CADDNAR


[CITE: Jaeco v. DNR, 3 CADDNAR 100 (1986)]

 

[VOLUME 3, PAGE 100]

 

 

Cause #: 85-157R

Caption: Jaeco v. DNR
Administrative Law Judge: Shadley
Attorneys: Runnells; Szostek, DAG
Date: January 10, 1986

ORDER

 

Notice of Violation #N50528-S-00118, Violation 2 of 4, is vacated.

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1. On June 26, 1985, Jaeco, Inc. ("Jaeco") requested a hearing to review the issuance of Notice of Violation #N50528-S-00118, Violation 2 of 4.

 

2. IC 13-4.1 applies to this proceeding.

 

3. The Department of Natural Resources is an agency as defined in IC 4-22-1. The Director is the ultimate authority of the Department with respect to this proceeding.

 

4. The Director has jurisdiction over the subject matter and parties to this proceeding.

 

5. On October 8, 1985, Jaeco filed a Motion for Summary Decision, pursuant to 310 IAC 0.5-1-11.

 

6. On October 9, 1985, the Department was provided with a copy of the Motion for Summary Decision and given thirty (30) days in which to file a response to the Motion.

 

7. On November 18, 1985, the Department was granted a one week extension of time in which to file a response to the Motion for Summary Decision.

 

8. On December 5, 1985, the parties verbally stipulated to inclusion in the record of the Notice of Violation and Inspection Report.

 

9. On December 10, 1985, the Motion for Summary Decision was denied.

 

10. On January 8, 1986, Claimant filed a renewed Motion for Summary Decision.

 

11. Jaeco holds permit S-00118 to conduct surface coal mining operations in Clay County at its Eel River Mine.

 

12. William Hess, an authorized representative of the Director issued Notice of Violation #N50528-S-00118, Violation 2 of 4 to Jaeco on May 28, 1985.

 

13. Notice of Violation #N50528-S-00118, Violation 2 of 4 cited Jaeco for failure to case and seal all drill holes when no longer in use for exploration, in violation of 310 IAC 12-5-10, 310 IAC 12-5-8 and Plan for Reclamation IV A (7)(a).

 

14. Inspector Hess believed three holes to have been drilled recently and two to have been more than one year old.

 

15. The holes had in fact been in existence for not more than two weeks prior to issuance of the Notice of Violation.

 

16. 310 IAC 12-5-8 and 310 IAC 12-5-10 require each drilled hole, shaft, well or other exposed underground opening when no longer in use for exploration, monitoring or other mine uses to be cased, sealed or otherwise managed to prevent acid or other toxic drainage from entering ground and surface waters.

 

17. The Plan of Reclamation stated what material would be used to fill the boreholes.

 

18. Neither 310 IAC 12-5-8, 310 12-5-10, nor the Plan of Reclamation specify a time frame for casing and sealing the holes other than when no longer in use for exploration, monitoring and other mine uses.

 

19. On May 28, 1985, it was Jaeco's intention to auger out the holes and do further logging of them for exploration purposes. 20. Jaeco had not, on May 28, 1985, failed to case and seal all drill holes no longer in use for exploration.