-IR- Database Guide
-IR- Database: Indiana Register

DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE
04-20100647P.LOF

Letter of Findings Number: 04-20100647P
Sales and Use Tax
For Tax Years 2007, 2008, and 2009


NOTICE: Under IC § 4-22-7-7, this document is required to be published in the Indiana Register and is effective on its date of publication. It shall remain in effect until the date it is superseded or deleted by the publication of a new document in the Indiana Register. The publication of this document will provide the general public with information about the Department's official position concerning a specific issue.
ISSUE
I. Tax Administration–Negligence Penalty.
Authority: IC § 6-8.1-10-2.1; 45 IAC 15-11-2.
Taxpayer requests that the Department exercise its discretion to abate the ten-percent negligence penalties for the 2007, 2008, and 2009 tax years.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
As the result of a Department sales and use tax audit, Taxpayer was assessed negligence penalties for not collecting and remitting sales tax on its sales to non-exempt customers, and for not paying sales or use tax on several of its own purchases. In a letter sent to the Department, Taxpayer requests that the Department abate the negligence penalties.
The Department sent a letter to Taxpayer stating that Taxpayer could request a hearing by replying to the letter within twenty (20) days of the letter. Taxpayer did not reply to the Department's letter. Due to Taxpayer's failure to reply, this Letter of Findings is written based on the information in Taxpayer's protest file and other Department records relating to Taxpayer.
DISCUSSION
I. Tax Administration–Negligence Penalty.
Taxpayer requests abatement of ten-percent negligence penalties added to delinquent payment assessments.
IC § 6-8.1-10-2.1 states:
(a) If a person:
(1) fails to file a return for any of the listed taxes;
(2) fails to pay the full amount of tax shown on the person's return on or before the due date for the return or payment;
(3) incurs, upon examination by the department, a deficiency that is due to negligence;
(4) fails to timely remit any tax held in trust for the state; or
(5) is required to make a payment by electronic funds transfer (as defined in IC 4-8.1-2-7), overnight courier, or personal delivery and the payment is not received by the department by the due date in funds acceptable to the department;
the person is subject to a penalty.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (g), the penalty described in subsection (a) is ten percent (10[percent]) of:
(1) the full amount of the tax due if the person failed to file the return;
(2) the amount of the tax not paid, if the person filed the return but failed to pay the full amount of the tax shown on the return;
(3) the amount of the tax held in trust that is not timely remitted;
(4) the amount of deficiency as finally determined by the department; or
(5) the amount of tax due if a person failed to make payment by electronic funds transfer, overnight courier, or personal delivery by the due date.
(c) For purposes of this section, the filing of a substantially blank or unsigned return does not constitute a return.
(d) If a person subject to the penalty imposed under this section can show that the failure to file a return, pay the full amount of tax shown on the person's return, timely remit tax held in trust, or pay the deficiency determined by the department was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, the department shall waive the penalty.
(e) A person who wishes to avoid the penalty imposed under this section must make an affirmative showing of all facts alleged as a reasonable cause for the person's failure to file the return, pay the amount of tax shown on the person's return, pay the deficiency, or timely remit tax held in trust, in a written statement containing a declaration that the statement is made under penalty of perjury. The statement must be filed with the return or payment within the time prescribed for protesting departmental assessments. A taxpayer may also avoid the penalty imposed under this section by obtaining a ruling from the department before the end of a particular tax period on the amount of tax due for that tax period.
The Department also refers to 45 IAC 15-11-2(b), which states:
"Negligence" on behalf of a taxpayer is defined as the failure to use such reasonable care, caution, or diligence as would be expected of an ordinary reasonable taxpayer. Negligence would result from a taxpayer's carelessness, thoughtlessness, disregard or inattention to duties placed upon the taxpayer by the Indiana Code or department regulations. Ignorance of the listed tax laws, rules and/or regulations is treated as negligence. Further, failure to read and follow instructions provided by the department is treated as negligence. Negligence shall be determined on a case by case basis according to the facts and circumstances of each taxpayer.
The Department may waive the negligence penalty as provided in 45 IAC 15-11-2(c), as follows:
The department shall waive the negligence penalty imposed under IC [§] 6-8.1-10-2.1 if the taxpayer affirmatively establishes that the failure to file a return, pay the full amount of tax due, timely remit tax held in trust, or pay a deficiency was due to reasonable cause and not due to negligence. In order to establish reasonable cause, the taxpayer must demonstrate that it exercised ordinary business care and prudence in carrying out or failing to carry out a duty giving rise to the penalty imposed under this section. Factors which may be considered in determining reasonable cause include, but are not limited to:
(1) the nature of the tax involved;
(2) judicial precedents set by Indiana courts;
(3) judicial precedents established in jurisdictions outside Indiana;
(4) published department instructions, information bulletins, letters of findings, rulings, letters of advice, etc.;
(5) previous audits or letters of findings concerning the issue and taxpayer involved in the penalty assessment.
Reasonable cause is a fact sensitive question and thus will be dealt with according to the particular facts and circumstances of each case.
Taxpayer maintains that due to significant growth, it had to hire a new controller who, as it turns out, was not familiar with Taxpayer's particular industry. Taxpayer further maintains that the items where sales or use tax was not paid by Taxpayer on items that it purchased were of an unusual nature, and that these were isolated incidents. Taxpayer also states that in another instance, it was not able to obtain an exemption certificate from a customer after the fact, due to the customer's recent death. Although Taxpayer has apparently made efforts to rectify these situations by reading up on the applicable law and changing its internal policies, Taxpayer still has not established that its failure to collect and remit sales tax or to pay sales or use tax on its own purchases was due to reasonable cause and not due to negligence, as required by 45 IAC 15-11-2.
FINDING
Taxpayer's request for abatement of negligence penalties is respectfully denied.

Posted: 05/25/2011 by Legislative Services Agency

DIN: 20110525-IR-045110296NRA
Composed: Apr 29,2024 10:19:33PM EDT
A PDF version of this document.