CADDNAR


[CITE: S & G Excavating, Inc. v. Department, 2 CADDNAR 60 (1986)]

 

[VOLUME 2, PAGE 60]

 

Cause #: 84-311R

Caption: S & G Excavating, Inc. v. Department
Administrative Law Judge: Shadley
Attorneys: Monday; Spicker, DAG
Date: February 21, 1986

ORDER

 

Notice of Violation #N41206-S-00044 is affirmed.

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1. On December 18, 1984, S & G Excavating, Inc. requested a Hearing to review the issuance of Notice of Violation #N41206-S-00044.

 

2. IC 13-4.1 applies to this proceeding.

 

3. The Department of Natural Resources is an agency as defined in IC 4-22-1. The Director is the ultimate authority of the Department with respect to this proceeding.

 

4. The Director has jurisdiction over the subject matter and parties to this proceeding.

 

5. The parties agreed to waive their right to Hearing and in lieu thereof have submitted stipulations of fact.

 

6. S & G Excavating, Inc. holds permit S-00044 to conduct surface coal mining operations in Clay County.

 

7. William Hess, an authorized representative of the Director, issued Notice of Violation #N41206-S-00044 which was written on December 6, 1984.

 

8. The Notice of Violation was written for failure to have records of blasting operations available for inspection by the Director and the public on request, in violation of 310 IAC 12-5-38.

 

9. Permit S-00044 has two pits, the North Pit and the South Pit.

 

10. S & G has no regular hours at this permit; at time they work around the clock, and on this date they were not working at all, except for a secretary who was in the mine office at the South Pit.

 

11. On January 30, 1986, the blasting records for both the North Pit and the South Pit were on-site, but only the records of the North Pit were made available for inspection.

 

12. The records of the North Pit were made available by the mine superintendent who lives on the mine site.

 

13. The reason the records for the South Pit were not made available for inspection was that the only person in the office did not know where the records were kept, and no other persons were in the office due to extremely cold weather resulting in mining operations having been called off.

 

14. 310 IAC 12-5-38 provides a "record of each blast, including seismograph records when obtained, shall be retained by the permittee for at least three years and shall be made available for inspection by the director and the public on request."

 

15. The records for the South Pit were not made available for inspection upon request of Inspector Hess.

 

16. This failure to make records of blasting available for inspection is a violation of 310 IAC 12-5-38.[FOOTNOTE i]

FOOTNOTE

i. S & G argues that the effect of this Notice of Violation is that the Department is telling S & G when they must be open for business. I disagree, I believe the only effect of this Notice of Violation is that records, which by law are required to be made available for inspection upon request, must be maintained in such a way that they are available upon request. It is important that these records not be kept in a way that inspection is made impossible. By keeping records such that only one person can locate them, the result is that accessibility is seriously impaired since inspection can only occur when the person is available. I do not think it would be proper to issue a Notice of Violation in the instance when the office was locked, but if the office is open, the records should be maintained so that inspection is possible, no matter which employee is possible, no matter which employee is present in the office.