|
|
IC 20-31-8-2
Secondary means of assessing improvements
Sec. 2. (a) In addition to scores on the ISTEP program test and
other assessments, the department shall use the performance
indicators developed under section 1 of this chapter and the
benchmarks and indicators of performance in each school
corporation's annual performance report as a secondary means of
assessing the improvement of each school and school corporation.
(b) The department shall assess improvement in the following
manner:
(1) Compare each school and each school corporation with its
own prior performance and not to the performance of other
schools or school corporations.
(2) Compare the results in the annual report under IC 20-20-8
with the benchmarks and indicators of performance established
in the plan for the same school.
(3) Compare the results for a school by comparing each
student's results for each grade with the student's prior year
results, with an adjustment for student mobility rate. The
education roundtable shall make recommendations concerning
the incorporation of a statistical adjustment for student mobility
rates into the results.
(4) Compare the results for a school with the state average and
the ninety-fifth percentile level for all assessments and
performance indicators.
As added by P.L.1-2005, SEC.15.
IC 20-31-8-4
Placement of school in category or designation of school
improvement
Sec. 4. The state board shall place each school in a category or
designation of school improvement based on the department's
findings from the assessment of the improvement of each school
under section 2 of this chapter. The state board must place those
schools that do not show improvement and in which less than ninety
percent (90%) of the students meet academic standards in the lowest
category or designation.
As added by P.L.1-2005, SEC.15.