TITLE 750 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Regulatory Analysis
LSA Document #23-837
a. History and Background of the Rule
This rulemaking sets forth a schedule for fees, fines, and civil penalties as may be assessed by the Department of Financial Institutions (the "Department") as required under IC 4-22-2-19.6(b). The proposed rule will establish the Department's fees at the same amounts that were most recently adopted by the Members effective July 1, 2023. The proposed rule will not change or increase any fee that is currently being assessed by the Department.
Similarly, the proposed rule sets forth a schedule of civil penalties for violations of specific statutes; however, the Department will not be obligated to issue a civil penalty. In the last five years, the Department has averaged issuing one civil penalty a year and the dollar amounts have been small. Civil penalties are not considered a revenue source for the Department.
b. Scope of the Rule
The proposed rule is intended to align the Department's rules with HEA 1623 and IC 4-22-2-19.6. Specifically, 750 IAC 10 will set forth all the Department's current fees, fines, or civil penalties.
c. Statement of Need
The proposed rule will bring the Department's practices into compliance with HEA 1623 and IC 4-22-2-19.6 by setting forth the Department's fees, fines, and civil penalties. The Department is a dedicated fund agency that is required, pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5(b), to "fix and collect, on an annual basis, a schedule of fees for the services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions."
The public policy reason for assessing fees is that IC 28-11-3-5(b) requires the Department to set a fee schedule for the services rendered. Further, IC 28-11-3-5(c) requires that "in determining the costs, the department may classify the assets of financial institutions and fix fees at different rates for the examination, supervision, regulation, and liquidation of the classes of assets, based on the proportionate cost and expense incurred by the department in making examinations and in the administration of financial institutions." The regulatory model of the Department has been time tested and has resulted in a system producing sound financial supervision and a strong financial institution system in Indiana all the while being a value-priced regulator.
The Department is not statutorily required to assess fines or civil penalties; however, it has broad statutory authority to generally assess fines and civil penalties in an amount of up to $10,000 per violation. The proposed rule will bring the Department into compliance with HEA 1623 and IC 4-22-2-19.6(d) by setting forth a civil penalty schedule. The civil penalty schedule identifies a baseline civil penalty amount along with factors that may increase or decrease the amount of the civil penalty. Included in the proposed factors are those that are statutorily required, and factors enumerated in IC 4-22-2-19.6(d).
Additionally, the Department has included a provision that will not obligate it to issue a civil penalty. This provision is intended to allow the Department to continue the practice of focusing on requiring refunds for those borrowers who are unlawfully charged, in lieu of the Department receiving a civil penalty. While there are multiple public policy reasons for issuing civil penalties–including, but not limited to, protecting the public, ensuring full compliance with the law, deterring violations, promoting respect for the law, and providing just punishment–the Department focuses on requiring consumer refunds. There are times, however, when the violation warrants civil penalties in addition to consumer restitution. For these rare occasions in which a civil penalty is warranted, the Department's proposed rule will conform with HEA 1623 thereby preserving the Department's discretion to issue a civil penalty.
d. Statutory Authority for the Proposed Rule
The Department has statutory authority to assess fees to financial institutions in general pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5(b), which provides that "the department shall fix and collect, on an annual basis, a schedule of fees for the services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions." Further, IC 28-11-3-5(c) requires that "in determining the costs, the department may classify the assets of financial institutions and fix fees at different rates for the examination, supervision, regulation, and liquidation of the classes of assets, based on the proportionate cost and expense incurred by the department in making examinations and in the administration of financial institutions."
Additional statutory authority for specific fees are as follows:
Additional statutory authority for civil penalties is as follows:
| |
Civil Penalty | Statutory Authority |
Violating naming convention standards | IC 28-1-20-4(m) |
Unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law; and violations by certain individuals | IC 28-11-4-7 and 9 |
Violation of statute, cease and desist order, or any condition imposed in writing by the director by individuals | IC 24-4.4-2-404.4(3)(c) |
Violations of the First Lien Mortgage Act | IC 24-4.4-3-111(1) |
Pattern or practice of refusal to issue refund for prepayment owed for a consumer credit sale or consumer loan credit insurance | IC 24-4.5-4-108(6) |
Violations of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code | IC 24-4.5-6-113(3) |
Violation of statute, cease and desist order, or any condition imposed in writing by the director by directors, officers, or manager of a creditor | IC 24-4.5-6-122(c) |
Violations of limits and number of amounts of outstanding small loans, lender verification requirements, and third-party data base requirements | IC 24-4.5-7-404(10) |
Violations of the Rental Purchase Agreement Act | IC 24-7-7-1(b) |
Violations of the Civil Proceeding Advance Payment Act | IC 24-12-5-1 |
Violations of the Debt Management chapter | IC 28-29-13(b) |
Knowingly authorized, directs, or aids violations of the Debt Management chapter | IC 28-29-13(c) |
Violations of the Pawnbroking Law | IC 28-7-5-38.1 |
Violations of Money Transmission Modernization Act | IC 28-4.1-1105 |
Violations of the Check Cashing Act | IC 28-8-5-24(a) |
e. Fees, Fines, and Civil Penalties
The proposed rule adds fees and civil penalties and will comply with HEA 1623 and IC 4-22-2-19.6.
II. Fiscal Impact Analysis
a. Anticipated Effective Date of the Rule
July 1, 2024
b. Estimated Fiscal Impact on State and Local Government
The proposed rule establishes fees and civil penalties for the Department. The Department does not consider civil penalties to be a revenue source. In the last five years, the Department has averaged issuing one civil penalty a year and the dollar amounts have been insignificant. The Department is wholly dependent upon the fees it collects to fund its annual budget as determined by its legislative appropriation. The fee schedule in the proposed rule would generate $10,698,000 in annual revenue, which is significantly less than the legislative appropriation for the Department. This rule does not impact expenditures or revenues of local government.
c. Sources of Expenditures or Revenues Affected by the Rule
The proposed rule will impact the Department's revenue. Pursuant to IC 28-11-2-9(c), all revenue accruing to the Department is required to be paid into the financial institutions' fund, which is a dedicated fund. The proposed rule will go into effect on July 1, 2024, and will impact the Department's revenue in each successive fiscal year.
There will be no new impacted parties as a result of the proposed rule. The proposed rule is adopting fees that are already being assessed to regulated persons. Similarly, the proposed rule does not add new civil penalties but rather reflects the Department's current practices. As such, only persons who are regulated by the Department are subject to the assessment of fees. Only persons who have been found to violate specific statutes, identified below, will be potentially liable for the civil penalties.
IV. Changes in Proposed Rule
The proposed new rule adopts a schedule of fees and civil penalties. The fee schedule as proposed in the new rule does not represent a change but rather incorporates the Department's existing fee schedule as set by the Department's board members. The proposed civil penalty schedule is rooted in the Indiana Code; there is not something that exists in another document. The Department does not intend to change its enforcement practice–which is to issue civil penalties only when the violation warrants civil penalties in addition to consumer restitution.
The fee schedule in the proposed new rule adopts the Department's existing fee schedule. The existing fees are either based on a schedule applied to asset size, a schedule based on volume, or set fees. The existing fees are as set forth below.
a. Pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5, the schedule of fees for services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions for banks, savings banks, building and loan associations, and industrial authorities shall be as follows:
| | | | |
IF THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL ASSETS IS: | THE FEE WILL BE: |
OVER | BUT NOT OVER | THIS AMOUNT | PLUS | OF EXCESS OVER |
$ 0 | $ 10,000M | 4,380 | | |
10,001M | 15,000M | 4,380 | .2160 per Thousand | 10,000M |
15,001M | 25,000M | 5,460 | .0970 per Thousand | 15,000M |
25,001M | 50,000M | 6,430 | .0748 per Thousand | 25,000M |
50,001M | 100,000M | 8,301 | .0683 per Thousand | 50,000M |
100,001M | 500,000M | 11,717 | .0660 per Thousand | 100,000M |
500,001M | 1,000,000M | 38,101 | .0644 per Thousand | 500,000M |
1,000,001M | 3,000,000M | 70,279 | .0482 per Thousand | 1,000,000M |
3,000,0001M | 5,000,000M | 166,669 | .0378 per Thousand | 3,000,000M |
5,000,0001M | 10,000,000M | 242,269 | .0346 per Thousand | 5,000,000M |
10,000,001M | 20,000,000M | 415,204 | .0324 per Thousand | 10,000,000M |
20,000,001M | 40,000,000M | 739,339 | .0318 per Thousand | 20,000,000M |
40,000,0001M | | 1,376,269 | .0297 per Thousand | 40,000,000M |
b. Pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5, the schedule of fees for services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions for trust departments shall be as follows:
| | |
IF THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL ASSETS IS: | THE FEE WILL BE: |
OVER | BUT NOT OVER | THIS ASSESSMENT |
$ 0 | $ 2,000M | $ 800 |
2,001M | 5,000M | 1,500 |
5,001M | 10,000M | 2,000 |
10,001M | 20,000M | 3,000 |
20,001M | 30,000M | 4,000 |
30,001M | 40,000M | 5,000 |
40,001M | 50,000M | 6,000 |
50,001M | 100,000M | 8,500 |
100,001M | 500,000M | 11,000 |
500,001M | 1,000,000M | 21,000 |
1,000,001M | | $21,000 plus$.0022 per thousand on Trust Assets over $1,000,000M |
c. Pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5, the schedule of fees for services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions for corporate fiduciaries shall be as follows:
| | | | |
IF THE AMOUNT OF TRUST ASSETS IS: | THE FEE WILL BE: |
OVER | BUT NOT OVER | THIS AMOUNT | PLUS | OF EXCESS OVER |
$ 0 | $ 20,000M | 5,150 | | |
20,001M | 50,000M | 5,150 | .1578 per Thousand | 20,000M |
50,001M | 100,000M | 9,884 | .0922 per Thousand | 50,000M |
100,001M | 500,000M | 14,494 | .0205 per Thousand | 100,000M |
500,001M | 1,000,000M | 22,694 | .0102 per Thousand | 500,000M |
1,000,001M | 10,000,000M | 27,794 | .0050 per Thousand | 1,000,000M |
10,000,001M | 20,000,000M | 72,794 | .0035 per Thousand | 10,000,000M |
20,000,001M | 40,000,000M | 107,794 | .0025 per Thousand | 20,000,000M |
40,000,001M | | 157,794 | .0020 per Thousand | 40,000,000M |
d. Pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5, the schedule of fees for services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions for credit unions shall be as follows:
| | | | |
IF THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL ASSETS IS: | THE FEE WILL BE: |
OVER | BUT NOT OVER | THIS AMOUNT | PLUS | OF EXCESS OVER |
$ 0 | $ 545M | 510 | | |
546M | 1,000M | 510 | .7373 per Thousand | $ 545M |
1,001M | 5,000M | 845 | .7607 per Thousand | 1,000M |
5,001M | 10,000M | 3,888 | .2534 per Thousand | 5,000M |
10,001M | 50,000M | 5,155 | .0677 per Thousand | 10,000M |
50,001M | 100,000M | 7,861 | .0665 per Thousand | 50,000M |
100,001M | 500,000M | 11,188 | .0660 per Thousand | 100,000M |
500,001M | 1,000,000M | 37,572 | .0644 per Thousand | 500,000M |
1,000,001M | 3,000,000M | 69,749 | .0631 per Thousand | 1,000,000M |
3,000,001M | 5,000,000M | 196,001 | .0232 per Thousand | 3,000,000M |
5,000,001M | | 242,306 | .0227 per Thousand | 5,000,000M |
e. If a bank, savings banks, building and loan association, industrial authority, trust department, corporate fiduciary, or credit union, receives a composite 3 rating at its most recent state or federal safety and soundness examination, its annual fee shall be increased by 12.5%. This assessment shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. The increased supervisory assessment shall stay in effect until the quarter following the financial institution's receipt of a composite 1 or 2 rating at a state or federal safety and soundness examination.
f. If a bank, savings banks, building and loan association, industrial authority, trust department, corporate fiduciary, or credit union, receives a composite 4 or 5 rating at its most recent state or federal safety and soundness examination, its annual fee shall be increased by twenty-five percent (25%). This assessment shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. The increased supervisory assessment shall stay in effect until the quarter following the financial institution's receipt of a composite 1 or 2 rating at a state or federal safety and soundness examination.
g. Newly chartered and converted financial institutions, which include thrift and national to state-chartered financial institutions, shall be charged a percentage of their annual fee, as calculated above, based on the number of months that it is in existence as an Indiana state-chartered financial institution during the department's fiscal year.
h.
1. Pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5, the schedule of fees for services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions for the following applications shall be as follows:
| |
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION FORMATION | BASE FEES |
Interim Institution | $2,000 |
Full-Service Institution Upon Submission of Application | $4,000 |
Full-Service Institution Upon Department's Approval of Application | $4,000 |
| |
BANK HOLDING COMPANY | |
Bank Holding Company Acquisition | $5,000 |
Bank Holding Company Acquisitions (including Interim Bank and Merger) | $5,000 |
| |
CHANGE OF CONTROL | $500 |
| |
MERGER FEE FOR BANKS, TRUST COMPANIES, SAVINGS BANKS, BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS, INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITIES, TRUST DEPARTMENTS, AND CORPORATE FIDUCIARIES | $1,000 |
| |
MERGER FOR CREDIT UNIONS | $500 |
CONVERSIONS | |
National Bank to State Charter | $0.00 |
Federally Chartered Savings and Loan to Bank or Savings Bank | $0.00 |
Mutual Savings Bank to Stock Savings Bank | $0.00 |
State Chartered Savings and Loan to Bank or Savings Bank | $0.00 |
Federal Credit Union to State Charter | $0.00 |
| |
MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY REORGANIZATION | $1,000 |
| |
ESTABLISHMENT OF A BRANCH | |
Full-Service Branch | $500 |
| |
ESTABLISHMENT OF A TRUST OFFICE | $500 |
| |
RELOCATION OF MAIN OFFICE OR BRANCH | $500 |
| |
BANK HOLDING COMPANY FORMATION | $1,000 |
| |
CONSOLIDATION | $1,000 |
| |
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION | |
Time of Submission of Application | $2,500 |
| |
ISSUANCE OF SUBORDINATED DEBT AS CAPITAL | $0.00 |
| |
ESTABLISHMENT OF A NONQUALIFYING SUBSIDIARY | $500 |
2. Base Fees in subsection h(1) are the minimum amount charged for an application. Actual expenses will be charged at $80 per hour or a portion thereof for all personnel involved in processing, analyzing, or investigating an application. Actual expenses also include transcript preparation, Administrative Law Judge fees, and travel expenses for the Members of the department and office personnel. If actual expenses exceed the basic fee for an application the amount of the actual expense will be charged for the application. Actual expenses of an application for conversion, merger, or consolidation examination shall not exceed $30,000.
3. Financial Institutions that are in the process of voluntary dissolution will not be charged an annual fee after the board resolution authorizing the dissolution has been approved by the Department in accordance with IC 28-1-9-3.
4. Fees shall not be imposed if an institution involved in an application is insolvent or is in imminent danger of becoming insolvent, as determined by the Director.
i. Pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5, the schedule of fees for services rendered and the duties performed by the department in the administration of financial institutions, as defined by IC 28-1-2-30, for the licenses and registrations included below shall be as follows:
| | |
Entity Type | Fee Type | Amount of Fee |
| |
Check Cashing License | |
| Application Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Fee | $500 + $250 per each additional location,
$2,000 maximum |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Civil Proceeding Advance Payment Provider License | |
| Application Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Debt Management License | |
| Application Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Creditor's Notification Return for Depository Institutions | |
| Application Fee | N/A |
| Renewal Fee | Volume Fee Due at $2/$100,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | N/A |
| Hourly Exam Fee | N/A |
| |
Hoosier Traditional Mortgage | |
| Certification Fee | $50 |
| Recertification Fee | $50 |
| |
Consumer Loan License | |
| Application | $1,000 |
| Renewal Fee | The greater of $1,000 or Volume Fee of $2/$100,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Money Transmitter License | |
| Application Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Mortgage Lending License | |
| Application | $1,000 |
| Renewal Fee | $1,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Mortgage Loan Originator (MLO) License | |
| Application Fee | $100 |
| Renewal Fee | $100 |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| |
Non-Lender Registration (Credit Sellers/Lessors) (Notice of Intent – State Form 83) | |
| Notification Fee | N/A |
| Renewal Fee | Volume Fee Due at $2/$100,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | N/A |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Pawnbroker License | |
| Application Fee | $1,000 + $500 for each additional location |
| Renewal Fee | $1,000 + $500 for each additional location |
| Late Renewal Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Rental Purchase Registration | |
| Notification Fee | $500 |
| Renewal Fee | $500 + $250 for each additional location, not to exceed $10,000 |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
| |
Small Loan License | |
| Application Fee | $2,000 + $750 per each additional location |
| Renewal Fee | $2,000 + $750 per each additional location |
| Renewal Late Fee | $20 per day |
| Hourly Exam Fee | $80 per hour |
| Late Exam Fee | $20 per day |
1. The exam fee may be offset by license and renewal fees paid. The first three days of the exam fee are waived, plus an additional $600 of the exam fee is waived per additional location examined.
2. If the total amount owed for the Volume Fee in this subsection is $100 or less, the volume fee is waived.
3. The mortgage lending license application fee is waived if the applicant's mortgage loan originators are exempt from licensure pursuant to 760 IAC 9-3-1(h)(2)(i).
The proposed rule has the following newly added civil penalty schedule.
| | |
Legal Citation | General Description of Violation | Base Violation |
IC 28-1-20-4(m) | Violating naming convention standards | $7,500 per day |
IC 28-11-4-7 and 9 | Unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law; and violations by certain individuals. | $500 per day |
The amount of a civil penalty in IC 28-1-20-4(m) and 28-11-4-7 and 9 may be adjusted downward to reflect mitigating factors. Factors that may be considered are the following:
(1) The appropriateness of the civil penalty with respect to the financial resources and good faith of the person or individual charged.
(2) Existence of written policies governing the conduct.
(3) Cooperation with the Department in addressing the violation.
(4) The person's history of compliance.
(5) Remedial or corrective action taken by the person.
(6) Whether the violation was voluntarily disclosed to the Department.
(7) Evidence of any restitution paid.
(8) Other factors that justice requires1.
The amount of civil penalty in IC 28-1-20-4(m) and 28-11-4-7 and 9 may be adjusted upward to reflect aggravating factors. Factors that may be considered are the following:
(1) The gravity of the practice, violation or act including:
a. Loss or risk of loss to the person;
b. Loss or risk of loss to consumers;
c. Impact other than loss;
d. Concealment; and
e. Number of violations at issue.
(2) Economic benefit derived by the person or individual from the practice, violation, or act.
(3) Willful or intentional misconduct.
(4) Duration and frequency of the violation.
(5) History of similar prior violations.
(6) Fraudulent conduct.
(7) Whether the violation negatively impacts the integrity or public trust of financial institutions in the state of Indiana.
(8) Other factors justice requires2.
1 This factor is a statutorily required factor for the violations of IC 28-11-4-7 and 9. In order to make the factors consistent so institutions are held to the same standards, it is being applied uniformly.
| | |
Legal Citation | General Description of Violation | Base Violation |
IC 24-4.4-2-404.4(3)(c) | Violation of statute, cease and desist order, or any condition imposed in writing by the director by individuals | $7,500 |
IC 24-4.4-3-111(1) | Violations of the First Lien Mortgage Act | $2,500 |
IC 24-4.5-4-108(6) | Pattern or practice of refusal to issue refund for prepayment owed for a consumer credit sale or consumer loan credit insurance | $500 |
IC 24-4.5-6-113(3) | Violations of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code | $5,000 |
IC 24-4.5-6-122(c) | Violation of statute, cease and desist order, or any condition imposed in writing by the director by directors, officers, or manager of a creditor | $7,500 |
IC 24-4.5-7-404(10) | Violations of limits and number of amounts of outstanding small loans, lender verification requirements, and third-party data base requirements | $50 |
IC 24-7-7-1(b) | Violations of the Rental Purchase Agreement Act | $5,000 |
IC 24-12-5-1 | Violations of the Civil Proceeding Advance Payment Act | $5,000 |
IC 28-29-13(b) | Violations of the Debt Management chapter | $5,000 |
IC 28-29-13(c) | Knowingly authorized, directs, or aids violations of the Debt Management chapter | $10,000 |
IC 28-7-5-38.1 | Violations of the Pawnbroking Law | $5,000 |
IC 28-4.1-1105 | Violations of Money Transmission Modernization Act | $5,000 |
IC 28-8-5-24(a) | Violations of the Check Cashing Act | $5,000 |
The amount of a civil penalty listed in the above table may be adjusted downward to reflect mitigating factors. Factors that may be considered are the following:
(1) The appropriateness of the civil penalty with respect to the financial resources and good faith of the person or individual charged.
(2) Existence of written policies governing the conduct.
(3) Cooperation with the Department in addressing the violation.
(4) The person's history of compliance
(5) Remedial or corrective action taken by the person.
(6) Whether the violation was voluntarily disclosed to the Department.
(7) Evidence of any restitution paid.
(8) Other factors that justice requires3.
The amount of civil penalty listed in the above table may be adjusted upward to reflect aggravating factors. Factors that may be considered are the following:
(1) The gravity of the practice, violation or act including:
a. Loss or risk of loss to the person;
b. Loss or risk of loss to consumers;
c. Impact other than loss;
d. Concealment; and
e. Number of violations at issue.
(2) Economic benefit derived by the person or individual from the practice, violation, or act.
(3) Willful or intentional misconduct.
(4) Duration and frequency of the violation.
(5) History of similar prior violations.
(6) Fraudulent conduct.
(7) Whether the violation negatively impacts the integrity or public trust of financial institutions in the state of Indiana.
(8) Other factors justice requires4.
3 This factor is a statutorily required factor for the violations of IC 24-4.4. In order to make the factors consistent so institutions are held to the same standards, it is being applied uniformly.
Nothing in the rule shall require the Department or Director to assess a civil penalty for a violation.
2) The civil penalties will be effective on July 1, 2024, after the department passes a rule. They will be in effect for the duration of the rule.
3) Only individuals and entities who have been found to violate the specific statute will be liable for the civil penalties.
There are no new fees or civil penalties as a result of the proposed rule. There are no modified fees or civil penalties as a result of the proposed rule. Rather, the proposed rule is a reflection of the Department's current assessment of fees and civil penalties. As mentioned previously, the revenue collected from assessing fees to regulated entities is the sole source of revenue for the Department. As a result, the primary benefit of adopting the fees and civil penalties pursuant to the requirements of HEA 1623 and IC 4-22-2-19.6 is that it will allow the Department to continue to fulfill its statutory obligations to supervise the financial industry in Indiana.
a. Estimate of Compliance Costs for Regulated Entities
The proposed rules do not impose additional compliance costs or requirements on regulated entities. As stated previously, the proposed rules simply adopt the Department's current fee schedule so there are no additional costs imposed on regulated entities.
b. Estimate of Administrative Expenses Imposed by the Rules
The proposed rules do not impose additional administrative expenses on regulated parties.
c. The fees, fines, and civil penalties analysis required by IC 4-22-2-19.6
Regarding the fees, pursuant to IC 4-22-2-19.6(c), the amounts of the proposed fees are based on the amount necessary to carry out the purposes for which the fees are imposed. First, the application fees are only applicable to entities that submit the specific application. Additionally, the department performed a calculation averaging the amount of time typically spent on each application multiplied by the labor cost to arrive at the application fee. Further, the application fees are based on the amount of work necessary to carry out the purpose of the fees and the proportionate cost and expense incurred by the department in making examinations and in the administration of financial institutions pursuant to IC 28-11-3-5.
Regarding the asset-based fees, IC 28-11-3-5(c) directs the department in determining costs to classify the assets of financial institutions and fix fees and different rates for the examination, supervision, regulation, and liquidation of the classes of assets, based on the proportionate cost and expense incurred by the department in making examinations and in the administration of financial institutions. The code further states that the fees may not exceed the comparative cost to the department in the administration of financial institutions. Annually, when setting fees, the Department's board members have considered the department's legislative appropriation, projected expenses, and the balance of the financial institutions' fund. The financial institutions' fund, which is the department's dedicated fund, must maintain a minimum four (4) months of reserves for accreditation purposes. It is common practice to require six (6) months reserves. The fees are reflective of the amount of labor involved in the supervision of Indiana's state-chartered financial institutions. This process works conjointly with the requirements of IC 4-22-4-19.6(c) that "fees be reasonably based on the amount necessary to carry out the purposes for which the fee is imposed."
To comply with IC 4-22-2-19.6(d), the department has created a list of civil penalties authorized in the portions of the Indiana code that it is charged with overseeing and has proposed a base penalty. Second, pursuant to IC 4-22-2-19.6(d)(1) it has proposed factors that may either increase or decrease the amount of the civil penalty. Included in the proposed factors are factors that are statutorily required, including the identical factors enumerated in IC 4-22-2-19.6(d).
Additionally, the department has included a provision that will not obligate it to issue a civil penalty. This provision is intended to allow the department to continue the practice of focusing on restitution of those consumers and borrowers who are harmed in lieu of the department receiving a civil penalty. As stated above, there are times when a violation warrants civil penalties, so adopting the proposed framework in an administrative rule will preserve the tool, but not impose any unnecessary civil penalties.
VII. Sources of Information
In making the above determinations, regarding its fees, the Department consulted its current fee schedules and conducted a financial analysis to project expected revenue based on the most recent data. Regarding civil penalties, the Department consulted state statute to derive a schedule of penalties and both mitigating and aggravating factors.
VIII. Regulatory Analysis
The proposed new rule complies with HEA 1623 and IC 4-22-2-19.6. While the proposed rule is new, the fees and civil penalties are not and have been assessed for numerous years throughout the Department's history. The proposed rule establishes the Department's current fee schedule and civil penalty practices in a rule as required by HEA 1623. As such, there are no new costs associated with the proposed new rule. If the fees are not promulgated into a rule pursuant to IC 4-22-2-19.6, then the Department will not be able to assess fees, its reserves will fall below the required reserves, and the supervision of Indiana's financial institutions will largely shift to the federal government. As a result, the primary benefit of the rule is to allow the Department to continue assessing fees, thereby allowing it to comply with statutory requirements to supervise the state's financial institutions using a regulatory model that has been time-tested and has resulted in a system producing sound financial supervision and a strong financial system in Indiana.
LSA Document #23-837
Notice of Determination Received: December 21, 2023
Posted: 01/03/2024 by Legislative Services Agency
DIN: 20240103-IR-750230837RAA
Composed: May 19,2024 1:42:25PM EDT
A PDF version of this document.
|