TITLE 327 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
FIRST NOTICE OF COMMENT PERIOD
LSA Document #16-4
INTERFERENCE OF A PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS
The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is soliciting public comment on amendments to
327 IAC 5-17-11 concerning the definition of "interference" as it relates to pretreatment discharge to a publicly owned treatment works (POTW). IDEM seeks comment on the affected citation listed and any other provisions of Title 327 that may be affected by this rulemaking.
SUBJECT MATTER AND BASIC PURPOSE OF RULEMAKING
Basic Purpose and Background
IC 13-14-8-5 allows any person meeting the statutory requirements to present a written proposal to the Environmental Rules Board (board) requesting adoption, amendment, or repeal of a rule. A written proposal for the amendment of
327 IAC 5-17-11, the definition of "interference" as it regards pretreatment discharge of wastewater into a POTW, was presented to the board at its meeting in January 2015. The proposal and its supporters alleged that the definition at
327 IAC 5-17-11 is more stringent than the federal definition at 40 CFR 403.3(k) and that the state's definition creates vagueness and subjectivity in determining whether interference has occurred at the POTW. The board held a hearing on the proposal and considered it at several board meetings after the initial presentation. The board's final action at its October 2015 meeting was to direct IDEM to conduct rulemaking to revise the definition at
327 IAC 5-17-11 to be consistent with the federal definition. IDEM seeks comment on the affected citations listed, including suggestions for specific language, any other provisions of Title 327 that may be affected by this rulemaking, and alternative ways to achieve the purpose of the rulemaking.
Alternatives to Be Considered Within the Rulemaking
Alternative 1. Amend
327 IAC 5-17-11 to be consistent with 40 CFR 403.3(k).
• Is this alternative an incorporation of federal standards, either by reference or full text incorporation? Yes.
• Is this alternative imposed by federal law or is there a comparable federal law? The federal law requires that the state rule must be at least as stringent as the federal requirement.
• If it is a federal requirement, is it different from federal law? The purpose of this alternative is to change the state rule from being different than the federal requirement to being consistent with the federal requirement for the definition of "interference".
• If it is different, describe the differences. Existing state rule at
327 IAC 5-17-11 defines "interference" as occurring if one of three listed conditions occurs at the POTW due to a discharge or discharges from other sources. The listed conditions include a discharge or discharges that inhibit or disrupt the POTW, cause a violation of any of the POTW's NPDES permit requirements, and prevent the use of the POTW's sewage sludge or its sludge disposal method. The federal definition of "interference" ties the conditions and causing a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NPDES permit together so that all have to occur before interference has occurred.
• There is no other rulemaking alternative because the board directed IDEM to revise
327 IAC 5-17-11 to be consistent with 40 CFR 403.3(k).
The federal definition of "interference" occurs at 40 CFR 403.3(k), which is included in 40 CFR 403 for General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New Sources of Pollution.
Potential Fiscal Impact of Alternative 1. The proposal before the board stated that the existing definition of "interference" is more stringent than the federal definition. Amending the state definition to be consistent with the federal definition would mean a lessening of potential fiscal impact. It is not possible to measure reduction of fiscal impact in the absence of an interference occurrence. A goal of the pretreatment program rules is to provide dischargers the regulatory guidance to avoid violations such as interference.
Small Business Assistance Information
IDEM established a compliance and technical assistance program (CTAP) under
IC 13-28-3. The program provides assistance to small businesses and information regarding compliance with environmental regulations. In accordance with
IC 13-28-3 and
IC 13-28-5, there is a small business assistance program ombudsman to provide a point of contact for small businesses affected by environmental regulations. Information on the CTAP program and other resources available can be found at:
www.in.gov/idem/ctap
For purposes of
IC 4-22-2-28.1, small businesses affected by this rulemaking may contact the Small Business Regulatory Coordinator:
Patricia Daniel
IDEM Small Business Regulatory Coordinator
IGCN 1225
100 North Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251
(317) 232-8172 or (800) 988-7901
ctap@idem.in.gov
Erik Scheub
Office of Small Business and Entrepreneurship
One North Capitol, Suite 600
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 232-5679
ombudsman@osbe.in.gov
Resources available to regulated entities through the small business ombudsman include the ombudsman's duties stated in
IC 4-4-35-8, specifically
IC 4-4-35-8(9), investigating and attempting to resolve any matter regarding compliance by a small business with a law, rule, or policy administered by a state agency, either as a party to a proceeding or as a mediator.
The Small Business Assistance Program Ombudsman is:
Steven N. Howell
IDEM Small Business Assistance Program Ombudsman
IGCN 1301
100 North Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251
(317) 232-8587 or (800) 451-6027
snhowell@idem.in.gov
Public Participation and Work Group Information
At this time, no work group is planned for the rulemaking. If you feel that a work group or other informal discussion on the rule is appropriate, please contact MaryAnn Stevens, Rules Development Branch, Office of Legal Counsel at (317) 232-8635 or (800) 451-6027 (in Indiana).
REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS
At this time, IDEM solicits the following:
(1) The submission of alternative ways to achieve the purpose of the rule.
(2) The submission of suggestions for the development of draft rule language.
Comments may be submitted in one of the following ways:
(1) By mail or common carrier to the following address:
LSA Document #16-4 Definition of Interference
MaryAnn Stevens
Rules Development Branch
Office of Legal Counsel
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Indiana Government Center North
100 North Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251
(2) By facsimile to (317) 233-5970. Please confirm the timely receipt of faxed comments by calling the Rules Development Branch at (317) 232-8922.
(3) By electronic mail to mstevens@idem.in.gov. To confirm timely delivery of submitted comments, please request a document receipt when sending the electronic mail. PLEASE NOTE: Electronic mail comments will NOT be considered part of the official written comment period unless they are sent to the address indicated in this notice.
(4) Hand delivered to the receptionist on duty at the thirteenth floor reception desk, Office of Legal Counsel, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Regardless of the delivery method used, in order to properly identify each comment with the rulemaking action it is intended to address, each comment document must clearly specify the LSA document number of the rulemaking.
All comments must be postmarked, faxed, or time stamped not later than February 12, 2016. Hand-delivered comments must be delivered to the appropriate office by 4:45 p.m. on the above-listed deadline date.
Additional information regarding this action may be obtained from MaryAnn Stevens, Rules Development Branch, Office of Legal Counsel (317) 232-8635 or (800) 451-6027 (in Indiana).
Nancy King, Chief
Rules Development Branch
Office of Legal Counsel
Posted: 01/13/2016 by Legislative Services Agency
DIN: 20160113-IR-327160004FNA
Composed: May 01,2024 5:59:38AM EDT
A
PDF version of this document.
