporary
admission is thereafter denied, the registration fee shall not be refunded.
(4) The attorney files a certificate of good standing issued
within the previous thirty days by the highest court in each state in which the
attorney is admitted to practice law and a verified petition, co-signed by
co-counsel designated pursuant to subdivision (a)(1), setting forth:
(i) The attorney's residential address, office address,
office telephone number, electronic mail address, and the name and address of
the attorney's law firm or employer, if applicable;
(ii) All states or territories in which the attorney has
ever been licensed to practice law, including the dates of admission to
practice and any attorney registration numbers;
(iii) That the attorney is currently a member in good
standing in all jurisdictions listed in (ii);
(iv) That the attorney has never been suspended, disbarred
or resigned as a result of a disciplinary charge, investigation, or proceeding
from the practice of law in any jurisdiction; or, if the attorney has been
suspended, disbarred or resigned from the practice of law, the petition shall
specify the jurisdiction, the charges, the address of the court and
disciplinary authority which imposed the sanction, and the reasons why the
court should grant temporary admission not withstanding prior acts of
misconduct;
(v) That no disciplinary proceeding is presently pending
against the attorney in any jurisdiction; or, if any proceeding is pending, the
petition shall specify the jurisdiction, the charges and the address of the
disciplinary authority investigating the charges. An attorney admitted under
this rule shall have a continuing obligation during the period of such
admission promptly to advise the court of a disposition made of pending charges
or the institution of new disciplinary proceedings;
(vi) A list of all cases and proceedings, including caption
and case number, in which the attorney has appeared in any court or
administrative agency of this state during the last five (5) years by temporary
admission.
(vii) Absent good cause, repeated appearances by any person
pursuant to this rule shall be cause for denial of the petition. A
demonstration that good cause exists for the appearance shall include at least
one of the following:
(a) the cause in which the attorney seeks admission involves
a complex field of law in which the attorney has special expertise,
(b) there has been an attorney-client relationship with the
client for an extended period of time,
(c) there is a lack of local counsel with adequate expertise
in the field involved,
(d) the cause presents questions of law involving the law of
the foreign jurisdiction in which the applicant is licensed, or
(e) such other reason similar to those set forth in this
subsection as would present good cause for the temporary admission.
(viii) A statement that the attorney has read and will be
bound by the Rules of Professional Conduct adopted by the Supreme Court, and
that the attorney consents to the jurisdiction of the State of Indiana, the
Indiana Supreme Court, and the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission to
resolve any disciplinary matter that might arise as a result of the
representation.
(ix) A statement that the attorney has paid the registration
fee to the Executive Director
of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education in compliance with subdivision (a)(3) of this rule,
together with a copy of the payment receipt and temporary admission attorney
number issued by the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education pursuant to subdivision (3).
(b)
Responsibilities of Attorneys. Members of the bar of this state serving as co-counsel
under this rule shall sign all briefs, papers and pleadings in the cause and
shall be jointly responsible therefore. The signature of co-counsel constitutes
a certificate that, to the best of co-counsel's knowledge, information and
belief, there is good ground to support the signed document and that it is not
interposed for delay or any other improper reason. Unless ordered by the trial
court, local counsel need not be personally present at proceeding before the
court.
(c) Failure to Register, or Otherwise Perform as Required.
Any foreign attorney who fails to register or pay the registration fee as
required under subsection (a) shall be subject to discipline in this state.
Members of the bar of this state serving as co-counsel under this rule shall be
subject to discipline if the attorney admitted under this rule fails to pay the
required fees or otherwise fails to satisfy the requirements of this rule.
The
amendments apply only to requests for Temporary Admission on Petition filed on
or after January 1, 2022.
If
an attorney has been granted temporary admission status in a case prior to
January 1, 2022, the attorney need not pay a renewal fee in that case. For
cases initiated after January 1, 2022, an attorney must pay the temporary
admission registration fee for each case.
If
more than one (1) attorney from one firm is appearing pursuant to a Temporary
Admission on Petition in a particular case or proceeding on behalf of the same
client, each attorney appearing nevertheless has an individual obligation to
comply with the Rule as amended.
A record shall hereafter be made and
entered on the order book of this court of the admission, enrollment,
resignation, suspension, disbarment, reinstatement, and recertification of any
and all members of the bar of this court. In addition, the Executive Director
of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education shall keep, and
from time to time revise, a permanent electronic database of the members of the
bar of this court who have been enrolled as such, showing the name, address,
and date of admission of each living member.
Rule 5. Foreign Legal Consultants
(1) General Regulation as to Licensing. In its discretion, the Supreme Court may license to
practice in Indiana as a foreign legal consultant, without examination, an
applicant who:
(a) is a member in good standing of a recognized legal
profession in a foreign country, the members of which are admitted to practice
as attorneys or counselors at law or the equivalent and are subject to
effective regulation and discipline by a duly constituted professional body or
a public authority;
(b) for at least five of the seven years immediately
preceding his or her application has been a member in good standing of such
legal profession and has actually been engaged in the practice of law in the
said foreign country or elsewhere substantially involving or relating to the
rendering of advice or the provision of legal services concerning the law of
the said foreign country;
(c) possesses the good moral character and general fitness
requisite for a member of the bar of Indiana; and
(d) intends to practice as a foreign legal consultant in
Indiana and to maintain an office in this State for that purpose.
(2) Proof Required.
An applicant under this Rule shall file with the State Board of Law Examiners:
(a) a certificate from the professional body or public
authority in such foreign country having final jurisdiction over professional
discipline, certifying as to the applicant's admission to practice and the date
thereof, and as to his or her good standing as such attorney or counselor at
law or the equivalent;
(b) a letter of recommendation from one of the members of
the executive body of such professional body or public authority or from one of
the judges of the highest law court or court of original jurisdiction of such
foreign country and a letter of recommendation from at least one attorney who is
licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana other than as a foreign legal
consultant;
(c) a duly authenticated English translation of such
certificate and such letter if, in either case, it is not in English;
(d) the National Conference of Bar Examiners questionnaire
and affidavit along with the payment of the requisite fee and such other
evidence as to the applicant's educational and professional qualifications,
good moral character and general fitness, and compliance with the requirements
of Section 1 of this Rule as the State Board of Law Examiners may require;
(e) a copy or summary of the law and customs of the foreign
country that describes the opportunity afforded to members of the Bar of
Indiana to establish offices for the giving of legal advice to clients in such
foreign country, together with an authenticated English translation if it is
not in English; and
(f) the requisite documentation evidencing compliance with
the immigration laws of the United States.
(3) Reciprocal Treatment of Members of the Bar of Indiana. In considering whether to license an applicant to practice
as a foreign legal consultant, the Supreme Court may in its discretion take
into account whether a member of the bar of Indiana would have a reasonable and
practical opportunity to establish an office for the giving of legal advice to
clients in the applicant's country of admission. Any member of the bar who is
seeking or has sought to establish an office in that country may request the
court to consider the matter, or the Court may do so sua sponte.
(4) Scope of Practice.
A person licensed to practice as a foreign legal consultant under this Rule
shall be limited to rendering professional legal advice on the law of the
foreign country where the foreign legal consultant is admitted to practice. A
foreign legal consultant shall not:
(a) appear for a person other than himself or herself as
attorney in any court, or before any magistrate or other judicial officer, in
this State other than upon admission pro hac vice;
(b) prepare any instrument effecting the transfer or
registration of title to real estate located in the United States of America;
(i) any will or trust instrument effecting the disposition
on death of any property located in the United States of America and owned by a
resident thereof; or
(ii) any instrument relating to the administration of a
decedent's estate in the United States of America;
(d) prepare any instrument in respect of the marital or
parental relations, rights or duties of a resident of the United States of
America, or the custody or care of the children of such a resident;
(e) render professional legal advice on the law of this
State or of the United States of America (whether rendered incident to the
preparation of legal instruments or otherwise) except on the basis of advice
from a person duly qualified and entitled (otherwise than by virtue of having
been licensed under this Rule) to render professional legal advice in this
State;
(f) be, or in any way hold himself or herself out as, a
member of the bar of Indiana; or
(g) use any title other than “foreign legal consultant” and
affirmatively state in conjunction therewith the name of the foreign country in
which he or she is admitted to practice (although he or she may additionally
identify the name of the foreign or domestic firm with which he or she is
associated).
(5) Rights and Obligations. Subject to the limitations set forth in Section 4 of this
Rule, a person licensed as a legal consultant under this Rule shall be
considered a lawyer affiliated with the bar of this State and shall be entitled
and subject to:
(a) the rights and obligations set forth in the Indiana
Rules of Professional Conduct or arising from the other conditions and
requirements that apply to a member of the bar of Indiana under the Indiana
Rules of Court; and
(b) the rights and obligations of a member of the bar of
Indiana with respect to:
(i) affiliation in the same law firm with one or more
members of the bar of Indiana with respect to:
(A) employing one or more members of the bar of Indiana;
(B) being employed by one or more members of the bar of
Indiana or by any partnership or professional corporation which includes
members of the bar of this State or which maintains an office in this State;
(C) being a partner in any partnership or shareholder in any
professional corporation which includes members of the bar of Indiana or which
maintains an office in this State; and
(ii) attorney-client privilege, work product privilege and
similar professional privileges.
(6) Disciplinary Provisions. A person licensed to practice as a legal consultant under
this Rule shall be subject to professional discipline in the same manner and to
the same extent as members of the bar of Indiana and to this end:
(a) every person licensed to practice as a foreign legal
consultant under these Rules:
(i) shall be subject to control by the Supreme Court and to
censure, suspension, removal or revocation of his or her license to practice by
the Supreme Court and shall otherwise be governed by the Admission and
Discipline Rules; and
(ii) shall execute and file with the Supreme Court, in such
form and manner as such court may prescribe:
(A) his or her commitment to observe the Rules of
Professional Conduct and the Indiana Rules of Court to the extent applicable to
the legal services authorized under Section 4 of this Rule;
(B) a written undertaking to notify the court of any change
in such person's good standing as a member of the foreign legal profession
referred to in Section 1(a) of this Rule and of any final action of the
professional body or public authority referred to in Section 2(a) of this Rule
imposing any disciplinary censure, suspension, or other sanction upon such
person; and
(C) a duly acknowledged instrument, in writing, setting
forth his or her address in this State and designation the clerk of such court
as his or her agent upon whom process may be served, with like effect as if
served personally upon him or her, in any action or proceeding thereafter
brought against him or her and arising out of or based upon any legal services
rendered or offered to be rendered by him or her within or to residents of
Indiana, whenever after due diligence service cannot be made upon him or her at
such address or at such new address in this State as he or she shall have filed
in the office of such clerk by means of a duly acknowledged supplemental
instrument in writing.
(b) service of process on such clerk, pursuant to the
designation filed as aforesaid, shall be made by personally delivering to and
leaving with such clerk, or with a deputy or assistant authorized by him or her
to receive such service, at his or her office, duplicate copies of such process
together with a fee of ten dollars ($10). Service of process shall be complete
when such clerk has been so served. Such clerk shall promptly send one of such
copies to the foreign legal consultant to whom the process is directed, by
certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to such foreign legal
consultant at the address specified by him or her as aforesaid.
(7) Application and Renewal Fees. An applicant for a license as a foreign legal consultant
under this Rule shall pay an application fee which shall be equal to the fee
required to be paid by a person applying for admission as a member of the bar
of Indiana under Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 6. A person licensed as a
foreign legal consultant shall pay the annual registration fee required by
Admis.Disc.R. 23(21).
(8) Revocation of License.
In the event that a person licensed as a legal consultant under this Rule no
longer meets the requirements for licensure set forth in Section 1(a) or 1(c)
of this rule, the license granted to such person hereunder is revoked.
(9) Admission to Bar.
In the event that a person licensed as a foreign legal consultant under this
Rule is subsequently admitted as a member of the bar of Indiana under the
provisions of the Rules governing such admissions, the license granted to such
person hereunder shall be deemed superseded by the license granted to such
person to practice law as a member of the bar of Indiana.
(10) Application for Waiver of Provisions. The Supreme Court, upon application, may in its discretion
vary the application of or waive any provision of this Rule where strict
compliance will cause undue hardship to the applicant. Such application shall
be in the form of a verified petition setting forth the applicant's name, age
and residence address, the facts relied upon and a prayer for relief.
Rule 6. Admission Without Examination
Section 1. Attorneys Licensed in
Other States
A person who has been admitted to
practice law in the highest court of law in any other state (herein defined as
a state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia), may be
granted a license to practice law in Indiana without examination upon a finding
by the State Board of Law Examiners that said person has met each of the following
conditions:
(a) The applicant has actively engaged in the
practice of law for a period of at least three of the five years immediately
preceding the date of application. “Actively engaged in the practice of law”
shall mean:
(i) performing legal services for the general
public as a lawyer for at least 1,000 hours per year;
(ii) being employed by a state or local
governmental or business entity as a lawyer performing duties for which
admission to the practice of law is a prerequisite for at least 1,000 hours per
year;
(iii) performing the duties of a teacher of law on a
full-time basis in an ABA accredited law school;
(iv) serving as a judge of a court of record on a
full-time basis;
(v) serving on a full-time salaried basis as an
attorney with the federal government or a federal governmental agency including
service as a member of the Judge Advocate General's Department of one of the
military branches of the United States; or
(vi) a combination of the above.
(b) The practice of law must have been authorized
based on the applicant’s admission in the state where the applicant is licensed
and during the period of licensure unless the practice falls under subdivisions
(iii) or (v) above. Practice under either a business counsel license or a pro
bono publico license may apply toward years of practice so long as the
applicant meets all other requirements of this rule.
(c) The applicant is a member in good standing in
all states of admission, at least one of which has rules or other provisions
providing for admission without examination and by reciprocity or comity that
are no more restrictive than this rule.
(d) The admission of the applicant is in the
public interest.
(e) The applicant meets Indiana’s character and
fitness requirements.
(f) The applicant has paid or tendered the
required fee.
(g) The applicant has not failed the Indiana bar
examination or scored below 264 on the Uniform Bar Examination (whether
administered in Indiana or another jurisdiction) within five years of the date
of the application.
(h) The applicant has obtained a JD degree (or its
equivalent) from a law school located in the United States that at the time of
the applicant’s graduation was on the approved list of the Council of Legal
Education and Admission to the Bar of the American Bar Association.
Section
1.1. Military Spouses
(a) The Board has the discretion to waive the
minimum practice and reciprocity requirements in Section 1 for an applicant who
has been admitted to practice law in the highest court of law in any other
state and whose spouse is a member of the armed forces of the United States
subject to military transfer to Indiana for active duty military service upon a
finding that said person has met the requirements specified in Sections
1(c)–(h), and the following conditions:
(i) The applicant has achieved a passing score on
the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as established in Rule
17(4).
(ii) The applicant is not currently subject to
lawyer discipline or the subject of a pending disciplinary matter in any other
jurisdiction.
(iii) The applicant is the husband or wife of an
individual who is a member of the armed forces of the United States or the
Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, and that member
of the armed forces is on active military duty orders and stationed in Indiana.
(iv) The applicant physically resides in Indiana.
(b) In determining whether to waive the minimum
practice requirements in Section 1, the Board shall consider the following:
(i) The length of time the applicant has been
admitted in other jurisdictions.
(ii) The applicant’s practice history and
experience, including the type of practice, in other jurisdictions.
(iii) The type of practice the applicant intends to
undertake in Indiana and the applicant’s past experience in that type of
practice.
(iv) The level and amount of support, supervision,
or mentoring the applicant will have in their practice.
(v) The applicant’s showing of familiarity with
Indiana law, including CLE programs the applicant may have taken or other
showing the applicant may make regarding study of familiarity with Indiana’s
procedural and evidence rules and substantive Indiana law relating to the
applicant’s intended practice.
(c) Applicants who have not achieved a passing
score on the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination at the time of
application but who meet all other conditions may be provisionally admitted for
six months to achieve a passing score on the examination.
(d) When the active-duty service member is
assigned to an unaccompanied or remote follow-on assignment and the attorney
continues to physically reside in Indiana, the admission may be renewed until
that unaccompanied tour or remote assignment ends, provided that the attorney
complies with all other requirements for renewal.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision found in
this rule, the license of an attorney who is the spouse of an active-duty
service member shall terminate, and the attorney, consistent with the Rules of
Professional Conduct, shall immediately begin to take all steps necessary to
relinquish their license upon the occurrence of any of the following:
(i) The spouse’s discharge, separation, or
retirement from active duty in the United States Uniformed Services, or the
spouse’s no longer being on military orders stationed in Indiana.
(ii) The attorney no longer physically residing in
Indiana.
(iii) The attorney ceasing to be a dependent as
defined by the Department of Defense (or, for the Coast Guard when it is not
operating as a service in the Navy, by the Department of Homeland Security).
(iv) The attorney being admitted to practice law in
Indiana pursuant to any other rule.
Section 2.
Business Counsel License
A person who establishes an office or
other systematic and continuous presence in Indiana for the purpose of
accepting or continuing employment by a person or entity engaged in business in
Indiana other than the practice of law may be granted a business counsel
license to practice law in Indiana without examination so long as granting the
license is in the public interest and such person:
(a) is admitted to practice law in the highest
court of law in any other state or in a foreign country and fulfills the
requirements set forth in Rule 5(1)(a);
(b) complies with Section 1(a)(ii) and who is or
will be devoted solely to the business of such employer, receives or will
receive their entire compensation from such employer for the applicant’s legal
service, and remains in such employment, except for practice permitted under
Rule 6.2(2)(c);
(c) is a member in good standing in all states of
admission;
(d) meets Indiana’s character and fitness
requirements;
(e) pays or tenders the required fee; and
(f) has not failed the Indiana bar examination or
scored below 264 on the Uniform Bar Examination (whether administered in
Indiana or another jurisdiction) within five years of the date of the
application.
A person granted a business counsel
license under this rule based upon admission to the practice of law only in a
foreign country shall be subject to the limitations on scope of practice set
forth in Rule 5(4)(a)–(d). Upon the transfer of such employment outside of
Indiana, the right to practice law in Indiana shall terminate.
Upon the termination of such
employment, the right to practice law in Indiana under a business counsel
license shall terminate unless such business counsel license admittee has
secured employment from another person or entity within three months of their
termination and that employment meets the criteria of this section or such
business counsel license admittee shall have been admitted to practice law in
Indiana pursuant to any other rule.
Section 3.
Fees
The applicant shall submit their
application accompanied by a fee of $875 in accordance with procedures
established by the Board. The Executive Director of the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education may refer said application to the National
Conference of Bar Examiners for investigation and report. The Board is
authorized to pay all expenses incident to the investigation of the applicant’s
qualifications. However, in the event said application is considered and denied
by the Board prior to referral to the National Conference, the Board is
authorized to refund to the applicant one half of the application fee. No part
of the application fee shall otherwise be refunded.
Section 4.
Renewal of Business Counsel License
A business counsel license may
continue in force for one year and may be renewed for a like period upon the
submission of such verified individualized information that demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Board that the applicant has during the past year been
employed under the terms of the business counsel license and will continue to
be so employed. At the time of the first renewal request, the applicant must
also submit verified information to demonstrate compliance with the educational
requirements in Section 5.
(a) Annual Renewal Fee. Each attorney who is
licensed under Section 2 shall pay a renewal fee of $50 on or before November 1
of each year; a delinquent fee of $25 shall be added to the renewal fee
for fees paid after November 1 and on or before November 15 of each year; a
delinquent fee of $50 shall be added to the renewal fee for fees paid after
November 15 and on or before December 31 of each year; and a delinquent fee of
$150 shall be added to the renewal fee for fees paid after December 31 of each
year. Additionally, a $100 surcharge will be added to the late fee for each
consecutive year for which the attorney fails to timely file the renewal form.
This renewal fee is in addition to any annual registration and fees paid as
required in Rule 2.
(b) Failure to Pay Renewal Fee or Comply with
Educational Requirements. An attorney who fails to pay the renewal fee required
by Section 4(a), fails to file the affidavit required by Section 4(d), or fails
to comply with the educational requirements in Section 5 shall be subject to
revocation of their license to practice law and sanctions for contempt of this
Court in the event they thereafter engage in the practice of law in Indiana.
(c) Annual Renewal Notice. On or before September
1 of each year, the Executive Director shall mail a notice or notify via
electronic mail to each attorney admitted under Section 2 that:
(i) a renewal fee must be paid on or before
November 1; and
(ii) the attorney must either affirm compliance
with eligibility requirements to maintain the license or submit the signed
relinquish affidavit to the Board on or before November 1.
Notice sent
pursuant to this section shall be sent to the name and address maintained by
the Executive Director pursuant to Rule 2.
(d) Relinquishing of License. Any attorney who is
admitted under Section 2, is in good standing, is current in payment of all
applicable registration fees and other financial obligations imposed by
these rules, is not the subject of an investigation into or a pending
proceeding involving allegations of misconduct, and is no longer able to meet
the requirements to maintain their license pursuant to this rule may voluntarily
relinquish their license to practice law in Indiana by tendering the renewal
form with the signed relinquish affidavit to the Executive Director. The
Executive Director shall promptly verify the eligibility of the attorney to
relinquish under this section and, if eligible, shall show on the Roll of
Attorneys that the attorney’s Indiana law license has been relinquished
permanently and that the lawyer is no longer considered an attorney licensed to
practice law in Indiana. An attorney who relinquishes their license under this
section may apply for admission under Rules 3 through 21. In the event the
attorney is not eligible to relinquish under this section, the Executive
Director shall promptly notify the attorney of all reasons for ineligibility.
Section 5.
Educational Requirements
(a) In addition to the requirements in Rule 29,
within twelve months of an applicant's admission under Sections 1 or 2 of this
rule, the applicant shall attend an annual Indiana law update seminar that
provides a minimum of twelve hours of continuing legal education that has been
approved by the Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education. The Board
shall publish a list of approved seminars.
(b) Applicants admitted under this rule are
subject to, and shall comply with, Indiana’s Rules for Admission to the Bar and
the Discipline of Attorneys, Indiana’s Rules of Professional Conduct, all other
Court rules, and all statutory requirements.
Section 6.
Application of Rules and Appearance Before the Board
The provisions of Rule 12(7)–(9)
apply to admission under this rule. An applicant for admission under this rule
who is denied admission may request an appearance before the Board and a
hearing thereafter.
Section 1. Temporary
License
A person who has been admitted to
practice law in the highest court of law in any other state (as defined in Rule
6, section 1), and who is in good standing and has no pending disciplinary proceedings
in each state of admission, may be granted a temporary license to practice law
in Indiana if the person has applied for admission to the Indiana bar, either
on examination or on foreign license, and meets one of the following
qualifications:
(a) The
person is employed as a full-time faculty member at an ABA-accredited law
school in Indiana and is supervising law students in a clinical program of that
law school; or
(b) The
person is employed by a legal services organization or public defender office
that provides legal assistance to persons of limited means, free of charge; or
(c) The
person offers pro bono services to persons of limited means, free of charge,
through a legal services organization or public defender office; or
(d) The
person is employed full-time as an attorney for the Indiana Department of Child
Services providing litigation services in child welfare cases; or
(e) The
person is employed full-time as a deputy prosecutor.
Section 2. Conditions
and Limitations on Practice Under Temporary License
(a) All
legal work performed under Section 1 of this rule must be performed under the
supervision of an attorney admitted to practice in Indiana.
(b) Except
as otherwise authorized by these rules, a person authorized to practice under
this rule shall not perform any legal services in Indiana except as provided in
Section 1 and shall not request or accept compensation for services except such
salary as may be provided by the legal services organization, public defender
office, Indiana Department of Child Services, prosecutor’s office, or law
school.
(c) The
temporary license issued under this rule shall expire on the earliest of the
following dates:
(1) the
date the person is admitted to the Indiana bar;
(2) the
date the person’s application for the Indiana bar is denied for any reason,
including but not limited to failing to achieve a passing score on a qualifying
bar examination or failing to satisfy character and fitness or other
eligibility requirements;
(3) two
years after the date the temporary license is issued.
(d) At any
time while a person’s application for admission to the Indiana bar is pending,
the Board of Law Examiners may petition the Court to revoke the temporary
license if the Board determines that the person no longer meets the
requirements for temporary licensure or temporary licensure no longer is in the
public interest.
(e) A
person granted a temporary license under this Rule submits to the jurisdiction
of the Supreme Court for disciplinary purposes and agrees to be bound by the
Rules of Professional Conduct adopted by the Indiana Supreme Court.
Rule 6.2. Pro Bono Publico License
Section 1. General
Regulation as to Licensing.
In its discretion, the Supreme Court
may admit and authorize to practice in Indiana as a pro bono publico attorney
an applicant who:
(a) possesses
the good moral character and fitness to practice;
(b) intends
to provide legal services free of charge to persons of limited means through a
pro bono or other legal service organization eligible for fee waiver under IC
33-37-3-2(b); and
(c) either:
(i) was an
active member in good standing in Indiana, but who is currently registered as
inactive or retired under Rules 2(c) or (d), respectively; or
(ii) has
been admitted to practice law in the highest court of law in any other state
(as defined in Rule 6, section 1), and who is in good standing and has no
pending disciplinary proceedings in each state of admission.
(d) As used
in clause (c)(ii), “good standing” shall mean having been an active member of
the bar of another state and currently holding a law license in that state as
an active, inactive, or retired member.
Section 2. Proof
Required.
An applicant under this Rule shall
file with the State Board of Law Examiners:
(a) if
inactive good standing or retired from Indiana, an affidavit of intent to be
devoted solely to the provision of pro bono legal services; or
(b) if
admitted in any other state, a certificate from the highest court of law in
that state, certifying as to the applicant's admission to practice and the date
thereof, and as to his or her good standing as such attorney, and an affidavit
of intent to be devoted solely to the provision of pro bono legal services; or
(c) if
admitted pursuant to a Business Counsel License, pursuant to Rule 6 Section 2,
an affidavit that any legal services not devoted to his/her business counsel
license will be exclusively pro bono legal services.
Section 3. Scope of
Practice.
A person licensed to practice as a
pro bono publico attorney under this Rule:
(a) may
appear before a court or tribunal of this jurisdiction, prepare legal
documents, render legal advice and provide other pertinent legal services free
of charge to persons of limited means through a pro bono or other legal
assistance organization.
(b) shall
indicate the following immediately adjacent to the lawyer’s name on any
appearance and other document filed with a court or other tribunal or on any legal
document requiring an indication of the name of the preparer: “Authorized
pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 6.2.”
A pro bono publico attorney shall not
hold himself or herself out as an active member of the bar of Indiana.
Section 4. Rights and
Obligations.
A person licensed as a pro bono
publico attorney under this Rule shall be considered a lawyer affiliated with
the bar of this State and shall be entitled and subject to:
(a) the
rights and obligations set forth in the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct,
most specifically reporting requirements of Prof.Cond.R. 6.7(a)(1), or arising
from the other conditions and requirements that apply to a member of the bar of
Indiana under the Indiana Rules of Court; and
(b) the
rights and obligations of a member of the bar of Indiana with respect to
attorney-client privilege, work product privilege and similar professional
privileges.
(c) complete
no fewer than three (3) hours of Approved Continuing Legal Education Courses
within each year he or she practices under this rule. At least one (1) of those
hours must include professional responsibility.
Section 5. Disciplinary
Provisions.
A person licensed to practice as a
pro bono publico attorney under this Rule shall be subject to professional
discipline in the same manner and to the same extent as members of the bar of
Indiana; therefore, every person licensed to practice as a pro bono publico
attorney under these Rules:
(a) shall
be subject to control by the Supreme Court and to censure, suspension, removal
or revocation of his or her license to practice by the Supreme Court and shall
otherwise be governed by the Admission and Discipline Rules; and
(b) shall
execute and file with the Supreme Court, in such form and manner as such court
may prescribe:
(i) his or
her commitment to observe the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Indiana
Rules of Court; and
(ii) a
written undertaking to notify the court of any change in such person's good
standing as a member of the bar of any other state.
Section 6. Application
and Renewal Fees.
An applicant for a license as a pro
bono publico attorney under this Rule shall not be required to pay any fee
other than that which is required by other rules herein.
Section 7. Admission to
Bar.
In the event that a person licensed
as a pro bono publico attorney under this Rule is subsequently admitted as a
member of the bar of Indiana under the provisions of the Rules governing such
admissions, the license granted to such person hereunder shall be deemed
superseded by the license granted to such person to practice law as a member of
the bar of Indiana.
An
applicant admitted through examination shall be entitled to a certificate of
his admission upon taking the oath of attorneys and being entered on the roll
of attorneys by the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and
Continuing Education.
Rule 8. [Vacated effective June 23, 1971]
Rule 9. State Board of Law Examiners
The State Board of Law Examiners of the
State of Indiana shall consist of ten (10) members of the bar, two (2) from
each Supreme Court judicial district, who shall be appointed by this Court to
serve for terms of five (5) years and until their successors are appointed. The
terms of two (2) members of such Board shall expire on December 1 of each year.
The Board shall elect annually, a president, a vice-president, and a secretary.
These officers shall take office on December 1.
Rule 10. Expenses and Compensation of Members of Board
The board shall have authority to
prescribe such forms and adopt such rules as are necessary, not inconsistent
herewith. The board shall maintain in a separate fund the fees received under
these rules which shall be expended only upon the approval of the Supreme
Court. The members of the board of law examiners shall be allowed their
necessary expenses and a reasonable compensation which shall be fixed from time
to time by the court.
Application for admission and all
information in reference thereto shall be upon forms furnished by the secretary
of the board.
Rule 12. Committee on Character and Fitness
Section
1. The State Board of Law Examiners
shall inquire into and determine the character, fitness and general
qualifications to be admitted to practice law as a member of the bar of the
Supreme Court of Indiana. It is a condition precedent to admission, whether
upon examination or upon foreign license, that the Board report and certify to
the Supreme Court that the applicant, after due inquiry, has been found to
possess the necessary good moral character and fitness to perform the
obligations and responsibilities of an attorney practicing law in the State of
Indiana, and has satisfied all general qualifications for admission.
Section
2. The applicant must be at least 21
years of age and possess good moral character and fitness to practice law. The
applicant shall have the burden of proving that he or she possesses the
requisite good moral character and fitness to practice law. The applicant has
the absolute duty to inform the Board with full candor of any facts which bear,
even remotely, upon the question of the applicant's character and fitness and
general qualifications to practice law, which obligation continues from the
date of application to the time of admission, and includes the obligation to
promptly and to fully inform the Board of any such facts occurring or
discovered prior to admission. The term “good moral character” includes, but is
not limited to, the qualities of honesty, fairness, candor, trustworthiness,
observance of fiduciary responsibility, and of the laws of this State and of
the United States, and a respect for the rights of other persons and things,
and the judicial process. Anyone who has been convicted of a felony prima
facie shall be deemed lacking the requisite of good moral character as
defined in this section. The term “fitness” includes, but is not limited to,
the physical and mental suitability of the applicant to practice law in
Indiana. In satisfying the requirements of good moral character and fitness,
applicants should be persons whose record of conduct justifies the trust of
clients, adversaries, courts and others with respect to the professional duties
owed to them, and whose record demonstrates the qualities of honesty, trustworthiness,
diligence, or reliability. In the determination of good moral character and
fitness, relevant considerations may include, but are not limited to the
following: unlawful conduct; academic misconduct; making of false statements,
including omissions; misconduct in employment; acts involving dishonesty,
fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; abuse of legal process; neglect of
financial responsibilities; violation of an order of a court; evidence of
mental or emotional instability; evidence of drug or alcohol dependency; denial
of admission to the bar in another jurisdiction on character and fitness
grounds; and disciplinary action by a lawyer disciplinary agency or other
professional disciplinary agency of any jurisdiction.
General
qualifications are those requirements to be admitted to the practice of law
established by these rules, other than those dealing with examinations and
character and fitness.
Section 3.
No person who advocates the overthrow of the government of the United States or
this state by force, violence or other unconstitutional or illegal means, shall
be certified to the Supreme Court of Indiana for admission to the bar of the
court and a license to the practice of law.
Section 4.
There shall be appointed by this Court a Committee on Character and Fitness in
each Supreme Court judicial district, consisting of at least one
attorney-at-law from each county in such district. The members of such
committee shall continue in office until their successors are appointed. The
State Board of Law Examiners shall provide a copy of each application for
admission to the bar of this state to the local member of the Committee on
Character and Fitness in the Indiana county which the applicant selects. A
member of the committee, or some member designated by the State Board of Law
Examiners, shall require the personal attendance of each applicant before the
member, and inquire into the question as to whether or not the applicant is
possessed of those requisites of good moral character and fitness, has adequate
knowledge of the standards and ideals of the profession, and is familiar with
and agrees to be bound by the Indiana Supreme Court Rules of Professional
Conduct, all as necessary to qualify him to serve as an attorney. The member of
the committee shall make such further inquiry into the matter as the member
sees fit. At least thirty (30) days before the examination, the member of the
committee conducting the inquiry, or promptly, if upon application for
admission upon foreign license, the Board member conducting the inquiry shall
make a finding: (1) That the applicant is familiar with and agrees to be bound
by the Indiana Supreme Court Rules of Professional Conduct and that such
Applicant is a person of good moral character and is fit to practice law in
Indiana; or (2) That the member is unable to certify that the Applicant is a
person of good moral character and is fit to practice law in Indiana, setting
forth the reasons for this conclusion; or (3) That there is some question as to
the Applicant's good moral character and/or fitness to practice law in Indiana
and therefore recommends that the State Board of Law Examiners conduct a
personal inquiry with the Applicant, stating the reasons for the member's
conclusion. The committee member shall forward such findings and
recommendations and all papers filed in connection therewith to the State Board
of Law Examiners, which Board shall at its next meeting review said findings,
make such further inquiry as it sees fit, and take such action as the matter
requires.
Section 5.
The Board may, upon its own motion, require an applicant to appear before the
full Board, or a committee composed of members of the Board, for inquiry into
the applicant's character and fitness. The Board may continue such appearance
and require that the applicant submit additional information, evaluations or
proofs before concluding such appearance.
Section 6.
The Board of Law Examiners shall make a finding regarding each applicant:
(a) That the applicant possesses the
requisite good moral character and fitness and has satisfied the general
qualifications to be eligible to be admitted to practice law in Indiana,
subject to continued qualification; or
(b) That the applicant has failed to
sustain his or her burden of proof that the applicant possesses good moral
character and fitness, and has satisfied all of the general qualifications to
be admitted to the practice of law, in which case the Board may find that the
applicant should not be permitted to reapply for admission to practice law or
should be permitted to reapply only after a specific period of time; or
(c) That the Board has special
concerns about the proof of applicant's moral character and fitness based upon
evidence of drug, alcohol, psychological or behavioral problems, but in lieu of
denying admission to the bar finds that the applicant has satisfied the Board
as to his or her character and fitness, and has also satisfied the general
qualifications, sufficiently to be eligible for conditional admission upon such
terms and conditions as specified by the Board, said conditional admission to
be administered by the Board over a period of time not to exceed five (5)
years. The conditional admission shall be governed by Internal Rules and
Policies adopted by the Board. The fact that the admission is conditional shall
be confidential; or
(d) That the Board has special
concerns about the proof of applicant's moral character and fitness based upon
evidence of drug, alcohol, psychological or behavioral problems, but in lieu of
denying admission to the bar finds that the applicant's admission be withheld
for a specified period of time, not to exceed two (2) years, to allow the
applicant to establish and prove rehabilitation. If at the end of the specified
period of time the applicant shall have satisfied requirements to be eligible
for admission to practice law, barring subsequent disclosure of matters
adversely reflecting upon the applicant's character and fitness, the applicant
will be eligible for admission upon passing the examination requirements. The
Board may permit the applicant to take any examination administered during that
period; or
(e) That the Board has special
concerns about the proof of applicant's moral character and fitness based upon
evidence of drug, alcohol, psychological or behavioral problems, but in lieu of
denying admission to the bar finds that the behavior giving rise to the special
concern has occurred of such recent date to prevent the Board from determining
whether the applicant has sufficiently established his or her qualifications
and the Board extends the time for further inquiry for a reasonable time, not
to exceed one (1) year, and the Board may permit the applicant to take any
examination administered during that period.
Section 7.
If the Board finds that the applicant is not eligible for admission, or if the
Board finds that an applicant is eligible for admission only upon condition
under Section 6(c), whether after inquiry into the applicant's character and
fitness to practice law, or determination that the applicant has failed to
establish satisfaction of general qualifications, or in the case of an
applicant for admission on foreign license, failure to prove that he or she has
met the requirements of Rule 6, Sections 1 through 3, or if a conditional
admittee has violated the terms of conditional admission, the applicant or
conditional admittee may request a hearing under Section 9 of this Rule by
filing a written request for such hearing with the Board within thirty (30)
days of mailing of notice to the applicant of the finding of the Board.
Section 8.
The necessity of a hearing as provided in Section 9 of this Rule may be
dispensed with by the Board where the evidence is not in dispute and the
subject matter of the hearing may be submitted to the Supreme Court upon
written findings and specifications adopted by the Board.
Section 9.
If the applicant or conditional admittee timely requests a hearing, or if the
State Board of Law Examiners in connection with further inquiry shall deem it
advisable to hold a hearing, the State Board of Law Examiners will schedule a
hearing pursuant to the provisions of this Section.
(a) In such event, the Board may
appoint a hearing panel from the members of the Board, consisting of three
members. Said panel shall select from among its members a presiding officer and
shall schedule and conduct such hearing. All of the above rules and regulations
with respect to the action of the Board shall apply at said hearing.
(b) If, in connection with said
further inquiry, the State Board of Law Examiners shall deem it advisable to
hold a hearing, the applicant or conditional admittee shall be informed of the
substance of the matter to be inquired into by written notice served on the
applicant or conditional admittee by mailing such notice to the applicant or
conditional admittee at such person's last known address as shown by the
Board's record by certified mail, return receipt requested, at least ten (10)
days before the date set for said hearing.
(c) A record of the proceedings shall
be taken by electronic recording equipment provided by the Board. If necessary
this record shall be transcribed by the staff of the Executive Director.
(d) The panel shall report its
findings to the Board for consideration and decision.
(e) The State Board of Law Examiners,
at any such hearing, or otherwise, shall have the power to administer oaths, to
issue subpoenas to require attendance at said hearing and for the production of
documentary or other evidence. In case of the refusal of a witness to attend
said hearing, to produce documentary or other evidence or to testify, the said
Board shall certify such failure to the Court, and such witness shall be dealt
with as for a contempt. Witnesses shall receive the fees and mileage provided
by law for witnesses in civil cases. The Board may employ outside legal counsel
to represent the interest of the State of Indiana at such hearing.
(f) The applicant or conditional
admittee shall have the right to attend such hearing in person, to examine and
cross-examine witnesses and otherwise participate in said hearing and to
require the attendance of witnesses and production of documentary and other
evidence by subpoena. An applicant or conditional admittee may be represented
by counsel at such person's expense.
(g) Upon the conclusion of said
hearing, the State Board of Law Examiners shall enter findings as provided in
Section 6 (a) through (e) of this Rule.
(h) In the event the Board makes a
finding other than that the applicant or conditional admittee does possess good
moral character and fitness and has satisfied the general qualifications to be
admitted to practice as provided in Section 6 (a) of this Rule, a final report
of the proceedings, including specific findings of fact, conclusion and
recommendations shall be prepared. The Board shall notify the applicant or
conditional admittee and all counsel of record of the action of the Board,
including with such notice a copy of the final report.
Section 10.
If, after following the hearing procedures in Section 5, 8 & 9 of this
Rule, the Board determines that a conditional admittee has violated any of the
conditions of the admission, or if the Board determines that any applicant
admitted under these rules falsified or failed to fully inform the Board of
facts bearing upon the applicant's character and fitness and general
qualifications to practice law prior to admission, the Board may impose
additional conditions, including without limitation, an additional term of
conditional admission for up to five (5) years, or the Board may certify such
findings to the Supreme Court of Indiana with the recommendation that the Court
revoke such admission, along with a recommended period of time before the
conditional admittee can submit a new application for admission. A conditional
admittee whose conditional admission has been revoked by the Supreme Court
shall not be readmitted, except upon a new application and examination, after
the expiration of the revocation period set by order of the Supreme Court.
Rule 13. Educational Requirements for Admission by Examination
Section 1. Educational Qualifications. Each
applicant for admission to the Indiana bar by written examination must
establish to the satisfaction of the State Board of Law Examiners that the
applicant:
(a) Has obtained a JD degree (or its equivalent)
from a law school located in the United States that at the time of the
applicant’s graduation was on the approved list of the Council of Legal
Education and Admission to the Bar of the American Bar Association. (The
Indiana Supreme Court reserves the right to disapprove any school regardless of
ABA approval.);
(b) Has satisfactorily completed the law course
required for graduation and furnishes to the Board a certificate from the dean
of the law school (or the dean’s designee) that the applicant will receive a JD
degree (or its equivalent) as a matter of course at a future date, pursuant to
Rule 15; and
(c) Has completed two cumulative semester hours
of legal ethics or professional responsibility in law school.
Section 2. Early Examination Rule. An
applicant, who has fewer than five hours to complete and is within one-hundred
days of graduating from an ABA-approved law school, has satisfactorily passed
work in the subject matter as set forth in Section 1, and has otherwise
completed all requirements for admission to the bar, may take the examination
but may not be admitted to the Indiana bar until the applicant has met all
other requirements for admission and has graduated from an ABA-approved law
school.
Section 3. Certification of Educational Qualifications. The law school dean (or the dean’s designee) shall certify an applicant’s completion of the subject-matter requirements under this rule and must file such certification with the Board at least twenty days before the examination.
Section 4. Waiver of Educational Qualification. The Board may in
its discretion waive the requirement in Section 1(a) for an applicant who (1)
has graduated from a law school located in the United States that is not
approved by the ABA, was eligible upon graduation from that law school to take
the bar examination of another state, and the Board finds is qualified by
reason of education or experience to take the Indiana bar examination; or (2)
has completed legal education in a jurisdiction outside the United States, has
obtained a graduate degree from an ABA-approved law school in a program based
on American law, and the Board finds is qualified by reason of education or
experience to take the Indiana bar examination.
Applicants seeking a waiver under this section must
petition the Board by letter and provide the Board with the following
materials:
(a) Official transcripts from each undergraduate
college or university the applicant attended, reflecting all courses taken, the
grade for each course, the number of semester hours of credit earned, and the
degree(s) awarded, if any.
(b) Official transcripts from each law school the
applicant attended, reflecting all courses taken, the grade for each course,
the number of semester hours of credit earned, and the degree(s) awarded, if
any.
(c) A narrative statement that includes a
description of the applicant’s legal education and training, a description of
the applicant’s work history, and reasons why the applicant believes a waiver
is warranted.
(d) Bar examination results—number of graduates
from the applicant’s law school(s) who passed/failed, classified by state
administering the exam, for the previous three years.
(e) A statement of whether the applicant has
applied to take the bar exam in any other jurisdiction and the result of that
request, and the result of any bar examination taken by the applicant.
(f) For applicants who have completed legal
education outside the United States, a description of that country’s legal
system, including, but not limited to, whether the English common law
substantially forms the basis of that country’s jurisprudence and whether
English is the language of instruction and practice in the courts of that
jurisdiction.
(g) Any other documentation, material, or
information the applicant believes is relevant to establish the applicant is
qualified by reason of education or experience to take the Indiana bar
examination.
Any document submitted to the Board that is not in the
English language must be translated into English. The Board may request
additional information or material as it deems appropriate, and no material
submitted to the Board will be returned to the applicant. The Board should
grant a waiver when doing so would be in the public interest after balancing
all relevant factors including the applicant’s educational history and
achievement, work history and achievement, bar exam results from other
jurisdictions, desire to practice law in Indiana, and familiarity with the
American legal system. The Board’s decision is subject to final approval by the
Court.
Section
1. Before the release of the results
of the Indiana bar examination, the Board of Law Examiners shall review the
written answers of all applicants who are within five (5) points of achieving a
passing
score of 264 on the examination to confirm that the written answers have been
graded correctly. Applicants may not appeal the results of the examination. The determination by the Board of Law Examiners whether to
treat an applicant as having passed the bar examination shall be final, subject
to general principles of procedural due process.
Section 2.
Any applicant aggrieved by the final action of the State Board of Law Examiners
in refusing to recommend to the Supreme Court of Indiana the admission of the
applicant to practice law in Indiana for any reason other than the failure to
pass any examination may, within twenty (20) days of receipt of notification
setting forth the reason for refusal, file a petition with the Supreme Court of
Indiana requesting review by this Court of such final determination. The
notification referenced herein shall be sent to the applicant by certified mail
with return receipt requested. In the petition the applicant shall set forth
specifically the reasons, in fact or law, assigned as error in the Board's
determination. The Court may order further consideration of the application, in
which event the State Board of Law Examiners shall promptly transmit to the
Court the complete file relating to such applicant and his or her application,
including the transcript of the record of any hearing held by the State Board
of Law Examiners relating thereto. The Court shall enter such order as in its
judgment is proper, which shall thereupon become final. The petition for review
must be accompanied by a fifty dollar ($50.00) filing fee unless the petitioner
previously paid an application fee to the State Board of Law Examiners as
provided in these rules.
Rule 15. Applications, Filing Dates and Fees for Examination and Re-Examination
Applications for admission on first examination shall be
filed through the electronic application procedures prescribed by the State
Board of Law Examiners. The application shall be in such form and shall request
such information as may be required by the Board of Law Examiners. The Board of
Law Examiners may require additional information as is deemed by it to be
necessary.
An affidavit of the dean of the applicant's law school, or
the dean's designee, to the effect that there is nothing in the school records
or personal knowledge of the dean or faculty of such school to indicate that
the applicant is not of good moral character or that the applicant is not fit
for admission to the practice of law must be filed with the State Board of Law
Examiners. The Board shall provide forms for such certification.
A certified transcript of the law school record of the
applicant showing the date of graduation and the degree conferred must be filed
with the Board of Law Examiners before the applicant can be admitted to the
bar.
For an application to be properly filed, an applicant must
submit the electronic application and prescribed filing fee by the stated
filing deadline. No requests for filing past the stated deadlines or for waiver
of filing deadlines will be accepted by the Board of Law Examiners or by the
Supreme Court.
Applications for admission on first examination for the July
examination must be filed by April l, and accompanied by a filing fee of two
hundred fifty dollars ($250). A late filing period is permitted until April 15.
The filing fee for late filing is five hundred dollars ($500).
The deadline filing date for the February examination is
November 15 of the previous year. The filing fee is two hundred fifty dollars
($250). The late filing period is from that date to November 30 of the previous
year. The late filing fee is five hundred dollars ($500).
If an applicant fails to pass the first examination and is
permitted to take further examinations, the application for re-examination must
be made on forms prescribed by the Board and filed with the Executive Director of the Indiana
Office of Admissions and Continuing Education
by the following dates. Applications for re-examination for the July
examination must be filed by May 30 and accompanied by a filing fee of two
hundred fifty dollars ($250). The late filing deadline is June 15 and the late
filing fee is five hundred dollars ($500). Applications for re-examination for
the February examination must be filed by December 15 of the previous year. The
regular filing fee is two hundred fifty dollars ($250). The late filing
deadline is December 30 of the previous year. The late filing fee is five
hundred dollars ($500).
There are no other provisions for or consideration of requests
for late filing by the Board or by the Indiana Supreme Court.
Applicants who have a petition before the Board or an appeal
before the Supreme Court of the grading of their examination will be required
to meet all filing deadlines for re-examination. If an applicant is successful
on petition or on appeal, the applicant will receive a full refund of any
re-examination fee.
If an applicant whose application has been approved and
processed fails to take the examination first following its approval, such applicant
shall have the privilege of having that application held in abeyance and of
taking the next regularly scheduled examination given by the Board without
payment of any additional fee. Any applicant whose application has been
approved and processed who fails to take that examination, or the next
following examination, shall have that application dismissed. The applicant
will be entitled to a refund of one-half ( 1/2 ) of the fee paid.
If an applicant applies to sit for a first examination after
his or her application has been dismissed, a new application must be filed and
a two hundred fifty dollar ($250) filing fee must be paid and the first
examination deadlines must be met. If an applicant applies to sit for a
re-examination after his or her application has been dismissed, a new
application must be filed and a two hundred fifty dollar ($250) filing fee must
be paid, but these applicants will be permitted to file by the re-examination
time deadline and will have the opportunity to file within that late filing
period. All applicants applying after dismissal must meet the regular deadlines
or late filing deadlines and pay the regular fee or the late fee as they apply
to those deadlines.
Rule 16. [Vacated effective January 1, 1998]
Rule 17. Admission Upon Examination
Section
1. The Indiana bar examination shall
consist of the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE) developed by the National
Conference of Bar Examiners. To qualify for admission upon examination, an
applicant must achieve a scaled score of at least 264 on the Indiana bar
examination.
Section 2. No
person shall be licensed to practice law in this state who has not taken and
passed the Indiana bar examination as provided in these rules, except
applicants admitted on a transferred UBE score under these rules or attorneys
who are licensed in another jurisdiction and who qualify for admission without
examination under the provisions of Admission and Discipline Rule 6.
Section 3. Any
applicant for admission upon examination on any Indiana bar examination
administered after July 1, 2021, shall be required to complete the Indiana Law
Course, a jurisdiction-specific component on Indiana law, not later than six
(6) months after the date of the applicant’s admission to the Indiana bar. If
an applicant fails to complete the Indiana Law Course within the required time
period, the Board of Law Examiners may certify such fact to the Supreme Court
with the recommendation that the applicant’s license be suspended pending
completion of the course.
Section 4. In
addition, each applicant for admission upon examination, before being admitted,
must pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE). The
passing score for the MPRE shall be a scaled score of eighty (80) and must be
achieved no earlier than two (2) years before the date the applicant
successfully sits for the Indiana bar examination.
Section 5. An applicant who successfully passes the Indiana bar examination must complete all requirements for,
and receive, a law degree and be admitted to the practice of law before the
Court within five (5) years of the last date of the applicant's bar
examination, or the bar examination must be repeated.
Section 6. The
bar examination shall be administered with the identity of the applicant
remaining anonymous throughout the examination, grading and review. The
Executive Director shall adopt such procedures necessary for the identity of
all applicants by number only. It shall be a violation of these Rules for the
applicant, or anyone upon the applicant's behalf, to attempt to reveal the
identity or any identifying characteristics of
the applicant at any time throughout the examination and review process.
Rule 17.1. Admission by Transferred Uniform Bar Examination
Score
Section 1. An
applicant who has taken the UBE in a jurisdiction other than Indiana and
achieved a scaled score of at least 264 may be admitted to the Indiana bar if
he or she satisfies the following conditions:
(a) The scaled score was attained on a
UBE administered within five (5) years preceding the date of application;
(b) The applicant received a scaled
score of eighty (80) on the MPRE no earlier than two (2) years before the
applicant sat for the UBE on which he or she achieved a scaled score of 264;
(c) The applicant is a member in good
standing of the bar(s) of admission;
(d) The applicant meets the character
and fitness requirements of Indiana; and
(e) The applicant graduated from an ABA
accredited law school.
Section 2.
Any applicant for admission by a transferred UBE score shall be required to
complete the Indiana Law Course, a jurisdiction-specific component on Indiana
law, not later than six (6) months after the date of the applicant’s admission
to the Indiana bar. If an applicant fails to complete the Indiana Law Course
within the required time period, the Board of Law Examiners may certify such
fact to the Supreme Court with the recommendation that the applicant’s license
be suspended pending completion of the course.
Section 3.
Applications for admission by a transferred UBE score shall be filed through
the electronic application procedures prescribed by the Board of Law Examiners.
The application shall be in such form and shall request such information as may
be required by the Board of Law Examiners. The Board of Law Examiners may
require additional information deemed by it to be necessary.
Section 4. An
affidavit of the dean of the applicant's law school, or the dean's designee, to
the effect that there is nothing in the school records or personal knowledge of
the dean or faculty of such school to indicate that the applicant is not of
good moral character or that the applicant is not fit for admission to the
practice of law must be filed with the Board of Law Examiners. The Board shall
provide forms for such certification.
Section 5. A
certified transcript of the law school record of the applicant showing the date
of graduation and the degree conferred must be filed with the Board of Law
Examiners before the applicant can be admitted to the bar.
Section 6.
Applications for admission by a transferred UBE score shall be accompanied by a
filing fee of five hundred dollars ($500).
Rule 18. Report on Examinations
Section 1.
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, there shall be two (2) bar examinations
held annually, in February and July. The examination shall be supervised by the
Board.
Section 2.
The Board of Law Examiners shall act on and report passing or failing to the
applicant on all bar examinations within one hundred (100) days after the final
day of the examination, and may inform interested news media of the names of
the applicants successfully passing the bar examination.
Section 3.
The Board shall certify to the Court the applicants for admission who have passed
the bar examination and the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
(MPRE), and its recommendations for admission based upon the applicant's
satisfaction of the provisions and requirements of these Rules.
Section 1.
All information and all records obtained and maintained by the Board of Law
Examiners in the performance of its duty under these rules and as delegated by
the Supreme Court of Indiana shall be confidential, except as otherwise
provided by these rules, or by order of (or as otherwise authorized by) the
Supreme Court of Indiana.
Section 2.
All materials and information in the possession or knowledge of the Board of
Law Examiners, the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education, or its agents or employees, shall be the property of the
Supreme Court of Indiana, and the Board shall serve as custodian of such
materials and information. This shall include, but not be limited to, the
applications and files of all the applicants, reports and correspondence
regarding investigation of applicants, inter-office and inter-member memoranda,
minutes and records of all meetings and hearings, and all examination materials
and results.
Section 3.
The Board is authorized to disclose information relating to applicants or
members of the bar only as follows:
(a)
The names of applicants successfully passing the law examination.
(b)
The name of any applicant admitted to the practice of law at any admission
ceremony.
(c) The name, date of birth, Social
Security number, and other information relating to a bar application, an
applicant, and the result of the bar application for placement in a national
data bank operated by or on behalf of the National Conference of Bar Examiners.
(d) Upon request of any law school,
the names of each of its graduating students that took the law examination and
whether each passed or failed the exam.
(e) Information requests by the
National Conference of Bar Examiners or from a foreign bar admitting agency,
when accompanied by a written authorization and release duly executed by the
person about whom such information is sought, providing, however, that no
information received by the Board under an agreement of confidentiality or
designation of confidentiality or otherwise restricted by law or these rules
shall be disclosed.
(f) Information relating to a
violation of the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct or to the unauthorized
practice of law may be supplied to the Indiana Disciplinary Commission either
at the request of the Disciplinary Commission or on the Board's own motion,
except that information received by the Board under an agreement of confidentiality
or otherwise restricted by law shall not be disclosed.
(g) Copies of documents previously
filed by an applicant may be provided upon the applicant's written request.
Copies of documents submitted by other parties regarding an applicant may be
supplied to the applicant only upon written consent by the party submitting
such documents. The complete record of any hearing, including any and all
documents or exhibits formally introduced into the record, and any transcript
of such hearings may be made available to the applicant who was a party to the
hearing pursuant to other provisions of these rules.
Section
1. Persons Providing Information to the State Board of Law Examiners.
Every
person or entity shall be immune from civil liability for providing, in good
faith, documents, statements of opinion, records, or other information
regarding an applicant or potential applicant for admission to the bar of this
State to the State Board of Law Examiners; the Indiana Office of Admissions and
Continuing Education and its Executive Director, staff, employees or agents; or
to the Committees on Character and Fitness and their members and agents.
Section 2. Immunity for Board, Staff and Character and
Fitness Committee.
The
State Board of Law Examiners, the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing
Education and its Executive Director, staff, employees and agents, and the
Committees on Character and Fitness and their members and agents, are immune
from all civil liability for acts performed in the course of their official
duties relating to the examination, character and fitness qualification, and
licensing of persons seeking to be admitted to the practice of law.
An applicant who is eligible for
admission under the foregoing rules may be admitted by appearing in person
before the bar of this Court and by taking the oath hereinafter set forth after
establishing to the satisfaction of the Court that the applicant is a person of
good moral character and fitness.
Upon being admitted to practice law in
the state of Indiana, each applicant shall take and subscribe to the following
oath or affirmation:
“I do
solemnly swear or affirm that: I will support the Constitution of the United
States and the Constitution of the State of Indiana; I will maintain the
respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers; I will not counsel or
maintain any action, proceeding, or defense which shall appear to me to be
unjust, but this obligation shall not prevent me from defending a person
charged with crime in any case; I will employ for the purpose of maintaining
the causes confided to me, such means only as are consistent with truth, and
never seek to mislead the court or jury by any artifice or false statement of fact
or law; I will maintain the confidence and preserve inviolate the secrets of my
client at every peril to myself; I will abstain from offensive personality and
advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness,
unless required by the justice of the cause with which I am charged; I will not
encourage either the commencement or the continuance of any action or
proceeding from any motive of passion or interest; I will never reject, from
any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless, the
oppressed or those who cannot afford adequate legal assistance; so help me
God.”
Rule 23. Disciplinary Commission and Proceedings
Table of Contents
I.
Overview
(b)
Supreme Court’s exclusive jurisdiction
(c)
Purpose
(d)
Definitions
Section
2. Grounds for Discipline or Suspension
(a)
Indiana standards of conduct
(b)
Standards of conduct of other
jurisdictions
(c)
Disability
Section
3. Types of Discipline and Suspension; Notice of Orders and Opinions
(a)
Discipline for professional misconduct
(b)
Disability suspension
(c)
Probation
(d)
Required notice of orders and opinions
II.
The Disciplinary Commission and Bar Associations
Section 4. Sources and Uses of Funds
(a) Source and deposit of funds
(b) Disbursements
(c) Salaries
(d) Budget
Section 5.
Role of Bar Associations
(a) Mandatory and prohibited actions
(b)
Permissive actions regarding fee disputes
(c)
Authorization to file grievance
Section 6. Composition of Supreme Court Disciplinary
Commission
(a)
Establishment
(b)
Composition
Section 7. Organization of the Disciplinary Commission
(b)
Quorum
(c)
Meetings
(d)
Expenses and compensation
Section 8. Powers and Duties of the Disciplinary Commission
Section 9. Powers and Duties of the Executive Director
III. Specific Procedures
Section 10. Investigatory Procedures
(a) Initial review of grievances
(b)
Grievance on behalf of Disciplinary
Commission
(c)
Demand for information
(d)
Additional allegations or evidence
(e)
Duty to respond to demand for information
(f)
Self-report of misconduct
(g)
Action by Executive Director
(h)
Limitation on time to complete
investigation
Section 10.1. Noncooperation with
Disciplinary Investigation
(b)
Failure to cooperate
(c)
Suspension for noncooperation
(1)
Show cause order
(2)
Entry of noncooperation suspension order
(3)
Certification of cooperation
(4)
Conversion to indefinite suspension
(5) Repeated failures to cooperate
(d)
Costs.
Section 11. Disciplinary
Commission Consideration of Grievances
(a)
Consideration of Executive Director’s
report
(b)
Authorization to dismiss grievance
(c)
Authorization to file Disciplinary
Complaint
Section 11.1. Duty to Report Findings of Guilt; Interim and Summary
Suspensions
(a) Findings of criminal guilt
(1)
Duty to report finding of guilt of any
felony or misdemeanor
(2)
Criminal conviction of crime punishable
as a felony
(b) Emergency interim suspension
(c) Delinquency in paying child support
Section
12. Prosecution of Attorney Misconduct
(b)
Summons
(c)
Service of Disciplinary Complaint and
summons
(d)
Modification of a Disciplinary Complaint
or charge
Section 12.1. Agreed Discipline
(a) Private administrative admonition
(1)
Available for minor misconduct
(2)
Private administrative admonition letters
(b) Conditional Agreement for discipline
(1)
Submission to the Supreme Court
(2)
Contents of Conditional Agreement
(3)
Respondent’s affidavit
(4)
Consideration and disposition by the
Supreme Court
(5)
Use of Conditional Agreement.
(a) Appointment and qualifications
(b)
Change of hearing officer
(c)
Powers and duties
Section 14.
Proceedings Before the Hearing Officer
(a) Rules of pleading and practice
(b) Appearance and answer
(c) Failure to answer
(d) Discovery
(e) Pre-hearing conference
(f) The hearing
(g) Hearing Officer’s Report
Section
15. Supreme Court Review
(1)
Time for filing
(2)
Brief in Support of Petition for Review
(3)
Response and reply briefs
(b) Brief on Sanction
(c) Format
(a)
Imposition
(b)
Termination
(1)
Termination of probation not automatic
(2)
Petition for termination of probation
(3)
Objection to termination of probation
(4)
Adjustment of status in absence of
objection
(5)
Procedure if the Disciplinary Commission
objects to termination of probation
(c)
Revocation
(1)
Motion to Revoke Probation
(2)
Response to motion
(3)
Burden of proof and matters considered
(4)
Disposition
(d)
Service in termination and revocation
matters
(e)
Immediate suspension pending revocation
Section
17. Resignation and Disbarment by Consent on Admission of Misconduct
(a) Affidavit consenting to resignation
(b) Supreme Court action on affidavit consenting to resignation
(1)
Approval of resignation
(2)
Rejection of resignation
(c) Disbarment by consent
(d) Confidentiality of affidavit
Section
17.1. Consent to Discipline on Admission of Misconduct
(a)
Affidavit consenting to discipline
(b)
Briefing and decision
(a) Reinstatement after suspension with
automatic reinstatement
(b) Reinstatement after suspension without automatic reinstatement
(1)
Time for filing
(2)
Prerequisites for seeking reinstatement
(3)
Proof needed for reinstatement
(4)
Hearing on petition for reinstatement
(5)
Supreme Court review of the Hearing
Officer’s Report
(c) Reinstatement under other Sections of Rule 23
(d) Other terms and conditions
Section
19. Proceedings to Determine Disability
(a) Report to the Disciplinary Commission
(b) Investigation
(c) Hearing and Petition for Disability Suspension
(d) Immediate emergency suspension
(e) Objection to Petition for Disability Suspension
(f) Suspension if no objection is filed
(g) Procedure if an objection is filed
(h) Procedure for reinstatement.
Section
20. Discipline Imposed by Other Jurisdictions
(a)
Definitions and applicability
(b)
Indiana attorney’s duty to report foreign discipline
(c)
Executive Director’s duty to obtain copy of order
(d)
Notice and request for reciprocal suspension
(e)
Supreme Court order
(f)
Effect of foreign adjudication
(g)
Motion for Release from Reciprocal Suspension.
IV.
General Provisions
Section
21. Costs and Expenses
(a) Imposition of costs and expenses in
disciplinary proceedings
(b) Costs of hearing in reinstatement proceedings
(c) Costs for Disciplinary Commission services in providing copies of
documents
(1)
Documents
(2) Delivery costs
(3)
Right to withhold until payment is made
(4)
Inapplicable to discovery requests
(d) Failure to pay costs and expenses
(a) Documents and information about disciplinary matters
(b) Hearings
Section 23. Filing, Service, Submission, Format of
Documents; Motion Practice
(a)
Filing; general provisions
(b)
Filing defined
(c)
Filing; required documents
(d)
Time for service
(e)
Required service
(f)
Manner and date of service
(g)
Certificate of service
(h)
Documents submitted to the Supreme Court
(i)
Inclusion of contact information
(j)
Format
(k)
Electronic copy
(l)
Motion practice
Section
23.1. Obligations of Attorneys regarding Service; Constructive Service
(a)
Obligation to accept service
(b)
Obligation to notify Executive Director of the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education of change of contact information
(c)
Executive Director of the Indiana Office
of Admissions and Continuing Education as agent to receive constructive service
Section
23.2. Computation of Time
(a) Non-business and
business days
(b)
Counting days
(c)
Extension of time when served by mail or
carrier
Section
24. Assistance of Law Enforcement Agencies and to Attorney Disciplinary
Agencies in Other Jurisdictions
(a)
Assistance from law enforcement
(b)
Assistance to other jurisdictions
Section
25. Immunity
(a)
Statements to the Disciplinary Commission
or Lawyers Assistance Program
(b)
Suit arising from performance of duties
Section
26. Duties of Suspended Attorneys, Disbarred Attorneys, and Attorneys whose
Resignation has been Accepted
(a)
Applicability
(b)
Duties of all suspended and disbarred
attorneys
(c)
Additional duties of attorneys who have
been disbarred, suspended without automatic reinstatement, or suspended for
more than 180 days
(d)
Additional duties of suspended attorneys
not subject to subsection (c)
Section
27. Attorney Surrogates
Section
28. (Reserved).
V.
Trust Accounts
Section
29. Trust Account Funds
(a)
Required trust account records
(b) Availability of records
(c) Trust account safeguard
(d) Dissolution or sale of law practice
Section
30. Overdraft Notification and Processing
(a) Definitions
(b) Approval of financial institutions
(c) Disapproval and revocation of approval of financial institutions
(d) Duty to notify institutions of trust accounts
(e) Maintaining a trust account in a foreign jurisdiction
(f) Overdraft reports
(g) Investigation of overdrafts
I. Overview
Section 1. General
Principles
(a) Duties of attorneys. Each person
exercising the privilege to practice law in this State has the obligation to
behave at all times in a manner consistent with the trust and confidence
reposed in him or her by the Indiana Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) and in a
manner consistent with the duties and responsibilities as an officer or judge
of the courts of this State.
(b) Supreme Court’s exclusive jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has
exclusive jurisdiction of all cases in which an attorney is charged with
misconduct under this Rule.
(c) Purpose. The procedures set forth in this Rule shall be employed
and construed to protect the public, the courts and the members of the bar of
this State from misconduct on the part of attorneys, and to protect attorneys
from unwarranted claims of misconduct.
(d) Definitions.
(1) The term
“attorney” as used in this Rule shall include all persons admitted to the bar
of this State, all persons who practice law in this State, and all judges of
all courts of this State.
(2) Unless
otherwise specified, the term "Supreme Court Clerk" as used in this
Rule shall mean the Clerk of the Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and
Tax Court.
(3) The
“Disciplinary Commission” shall mean the Disciplinary Commission of the Indiana
Supreme Court established under Section 6(a) of this Rule.
(4) The
“Executive Director” shall mean the Executive Director of the Disciplinary
Commission appointed under Section 8(a)(1) of this Rule.
(5) The term
“respondent” shall mean a person who is named as the respondent in any court
proceeding under this Rule, or who is the subject of an investigation under
Section 10 of this Rule.
(6) “This
Rule” shall mean Admission and Discipline Rule 23, including all of its
Sections.
Section 2. Grounds for
Discipline or Suspension
(a) Indiana standards of conduct. Any
conduct that violates the Rules of Professional Conduct or the Code of Judicial
Conduct or any standards or rules of legal and judicial ethics or professional
responsibility in effect in Indiana at the time of the alleged misconduct shall
constitute grounds for discipline.
(b) Standards of conduct of other jurisdictions.
If an attorney admitted to practice in this State who is also admitted to
practice in any other jurisdiction should be disbarred or suspended by the
proper authority of the other jurisdiction, the disbarment or suspension shall
constitute sufficient grounds for reciprocal discipline of the attorney in this
State.
(c) Disability. Any attorney who becomes
disabled by reason of physical or mental illness or infirmity or because of the
use of or addiction to intoxicants or drugs shall be subject to suspension by
reason of the disability.
Section 3. Types of
Discipline and Suspension; Notice of Orders and Opinions
(a) Discipline for professional misconduct.
One of the following types of discipline may be imposed upon any attorney found
to have committed professional misconduct: (1) permanent disbarment from the
practice of law; (2) suspension from the practice of law without automatic
reinstatement; (3) suspension from the practice of law for a fixed period of
time, not to exceed 180 days, with provision for automatic reinstatement after
the expiration of the fixed period, upon any conditions as the Supreme Court
may specify in the order of suspension; (4) a public reprimand; (5) a private reprimand;
or (6) a private administrative admonition.
(b) Disability suspension. Any attorney
found disabled by reason of physical or mental illness or infirmity or by use
of or addiction to any intoxicants or drugs shall be suspended indefinitely for
the duration of the disability.
(c) Probation. In cases of misconduct or
disability, the Supreme Court may, in lieu of permanent disbarment or
suspension, stay the discipline in whole or in part, place an attorney on
probation and permit the attorney to continue practicing law if in its opinion
this action is appropriate and desirable. In this event, the attorney shall be
subject to conditions, limitations and restrictions as the Supreme Court may
see fit to impose, and upon a violation of these conditions, restrictions or
limitations, probation may be revoked and the attorney may be suspended or
disbarred.
(d) Required notice of orders and opinions.
(1) Notice
of orders and opinions imposing permanent disbarment, accepting resignation,
imposing suspension, granting reinstatement, revoking probation, and imposing
public reprimand shall be given by the Supreme Court Clerk to the respondent
and the Disciplinary Commission; the Clerk of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; the Clerk of each of the Federal District
Courts in this State; the Clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Courts in this
State; the Clerk of the Court, Circuit and Superior Court judges, and Bar
Association of each county in which the attorney maintains an office; the Clerk
of the Court, Circuit and Superior Court judges, and Bar Association of each
contiguous county; a newspaper of general circulation in each county in which
the attorney maintains an office; the official publication of the Indiana State
Bar Association; and the American Bar Association.
(2) In
addition, notice of disbarment, resignation, or suspension of one year or more
shall be given to the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court.
(3) Notice
of private reprimand shall be given to the respondent and to the Disciplinary
Commission.
(4) In cases
where probation is imposed by the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court Clerk shall
notify persons as the Supreme Court may direct of the action taken and of the
restriction, conditions or limitations.
II. The Disciplinary
Commission and Bar Associations
Section 4. Sources and
Uses of Funds
(a) Source and deposit of funds. The Supreme
Court shall periodically designate a portion of the registration fees charged
to attorneys pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 2 to be used for the
operations of the Disciplinary Commission. The Executive Director of the
Disciplinary Commission shall deposit these funds into an account designated
“Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission Fund.”
(b) Disbursements. Disbursements from the
fund shall be made solely upon vouchers signed by or pursuant to the direction
of the Chief Justice of Indiana.
(c) Salaries. The Supreme Court shall
specifically approve all salaries to be paid out of the Disciplinary Commission
Fund.
(d) Budget. Not later than May 1 of each
year, the Disciplinary Commission shall submit for approval by the Supreme
Court an operating budget for July 1 to June 30 of the following fiscal year.
Section 5. Role of Bar
Associations
(a) Mandatory and prohibited actions. Bar
associations in this State shall not conduct proceedings for the imposition of
discipline as defined in this Rule. The bar associations shall take all
necessary action to resolve attorney-client disputes which do not involve
claims of misconduct upon request by the Disciplinary Commission. The bar
associations and the members of the bar shall also assist the Disciplinary
Commission in the investigation of claims of misconduct upon request by the
Disciplinary Commission.
(b) Permissive actions regarding fee disputes.
Bar associations of this State may take reasonable action to resolve
attorney-client disputes where the dispute is limited to the amount of
compensation being charged by the attorney independent of any request by the
Disciplinary Commission and without referring the dispute to the Disciplinary
Commission. Action by the bar associations may include but shall not be limited
to mediation or arbitration of the amounts to be charged for an attorney's
services.
In cases where a bar association
attempts to resolve an attorney-client dispute as to compensation charged for
the attorney's services, any person dissatisfied with the attempt at resolution
shall have a right to file a formal grievance with the Disciplinary Commission
pursuant to this Rule if the amount charged by the attorney is so completely
excessive in relation to the services performed and to the usual considerations
taken into account in determining an attorney's charges as to constitute
misconduct in itself, or if other misconduct on the part of the attorney is
claimed.
(c) Authorization to file grievance. A bar
association of this State shall be permitted to prepare and file a grievance
with the Disciplinary Commission under the following circumstances:
(1) The
decision to prepare and file the grievance shall be taken at a regular or
special meeting of the bar association after notice has been given to the
members of the association; or, where the association has a governing Board of
Managers or Board of Directors, the decision may be taken at a regular or
special meeting of the Board of Managers or Board of Directors after notice to the
managers or directors.
(2) A quorum
of the members of the association, or of the Board of Managers or Board of
Directors thereof shall be in attendance at the meeting.
(3) The
decision to file grievance shall be made by a roll call vote of the members,
managers or directors in attendance at the meeting, with the vote of each
member present being recorded.
Section 6. Composition
of Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission
(a) Establishment. A Disciplinary Commission
to be known as the “Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Indiana” is
hereby created and shall have the powers and duties hereinafter set forth.
(b) Composition. The Disciplinary Commission
consists of nine members appointed by the Supreme Court of Indiana, seven of
whom must be admitted to the Bar of the Supreme Court and two of whom must be
citizens, not admitted to the practice of law. Those who are not members of the
Bar must take and subscribe to an oath of office to be filed and maintained by
the Supreme Court Clerk. A reasonable effort must be made to provide diversity
in membership, including, but not limited to, race, gender, practice area, and
geographical representation of the State. Members serve a five-year term that
begins on July 1 of the year of appointment. A member appointed to fill the
vacancy of an unexpired term serves until the end of the unexpired term. Any
member may be removed by the Supreme Court for good cause.
Section 7. Organization
of the Disciplinary Commission
(a) Officers. The Disciplinary Commission
shall annually elect from among its membership a Chair who shall preside at all
meetings, a Vice Chair who shall preside in the absence of the Chair, and a
Secretary who shall keep the minutes of the meetings of the Disciplinary
Commission.
(b) Quorum. Five (5) Commissioners shall
constitute a quorum of the Disciplinary Commission, and the Disciplinary
Commission shall act by a vote of a majority of Commissioners present.
(c) Meetings. The Disciplinary Commission
shall meet monthly at a time and place designated by the Chair, who may also
convene special meetings of the Disciplinary Commission in his or her
discretion.
(d) Expenses and compensation. The members
of the Disciplinary Commission shall be allowed their necessary expenses and
reasonable compensation as the Supreme Court shall fix from time to time.
Section 8. Powers and
Duties of the Disciplinary Commission
(a) Duties and powers. In addition to the
powers and duties set forth in this Rule, the Disciplinary Commission shall
have the duty and power to:
(1) Appoint
with the approval of the Supreme Court an Executive Director of the
Disciplinary Commission who shall be a member of the Bar of this State and who
shall serve at the pleasure of the Disciplinary Commission.
(2) Prepare
and furnish a form of request for investigation to each person who claims that
an attorney is guilty of misconduct and to each Bar Association in this State
for distribution to these persons.
(3) Supervise
the investigation of claims of misconduct.
(4) Issue subpoenas;
the failure to obey the subpoena may be punished as contempt of the Supreme
Court or, in the case of an attorney under investigation, shall subject the
attorney to suspension under the procedures set forth in subsection 10.1(c) of
this Rule.
(5) Do all
things necessary and proper to carry out its powers and duties under this Rule.
(6) Exercise
the right to bring an action in the Supreme Court to enjoin or restrain the
unauthorized practice of law.
(7) Make an
annual report of its activities to the Supreme Court and the Indiana State Bar
Association. The report shall include a statement of income and expenses for
the year.
(b) Rules and regulations. The Disciplinary
Commission may propose rules and regulations for the efficient discharge of its
power and duties. These rules and regulations shall become effective upon
approval by a majority of the Supreme Court.
Section 9. Powers and
Duties of the Executive Director
In addition to the powers and duties
set forth in other Sections of this Rule, the Executive Director shall have the
power and duty to:
(a) Administer
the Disciplinary Commission's work.
(b) Appoint,
with the approval of the Disciplinary Commission, staff as may be necessary to
assist the Disciplinary Commission to carry out its powers and duties under
this Rule.
(c) Supervise
and direct the work of the Disciplinary Commission's staff.
(d) Appoint
and assign duties to investigators.
(e) Supervise
the maintenance of the Disciplinary Commission's records.
(f) Issue
subpoenas in the name of the Disciplinary Commission. The failure to obey the
subpoena shall be punished as a contempt of the Supreme Court or, in the case
of an attorney under investigation, shall subject the attorney to suspension
under the procedures set forth in subsection 10.1(c) of this Rule.
(g) Enforce
the collection of the registration fee provided in Ind. Admission and Discipline
Rule 2 against delinquent members of the Bar.
(h) Notwithstanding
the Public Access requirements set out in Section 22 of this Rule, cooperate
with the attorney disciplinary enforcement agencies of other jurisdictions,
including, upon written request, the release of any documents or records that
are in the control of the Executive Director to the chief executive of an
attorney disciplinary enforcement agency in any jurisdiction in which an
Indiana attorney is also admitted.
(i) In
addition to the powers and duties set forth in other Sections of this Rule, the
Executive Director shall have the power and duty to designate in writing an
Acting Executive Director to act in the Executive Director’s absence.
(j) Do all
things necessary and proper to carry out the Executive Director's duties and
powers under this Rule.
III. Specific
Procedures
Section 10. Investigatory
Procedures
(a) Initial review of grievances. Upon
receipt of a written, verified request for investigation (“the grievance”) from
any person, including a bar association (“the grievant”), and completion of a
preliminary investigation as may be appropriate, the Executive Director may:
(1) Dismiss
the grievance, with subsequent approval by the Disciplinary Commission, if the
Executive Director determines that it raises no substantial question of
misconduct. In the event of a dismissal, the grievant and the attorney against
whom the grievance is filed (“the respondent”) shall be given written notice of
the Executive Director’s determination.
(2) If the
Executive Director determines that the grievance does raise a substantial
question of misconduct, issue a caution letter to the attorney against whom the
grievance is filed (hereinafter referred to as “the respondent”). The caution
letter may state the facts constituting the alleged violation, the method of
remedying the violation that the Executive Director proposes, and a deadline by
which the attorney must remedy the violation to avoid further action under this
Section. If the attorney complies with the terms of the caution letter, no
further action shall be taken concerning the grievance.
(3) If the
Executive Director determines that the grievance raises a substantial question
of misconduct that is not resolved under subsection (a)(2), the Executive
Director shall send a copy of the grievance by certified mail to the respondent
and shall demand a written response from the respondent.
(b) Grievance on behalf of Disciplinary
Commission. Upon receipt of information from any source that would give the
Executive Director reason to believe that an attorney has committed, or is
committing, professional misconduct, the Executive Director may draft a
grievance on behalf of the Disciplinary Commission or, if the misconduct would
qualify for a caution letter under Section 10(a), may send the attorney a
caution letter with respect to the misconduct. The Executive Director shall
send a copy of the grievance by certified mail to the respondent and shall
demand a written response from the respondent.
(c) Demand for information. The Executive
Director may demand from the respondent any information or clarification
necessary to complete its investigation. The respondent shall respond to the
demand as set forth in Section 10(e).
(d) Additional allegations or evidence. In
conducting an investigation of any grievance, before or after a Disciplinary
Complaint is filed, the Disciplinary Commission and Executive Director are not
limited to the matters raised in a grievance and may inquire into additional
allegations or evidence regarding the professional conduct of the respondent. The
Executive Director shall notify the respondent of the additional allegations
that may lead to a charge of misconduct in a demand letter sent by certified
mail. The respondent shall respond to such a demand as set forth in Section
10(e).
(e) Duty to respond to demand for information.
The respondent shall provide a written response to any grievance, Disciplinary
Commission grievance, or other demand for information from the Disciplinary
Commission or its Executive Director within thirty (30) days after respondent
receives a copy of the grievance or demand or within such additional time as
the Executive Director may allow. Additional time beyond a total of sixty (60)
days to respond shall be allowed only for good cause shown. In addressing the
allegations included in the grievance or in responding to a written demand from
the Executive Director, the respondent shall include supporting documents.
(f) Self-report of misconduct. If a
respondent self-reports misconduct, the Executive Director may proceed directly
to subsection (g) below.
(g) Action by Executive Director. Upon
consideration of the grievance, any response from the respondent, and any
preliminary investigation:
(1) if the
Executive Director determines there is a reasonable cause to believe that the
respondent is guilty of misconduct, the grievance shall be docketed and
investigated.
(2) if the
Executive Director determines that no such reasonable cause exists, the
grievance shall be dismissed with the subsequent approval of the Commission.
In either event, the person filing
the grievance (hereinafter “the grievant”) and the respondent shall be given
written notice of the Executive Director’s determination. If the grievance is
docketed for an investigation, the Executive Director shall conduct an
investigation of the grievance. Upon completion of the investigation, the
Executive Director shall promptly make a report of the investigation and a
recommendation to the Commission at its next meeting.
(h) Limitation on time to complete investigation.
Unless the Supreme Court permits additional time, any investigation into a
grievance shall be completed and action on the grievance shall be taken within
twelve (12) months from the date the grievance is received (or the date a
response is demanded to a Disciplinary Commission grievance). The purpose of
the deadline is to enable the Supreme Court to promote a fair and efficient
process and not to create substantive or procedural rights. Requests for
additional time shall be submitted to the Supreme Court and shall briefly
describe the circumstances necessitating the request. No response or objection
shall be allowed. Delays caused by a respondent’s noncooperation or requests
for extensions of time, and periods during which the respondent is suspended from
practice, shall not be counted toward the 12-month period. If the Disciplinary
Commission does not file a Disciplinary Complaint within this time, the
grievance shall be deemed dismissed.
Section 10.1. Noncooperation
with Disciplinary Investigation
(a) Duty to cooperate. It shall be the duty
of every attorney to cooperate with an investigation by the Disciplinary
Commission, accept service, and comply with the provisions of this Rule.
(b) Failure to cooperate. The failure to:
(1) respond to a grievance under this Rule; (2) comply with any written demand
from the Executive Director under this Rule; (3) accept certified mail from the
Disciplinary Commission that is sent to the attorney's official address of
record with the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and
Continuing Education and that requires a written response under this Rule; (4)
comply with a subpoena issued pursuant to this Rule; or (5) unexcused failure
to appear at any hearing on the matter under investigation shall be deemed
failure to cooperate with an investigation by the Disciplinary Commission.
(c) Suspension for noncooperation. A
respondent who fails to cooperate with an investigation by the Disciplinary
Commission may be subject to suspension from the practice of law.
(1) Show cause order. Upon the filing by the
Disciplinary Commission of a “Verified Petition for Noncooperation Suspension,”
the Supreme Court may issue an order directing the respondent to respond within
ten (10) days of service of the order and to show cause why the respondent
should not be immediately suspended for failure to cooperate with the
disciplinary process. Service upon the respondent shall be made pursuant to
Section 12(c). To comply with the show cause order, the respondent shall, within
ten days of service: (1) file a response to the show cause order with the
Supreme Court Clerk; and (2) cure the respondent’s failure to cooperate with
the investigation (unless the alleged failure is contested in good faith in the
response filed with the Supreme Court Clerk).
(2) Entry of noncooperation suspension order. Upon
a determination that the respondent has failed to cooperate with an
investigation by the Disciplinary Commission, the Supreme Court may enter an
order of noncooperation suspension. Upon this suspension from the practice of
law, the respondent shall comply with the requirements of Section 26.
(3) Certification of cooperation. If the
respondent complies with the demand from the Disciplinary Commission or
Executive Director, the Executive Director shall certify to the Supreme Court
that the respondent has cooperated with the investigation. Upon the filing of
the certification, the Supreme Court may enter an order dismissing the
proceeding as moot. If a noncooperation suspension has taken effect, the order
shall also direct the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions
and Continuing Education to adjust the respondent’s status on the Roll of
Attorneys to reflect that the respondent is no longer suspended, provided that
no other suspension is in effect. Any outstanding order to pay costs shall
remain in effect, and the Disciplinary Commission may, if appropriate, seek
costs.
(4) Conversion to indefinite suspension. On
motion by the Disciplinary Commission and order of the Supreme Court, a
noncooperation suspension that lasts for more than ninety (90) days may be
converted into indefinite suspension, after which the respondent may seek
reinstatement only pursuant to Section 18(b) of this Rule.
(5) Repeated failures to cooperate. If the
respondent has been the subject of two or more prior petitions for
noncooperation suspension within the preceding 12 months, the Disciplinary
Commission may include in its Petition for Noncooperation Suspension a request
that the Supreme Court issue an order of indefinite suspension. (This request
shall not delay the entry of a noncooperation suspension order under (c)(2)
above.) Upon such a request, the Supreme Court may issue an order directing the
respondent to respond in writing within ten (10) days of service of the order
and show cause why the respondent should not be immediately suspended for an
indefinite period for repeatedly failing to cooperate with the disciplinary
process. Unless the respondent shows good cause for a different disposition,
the Supreme Court may enter an order of indefinite suspension, whether or not a
noncooperation suspension is then in effect, and the respondent may seek
reinstatement only pursuant to Section 18(b) of this Rule.
(d) Costs. Upon the disposition of any
Petition for Noncooperation Suspension due to dismissal because the respondent
cooperated, or due to suspension, disbarment, or resignation in any proceeding,
the Disciplinary Commission may seek an order reimbursing the Disciplinary
Commission in the amount of $500 plus out-of-pocket expenses for its time and
effort in seeking the suspension, in addition to all other costs and expenses
provided for by Section 21 of this Rule. An attorney who fails to pay this
assessment by the due date of the annual registration fee required by Admission
and Discipline Rule 2(b) shall be subject to an order of suspension pursuant to
Section 21.
Section 11. Disciplinary
Commission Consideration of Grievances
(a) Consideration
of Executive Director’s report. The members of the Disciplinary Commission
shall consider and make a determination on the report and recommendations
submitted by the Executive Director.
(b) Authorization
to dismiss grievance. If, the Disciplinary Commission determines that there is
not reasonable cause to believe that the respondent has committed misconduct,
the grievance shall be dismissed and the grievant and the respondent shall be
given written notice of the Disciplinary Commission's determination.
(c) Authorization
to file Disciplinary Complaint. If after its consideration, the Disciplinary
Commission determines there is a reasonable cause to believe the respondent has
committed misconduct which would warrant disciplinary action, it shall file
with the Supreme Court Clerk a Disciplinary Complaint as provided in Section
12.
Section 11.1. Duty to
Report Findings of Guilt; Interim and Summary Suspensions
(a) Findings
of criminal guilt.
(1) Duty to
report finding of guilt of any felony or misdemeanor.
(i) The
judge of any court in this State in which an attorney is found guilty of any
felony or misdemeanor shall, within ten (10) days after the finding of guilt,
transmit a certified copy of proof of the finding of guilt to the Disciplinary
Commission’s Executive Director.
(ii) An
attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana who is found guilty
of any felony or misdemeanor under the laws of any state or the United States
shall, within ten (10) days after the finding of guilt, transmit a certified
copy of the finding of guilt to the Disciplinary Commission’s Executive
Director.
(2) Criminal
conviction of crime punishable as a felony.
(i) Upon
receipt of information indicating that an attorney has been found guilty of a
crime punishable as a felony under the laws of any state or of the United
States (even if alternative misdemeanor sentence or other disposition is
imposed), the Executive Director shall verify the information, and, in addition
to any other proceeding initiated pursuant to this Rule, shall file with the
Supreme Court a Notice of Finding of Guilt and Petition for Suspension, and
shall forward notice to the attorney by certified mail.
(ii) The
attorney shall have fifteen (15) days after the service of the Notice to file
any response to it.
(iii) Upon
finding that an attorney has been found guilty of a crime punishable as a
felony, the Supreme Court may suspend the attorney from the practice of law
pending further order of the Supreme Court or final determination of any
resulting disciplinary proceeding.
(b) Emergency interim suspension. If the
Disciplinary Commission determines by the affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3)
of its membership, that: (1) the continuation of the practice of law by an
attorney during the pendency of a disciplinary investigation or proceeding may
pose a substantial threat of harm to the public, clients, potential clients, or
the administration of justice, and (2) the alleged conduct, if true, would
subject the respondent to discipline under this Rule, the Executive Director
shall petition the Supreme Court for an order of interim suspension from the
practice of law or imposition of temporary conditions of probation on the
attorney.
(1) The
Disciplinary Commission’s petition to the Supreme Court for interim relief
under this subsection shall be verified and set forth the specific acts and
violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct alleged by the Disciplinary
Commission as grounds for the relief requested. The petition may be supported
by documents or affidavits.
(2) A copy
of the petition and notice to answer shall be served by the Disciplinary
Commission on the attorney in the same manner as provided in Sections 12(c) of
this Rule. The Executive Director shall file a return on service, setting forth
the method of service and the date on which the respondent was served with the
petition and notice to answer.
(3) The
respondent shall file an answer to the Disciplinary Commission's petition with
the Supreme Court within fifteen (15) days of service. The answer shall be
verified and may be supported by documents or affidavits. The respondent shall
serve a copy of the answer on the Disciplinary Commission Executive Director
and file proof of service with the Supreme Court Clerk.
(4) If the
respondent fails to answer the Disciplinary Commission's petition within the
time provided in this Rule for an answer, that failure to answer shall
constitute a waiver of the respondent’s right to contest the petition, and the
averments of the petition shall be conclusively established to be true for
purposes of ruling on the petition. Failure to timely answer shall not
establish the facts alleged as true for any other proceedings.
(5) The
Supreme Court may enter an order of interim suspension or imposition of
temporary conditions of probation in conformity with subsection (b)(9) either
upon the record before it or, at the discretion of the Supreme Court, after a
hearing ordered by the Supreme Court.
(6) Upon the
filing of the respondent's answer and upon consideration of all of the
pleadings, the Supreme Court may:
(i) Order
interim suspension or imposition of temporary conditions of probation upon the
petition and answer in conformity with subsection (b)(9);
(ii) Deny
the petition; or
(iii) Refer
the matter to a hearing officer.
(7) If the
Supreme Court refers a matter under this Section to a hearing officer, the
hearing officer shall hold a hearing thereon within thirty (30) days after the
date of referral and, within fourteen (14) days after the hearing, submit to
the Supreme Court a Hearing Officer’s Report, which report shall contain
findings of fact and a recommendation regarding the proposed interim
suspension.
(8) The
Supreme Court shall act promptly on the Hearing Officer's Report.
(9) If the
Supreme Court finds that the Disciplinary Commission has shown by a preponderance
of the evidence that:
(i)
The continuation of the practice of law by the respondent during the pendency
of a disciplinary investigation or proceeding may pose a substantial threat of
harm to the public, clients, potential clients, or the administration of
justice; and
(ii)
The conduct would subject the respondent to discipline under this Rule;
the Supreme Court may grant the
petition and enter an order of interim suspension or imposition of temporary
conditions of probation. The order shall set forth an effective date and remain
in effect until disposition of any related disciplinary proceeding or further
order of the Supreme Court.
(10) Dissolution or amendment of
order.
(i) If the
Supreme Court issues an order of interim relief, the respondent may file a
verified motion with the Supreme Court at any time for dissolution or amendment
of the interim order.
(ii) The
verified motion shall set forth specific facts demonstrating good cause to
dissolve or amend the interim order. A copy of the motion shall be served on
the Executive Director.
(iii) If the
verified motion is in proper form, the Supreme Court may refer the matter to a
hearing officer, who shall proceed consistent with the procedures set forth in
subsection (b)(7).
(iv) Successive
motions for dissolution or amendment of an interim order may be summarily
dismissed by the Supreme Court to the extent they raise issues that were or
with due diligence could have been raised in a prior motion.
(11)
If a Disciplinary Complaint for disciplinary action has not been filed by the
Disciplinary Commission against the respondent by the time an order of interim
suspension is entered, the Disciplinary Commission shall file a Disciplinary
Complaint within sixty (60) days of the Supreme Court’s entry of the interim
suspension order.
(12)
When a respondent in a disciplinary case is subject to an interim suspension
order entered pursuant to this Section, the hearing officer shall conduct a
final hearing of the underlying issues and file a report with the Supreme Court
Clerk without undue delay.
(13)
A respondent suspended from practice under this Section shall comply with the
duties of a suspended attorney under Section 26 of this Rule.
(c) Delinquency in paying child support.
(1)
Upon receipt of an order from a court pursuant to IC 31-16-12-8 or IC
31-14-12-5 finding that an attorney has been delinquent in the payment of child
support as a result of an intentional violation of an order for support, the
Executive Director shall file with the Supreme Court a Notice of Intentional
Violation of Support Order and Request for Suspension and shall serve that
request for suspension on the attorney by certified mail.
(2)
The attorney shall have fifteen (15) days after service to file any response to
the request for suspension.
(3)
Any order of suspension issued by the Supreme Court shall be effective until
further order of the Supreme Court.
(4)
An attorney suspended pursuant to Section 11.1(c) may be reinstated by the
Supreme Court upon filing a “Motion for Relief from Suspension” along with a
certified copy of a court order stating that the attorney is no longer in
intentional violation of an order for child support. The motion shall be filed
with the Supreme Court Clerk together with a filing fee of two hundred dollars
($200). If costs were imposed as part of the order of suspension, those costs
must be paid before a Motion for Relief from Suspension is filed.
Section 12. Prosecution
of Attorney Misconduct
(a) Disciplinary Complaint. If the
Disciplinary Commission determines that the misconduct, if proved, would
warrant disciplinary action and should not be disposed of by way of a private
administrative admonition, the Executive Director or designee shall prepare a
verified Disciplinary Complaint (“the Disciplinary Complaint”) which sets forth
the misconduct with which the attorney is charged and shall prosecute the case.
The caption shall contain the title of the case, which shall be “In the Matter
of,” naming the attorney as the respondent, and include the cause number
assigned by the Supreme Court Clerk. The allegations in the Disciplinary
Complaint may be verified on the basis of information and belief, and the
Disciplinary Complaint shall be filed with the Supreme Court Clerk. The
signature of the Executive Director or designee on the Disciplinary Complaint,
and the signatures thereon by other attorneys for the Disciplinary Commission,
shall serve as their appearance as attorney(s) for the Disciplinary Commission.
(b) Summons. The Disciplinary Commission
shall also prepare a summons and provide the Supreme Court Clerk with as many
copies of the Disciplinary Complaint and summons as are necessary for service. The
Supreme Court Clerk shall examine, date, sign and affix the Supreme Court
Clerk’s seal to the summons and thereupon return to the Disciplinary Commission
copies of the Disciplinary Complaint for service. Separate or additional
summons shall be issued by the Supreme Court Clerk at any time upon request by
the Disciplinary Commission.
The
summons shall contain:
(1) The name
and address of the person on whom the service is to be effected.
(2) The
Supreme Court cause number assigned to the case.
(3) The
title of the case as shown by the Disciplinary Complaint.
(4) The
name, address, and telephone number of the Disciplinary Commission.
(5) The time
within which this Rule requires the respondent to respond, and a clear
statement that in case of the respondent’s failure to do so, the allegations in
the complaint shall be taken as true.
The
summons may also contain any additional information that will facilitate proper
service.
(c) Service of Disciplinary Complaint and
summons.
(1) Upon the
filing of the Disciplinary Complaint, the summons and the Disciplinary
Complaint shall be served upon the respondent by delivering a copy of them to the
respondent personally or by sending a copy of them by registered or certified
mail with return receipt requested and returned showing its receipt. Alternatively,
service may be made electronically if authorized or required by the Supreme
Court.
(2) If personal
service or service by registered or certified mail cannot be obtained upon a
respondent, the summons and Disciplinary Complaint shall be served on the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education as set
forth in Section 23.1(c) of this Rule.
(d)
Modification of a Disciplinary Complaint
or charge. The Executive Director may amend a Disciplinary Complaint or a
charge without the Disciplinary Commission’s approval, if further investigation
reveals that the facts do not support continued prosecution of a particular
charge. The Executive Director may not, however, add additional charges to a
Disciplinary Complaint.
Section 12.1. Agreed
Discipline
(a) Private administrative admonition.
(1) Available for minor misconduct. If the
Disciplinary Commission determines that there is reasonable cause to believe an
attorney has committed misconduct that would not likely result in discipline
greater than a public reprimand if successfully prosecuted, the Disciplinary Commission
and the attorney may agree to resolve the matter by private administrative
admonition without filing a Disciplinary Complaint. Misconduct shall not be
regarded as minor if:
(i) The
misconduct involves misappropriation of funds or property;
(ii) The
misconduct resulted in or is likely to result in material prejudice (loss of
money, legal rights or valuable property rights) to a client or other person;
(iii) The
attorney has been publicly disciplined in the past three (3) years;
(vi) The
misconduct involved is of the same nature as misconduct for which the attorney
has been publicly or privately disciplined in the past five (5) years;
(v) The
misconduct includes dishonesty, misrepresentation, deceit, or fraud on the part
of the attorney; or
(vi) The
misconduct constitutes the commission of a felony under applicable law.
(2) Private administrative admonition letters.
(i) An
administrative admonition shall be issued in the form of a letter from the
Executive Director to the attorney summarizing the facts and setting out the
violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
(ii) The
proposed admonition letter shall first be submitted to the Supreme Court. The
administrative admonition shall be final within thirty (30) days thereafter,
unless disapproved by the Supreme Court. If not disapproved by the Supreme
Court, the Executive Director shall send the admonition letter to the attorney,
and the Executive Director shall file a Notice that an attorney has received a
private administrative admonition with the Supreme Court Clerk.
(iii) A
Notice that an attorney has received a private administrative admonition shall
be a public record, but the admonition letter shall be confidential. A copy of
the admonition letter shall be kept by the Executive Director in the
Disciplinary Commission’s records.
(b) Conditional Agreement for discipline.
(1) Submission to the Supreme Court. After
or with the filing of a Verified Complaint, the Disciplinary Commission and the
respondent may jointly submit to the Supreme Court a statement of circumstances
and conditional agreement for discipline (“the Conditional Agreement”).
(2) Contents of Conditional Agreement. The
Conditional Agreement shall contain the facts agreed to, the charge(s) which
the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent agree are established, and the
proposed discipline to which they conditionally agree. The Conditional
Agreement shall not contain statements by witnesses attesting to the character
or reputation of the respondent.
(3) Respondent’s affidavit. The Conditional
Agreement shall also contain an affidavit by the respondent stating that he or
she consents to the agreed discipline and that:
(i) The
respondent's consent is freely and voluntarily given, and the respondent is
aware of the implications of giving his or her consent;
(ii) The
respondent is aware that there is a pending proceeding alleging grounds for the
respondent’s discipline, the nature of which shall be specifically set forth;
(iii) The
respondent acknowledges that the material facts set forth in the Conditional
Agreement are true; and
(iv) The
respondent acknowledges that if prosecuted, the respondent could not
successfully defend himself or herself.
(4) Consideration and disposition by the Supreme
Court. The Supreme Court shall consider the Conditional Agreement and
either: (i) approve the Conditional Agreement and enter an order for the
discipline conditionally agreed to; (ii) notify the Disciplinary Commission and
the respondent that it declines to approve the Conditional Agreement; or (iii)
submit to the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent a proposed disposition
for discipline the Supreme Court deems appropriate (“Proposed Disposition”).
(i) Supreme
Court approval. The Conditional Agreement shall be effective upon entry of the
order approving it by the Supreme Court.
(ii) Acceptance
of Proposed Disposition. If the Supreme Court submits a Proposed Disposition,
the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent may agree to it by submitting to
the Supreme Court, within thirty (30) days, a statement of agreement to the
Proposed Disposition, verified by the respondent and by the Disciplinary
Commission’s Executive Director or designee. The statement of agreement shall
set forth or adopt by reference the Conditional Agreement, the Proposed
Disposition, and the agreement of the Disciplinary Commission and the
respondent. The Supreme Court may then enter an order approving the resulting
agreement, which shall conclude the matter.
(iii) Rejection
of Conditional Agreement. If the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent do
not agree to the Supreme Court’s Proposed Disposition or if the Supreme Court
rejects the Conditional Agreement without a Proposed Disposition, the action
shall proceed as if no Conditional Agreement had been submitted.
(5) Use of Conditional Agreement. It is the
intent of this Rule to encourage appropriate agreed dispositions of
disciplinary matters. A Conditional Agreement not approved by the Court shall
not be admitted into evidence at any hearing of the matter. If the Conditional
Agreement is the basis of a final disposition, it may be admitted into evidence
in a subsequent proceeding under this Rule, including contempt, probation
violation, and reinstatement proceedings in which the facts agreed to in the
Conditional Agreement may be relevant.
Section 13. Hearing
Officers
(a) Appointment and qualifications. Upon the
filing of a Disciplinary Complaint, the Supreme Court may appoint a hearing
officer to hear the charges. The hearing officer shall be a member of the Bar
of this State, shall have no investigations or actions regarding potential
professional misconduct pending before the Supreme Court or any of its
agencies, shall not be a member of the Disciplinary Commission or a member of
the same law firm as a Disciplinary Commission member, and shall not be an
employee of the Supreme Court.
(b) Change of hearing officer. A respondent
may, on a showing of good cause, petition the Supreme Court for a change of
hearing officer within ten (10) days after the appointment of the hearing
officer. Good cause may include any of the bases for disqualification found in
Rule 2.11 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Disciplinary Commission may seek
a change of hearing officer when the Disciplinary Commission is conducting an
investigation into alleged misconduct by the hearing officer.
(c) Powers and duties. Hearing officers shall
have the power and duty to:
(1) Conduct
a hearing on a Disciplinary Complaint;
(2) Administer
oaths to witnesses;
(3) Receive evidence and file a
Hearing Officer’s Report making written findings of fact and conclusions of
law; and
(4) Do all things necessary and
proper to carry out their responsibilities under this Rule.
Section 14. Proceedings
Before the Hearing Officer
(a) Rules of pleading and practice.
(1) Except
as otherwise specifically provided in Rule 23, the Indiana Rules of Trial
Procedure, the Indiana Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Indiana Rules of
Appellate Procedure shall not apply to proceedings brought under this Rule.
(2) Except
as otherwise explicitly provided, the Indiana Rules of Evidence shall apply in
all evidentiary hearings under this Rule.
(3) No
motion to dismiss or dilatory motions shall be entertained.
(b) Appearance and answer.
(1) When the
respondent first appears on his or her own behalf or by counsel, the respondent
or counsel shall file an appearance form. That appearance form shall have the
same caption as the Disciplinary Complaint and shall contain the name, address,
attorney number, FAX number, and email address of the respondent or the
respondent’s counsel as applicable.
(2) An
answer shall be filed by the respondent within thirty (30) days after service
of the summons and Disciplinary Complaint, or within any additional time as may
be allowed upon written motion setting forth good cause for extension of time
to answer the Disciplinary Complaint.
(3) A written
motion for enlargement of time to answer shall be automatically allowed for an
additional thirty (30) days from the original due date without a written order.
A motion for automatic enlargement of time filed pursuant to this Rule shall
state the date when the answer is due and the date to which time is to be
enlarged. The motion must be filed on or before the original due date or this
provision shall be inapplicable. Any other motion for enlargement of time to
answer the Disciplinary Complaint shall be granted only for good cause shown.
(4) The
respondent’s answer shall admit or controvert the averments set forth in the
Disciplinary Complaint by specifically denying designated averments or
paragraphs or generally denying all averments except the designated averments
or paragraphs as the respondent expressly admits. All denials shall fairly meet
the substance of the averments denied. If in good faith the respondent intends
to deny only a part of an averment, he or she shall specify so much of it as is
true and material and deny the remainder.
(5) If the
respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
truth of an averment, he or she shall so state and the statement shall be
considered a denial.
(6) Averments
in a Disciplinary Complaint are admitted when not denied in the answer.
(7) The
answer shall assert any legal defense.
(c) Failure to answer.
(1) If a
respondent fails to answer a Disciplinary Complaint as required by this
Section, the Disciplinary Commission may file a “Motion for Judgment on the
Complaint” asking that the allegations set forth in the Disciplinary Complaint
be conclusively established as true.
(2) The
respondent shall have fourteen (14) days to file a response to the Motion for
Judgment on the Complaint. If a respondent files a timely response to the
Motion for Judgment on the Complaint, the hearing officer shall set the motion
and the respondent’s response for hearing within twenty-eight (28) days, and
shall give the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent at least seven (7)
days’ notice of that hearing.
(3) Upon
Motion for Judgment on the Complaint and in the absence of a timely answer by
the respondent that conforms with subsections (a) and (b) above, or in the
absence of a response under subsection (c)(2), the hearing officer shall find
the allegations set forth in the Disciplinary Complaint are conclusively
established as true and promptly file a Hearing Officer’s Report in conformity
with subsection (g).
(4) If a
hearing officer has not been appointed by the time a Motion for Judgment on the
Complaint is filed, the Supreme Court shall act directly on the Motion for
Judgment on the Complaint.
(d) Discovery. Discovery shall be available
to the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent on terms and conditions that,
as nearly as practicable, follow Indiana Trial Rules 26 through 37.
(e) Pre-hearing conference. At the
discretion of the hearing officer, or upon the request of either the
Disciplinary Commission or the respondent, a pre-hearing conference shall be
ordered for the purpose of obtaining admissions, narrowing the issues presented
by the pleadings, requiring an exchange of the names and addresses of
prospective witnesses and the general nature of their expected testimony, considering
the necessity or desirability of amendments to the Disciplinary Complaint and
answer, and any other matters as may aid in the disposition of the action.
(f) The hearing.
(1) Within
thirty (30) days after the respondent has filed a timely answer or the hearing
officer is appointed and has qualified, whichever is later, the hearing officer
shall schedule a date for a final hearing on the Disciplinary Complaint and the
respondent’s answer. Absent good cause, the hearing date shall be within ninety
(90) days of the scheduling order.
(2) The
grievant, the respondent, and the Disciplinary Commission shall be given not
less than fifteen (15) days written notice of the hearing date.
(3) The
respondent shall have the right to attend the hearing in person, to be
represented by counsel, to examine witnesses and to submit evidence and
witnesses as in civil proceedings.
(4) Only the
Supreme Court and its duly appointed hearing officer or hearing officers shall
have jurisdiction to issue any orders or processes in connection with a
disciplinary case brought under this Rule.
(5) Upon
request, the hearing officer may issue a subpoena for the attendance of
witnesses or a subpoena for the production of documentary evidence, signed and
sealed but otherwise in blank, to the Disciplinary Commission or the respondent
or the respondent’s attorney, who shall fill it in before service. The
respondent, or attorneys for the Disciplinary Commission and for the
respondent, are authorized to sign and issue subpoenas. Subpoenas for the
attendance of witnesses and production of documentary evidence shall conform to
the provisions of Indiana Trial Rule 45. The hearing officer or officers shall
have authority to enforce, quash or modify subpoenas for good cause.
(6) The
hearing on the Disciplinary Complaint and the respondent’s answer shall be
conducted by the hearing officer on the record and without a jury.
(g) Hearing Officer’s Report.
(1) Within
sixty (60) days after the conclusion of the hearing or the filing of proposed
findings by the parties, whichever is later, the hearing officer shall file a
Hearing Officer’s Report with the Supreme Court Clerk. The Hearing Officer’s
Report shall include a determination whether it has been proved by clear and
convincing evidence that the respondent committed misconduct as charged in the
Disciplinary Complaint, and findings of fact and conclusions of law relevant to
that determination.
(2) The
Disciplinary Commission and the respondent may request the hearing officer to
make a recommendation concerning the discipline to be imposed if the hearing
officer finds misconduct, or the hearing officer may make a recommendation at
his or her own discretion. The recommendation by the hearing officer is not
binding on the Supreme Court.
(3) A copy
of the Hearing Officer’s Report shall be served by the hearing officer on the
respondent and the Disciplinary Commission when the report is filed with the
Supreme Court Clerk. The Hearing Officer's Report filed with the Supreme Court
Clerk shall be accompanied by a copy of the report in electronic format, unless
it was filed in electronic form. Any electronic format used by the word
processing system to generate the report is permissible. When the Hearing
Officer's Report is filed, the Disciplinary Commission shall transmit the
record of the case (including any exhibits and transcripts that have been
prepared) to the Supreme Court Clerk for filing.
Section 15. Supreme
Court Review
(a) Petition for Review.
(1) Time for filing. The respondent or
Disciplinary Commission shall have thirty (30) days after the filing of the
Hearing Officer’s Report to file a Petition for Review seeking a review of the
case by the Supreme Court.
(2) Brief in Support of Petition for Review.
The respondent or the Disciplinary Commission may file a supporting brief at
the time a petition for review is filed.
(3) Response and reply briefs. The
respondent or Disciplinary Commission opposing a Petition for Review shall have
thirty (30) days from the date of service of the Petition for Review to file a
response brief. The filer opposing a Petition for Review may raise in its
response brief any issues for review that were not raised in the Petition for
Review. The respondent or Disciplinary Commission filing the Petition for
Review shall then have fifteen (15) days from the date of service of the
response brief to file a reply brief addressing the response to the issues
originally raised in the Petition for Review as well as any additional issues
raised in the response brief. No further briefing shall be permitted without
leave of the Supreme Court.
(b) Brief on Sanction. If the respondent or
the Disciplinary Commission desires to address the Supreme Court on the issue
of the appropriate sanction to be imposed, they may file a "Brief on
Sanction." In that event, the deadlines for filing response and reply
briefs shall be the same as in the case of a Petition for Review. Alternatively,
arguments regarding the issue of appropriate sanction may be included in a
Petition for Review or supporting brief. No further briefing shall be permitted
without leave of the Supreme Court.
(c) Format. The Petition for Review and
briefs filed under this Section shall comply with the formatting requirements
of Section 23(j). They need not conform to the Rules of Appellate Procedure
adopted by the Supreme Court.
Section 16. Probation
(a) Imposition. An order of the Supreme
Court imposing suspension or granting reinstatement may include probation.
(b) Termination.
(1) Termination of probation not automatic. Unless
otherwise provided in the order, probation shall remain in effect until
terminated pursuant to this Rule or by Supreme Court order.
(2) Petition for termination of probation. No
sooner than fifteen (15) days prior to expiration of the period of probation
set by the Supreme Court’s order, the attorney may file with the Supreme Court
Clerk: (i) a “Petition for Termination of Probation;” and (ii) an affidavit by
the attorney attesting to compliance with all terms of probation.
(3) Objection to termination of probation. The
Disciplinary Commission shall have fifteen (15) days after service of a
Petition for Termination of Probation to file with the Supreme Court Clerk an
objection. If an objection is filed, probation shall continue until further
order of the Supreme Court. The attorney shall have fifteen (15) days after
service of an objection to file a response. The Disciplinary Commission shall
have ten (10) days after service of a response to file a reply.
(4) Adjustment of status in absence of
objection. If no objection to a Petition for Termination of Probation is
filed, the petition shall be deemed granted with no action by the Supreme
Court, effective fifteen (15) days after the petition was filed. The Supreme
Court Clerk shall adjust the attorney’s status on the Roll of Attorneys to
reflect that the attorney is no longer on probation, provided there is no other
probation or any suspension in effect.
(5) Procedure if the Disciplinary Commission
objects to termination of probation. If the Disciplinary Commission files
an objection to termination of probation, the dispute shall be resolved through
the procedures set forth in Section 16(c)(4) unless the Supreme Court directs
otherwise.
(c) Revocation.
(1) Motion to Revoke Probation. If the
Executive Director receives information that an attorney may have violated
probation, the Executive Director may file a verified Motion to Revoke
Probation with the Supreme Court Clerk, setting forth supporting facts. A
Motion to Revoke Probation shall not preclude the Disciplinary Commission from
filing independent disciplinary charges against the attorney based on the same
conduct alleged in the motion.
(2) Response to motion. Within ten (10) days
after service of a Motion to Revoke Probation, the attorney shall file a
response under penalties of perjury admitting or denying each of the
allegations in the motion. A general denial shall not be allowed and, if filed,
shall be taken as a failure to respond. The attorney's failure to respond timely
shall be deemed to be an admission to the allegations in the Motion to Revoke
Probation.
(3) Burden of proof and matters considered. The
Disciplinary Commission shall have the burden of proving violation of probation
by a preponderance of the evidence. Any reliable evidence of probative value
may be considered regardless of its admissibility under the rules of evidence
so long as the opponent is provided a fair opportunity to controvert it.
(4) Disposition. After the time for filing a
response has expired, the Supreme Court may dispose of the matter on the
documents filed or, if there are material factual disputes, may refer it to a
hearing officer. The hearing officer shall hold a hearing within fourteen (14)
days of appointment. The hearing officer shall file with the Supreme Court
Clerk findings and a recommendation within ten (10) days of the hearing. The
Supreme Court may then enter an order deciding the matter.
(d) Service in termination and revocation
matters. Service upon the attorney and the Disciplinary Commission through
its Executive Director shall be made by personal service or by certified mail,
return receipt requested. Service shall be complete upon mailing when served
upon the attorney at his or her current address of record on the roll of
attorneys, regardless of whether the attorney claims the mail. Alternatively,
service may be made electronically if authorized or required by the Supreme
Court.
(e) Immediate suspension pending revocation.
In addition to a Motion to Revoke Probation, the Executive Director may also
file a verified motion for the immediate suspension of the attorney's license
to practice. Upon a showing of good cause, the Supreme Court may order the
attorney's license suspended immediately until the Motion to Revoke Probation
has been decided.
Section 17. Resignation
and Disbarment by Consent on Admission of Misconduct
(a) Affidavit consenting to resignation. An
attorney who is the subject of an investigation or a proceeding involving
allegations of misconduct may consent to relinquish his or her license to
practice law in this State under a resignation, by submitting an affidavit and
simultaneously serving a copy on the Disciplinary Commission. The affidavit
shall state that the respondent desires to consent to resignation and that:
(1) The
respondent's consent to the resignation is freely and voluntarily given and he
or she is fully aware of the implications of giving his or her consent to
resignation;
(2) The
respondent is aware that there is a presently pending investigation or
proceeding involving allegations of grounds for his or her discipline, the
nature of which shall be specifically set forth;
(3) The
respondent acknowledges that the material facts alleged in the pending
investigation or proceeding are true; and
(4) The
respondent acknowledges that if prosecuted, he or she could not successfully
defend himself or herself.
(b) Supreme Court action on affidavit consenting
to resignation.
(1) Approval of resignation. The Supreme
Court may enter an order approving the resignation. If approved, the respondent
may seek reinstatement only under the provisions of Section 18(b) of this Rule.
(2) Rejection of resignation. If the Supreme
Court notifies the respondent and the Disciplinary Commission that it rejects
the respondent's consent to resignation, the investigation or proceeding then
pending shall proceed as though no consent to resignation had been submitted.
(c) Disbarment by consent. If the Supreme
Court notifies the respondent and the Disciplinary Commission that it rejects
the respondent’s resignation, the Supreme Court may include in the notice a
proposal that the respondent submit a supplemental affidavit consenting to
permanent disbarment instead of resignation. If the respondent submits a
supplemental affidavit consenting to permanent disbarment, the Supreme Court
may enter an order permanently disbarring the respondent from the practice of
law in this State.
(d) Confidentiality of affidavit. An order
entered under (b) or (c) above shall be a matter of public record. However, the
affidavit required under the provisions of (a) and (c) above shall not be
publicly disclosed or made available for use in any other proceeding except upon
order of the Supreme Court.
Section 17.1. Consent
to Discipline on Admission of Misconduct
(a) Affidavit consenting to discipline. An
attorney who is the subject of an investigation proceeding involving
allegations of misconduct may consent to discipline by filing an affidavit with
the Supreme Court Clerk, and serving a copy on the Disciplinary Commission,
stating that the respondent desires to consent to discipline as determined by
the Supreme Court and that:
(1) The
respondent's consent to discipline is freely and voluntarily rendered and he or
she is fully aware of the implications of giving his or her consent to
discipline;
(2) The
respondent is aware that there is a presently pending investigation or
proceeding involving allegations of grounds for his or her discipline the
nature of which shall be specifically set forth;
(3) The
respondent acknowledges that the material facts alleged in the pending
investigation or proceeding are true; and
(4) The
respondent acknowledges that if prosecuted, he or she could not successfully
defend himself or herself.
(b) Briefing and decision. The respondent
may file a brief on sanction simultaneously with the affidavit consenting to
discipline. The Disciplinary Commission shall have thirty (30) days from the date
of service of the affidavit to file a response brief on sanction. The
respondent shall then have fifteen (15) days from the date of service of the
Disciplinary Commission’s brief to file a reply brief. No further briefing
shall be permitted without leave of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may
then enter an order imposing discipline on the respondent.
Section 18. Reinstatement
(a) Reinstatement after suspension with
automatic reinstatement. Whenever an attorney is suspended for a fixed
period not to exceed 180 days with automatic reinstatement, the Disciplinary
Commission may file written objections to automatic reinstatement, which shall
be limited to:
(1) Failure
to comply with the terms of the order, including any conditions the Supreme
Court may have specified in the order of suspension;
(2) Pendency
of other complaints;
(3) Failure
to comply with the terms of Section 26; and
(4) Failure
to satisfy fully the costs of the proceeding assessed pursuant to Section 21,
which must be satisfied no later than twenty (20) days prior to the expiration
of the period of suspension.
The
objections must be filed with the Supreme Court Clerk at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the expiration of the period of suspension. If the Supreme Court
determines that the attorney should not then be reinstated, the Supreme Court’s
order may specify when and under what conditions the attorney may apply for
reinstatement.
If
the Supreme Court determines that the attorney has failed to satisfy fully the
costs assessed against him or her, the Supreme Court may enter an order staying
the automatic reinstatement until the suspended attorney satisfies fully the
costs of the proceeding or until further order of the Supreme Court.
(b) Reinstatement after suspension without
automatic reinstatement. An attorney who has been suspended from the
practice of law without automatic reinstatement, including an attorney under
resignation, may file with the Supreme Court Clerk a Petition for
Reinstatement, unless the order of suspension provides otherwise, together with
a filing fee of five hundred dollars ($500).
(1) Time for filing. The petition may be
filed when the term of suspension prescribed in the order of suspension has
elapsed, or at any time if the suspension is for an indefinite period of time. An
attorney whose resignation from the bar has been accepted may petition for
reinstatement when five (5) years have elapsed since the date of the order
accepting the resignation.
(2) Prerequisites for seeking reinstatement.
(i) The
attorney must file the notification affidavit required by Section 26(c)(7)
before a petition for reinstatement is filed.
(ii) The
attorney must take the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
(MPRE) within twelve (12) months before filing the petition and pass with a
scaled score of eighty (80) or above.
(iii) At
least twelve months must have passed since the Supreme Court denied a prior
petition for reinstatement by the attorney.
(3) Proof needed for reinstatement. A
petition for reinstatement under (a) above may be granted only if the attorney
establishes by clear and convincing evidence that:
(i) The
attorney desires in good faith to obtain restoration of his or her privilege to
practice law;
(ii) The
attorney has not practiced law in this State or attempted to do so since he or
she was disciplined;
(iii) The
attorney has complied fully with the terms of the order for discipline and the
duties set forth in Section 26, including the filing of a notification
affidavit;
(iv) The
attorney’s attitude towards the misconduct for which he or she was disciplined
is one of genuine remorse;
(v) The
attorney’s conduct since the discipline was imposed has been exemplary and
above reproach;
(vi) The
attorney has a proper understanding of and attitude towards the standards that
are imposed upon members of the bar and shall conduct himself or herself in
conformity with these standards;
(vii) The
attorney can safely be recommended to the legal profession, the courts and the
public as a person fit to be consulted by others and to represent them and
otherwise act in matters of trust and confidence, and in general to aid in the
administration of justice as a member of the bar and an officer of the courts;
and
(viii) The
disability has been removed, if the suspension was imposed by reason of
disability.
(4) Hearing on petition for reinstatement.
(i) Appointment of hearing officer. Upon the
filing of a Petition for Reinstatement, the Supreme Court may appoint a hearing
officer who meets the qualifications of Section 13(a) to hear the matter. A
hearing officer may be a former member of the Disciplinary Commission. The
Disciplinary Commission may recommend a hearing officer to the Supreme Court.
(ii) Change of hearing officer. An attorney
or the Disciplinary Commission may, on a showing of good cause, petition the
Supreme Court for a change of hearing officer within ten (10) days after the
appointment of the hearing officer.
(iii) Powers and duties. Hearing officers
shall have the powers provided in Section 13. The provisions of Section
14(a)(1) and 14(d) through (g) shall apply to the extent practicable. After a
hearing, the hearing officer shall determine whether the attorney has met the
prerequisites set forth in (b)(2) above and shall file a Hearing Officer’s
Report making findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation on
whether the attorney should be reinstated to the practice of law in this State.
(5) Supreme Court review of the Hearing
Officer’s Report. The attorney seeking reinstatement or the Disciplinary
Commission may file a Petition for Review of the Hearing Officer’s Report
within thirty (30) days of entry. Briefing and consideration of a Petition for
Review shall proceed under the provisions of Section 15 to the extent
practicable.
(c) Reinstatement under other Sections of Rule
23. An attorney suspended under Section 11.1(c) (delinquency in paying
child support), Section 20 (discipline imposed by other jurisdiction), Section
21 (failure to pay costs and expenses), or any other Section of this Rule with
its own reinstatement provisions may be reinstated by following the procedures
set forth in those Sections.
(d) Other terms and conditions. The Supreme
Court may provide for reinstatement on other terms and by other procedures than
those set forth above, such as reinstatement conditioned only on the attorney's
submission of proof of compliance with a requirement for reinstatement.
Section 19. Proceedings
to Determine Disability
(a) Report to the Disciplinary Commission. Any
person, including a member of the Disciplinary Commission, a member of the Bar
of this State, the Executive Director or designee, or any bar association of
this State, may submit a report to the Disciplinary Commission suggesting that
an attorney be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law due to
disability caused by physical or mental infirmity or by the use of intoxicants
or drugs.
(b) Investigation. The Executive Director
shall investigate the allegations and shall make a report to the Disciplinary
Commission as soon as practicable.
(c) Hearing and Petition for Disability
Suspension. If the Disciplinary Commission determines that there is good
reason to believe that the attorney is under a disability that would justify
suspension, the Disciplinary Commission shall hold a hearing to determine if
the attorney should be suspended indefinitely. To conduct the hearing, the
Disciplinary Commission may request the appointment of a hearing officer as
provided in Section 18(b)(4). The hearing officer shall submit findings of fact
and a recommendation to the Disciplinary Commission. The Disciplinary
Commission may then file with the Supreme Court Clerk a Petition for Disability
Suspension, which shall include its findings of fact. The Petition may also
include a suggestion that the Supreme Court appoint an Attorney Surrogate under
Section 27.
(d) Immediate emergency suspension. The
Disciplinary Commission’s Petition for Disability Suspension may include a
request for immediate emergency suspension pending final determination of the
Petition for Disability Suspension. If the Supreme Court enters an order of
immediate emergency suspension, the attorney shall have fifteen (15) days after
entry of the order to file a motion for dissolution or modification of the
order. The order of immediate emergency suspension shall remain in effect
unless dissolved or modified by the Supreme Court.
(e) Objection to Petition for Disability
Suspension. The attorney shall have thirty (30) days after the filing of
the Disciplinary Commission’s Petition for Disability Suspension to file an
objection.
(f) Suspension if no objection is filed. If
no timely objection is filed, the Supreme Court may enter an order of
indefinite suspension of the attorney for the duration of the disability.
(g) Procedure if an objection is filed. If
an objection to the Petition for Disability Suspension is timely filed, briefs
may be filed as the Supreme Court may direct. The briefs need not conform to
the Supreme Court’s rules except as provided by Section 23. The Supreme Court
may then enter an order on the Disciplinary Commission’s Petition for
Disability Suspension.
(h) Procedure for reinstatement. Any
attorney suspended indefinitely for disability as provided in this Section may
petition for reinstatement upon the termination of the disability as provided
by Section 18(b).
Section 20. Discipline
Imposed by Other Jurisdictions
(a) Definitions and applicability.
(1) For the
purpose of this Section, “foreign suspension” shall mean any suspension from
the practice of law, revocation of the attorney's license to practice law,
disbarment, or acceptance of resignation with an admission of misconduct
pursuant to an order in another jurisdiction.
(2) “Foreign
discipline” shall mean foreign suspension or any other public discipline
imposed by another jurisdiction.
(3) This
Section shall apply to an attorney admitted to practice in this State (“Indiana
attorney”), regardless of whether the attorney’s license is active in good
standing.
(b) Indiana attorney’s duty to report foreign
discipline. An Indiana attorney shall notify the Executive Director in
writing of an order imposing foreign discipline within fifteen (15) days after
entry of the order.
(c) Executive Director’s duty to obtain copy of
order. Upon notification from any source that an Indiana attorney has been
subject to foreign discipline, the Executive Director shall obtain a certified
copy of the order of discipline.
(d) Notice and request for reciprocal
suspension. Upon receipt of a certified copy of an order imposing foreign
suspension, the Executive Director or designee shall file with the Supreme
Court Clerk a Notice of Foreign Suspension. The Executive Director shall attach
a certified copy of the order of foreign suspension and request the Supreme
Court issue an order to the Executive Director and to the Indiana attorney
directing either of them to show cause in writing within thirty (30) days from
service of the order why the Supreme Court should not impose reciprocal
discipline on the Indiana attorney. The burden is on the opponent to reciprocal
suspension in this State to demonstrate that it should not be imposed.
(e) Supreme Court order. After thirty (30)
days from service of the show cause order, the Supreme Court may suspend the
Indiana attorney from the practice of law in this State indefinitely unless the
Supreme Court finds on the face of the record that:
(1) The
procedure in the foreign suspension case was so lacking in notice or opportunity
to be heard as to constitute a deprivation of due process;
(2) An
infirmity of proof gives rise to the clear conviction that the Supreme Court
could not, consistent with its duty, accept as final the foreign jurisdiction’s
conclusion regarding misconduct;
(3) The
imposition of suspension by the Supreme Court would be inconsistent with
standards governing discipline in this Rule or would result in grave injustice;
or
(4) The
misconduct established warrants substantially different discipline in this State.
If the Supreme Court determines that
any of the above factors exists, it may deny the request for reciprocal
suspension or impose alternative discipline as it concludes is appropriate.
(f) Effect of foreign adjudication. Except
as provided above, a final adjudication in another jurisdiction that an Indiana
attorney has committed misconduct shall establish conclusively the misconduct
for purposes of a disciplinary proceeding in this State.
(g) Motion for Release from Reciprocal
Suspension. An Indiana attorney suspended under this Section may file a
"Motion for Release from Reciprocal Suspension" in this State only
after he or she is reinstated to the practice of law in the jurisdiction that
imposed the foreign suspension and after the attorney has paid all costs
assessed by the Supreme Court. Regardless of the Indiana attorney's date of
reinstatement in the foreign jurisdiction, however, the attorney shall not be
released from reciprocal suspension in this State until he or she has been
suspended at least as long as he or she was suspended in the foreign
jurisdiction.
(1) The
suspension in this State shall be deemed to begin on the date the foreign
suspension begins only if the Indiana attorney promptly notifies the Disciplinary
Commission of the foreign suspension and states that the attorney has suspended
his or her practice in Indiana as of the date the foreign suspension began.
(2) The
Motion for Release from Reciprocal Suspension shall be verified, shall be
accompanied by certified proof of reinstatement in the foreign jurisdiction,
and shall state the length of time the Indiana attorney was suspended in the
foreign jurisdiction and the date on which the length of the attorney's Indiana
suspension equals the length of the attorney's foreign suspension.
(3) The
Supreme Court may decide the motion without appointment of a hearing officer,
and the provisions of Section 18(b) shall not apply.
(4) If the
Indiana attorney's reinstatement in the foreign jurisdiction is subject to
terms of probation, the attorney's release from reciprocal suspension in
Indiana shall also be subject to compliance with those terms. The Indiana
attorney shall promptly notify the Disciplinary Commission of any modification
or revocation of probation in the foreign jurisdiction.
IV. General Provisions
Section 21. Costs and
Expenses
(a) Imposition of costs and expenses in
disciplinary proceedings. If the Supreme Court imposes discipline or other
sanction, including a sanction for contempt, the Supreme Court may issue an
order that the respondent pay the costs and expenses of the proceeding. The
Executive Director shall prepare an itemized statement of expenses allocable to
each case, including: (1) expenses incurred by the Disciplinary Commission in
the course of the investigatory, hearing, or review procedures under this Rule;
(2) costs attributable to the services of the hearing officer: and (3) a fee of
two hundred fifty dollars ($250) payable to the Supreme Court Clerk, as
reimbursement for the processing of all papers in connection with the
proceeding. Proceedings for the collection of the costs taxed against the
respondent may be initiated by the Executive Director on the Supreme Court’s
order approving expenses and costs.
(b) Costs of hearing in reinstatement
proceedings. Any attorney filing a petition for reinstatement under Section
18, or seeking reinstatement to practice under any other provision of this
Rule, shall be responsible for the payment of all costs incurred by the
Disciplinary Commission in conducting a hearing that exceed the amount of any
filing fee paid by the attorney seeking reinstatement. The Disciplinary
Commission shall send a statement of costs to the attorney, and the attorney
shall pay the costs within ten (10) days of the receipt of the statement. In no
event shall there be any refund or rebate of any part of any filing fee paid by
the person seeking reinstatement.
(c) Costs for Disciplinary Commission services
in providing copies of documents.
(1) Documents. The Disciplinary Commission
may charge a person requesting copies of documents the same costs that the
Supreme Court has authorized the Supreme Court Clerk to charge for copies of
documents.
(2) Delivery costs. In addition, the
Disciplinary Commission may charge the costs of postage or other delivery
services in responding to requests for copies of documents.
(3) Right to withhold until payment is made.
The Disciplinary Commission may withhold the documents requested until the
costs for its service are paid.
(4) Inapplicable to discovery requests. This
subsection shall not apply to the Commission’s responses to discovery requests
in the course of litigation.
(d) Failure to pay costs and expenses. An
attorney who fails to pay costs and expenses assessed pursuant to this Section
or any other provision of this Rule (except subsection (c) above) by the due
date of the annual registration fee required by Admission and Discipline Rule
2(b) may be subject to an order of suspension from the practice of law pursuant
to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(h), and shall be reinstated only
upon paying the outstanding costs and expenses and filing with the Supreme
Court Clerk a written application for reinstatement and payment of an
administrative reinstatement fee of two hundred dollars ($200). The
requirements of Section 18(b) shall not apply to these proceedings.
Section 22. Public
Access
(a) Documents and information about disciplinary
matters.
(1) After a
Disciplinary Complaint has been filed with the Supreme Court, all papers filed
with the Supreme Court Clerk pertaining to that particular Disciplinary
Complaint shall be open and available to the public, except as provided by the
Rules on Access to Court Records.
(2) After a
Disciplinary Complaint has been filed with the Supreme Court, all proceedings
shall be open to the public, except adjudicative deliberations or as provided
in Section 22(b).
(3) Proceedings
and papers that relate to matters that have not resulted in the filing of a
Disciplinary Complaint shall be confidential and not available to the public.
(4) Communications
among members and staff of the Disciplinary Commission regarding disciplinary
matters, minutes and notes regarding Disciplinary Commission meetings and
deliberations, and investigative reports and other work product of the
Executive Director or his or her agents shall be confidential and not available
to the public.
(5) Conditional
Agreements, advisory letters and any responses from respondents, private
administrative admonition letters, resignation affidavits, and affidavits
consenting to disbarment shall be confidential and not open to public
inspection.
(b) Hearings. Hearings before hearing
officers shall be open to the public. However, hearing officers may order a
hearing or portions of a hearing to be closed or order evidentiary exhibits to
be held under seal if necessary for any of the following purposes:
(1) For the
protection of witnesses.
(2) To
prevent likely disruption of the proceedings.
(3) For the
security of the hearing officer or any of the participants at the proceedings.
(4) To
prevent the unauthorized disclosure of attorney-client confidences not at issue
in the proceeding.
(5) To
protect medical information.
(6) For any
other good cause shown which in the judgment of the hearing officer requires
the hearing to be closed.
Section 23. Filing,
Service, Submission, Format of Documents; Motion Practice
(a) Filing; general provisions.
(1) Pleadings,
motions, and other documents shall have a caption showing the Indiana Supreme
Court as the court in which they are filed and shall be filed with the Supreme
Court Clerk (not with the clerk of a trial court, even if the judge of that
court is serving as hearing officer in the disciplinary proceeding).
(2) No
deposition, request for discovery, or discovery response shall be filed with
the Supreme Court Clerk unless permitted under circumstances set forth in Trial
Rule 5(E)(2).
(3) Original
depositions shall be maintained according to the procedures of Trial Rule
5(E)(3).
(4) The
filing of any deposition shall constitute publication.
(b) Filing defined. All papers shall be
deemed filed when they are:
(1) Personally
delivered to the Supreme Court Clerk;
(2) Deposited
in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed to the Supreme
Court Clerk;
(3) Deposited
with any third-party commercial carrier for delivery to the Supreme Court Clerk
within three (3) calendar days, cost prepaid, and properly addressed; or
(4) Electronically
filed as authorized or required by the Supreme Court.
(c) Filing; required documents. Only the
original of a document shall be filed with or tendered to the Supreme Court
Clerk. No paper original shall be required for any documents electronically
filed with or tendered to the Supreme Court Clerk.
(d) Time for service. A filer shall serve a
document no later than the date it is tendered for filing.
(e) Required service. All documents tendered
to the Supreme Court Clerk for filing must be served upon all participants or
their counsel and the hearing officer, after one has been appointed.
(f) Manner and date of service. Unless
otherwise provided in this Rule, all documents shall be deemed served when they
are:
(1) Personally
delivered;
(2) Deposited
in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed;
(3) Deposited
with any third-party commercial carrier for delivery within three (3) calendar
days, cost prepaid, and properly addressed; or
(4) Electronically
served as authorized or required by the Supreme Court.
(g) Certificate of service. Anyone tendering
a document to the Supreme Court Clerk for filing in a disciplinary proceeding
shall certify that service has been made, list the persons served, and specify
the date and means of service. The certificate of service shall be placed at
the end of the document and shall not be separately filed. The separate filing
of a certificate of service, however, shall not be grounds for rejecting a
document for filing. The Supreme Court Clerk may permit documents to be filed
without a certificate of service but shall require prompt filing of a separate
certificate of service.
(h) Documents submitted to the Supreme Court.
Documents directed to be submitted to the Supreme Court shall be delivered to
the Supreme Court agency or office designated by the Supreme Court to accept
the submissions. Submission may be made electronically if authorized or
required by the Supreme Court. The date of submission shall be the date
received by the Supreme Court agency or office. Unless submitted
electronically, one paper original shall be submitted. Documents submitted to
the Supreme Court shall not be filed with the Supreme Court Clerk.
(i) Inclusion of contact information. A
person filing or submitting a pleading, motion, or document shall include at
any place under the signature line the person’s address, telephone number, FAX
number, and email address.
(j) Format. Motions, petitions for review,
and briefs shall conform to the following requirements:
(1) The
pages shall be 8 1/2 by 11 inch white paper of a weight normally used in
printing and typing.
(2) The
document shall be produced in a neat and legible manner using black print. It
may be typewritten, printed or produced by a word processing system. It may be
copied by any copying process that produces a distinct black image on white
paper. Text shall appear on only one side of the paper.
(3) The font
shall be Arial, Baskerville, Book Antiqua, Bookman, Bookman Old Style, Century,
Century Schoolbook, Courier, Courier New, CG Times, Garamond, Georgia, New
Baskerville, New Century Schoolbook, Palatino or Times New Roman and the
typeface shall be 12-point or larger in body text.
(4) All text
shall be double-spaced except that footnotes, tables, charts, or similar
material and text that is blocked and indented shall be single-spaced.
(5) The
pages shall be numbered at the bottom.
(6) All four
margins for the text of the document shall be at least one (1) inch from the
edge of the page.
(k) Electronic copy. Petitions and briefs
may be accompanied by a copy of the document in electronic format, unless the
document is filed in electronic form. Any electronic format used by the word
processing system to generate the document is permissible.
(l) Motion practice. Unless provided
otherwise by these Rules or by order of the Supreme Court, a request for an
order or for other relief shall be made by filing a written motion. A motion
for relief from a prior order shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days
after the date of the order, absent good cause shown for seeking relief at a
later date. Any response to a motion must be filed within fifteen (15) days
after the motion is served. The Supreme Court or hearing officer has the
discretion to rule on a motion without waiting for a response. The movant may
not file a reply to a response without leave of the Supreme Court or hearing
officer. Any reply must be tendered within five (5) days of service of the
response and accompanied by the filing of a motion for leave to file the reply.
Section 23.1. Obligations
of Attorneys Regarding Service; Constructive Service
(a) Obligation to accept service. It shall
be the duty of every attorney against whom a grievance is submitted to accept
service, and when notice is given by registered or certified mail, to claim the
notice in a timely manner either personally or through an authorized agent.
(b) Obligation to notify Executive Director of
the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education of change of contact
information. A failure to notify the Executive Director of the Indiana
Office of Admissions and Continuing Education of a change in contact
information shall be deemed a waiver of notice involving disciplinary matters.
(c) Executive Director of the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education as agent to receive constructive service. Each
attorney admitted to practice law in this State or practicing law in this State
shall be deemed to have appointed the Executive Director of the Indiana Office
of Admissions and Continuing Education as his or her agent to receive
constructive service of all papers, including processes and notices, called for
by any provision of this Rule when actual service on the attorney at the
attorney’s addresses shown on the records of the Executive Director of the
Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education cannot be accomplished,
or when the attorney has not provided the Executive Director of the Indiana
Office of Admissions and Continuing Education with an address. These papers may
be served by filing them with the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education as the agent for the attorney, together
with an affidavit setting forth the facts necessitating this method of service.
Upon receipt of the papers and the affidavit, the Executive Director of the
Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education shall immediately mail
notification to the attorney at the attorney's office address, or if
unavailable the attorney’s residence address, as shown in the records of the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education,
informing the attorney that the papers have been filed with the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education as agent
for the attorney. Alternatively, the Executive Director of the Indiana Office
of Admissions and Continuing Education may accomplish this notification by
emailing copies of or hyperlinks to the documents to the attorney at his or her
email address, as shown upon the records of the Executive Director of the
Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education. The Executive Director
of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education shall then file with
the Supreme Court Clerk a written certification showing the mailing or emailing
of the notification to the attorney. If the attorney has provided no contact
information to the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and
Continuing Education, the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education may, but need not, attempt to accomplish
notification through other means. Upon the completion of this procedure, the
attorney shall be deemed to have been served with the papers.
Section 23.2. Computation
of Time
(a) Non-business and business days. For
purposes of this Rule, a non-business day shall mean a Saturday, a Sunday, a
legal holiday as defined by State statute, or a day the Indiana Office of
Admissions and Continuing Education is closed during regular business hours. A
business day shall mean all other days.
(b) Counting days. In computing any period
of time allowed by this Rule, by order of the Supreme Court, or by any
applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the
designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of
the period so computed is to be included unless it is a non-business day. If
the last day is a non-business day, the period runs until the end of the next
business day. When the time allowed is less than seven (7) days, all
non-business days shall be excluded from the computation.
(c) Extension of time when served by mail or
carrier. When the Disciplinary Commission or the respondent serves a
document by mail or third-party commercial carrier, the time period for filing
any response or reply to the document shall be extended automatically for an
additional three (3) days from the date of deposit in the mail or with the
carrier. This extension of time does not extend any time period that is not
triggered by service of a document, such as the time for filing a petition for
review.
Section 24. Assistance
of Law Enforcement Agencies and to Attorney Disciplinary Agencies in Other
Jurisdictions
(a) Assistance from law enforcement. The
Disciplinary Commission, or the Executive Director, may request any law
enforcement agency or office to assist in an investigation. This assistance
shall include the furnishing of all available information about the respondent.
(b) Assistance to other jurisdictions. The
Supreme Court may order a person domiciled or found within this State to give
testimony or a statement or to produce documents or other things for use in an
attorney discipline or disability proceeding in another jurisdiction. The order
may be made upon the application of any interested person or in response to a
letter rogatory, and may prescribe the practice and procedure, which may be wholly
or in part the practice and procedure of a tribunal outside this State, for the
taking of the testimony or statement or producing the documents or other
things. To the extent that the order does not prescribe otherwise, the practice
and procedure shall be in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure. The order may direct that the testimony or
statement be given, or document or other thing be produced, before a person
appointed by the Supreme Court. A person may be required to give testimony or a
statement only in the county in which he or she resides or is employed or
transacts business in person, or at another convenient place fixed in the
order. The person appointed shall have the power to administer any necessary oath.
Any order to testify or to produce documents or other things issued as
prescribed in this subsection may be enforced in the circuit court of the
county in which the person commanded to appear is domiciled, upon petition of
any person interested in the attorney discipline or disability proceeding.
Section 25. Immunity
(a) Statements to the Disciplinary Commission or
Lawyers Assistance Program. Each person shall be absolutely immune from
civil suit for all of his or her oral or written statements intended for
transmittal either: (1) to the Disciplinary Commission, the Executive Director,
or the Disciplinary Commission staff, or made in the course of investigatory,
hearing, or review proceedings under this Rule; or (2) to a Lawyers Assistance
Program approved by the Supreme Court. Oral or written statements made to
others which are not intended for such transmittal have no immunity under this
Section.
(b) Suit arising from performance of duties. The
Executive Director, his or her staff, counsel, investigators, hearing officers,
and the members of the Disciplinary Commission shall be immune from suit for
any conduct arising out of the performance of their duties.
Section 26. Duties of
Suspended Attorneys, Disbarred Attorneys, and Attorneys whose Resignation has
been Accepted
(a) Applicability. This Section shall apply
to all attorneys who have been disbarred, or whose law license has been
suspended under this Rule or any other provision of the Indiana Admission and
Discipline Rules, including suspensions for registration fee nonpayment,
continuing legal education noncompliance, and nonpayment of costs (“license
maintenance suspension”). Disbarment shall include disbarment by consent, and
suspension shall include resignation.
(b) Duties of all suspended and disbarred
attorneys.
(1) Upon
receiving notice of the order of suspension or disbarment, including disbarment
by consent, the respondent shall not undertake any new legal matters between
receipt of the order and the effective date of the suspension or disbarment. Upon
the effective date, the respondent shall not practice law, represent clients,
or maintain a presence or occupy an office where the practice of law is
conducted.
(2) Upon
receiving notice of the order of suspension or disbarment, the attorney shall
file a notice of his or her suspension or disbarment in every pending matter in
which the attorney has filed an appearance. The attorney shall attach a copy of
the suspension or disbarment order to the notice.
(c) Additional duties of attorneys who have been
disbarred, suspended without automatic reinstatement, or suspended for more
than 180 days.
(1) This
subsection shall apply to attorneys who have been disbarred, suspended without
automatic reinstatement for any length of time (including those under
resignation), and attorneys whose active suspension exceeds 180 days (including
license maintenance suspensions).
(2) The
attorney shall promptly notify or cause to be notified by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, all clients being represented by him
or her in pending matters, of the disbarment or suspension and the attorney's inability
to act as an attorney. This notice shall advise the clients to seek legal
advice of the client's own choice elsewhere.
(3) In
addition to notifying clients as set forth above, the attorney shall move to
withdraw as counsel in the court or agency in which any proceeding is pending,
shall notify all attorneys for adverse parties in these proceedings, and shall
furnish the address of the client involved to the court or agency and to the
attorneys for adverse parties.
(4) The
attorney shall make available to any of his or her clients, to new counsel for
any of the clients or to any other person designated by the court having
appropriate jurisdiction, all papers, documents, files or information which may
be in his or her possession.
(5) The
attorney shall take any action as is necessary to cause the removal of any
indicia of attorney, lawyer, counselor at law, legal assistant, law clerk, or
similar title, displayed or communicated in any form or medium, including the
internet.
(6) The
attorney shall close any IOLTA account or other attorney trust account the
attorney may have and disburse any funds in the account(s) to their rightful
owner(s).
(7) Within
thirty (30) days after the effective date of the disbarment or suspension order
(or within 10 days of the date active suspension exceeds 180 days in the case
of license maintenance suspensions), the attorney shall file with the Supreme
Court a notification affidavit showing that he or she has fully complied with
the provisions of the order and with this Rule. The notification affidavit
shall disclose all other State, Federal and Administrative jurisdictions to
which the attorney has been admitted to practice. If the attorney is
representing no clients at the time the order is entered, the affidavit shall
so state. The attorney shall also serve a copy of the affidavit upon the
Executive Director and shall set forth the address where communications may be
directed to him or her.
(d) Additional duties of suspended attorneys not
subject to subsection (c). A suspended attorney not subject to subsection
(c) shall, within thirty (30) days from the date of the notice of the
suspension, file with the Supreme Court a notification affidavit showing that:
(1) All
clients being represented by the attorney in pending matters have been notified
by certified mail, return receipt requested, of the nature and duration of the
suspension, and all pending matters of clients requiring the attorney's
services during the period of suspension have been placed in the hands and care
of an attorney admitted to practice in this State with the consent of the
client.
(2) Clients
not consenting to be represented by substitute counsel have been advised to
seek the services of counsel of their own choice.
(3) If the
suspended attorney is representing no clients at the time the order of
suspension is entered, the affidavit shall so state.
Section 27. Attorney
Surrogates
(a) Definitions for purposes of this Section
only.
(1) “Attorney
Surrogate” means a senior judge certified by the Indiana Judicial Nominating
Commission or another member of the bar of this State, in good standing, who
has been appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to act as an Attorney
Surrogate for a Lawyer.
(2) “Court
of competent jurisdiction” means a court of general jurisdiction in the county
in which a Lawyer maintains or has maintained a principal office.
(3) “Disabled”
means that a Lawyer has a physical or mental condition resulting from accident,
injury, disease, chemical dependency, mental health problems, or age that
significantly impairs the Lawyer's ability to practice law.
(4) “Fiduciary
Entity” means a partnership, limited liability company, professional
corporation, or a limited liability partnership, in which entity a Lawyer is
practicing with one or more other members of the Bar of this State who are
partners, shareholders or owners.
(5) “Lawyer”
means a member of the Bar of this State who is engaged in the private practice
of law in this State. “Lawyer” does not include a member of the Bar whose
practice is solely as an employee of another Lawyer, a Fiduciary Entity, or an
organization that is not engaged in the private practice of law.
(b) Designation of Attorney Surrogate.
(1) At the
time of completing the annual registration required by Ind. Admission and
Discipline Rule 2(b), a Lawyer may designate an Attorney Surrogate in the
Courts Portal by specifying the attorney number of the Attorney Surrogate and
certifying that the Attorney Surrogate has agreed to the designation in a
writing in possession of both the Lawyer and the surrogate. The designation of
an Attorney Surrogate shall remain in effect until revoked by either the
designated Attorney Surrogate or the Lawyer designating the Attorney Surrogate.
The Lawyer who designates the Attorney Surrogate shall notify the Executive
Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing Education of any
change of designated Attorney Surrogate within thirty (30) days of such change.
The Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing
Education shall keep a list of designated Attorney Surrogates and their
addresses.
(2) A
Lawyer, practicing in a Fiduciary Entity, shall state the name and address of
the Fiduciary Entity where indicated in the Attorney Surrogate designation
section of the Courts Portal. Because of the ongoing responsibility of the
Fiduciary Entity to the clients of the Lawyer, no Attorney Surrogate shall be
appointed for a Lawyer practicing in a Fiduciary Entity.
(3) A Lawyer
not practicing in a Fiduciary Entity who does not designate an Attorney
Surrogate pursuant to subsection (1) above shall be deemed to designate a
senior judge or other suitable member of the bar of this State in good standing
appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to perform the duties of an
Attorney Surrogate.
(c) Role of Attorney Surrogate.
(1) Upon
notice that a Lawyer has:
(i) Died;
(ii) Disappeared;
(iii) Become
disabled; or
(iv) Been
disbarred or suspended and has not fully complied with the provisions of Ind.
Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 26,
any interested person (including a
local bar association) or a designated Attorney Surrogate may file in a court
of competent jurisdiction a verified petition (1) informing the court of the
occurrence and (2) requesting appointment of an Attorney Surrogate.
(2) A copy
of the verified petition shall be served upon the Lawyer at the address on file
with the Executive Director of the Indiana Office of Admissions and Continuing
Education or, in the event the Lawyer has died, upon the Lawyer’s personal
representative, if one has been appointed. Upon the filing of the verified
petition, the court shall, after notice and opportunity to be heard (which in
no event shall be longer than ten (10) days from the date of service of the
petition), determine whether there is an occurrence under (a), (b), (c) or (d),
and an Attorney Surrogate needs to be appointed to act as custodian of the law
practice. If the court finds that an Attorney Surrogate should be appointed
then the court shall appoint as Attorney Surrogate either the designated
Attorney Surrogate as set forth pursuant to subsection (b)(1), a suitable
member of the Bar of this State in good standing or a senior judge.
(3) Upon
such appointment, the Attorney Surrogate may:
(i) Take
possession of and examine the files and records of the law practice, and obtain
information as to any pending matters which may require attention;
(ii) Notify
persons and entities who appear to be clients of the Lawyer that it may be in
their best interest to obtain replacement counsel;
(iii) Apply
for extensions of time pending employment of replacement counsel by the client;
(iv) File
notices, motions, and pleadings on behalf of the client where jurisdictional
time limits are involved and other legal counsel has not yet been obtained;
(v) Give
notice to appropriate persons and entities who may be affected, other than
clients, that the Attorney Surrogate has been appointed;
(vi) Arrange
for the surrender or delivery of clients' papers or property;
(vii) As
approved by the court, take possession of all trust accounts subject to Ind.
Prof. Cond. R. 1.15(a), and take all appropriate actions with respect to such
accounts;
(viii) Deliver
the file to the client; make referrals to replacement counsel with the
agreement of the client; or accept representation of the client with the
agreement of the client; and
(xi) Do such
other acts as the court may direct to carry out the purposes of this Section.
(4) If the
Attorney Surrogate determines that conflicts of interest exist between the
Attorney Surrogate's clients and the clients of the Lawyer, the Attorney
Surrogate shall notify the court of the existence of the conflict of interest
with regard to the particular cases or files and the Attorney Surrogate shall
take no action with regard to those cases or files.
(5) Upon
appointment, the Attorney Surrogate shall notify the Disciplinary Commission.
(d) Jurisdiction of court. A court of
competent jurisdiction that has granted a verified petition for appointment
under this Section shall have jurisdiction over the files, records, and
property of clients of the Lawyer and may make orders necessary or appropriate
to protect the interests of the Lawyer, the clients of the Lawyer, and the
public. The court shall also have jurisdiction over closed files of the clients
of the Lawyer and may make appropriate orders regarding those files including,
but not limited to, destruction of the same.
(e) Time limitations suspended. Upon the
granting of a verified petition for appointment under this Section, any
applicable statute of limitations, deadline, time limit, or return date for a
filing as it relates to the Lawyer's clients (except as to a response to a
request for temporary emergency relief) shall be extended automatically to a
date 120 days from the date of the filing of the petition, if it would
otherwise expire on or after the date of filing of the petition and before the
extended date.
(f) Applicability of attorney-client rules. Persons
examining the files and records of the law practice of the Lawyer pursuant to
this Section shall observe the attorney-client confidentiality requirements set
out in Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 1.6 and otherwise may make disclosures in
camera to the court only to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of
this Section. The attorney-client privilege shall apply to communications by or
to the Attorney Surrogate to the same extent as it would have applied to
communications by or to the Lawyer. However, the Attorney Surrogate
relationship does not create an attorney/client relationship between the
Attorney Surrogate and the client of the Lawyer.
(g) Final report of Attorney Surrogate: petition
for compensation; court approval. When the purposes of this Section have
been accomplished with respect to the law practice of the Lawyer, the Attorney
Surrogate shall file with the court a final report and an accounting of all
funds and property coming into the custody of the Attorney Surrogate. The
Attorney Surrogate may also file with the court a petition for reasonable fees
and expenses in compensation for performance of the Attorney Surrogate's
duties. Notice of the filing of the final report and accounting and a copy of
any petition for fees and expenses shall be served as directed by the court.
Upon approval of the final report and accounting, the court shall enter a final
order to that effect and discharging the Attorney Surrogate from further
duties. Where applicable, the court shall also enter an order fixing the amount
of fees and expenses allowed to the Attorney Surrogate. The amount of fees and
expenses allowed shall be a judgment against the Lawyer or the estate of the
Lawyer. The judgment is a lien upon all assets of the Lawyer (except trust
funds) retroactive to the date of filing of the verified petition for
appointment under this Section. The judgment lien is subordinate to
nonpossessory liens and security interests created prior to its taking effect
and may be foreclosed upon in the manner prescribed by law. To the extent a
senior judge is not fully compensated under this subsection, the senior judge
may seek compensation pursuant to Administrative Rule 5 (B)(10).
(h) Immunity. Absent intentional wrongdoing,
an Attorney Surrogate shall be immune from civil suit for damages for all
actions and omissions as an Attorney Surrogate under this Section. This
immunity shall not apply to an employment after acceptance of representation of
a client with the agreement of the client under subsection (c)(3)(viii) above.
Section 28. [reserved]
V. Trust Accounts
Section 29. Trust
Account Funds
(a) Required trust account records. An
attorney who is licensed in Indiana shall maintain current financial records as
provided for in this Rule and required by Rule 1.15 of the Indiana Rules of
Professional Conduct. An attorney shall keep records sufficient to determine,
at any time, the amount held for each client or other beneficiary in relation
to the total amount held in the trust account as a pooled whole. For each trust
or other fiduciary account, attorneys shall create and retain the following
records for a period of five (5) years after the conclusion of each matter:
(1) Deposit
and disbursement journals containing a record of deposits to and withdrawals
from each trust account, specifically identifying the date, source of funds,
description, amount, and client or beneficiary of each item deposited; the
date, payee, purpose, amount, and client or beneficiary of each item disbursed;
and a running total of the balance of the trust account as a pooled whole (an
example of a deposit and disbursement journal is appended to this Section as
Exhibit A);
(2) Ledgers
for all trust accounts showing, for each separate trust client or beneficiary,
the amount of funds disbursed or deposited, the date of disbursement or
deposit, the source of funds deposited, the payee of funds disbursed, and a
running total of the amounts held in trust for each separate client or
beneficiary (examples of client ledgers are appended to this Section as Exhibit
B);
(3) A ledger
detailing the nominal amount of attorney funds held in the account, showing the
amount of attorney funds disbursed or deposited, the date of their disbursement
or deposit, and a running balance of the amount of attorney funds held in the
trust account (an example of a ledger of attorney owned funds is appended to
this Section as Exhibit C);
(4) Relevant
fee agreements;
(5) All
checkbook registers, bank statements, records of deposit, and cancelled checks;
(6) Records
of all electronic disbursements from trust accounts, including the name of the
person authorizing the disbursement, the date of the disbursement, the name of
the recipient, the purpose of the disbursement, and the client or beneficiary
for whom the disbursement was made; and
(7) All
periodic reconciliation reports for each trust account.
(b) Availability of records. Records
required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 29(a) may be
maintained by electronic, photographic, or other media provided that they
otherwise comply with these rules and printed copies can be produced. If trust
account records are maintained electronically, the attorney shall ensure that
backups occur regularly and frequently.
(c) Trust account safeguards.
(1) Attorneys
shall deposit all funds held in trust in accounts clearly identified as “trust”
or “escrow” accounts. Attorneys shall inform the financial institution of the
purpose and identity of each trust account. Funds held in trust include funds
held in any fiduciary capacity, whether as attorney, trustee, agent, guardian,
executor or otherwise. Trust accounts shall be maintained only in financial
institutions approved by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.
(2) Attorneys
shall not pay personal or business expenses directly from a trust account;
instead, attorneys shall promptly withdraw fully earned fees from the trust
account by first disbursing the fully earned fees to the attorney’s personal or
business account.
(3) Only an
attorney admitted to practice law in Indiana or a person under the direct
supervision of the attorney shall be an authorized signatory or authorized to
disburse funds from a trust account. If an attorney or law firm delegates
authority to disburse funds from a trust account to a person not admitted to
practice law in Indiana, this delegation shall be accompanied by safeguards,
including at minimum:
(i) All bank
statements or periodic account activity statements from the financial
institution shall be delivered unopened to and reviewed by an attorney having
supervisory authority over the non-attorney signatory, or the supervising attorney
shall review the bank statements electronically directly from the financial
institution; and
(ii) Responsibility
for conducting periodic reconciliations between internal trust account records
and periodic trust account activity statements from the financial institution
shall be vested in a person who has no authority to disburse funds from the
trust account.
(4) All
receipts shall be deposited into a trust account intact, and records of
deposits should be sufficiently detailed to identify each item deposited.
(5) Disbursements
from a trust account shall not be made by a check payable to “cash” or to
“bearer.” Disbursements from a trust account shall not be made by ATM
withdrawal or cash withdrawal.
(6) Provided
that the attorney complies with Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Sections
29(a) and 29(c)(5), an attorney may make disbursements from a trust account by
means of electronic transfer.
(7) Attorneys
shall reconcile their internal trust account records, specifically the records
required by Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 29(a)(1-3) with the
periodic bank account statements from the financial institution.
(d) Dissolution or sale of law practice. Upon
dissolution or sale of a law practice, the owner(s) or partner(s) shall make
reasonable arrangements for the maintenance and preservation of the records
required by Section 29(a).
Exhibit A - Attorney
John Counsel’s Deposit and Disbursement Journal
Date |
Client or Beneficiary |
Source of Funds
Deposited |
Payee |
Check Number |
Description |
Amount |
Trust Account Balance |
01/01/2015 |
John Counsel (attorney owned funds) |
John Counsel (attorney owned funds) |
|
|
Nominal amount of attorney funds
deposited to open trust account |
$100 |
$100 |
01/02/2015 |
Susan Plaintiff |
ABC insurance company |
|
|
Personal injury settlement |
$30,000 |
$30,100 |
01/06/2015 |
Susan Plaintiff |
|
John Counsel |
101 |
Attorney fees for personal injury
settlement |
($10,000) |
$20,100 |
01/06/2015 |
Susan Plaintiff |
|
Susan Plaintiff |
102 |
Client’s share of settlement |
($20,000) |
$100 |
01/20/2015 |
ABC Company |
ABC Company |
|
|
Prepayment of expenses and attorney
fees |
$10,000 |
$10,100 |
01/28/2015 |
Jack and Jill Vendor |
Mark Purchaser |
|
|
Purchase price for real estate sale |
$200,000 |
$210,100 |
02/01/2015 |
ABC Company |
|
Court Reporter Inc. |
103 |
Deposition transcript |
($200) |
$209,900 |
02/02/2015 |
Jack and Jill Vendor |
|
Jack and Jill Vendor |
104 |
Proceeds of real estate sale |
($199,500) |
$10,400 |
02/02/2015 |
Jack and Jill Vendor |
|
John Counsel |
105 |
Attorney fees for real estate sale |
($500) |
$9,900 |
02/08/2015 |
ABC Company |
|
John Counsel |
106 |
Attorney fees – 5 hours at
$200/hour |
($1,000) |
$8,900 |
Exhibit B - Client Ledgers
Susan Plaintiff
Date |
Source of Funds
Deposited |
Payee |
Check Number |
Description |
Amount |
Total amount held for client
or beneficiary |
01/02/2015 |
ABC Insurance Company |
|
|
Personal Injury Settlement |
$30,000 |
$30,000 |
01/06/2015 |
|
John Counsel |
101 |
Attorney fees for personal injury
settlement |
($10,000) |
$20,000 |
01/06/2015 |
|
Susan Plaintiff |
102 |
Client’s share of settlement |
($20,000) |
$0 |
ABC Company
Date |
Source of Funds
Deposited |
Payee |
Check Number |
Description |
Amount |
Total amount held for
client or beneficiary |
01/20/2015 |
ABC Company |
|
|
Prepayment of expenses and attorney
fees |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
02/01/2015 |
|
Court Reporter Inc. |
103 |
Deposition transcript |
($200) |
$9,800 |
02/08/2015 |
|
John Counsel |
106 |
Attorney fees – 5 hours at
$200/hour |
($1,000) |
$8,800 |
Jack
and Jill Vendor
Date |
Source of Funds
Deposited |
Payee |
Check Number |
Description |
Amount |
Total amount held for
client or beneficiary |
01/28/2015 |
Mark Purchaser |
|
|
Purchase price for real estate sale |
$200,000 |
$200,000 |
02/02/2015 |
|
Jack and Jill Vendor |
104 |
Proceeds of real estate sale |
($199,500) |
$500 |
02/02/2015 |
|
John Counsel |
105 |
Attorney fees for real estate sale |
($500) |
$0 |
Exhibit C -
Ledger of Attorney Owned Funds
John Counsel Ledger
Date |
Source of Funds
Deposited |
Payee |
Check Number |
Description |
Amount |
Total amount held for
client or beneficiary |
01/01/2015 |
John Counsel (attorney owned funds) |
|
|
Nominal amount of attorney funds
deposited to open trust account |
$100 |
$100 |
Section 30. Overdraft
Notification and Processing
(a) Definitions. As used in this Section:
(1)
“Financial institution” means a bank, savings and loan association, credit union,
savings bank, and any other business or person that accepts for deposit funds
held in trust by attorneys.
(2) “Trust
account” means any account maintained by an attorney admitted to practice law
in the State of Indiana for the purpose of keeping funds belonging to clients
or third parties separate from the attorney's own funds as required by Indiana
Professional Conduct Rule 1.15(a). It also means any account maintained by an
attorney for funds held in trust in connection with any other fiduciary capacity,
including as trustee, agent, guardian, executor, or otherwise.
(3) “IOLTA
(Interest on Lawyer Trust Account)” means an attorney trust account maintained
pursuant to Professional Conduct Rule 1.15(f).
(4)
“Properly payable” refers to an instrument or other disbursement which, if
presented in the normal course of business, is in a form requiring payment
under the laws of the State of Indiana.
(b) Approval of financial institutions.
(1) Section
29(c)(1) requires that attorneys maintain trust accounts only in financial
institutions that are approved by the Disciplinary Commission. A financial
institution shall be approved by the Disciplinary Commission as a depository
for trust accounts if it files with the Disciplinary Commission a written
agreement, in the form attached to this Section as Exhibit A under which it
agrees to report to the Disciplinary Commission whenever it has actual notice
that any properly payable instrument is presented against a trust account
containing insufficient funds, regardless of whether the instrument is honored.
(2) The
written agreement of any financial institution is binding upon all branches of
the financial institution.
(3) The
Disciplinary Commission shall maintain a public listing of all approved
financial institutions and shall publish it on its website. The names of
approved financial institutions shall also be available by written or telephone
inquiry to the Disciplinary Commission.
(4) The
written agreement of any financial institution shall continue in full force and
effect and be binding upon the financial institution until the financial
institution gives thirty (30) days’ notice of cancellation in writing to the
Disciplinary Commission, or until its approval is revoked by the Disciplinary
Commission.
(c) Disapproval and revocation of approval of
financial institutions.
(1) A
financial institution shall not be approved in the first instance as a
depository for trust accounts unless it submits to the Disciplinary Commission
an agreement in the form attached to this Section as Exhibit A that is binding
upon all of its branches and signed by an officer with authority to act on
behalf of the institution. The refusal of the Disciplinary Commission to
approve a financial institution due to its failure or refusal to submit an
executed written agreement in the form attached as Exhibit A is not appealable
or otherwise subject to challenge.
(2) A prior
approval of a financial institution shall be revoked and the institution shall
be removed by the Disciplinary Commission from the list of approved financial
institutions if it engages in a pattern of neglect or acts in bad faith in not
complying with its obligations under the written agreement.
(3) The
Executive Director or designee shall communicate any decision to revoke the
approval of a financial institution in writing by certified mail to the
institution in care of the officer who signed the written agreement. The notice
of revocation shall include a specific statement of facts setting forth the
reasons in support of the revocation decision. The financial institution shall
have a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the notice of
revocation to submit a written request with the Executive Director or designee
seeking reconsideration of the revocation decision. If an institution timely
seeks reconsideration, the Disciplinary Commission shall appoint one of its
members to act as hearing officer to take evidence. The Executive Director or
designee shall act to defend the revocation decision. The hearing officer,
after taking evidence, shall report findings and conclusions for review by the
full Disciplinary Commission, whose decision in the matter shall be final. The
approved status of a financial institution shall continue until the time the
reconsideration process is final. The financial institution shall be liable for
the costs of the reconsideration of the revocation decision and the costs of
any hearing on the request.
(4) Once the
approval of a financial institution has been revoked, the institution shall not
again be approved as a depository for trust accounts until the institution
petitions the Disciplinary Commission for approval and includes in the petition
a plan for curing any deficiencies that caused its earlier revocation and for
periodically reporting compliance with the plan in the future.
(d) Duty to notify institutions of trust
accounts.
(1) Every
attorney shall notify each financial institution in which he or she maintains
any trust account, as defined above, that the account is subject to the
provisions of overdraft reporting. For each trust account, an attorney or law
firm shall maintain a copy of each notice throughout the period of time that
the account is open and for a period of five (5) years following closure of the
account.
(i) For
IOLTA accounts as required by Professional Conduct Rule 1.15(f), notice by the
attorney to the financial institution that the account is an IOLTA account
shall constitute notice to the financial institution that the account is
subject to overdraft reporting to the Disciplinary Commission.
(ii) For
non-IOLTA trust accounts as permitted by Professional Conduct Rule 1.15(f)(1),
every attorney shall notify each financial institution that the account is
subject to overdraft reporting to the Disciplinary Commission by submitting a
notice in the form attached to this Section as Exhibit B.
(2) In the
case of a law firm that maintains one or more trust accounts in the name of the
firm, only one notice from a member of the firm need be provided for each trust
account. However, every member of the firm is responsible for ensuring that
notice of each firm trust account is given to each financial institution
wherein an account is maintained.
(e) Maintaining
a trust account in a foreign jurisdiction. Any attorney who is admitted to
practice law in another jurisdiction having attorney trust account overdraft
notification rules that are substantially similar to the Indiana rules
governing attorney trust account overdraft notification may apply to the Disciplinary
Commission for exemption from compliance with these rules to the extent that
the attorney maintains trust funds belonging to Indiana clients in a trust
account in a foreign jurisdiction that is subject to overdraft reporting under
the rules of that jurisdiction. Any application for exemption shall be in
writing and shall include:
(1) A copy
of the rules from the other jurisdiction governing attorney trust account
overdraft notification;
(2) A copy
of the agreement between the financial institution and the agency in the
foreign jurisdiction that administers the overdraft notification program
verifying that the financial institution participates in the foreign
jurisdiction's attorney trust account notification program;
(3) A list
of the names of all financial institutions, account names, and account numbers
of all trust accounts maintained by the attorney in the foreign jurisdiction;
and
(4) A
certification under oath by the attorney that each foreign trust account has
been properly identified to the foreign financial institution as an attorney
trust account subject to overdraft reporting.
Any attorney
seeking exemption under the terms of this provision is under a continuing
obligation to immediately report any changes in the information provided to the
Disciplinary Commission.
(f) Overdraft reports.
(1) Overdraft
notifications made by financial institutions to the Disciplinary Commission
shall be in the following format:
(i) In the
case of a dishonored instrument or dishonored disbursement, the report shall be
identical to the overdraft notice customarily forwarded to the customers of the
financial institution, and it should include a copy of the dishonored
instrument, if a copy is normally provided to customers of the financial
institution.
(ii) In the
case of disbursements or instruments that are presented against insufficient
funds but which are honored, the report shall identify the financial
institution, the attorney or law firm, the account number, the date of
presentation for payment, and the date paid, as well as the amount of overdraft
created.
(2) Reports
under subsection (f)(1) shall be made simultaneously with, and within the time
provided by law for notice of dishonor, if any. If an instrument presented
against insufficient funds is honored, then the report shall be made within
five (5) banking days of the date of presentation for payment against
insufficient funds.
(3) Every
attorney practicing or admitted to practice in this jurisdiction shall, as a
condition thereof, be conclusively deemed to have consented to the reporting
and production requirements mandated by this Rule.
(4) Nothing
in this Rule shall preclude a financial institution from charging a particular
attorney or law firm for the reasonable cost of producing the reports and
records required by this Rule.
(g) Investigation of overdrafts.
(1) Whenever
the Disciplinary Commission receives an overdraft notice from a financial
institution, the Executive Director or designee shall send a letter to the
respondent attorney seeking a comprehensive explanation of the overdraft, to
which the respondent shall respond within thirty (30) days of receipt. This
letter is a demand for information, noncompliance of which is a violation of
Professional Conduct Rule 8.1(b).
(2) If the
respondent fails to timely and adequately respond to the notice of overdraft
and demand for explanation, the Executive Director or designee may file a
non-cooperation case against the respondent pursuant to Section 10.1.
(3) Upon
considering the respondent’s response to the notice of overdraft, the Executive
Director or designee may dismiss the overdraft matter as not presenting a
substantial issue of misconduct, or the Executive Director or designee may
continue to investigate the matter and then present the matter for
consideration to the Disciplinary Commission pursuant to Section 11. Thereafter,
the procedures for disciplinary actions shall apply.
(4) In
investigating an overdraft, the Disciplinary Commission and the Executive
Director or designee shall have all investigatory powers otherwise available
when investigating grievances, including but not limited to the power to issues
subpoenas, take testimony, require accountings, send demand letters, and
perform trust account audits. Likewise, a respondent attorney who is the
subject of an overdraft investigation shall fully and promptly cooperate with
the Disciplinary Commission’s investigation.
(5) Nothing
in this Section shall limit the Disciplinary Commission’s ability to
investigate overdrafts or trust account mismanagement pursuant to its authority
under Section 10.
Exhibit A to Section 30
TRUST ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT
REPORTING AGREEMENT
TO: INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION
The undersigned,
being a duly authorized officer of ____________________________________________________________,
a financial institution doing business in the State of Indiana, and the agent
of the named financial institution specifically authorized to enter into this
agreement, hereby applies to be approved to receive attorney trust accounts in
the State of Indiana. In consideration of the Indiana Supreme Court
Disciplinary Commission's approval of the named financial institution, the
institution agrees to comply with the reporting requirements for such institution
as set forth in Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23, § 30, as now in
effect and as hereafter amended from time to time.
Specifically,
the named financial institution agrees:
(1) To
report to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission in the event it has
actual notice that any properly payable attorney trust account instrument is
presented against insufficient funds, irrespective of whether the instrument is
honored. (This obligation applies to both IOLTA trust accounts under Indiana
Professional Conduct Rule 1.15(f)(1) and non-IOLTA attorney trust accounts
under Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.15(f)(1).)
(2) That all
such reports shall be in substantially the following format:
(a) in the
case of a dishonored instrument, the report shall be identical to the overdraft
notice customarily forwarded to the depositor and should include a copy of the
dishonored instrument, if such a copy is normally provided to the depositor;
(b) in the
case of an instrument that is presented against insufficient funds but which
instrument is honored, the report shall identify the financial institution, the
depositor attorney or law firm, the account number, the date of presentation
for payment, the date paid, and the amount of the overdraft created thereby.
(3) That all
such reports shall be made within the following time periods:
(a) in the
case of a dishonored instrument, simultaneously with, and within the time
provided by law for, notice of dishonor;
(b) in the
case of an instrument that is presented against insufficient funds but which
instrument is honored, within five (5) banking days of the date of presentation
for payment against insufficient funds.
(4) To
provide the Disciplinary Commission with the name and contact information of
the financial institution’s primary point of contact for matters pertaining to
its responsibilities under this agreement, and to promptly update that contact
information in the event it changes.
This agreement shall
apply to all branches of the named financial institution and shall not be
canceled except upon thirty (30) days notice in writing to the Executive
Director, Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.
Name, Address, and Telephone Number of
Contact Person for Financial Institution:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
DATE:__________________ ___________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Official
CORPORATE ___________________________________________
Printed or Typed Name of Authorized
Official
SEAL
___________________________________________
Title or Position of Authorized
Official
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF _________________________ )
) ss:
COUNTY OF _______________________ )
On the ______ day of ____________________,
20___, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of ______________,
personally appeared the above-named individual, known to me to be the person
executing the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged and executed said
instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed.
______________________________________
Notary Public (signature)
______________________________________
Notary Public (printed or typed)
My Commission Expires:______________________ County of
Residence:______________________
ACCEPTANCE
The named financial
institution is hereby approved by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary
Commission as a depository for trust accounts in the State of Indiana until
such time as this agreement is canceled upon thirty (30) days' written notice
to the Commission by the institution or is revoked by action of the
Disciplinary Commission.
DATE: __________________ ____________________________________
Executive Director
Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary
Commission
Exhibit B to Section 30
Attorney Trust Account
Notification
____________________________________ ______________________________
Name of Attorney Attorney Number
______________________________________________________________________________
Name of Law Firm
______________________________________________________________________________
Business Address
______________________________________________________________________________
City State Zip Code
______________________________________________________________________________
Name of Financial Institution
______________________________________________________________________________
Business Address
______________________________________________________________________________
City State Zip Code
______________________________________________________________________________
Name of Account
______________________________ ________New _______Existing
Account Number
Type of Account:
_____Trust _____Guardian
_____Escrow _____Estate
_____Other
____________________________________________
(Please Describe)
The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she is an
attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana and that the
information indicated above provided to his/her financial institution is
accurate. This information is provided to permit the financial institution to
report all overdraft or insufficient funds occurrences to the Indiana Supreme
Court Disciplinary Commission pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule
23, Section 30.
Date:______________________ _______________________________________
Signature
Rule 24. Rules Governing the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Original actions, under I.C. 33-24-1-2, to restrain or
enjoin the unauthorized practice of law in this state may be brought in this
court by the attorney general, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary
Commission, the Indiana State Bar Association or any duly authorized committee
thereof, without leave of court, and by any duly organized local bar
association by leave of court. The action against any person, firm, association
or corporation, shall be brought by verified petition, in the name of the state
of Indiana, on the relation of the authorized person or association or
committee, and shall charge specifically the acts constituting the unauthorized
practice.
Within time allowed, a respondent may file a verified return
showing any reason in law or fact why an injunction should not issue. No other
pleading in behalf of a respondent will be entertained. All allegations of fact
in the petition and return shall be specific and not by way of ultimate fact or
conclusion. The return shall specifically deny or admit each allegation of fact
in the petition, and it may allege new facts in mitigation or avoidance of the
causes alleged in the petition.
The parties shall file an original and five [5] copies of
all pleadings, including exhibits, plus an additional copy for each adverse
party. If any exhibit shall be a matter of public record one [1] certified copy
thereof shall be filed with the original petition or return. No pleading or
exhibit thereto will be considered which has words or figures on both sides of
the same sheet of paper.
No restraining order will issue without notice except upon
the filing of an undertaking with conditions and surety to the approval of the
court. Notice of the filing of the petition will be given and served upon any
respondent as may be directed by the court, such notice to be accompanied by a
copy of the petition. The clerk will mail a copy of any return to the relator.
The verified petition and return shall constitute the
evidence upon which the issues are decided, unless the court shall deem it
necessary to, and shall appoint, a commissioner, in which event such
commissioner, who shall have full authority to subpoena witnesses and records,
shall hear the evidence and report his findings of fact to the court.
A copy of any pertinent agreement, made by any recognized
bar association concerning the unauthorized practice of law, may be attached to
and made a part of any pleading and unless denied under oath shall be deemed to
be a true copy without further proof of the execution thereof.
The costs and expenses incurred by such hearing shall be
borne by the losing party. Briefs need not conform to requirements of Appellate
Rules 43-48. Arguments will not be heard as of right.
Rule 25. Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings
Preamble.
The regulation of judicial conduct is critical to the integrity of the
judiciary and to public confidence in the judicial system. The purpose of this
rule is to provide a mechanism for the discipline of judicial officers of the
State of Indiana.
A. Pursuant to Article 7, Section 4
of the Constitution of Indiana, the Supreme Court of Indiana (the Supreme
Court) has exclusive, original jurisdiction for the discipline, removal, and
retirement of all judicial officers of this state.
B. The Indiana Commission on Judicial
Qualifications (the Commission), established by Article 7, Section 9 of the
Constitution of Indiana, shall receive and investigate complaints against all
judicial officers of the state, regardless of the origin of such judicial
position, and shall, in accordance with the procedures established under these
rules, forward to the Supreme Court of Indiana any recommendation for the
discipline, removal, or retirement of any judicial officer of this state. This
provision shall not in any way curtail the authority of Judicial Nominating
Commissions appointed in any county of this state.
C. The Commission shall have
jurisdiction over conduct committed by a judicial officer, whether or not
related to the judicial office and whether or not committed during the judicial
officer's term of office.
D. The Commission may refer to the
Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission allegations of misconduct
committed by a judicial officer while an attorney and not during the judicial
officer's term of office.
E. The Commission shall have
jurisdiction over violations of Canon 4 of the Code of Judicial Conduct
committed by a candidate for judicial office.
F. The jurisdiction of the Commission
survives the resignation or retirement of a judicial officer.
II. Application and Definitions. These rules shall apply to all judicial officers of the
State of Indiana regardless of the origin of their judicial office.
For the purposes of this rule the following definitions
shall apply:
“Deferred Resolution”--A confidential agreement between the
Commission and a judicial officer entered into prior to the filing of formal
proceedings which defers the resolution of a complaint for a specific period of
time upon condition that the judicial officer take appropriate specified
corrective action.
“Judicial Officer”--A Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court,
Judge of the Indiana Court of Appeals, Judge of the Indiana Tax Court, Judge of
any Circuit, Superior, County, City or Town Court of the State, and a pro
tempore or senior judge, magistrate, commissioner, master or referee thereof,
and any person eligible to perform a judicial function, whether or not a
lawyer, whether part-time or full-time, temporary or permanent, excluding
mediators and arbitrators and administrative law judges of independent state
agencies. This rule applies to candidates for judicial office who are subject
to the jurisdiction of the Commission as if they were judicial officers.
“Private Caution”--A confidential statement from the Commission
to a judicial officer stating that the Commission has inquired into or
investigated a complaint and has considered the judicial officer's written
response to the allegations, and has voted to close the inquiry or
investigation by cautioning the judicial officer that misconduct was
established which, in light of all the circumstances, does not warrant further
inquiry.
“Public Admonition”--A public statement from the Commission
concluding that misconduct occurred, which is issued by the Commission after a
determination that formal proceedings are warranted and which is issued in lieu
of formal proceedings and with the written consent of the judicial officer.
“Settlement Agreement”--A written agreement submitted to the
Supreme Court after the Commission has filed charges, and after the judicial
officer has had an opportunity to answer, in which the parties agree to facts
which establish grounds for discipline under this rule and to an appropriate
sanction.
III. Grounds for Discipline or Involuntary Retirement.
A. Any judicial officer may be
disciplined for any of the following acts:
(1)
conviction of any felony, or any crime which involves moral turpitude or
conduct that adversely affects the ability to perform the duties of judicial
office;
(2)
willful and persistent failure to perform duties;
(3)
willful misconduct in office;
(4)
willful misconduct unrelated to the judicial office that brings such office
into disrepute;
(5)
habitual intemperance;
(6)
conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, including the repeated
failure to adhere to the rules of procedure; or
(7)
a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, the Rules of Professional Conduct,
or other professional rules duly adopted by the Indiana Supreme Court.
B. A judicial officer may be
involuntarily retired when a physical or mental disability seriously interferes
with the performance of judicial duties.
C. A judicial officer involuntarily
retired by the Supreme Court shall be considered to have retired voluntarily. A
judicial officer removed from office by the Supreme Court under an order of
discipline, excluding retirement or disability, shall be ineligible for
judicial office and, pending further order of the Supreme Court, shall be
suspended from the practice of law in the State of Indiana.
D. These rules shall not be construed
to impair any vested right or benefit of a judicial officer, now or hereafter
existing as provided by law.
IV. Sanctions.
Upon a finding of misconduct pursuant to Section III A. or disability pursuant
to Section III B., the Supreme Court may impose any of the following:
(1)
removal;
(2)
retirement;
(3)
suspension;
(4)
discipline as an attorney;
(5)
limitations or conditions on the performance of judicial duties;
(6)
private or public reprimand or censure;
(7)
fine;
(8)
assessment of reasonable costs and expenses; or
(9)
any combination of the above sanctions.
A. A judicial officer shall be
suspended with pay by the Supreme Court without the necessity of action by the
Commission upon the filing of an indictment or information charging the
judicial officer in any court in the United States with a crime punishable as a
felony under the laws of Indiana or the United States.
B. A judicial officer shall be
suspended with pay while there is pending before the Supreme Court a
recommendation from the Commission for the retirement or removal of the
judicial officer.
C. Upon a finding of guilty, plea of
guilty, or plea of no contest to a crime punishable as a felony under the laws
of Indiana or the United States, or any crime that involves moral turpitude
under the law, a judicial officer may be suspended without pay by the Supreme
Court.
D. A judicial officer may be
suspended with pay by the Supreme Court without the necessity of action by the
Commission upon the filing of an indictment or information charging the
judicial officer with a misdemeanor which suggests conduct that adversely
affects the ability to perform the duties of the judicial office. In the event
the Supreme Court suspends a judicial officer under this provision without a
hearing, the suspended judicial officer shall thereafter be permitted a hearing
and review of the basis for the suspension.
E. Upon petition by the Commission,
the Supreme Court may impose, pending the disposition of formal charges, an
interim suspension with pay if the Court deems the interim suspension necessary
to protect public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. This provision
is applicable in proceedings involving the disability of the judge as well as
proceedings involving discipline.
A. The Indiana Office of Judicial
Administration (IOJA) shall serve the Commission in the performance of the
Commission's constitutional and statutory duties. Any attorney specifically
appointed by the Supreme Court for such purpose may serve as Counsel for the
Commission in the course of a judicial disciplinary proceeding. In the event a
judicial disciplinary proceeding involves a current member of the Supreme
Court, a regular employee of the Supreme Court shall not serve as Counsel.
B. A quorum of the Commission shall
have the authority to employ investigators and such experts and staff as the
Commission, in its discretion, determines necessary to the performance of its
duties.
VII. Immunity.
Members of the Commission, Masters, Commission Counsel, and staff are
absolutely immune from suit for all conduct in the course of their official
duties.
(1)
The Commission shall meet from time to time as may be necessary to discharge
its responsibilities. The Commission shall elect a Vice-Chair to perform the
duties of the Chair when the Chair is absent or unable to act by reason of
unavailability or disqualification. Meetings of the Commission shall be called
by the Chair, or the Vice-Chair, whenever deemed necessary or upon the request
of any four members of the Commission, and each member of the Commission shall
be given at least five days' written notice by mail of the time and place of
every meeting, unless the Commission at its previous meeting designated the
time and place of its next meeting. A quorum for the transaction of business
shall be four members of the Commission.
(2)
Meetings of the Commission are to be held at such place in Indiana as the Chair
of the Commission, or the Vice-Chair, may arrange.
(3)
The Commission shall act only at a meeting. Meetings may be conducted by
telephone conference, electronic mail, written and facsimile communication, or
other means of communication, on all matters that do not involve deliberating
and voting on whether to file formal charges, when the Commission shall meet in
person. The Commission shall have the power to adopt reasonable and proper
rules and regulations for the conduct of its meeting and the discharge of its
duties.
(1)
Before the filing and service of formal charges, the Commission shall not
publicly disclose information relating to a complaint, inquiry, or
investigation, except that the Commission may disclose information:
(a)
upon waiver or agreement by the judicial officer; or
(b)
where the Commission has determined that there is a need to notify another
person or agency in order to protect the public or to assure the proper
administration of justice; or
(c)
where the Commission elects to respond to publicly disseminated statements by a
complainant or a judicial officer.
(2)
After the filing of formal charges, all pleadings and proceedings are public
unless the Masters or Supreme Court find extraordinary circumstances warranting
limitations on the public nature of the proceedings.
(3)
Commission deliberations, settlement conferences, and proposed settlement
agreements shall remain confidential. Settlement agreements submitted to the
Supreme Court for approval shall become public when the Supreme Court accepts
the agreement in whole or in part and issues an order or opinion resolving the
judicial disciplinary case.
C.
Civil Immunity. Each person shall be immune from civil suit for all
sworn or written statements, if made without malice, and intended for
transmittal only to the Commission, Counsel, or staff, or made in the course of
investigatory, hearing, or review proceedings under this rule.
D.
Complaint. Any person may file a complaint with the Commission about the
judicial activities, fitness, or qualifications of any judicial officer.
Complaints directed to the Commission or to any member of the Commission
concerning a judicial officer shall be in writing and verified. No specified
form of complaint shall be required.
E. Consideration of Complaint.
(1)
The Commission shall provide written acknowledgment of the complaint and shall
notify the complainant in writing of its final disposition.
(2)
The Commission shall make such initial inquiry as is necessary to determine if
the complaint is founded and within the jurisdiction of the Commission. The
Commission, without receiving a complaint, may make such an initial inquiry on
its own motion. The Commission shall dismiss any complaint or inquiry which is
frivolous, groundless, not within the Commission's jurisdiction, or upon a
finding that no misconduct occurred. The notification of dismissal to the
complainant shall contain the basis for the Commission's decision. The
Commission may also conduct further inquiry, begin an investigation, agree to a
deferred resolution, or issue a private caution. If the final disposition is by
deferred resolution or private caution, the judicial officer shall have had the
opportunity to respond to the allegations in writing and the complainant shall
be notified that appropriate action was taken without specifying the nature of
the disposition.
(3)
If the Commission deems it necessary as the result of its initial inquiry to
conduct an investigation, the judicial officer involved shall be notified of
the investigation, the nature of the charge, and the name of the person making
the complaint, if any, or that the investigation is on the Commission's own
motion, and shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity in the course of the
investigation to present such matters as the judicial officer may choose. Such
notice shall be given by certified mail addressed to the judicial officer's
chambers or address of record and shall be clearly marked “Personal and
Confidential.” Delivery of all other papers or notices shall be made in
accordance with the Rules of Procedure.
(4)
The Commission shall have such jurisdiction and powers as are necessary to
conduct the proper and speedy disposition of any investigation, including the
power to compel the attendance of witnesses, to take or cause to be taken the
deposition of witnesses, and to order the production of books, records, or
other documentary evidence. Any member of the Commission shall have the power
to subpoena witnesses or the production of evidence and may administer oaths
and affirmations to witnesses in any matter within the jurisdiction of the
Commission. The quashing and enforcement of subpoenas, and the enforcement of
any other power delegated to the Commission shall be upon application to the
Supreme Court or to the Masters, if appointed.
(5)
If the investigation does not disclose probable cause to warrant further
proceedings, the Commission may dismiss the complaint with a finding that no
misconduct occurred, may conduct further investigation, or may issue a deferred
resolution or private caution, and the judicial officer shall be so notified.
Where a deferred resolution or private caution is imposed, the judicial officer
shall have had an opportunity to respond in writing to the allegations. The
Commission shall have the power to make investigations by members of the
Commission, staff, or by special investigators employed by the Commission and
to hold confidential hearings with the judicial officer involved.
(6)
During the course of an investigation by the Commission, the judicial officer
whose conduct is being investigated may demand, in writing, that the Commission
either institute formal proceedings or enter a formal finding that there is not
probable cause to believe that the judicial officer is guilty of misconduct,
and the Commission shall, within sixty days after such demand, comply
therewith.
(7)
If, upon the conclusion of a full investigation, the Commission does not find
probable cause to believe that misconduct has occurred, the Commission shall
dismiss the complaint. If the Commission determines the existence of probable
cause, the Commission may vote that one or more of the following is
appropriate:
(a)
dismissal;
(b)
deferred resolution or private caution;
(c)
formal charges;
(d)
petition for suspension;
(e)
a stay.
At any time after the Commission has
determined the existence of probable cause to file charges, the judicial
officer may demand that the charges be filed within sixty days rather than
consent to a private caution, a public admonition, deferred resolution, or a stay.
If the Commission votes to file
formal charges against a judicial officer, it may, with the judicial officer's
written consent, dismiss the complaint after issuing a public admonition of the
judicial officer's conduct.
F. Notice of Formal Proceedings.
(1)
After the investigation has been completed and the Commission concludes that
there is probable cause to believe in the existence of grounds for discipline
or involuntary retirement under Section III of this Rule and that formal
proceedings should be instituted, it shall give written notice to the judicial
officer advising of the institution of formal proceedings. This notice shall be
filed as an original action in the Supreme Court.
(2)
The notice shall be issued in the name of the Commission, shall specify in
ordinary and concise language the charges against the judicial officer and the
alleged facts upon which such charges are based, and shall advise the judicial
officer of the right to file a written answer to the charges within twenty days
after service of notice. No charge shall be sufficient if it merely recites the
general language of the original complaint, but must specify the facts relied
upon to support a particular charge.
(3)
The notice shall be made by certified mail to the judicial officer's chambers
or address of record and shall be clearly marked “Personal and Confidential”.
(4)
In the event the notice filed under Rule VIIIF(1) is directed toward a member
of the Supreme Court, the provisions of this paragraph shall apply.
(a)
At the time the notice is filed, all Justices of the Supreme Court, except the
Chief Justice, shall recuse themselves from the proceedings. Should the Chief
Justice, for any reason, be unable to participate in such proceedings, the most
senior member of the Supreme Court, not otherwise disqualified, shall continue
to serve. The Chief Justice or the member of the Supreme Court continuing to
serve under this provision shall be the presiding member of the Supreme Court
for all proceedings relating to the notice.
(b)
The vacancies on the Supreme Court created by the above procedure shall be
filled for the limited purpose of the judicial disciplinary proceedings by
members of the Indiana Court of Appeals chosen pursuant to this provision. Six
Judges of the Court of Appeals shall be randomly selected by the Clerk of the
Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Advisement of the members of the Court of
Appeals selected under this procedure shall be given to the Commission and the
judicial officer. Within seven days after advisement of the selection is
issued, the Commission shall strike one judge selected and within seven days
after the judge is stricken by the Commission, the judicial officer shall
strike one judge. If the Commission or the judicial officer fails to strike a
judge under this procedure, the Clerk of the Supreme Court shall strike at
random in their stead.
(c)
In the event all members of the Supreme Court are unable to participate in a
judicial disciplinary proceeding, the Clerk of the Supreme Court and Court of
Appeals shall randomly select seven members of the Indiana Court of Appeals to
serve in such proceedings and each side shall strike one judge under the
procedure set forth in Rule VIIIF(4)(b) above.
G.
Answer. Within twenty days after service of the notice of formal
proceedings, the judicial officer may file with the Supreme Court, under the
cause initiated by the filing of the notice of formal proceedings, an answer,
and serve a copy of the answer on Counsel for the Commission by mail.
All pleadings shall be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme
Court and shall be served to the Commission at its published address.
H.
Settlement Agreements. The Commission and the judicial officer may enter
into a settlement agreement, either prior to the appointment of Masters, or at
any time prior to a final disposition by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court
may accept the agreement resolving the case or it may reject the agreement and
return the matter to the Commission for further action.
I.
Masters. Upon the filing of an answer or upon the expiration of the time
for its filing, the Supreme Court shall, within thirty days, appoint three
Masters and designate a Presiding Master. Each Master shall be an active or
retired member of a court of record in the State of Indiana. The Masters shall
hear and take evidence in the judicial disciplinary proceeding and report
thereon to the Supreme Court. The appointed Masters shall set a time and place
for a hearing, to be conducted within ninety days of their appointment, and
shall give notice of such hearing to the judicial officer charged and Counsel
for the Commission at least twenty days prior to the date set. At the
discretion of the Masters, the cause may be set for a pretrial conference or
such other hearing as may be deemed necessary under the circumstances.
Continuances shall be granted only by agreement or upon good cause shown. All
differences of opinion by the Masters shall be resolved by majority vote,
except that a minority opinion may be submitted to the Supreme Court with the
final report and the recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(1)
In all formal proceedings, discovery shall be available to the Commission and
to the judicial officer in accordance with the Indiana Rules of Trial
Procedure. Any motions requesting court orders for discovery shall be made to
the Masters appointed to hear the case.
(2)
In all formal proceedings, Counsel for the Commission shall furnish to the
judicial officer not less than twenty days prior to any hearing the following,
unless modified by agreement or by an order on discovery:
(a)
The names and addresses of all witnesses whose testimony Counsel expects to
offer at the hearing, together with copies of all written statements and
transcripts of testimony of such witnesses in the possession of Counsel or the
Commission and copies of all documentary evidence which Counsel expects to
offer in evidence at the hearing. The testimony of any witness whose name and
address has not been furnished to the judicial officer, and documentary
evidence copies of which have not been furnished to the judicial officer, as
provided above, shall not be admissible in evidence at said hearing over
objection.
(b)
After formal proceedings have been instituted, Counsel shall furnish to the
judicial officer, within ten days, the names and addresses of all witnesses,
then or thereafter known to Counsel, who have information which may be relevant
to any charge against the judicial officer, and to any defense. Counsel shall
also furnish copies of such written statements, transcripts of testimony, and
documentary evidence as are then or thereafter in the possession of Counsel for
the Commission, which are relevant to any such charge or defense and which have
not previously been furnished to the judicial officer.
(1)
At the time and place set for hearing, the Masters may proceed with the hearing
whether or not the judicial officer has filed an answer or appears at the
hearing.
(2)
The failure of the judicial officer to answer or to appear at the hearing,
standing alone, shall not be taken as evidence of the facts alleged or
constitute grounds for discipline, retirement, or removal, however the failure
to cooperate in the prompt resolution of a complaint by the refusal to respond
to Commission requests or by the use of dilatory practices, frivolous or
unfounded arguments, or other obdurate behavior may be considered as
aggravating factors affecting sanctions or may be the basis for the filing of
separate counts of judicial misconduct.
(3) In any proceeding for involuntary retirement for disability, the failure of the judicial officer to testify in his or her own behalf or to submit to medical examination requested by the Commission or Masters may be considered, unl