-IR- Database Guide
-IR- Database: Indiana Register

TITLE 820 STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY EXAMINERS

Economic Impact Statement
LSA Document #06-151


IC 4-22-2.1-5 Statement Concerning Rules Affecting Small Businesses
Estimated Number of Small Businesses Affected by Industry Sector Number:
NAICS 611511 Cosmetology Schools: 85
NAICS 812112 Beauty Salons: 8,143
NAICS 812113 Nail Salons: 830
NAICS 812199 Other Personal Services (tanning salons): 1,596
The types of small businesses most likely to be affected by the proposed rule are cosmetology schools, cosmetology salons, manicuring salons, esthetics salons, electrology salons, and tanning salons.

Estimated Administrative Costs Imposed on Small Businesses
The proposed rules do not impose any new reporting, record keeping, or other administrative costs on small businesses.

Estimated Total Annual Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The following figures are based upon the number of applications for licensure and renewal applications received in 2005*.

Applications for licensure  # applications  Current application fee  Proposed Application fee  Yearly Revenue  Proposed revenue  Difference 
School  $300  $300  $1,800  $1,800  $0 
Salons (all types except tanning salons)  823  $40  $40  $32,920  $32,920  $0 
Tanning salons  236  $200  $200  $47,200  $47,200  $0 

Applications for renewal  # applications  Current renewal fee  Proposed renewal fee  Yearly Revenue  Proposed revenue  Difference 
School  $400  $400  $0  $0 
Salons (all types except tanning salons)  1,256  $40  $40  $50,240  $50,240  $0 
Tanning salons  308  $200  $200  $61,600  $61,600  $0 

Justification of Requirements or Costs
Pursuant to IC 25-1-8-2, fees shall not be less than are required to pay all of the costs, both direct and indirect, of the operation of the cosmetology board. In 2005, the General Assembly enacted SEA 139 (P.L.194-2005) to give the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency and the boards, commissions, and committees it serves the authority to set fees by rule that had previously been set by statute. The proposed rule changes will not increase or decrease the number of small businesses already affected by the current regulations.

Consideration of Alternative Methods of Achieving the Purpose of the Proposed Rule
Since the rule provides no change in the amount of fees to be assessed to cosmetology schools, cosmetology salons, or tanning salons, the consideration of alternate compliance or reporting requirements or other operational standards was not appropriate. There are no new reporting or record keeping requirements for small businesses as a result of the proposed rule.

Explanation of Determination
The Board sought to set fees at the minimum levels needed in order to comply with IC 25-1-8-2.

Supporting Data, Studies, or Analyses
The agency used the following data (from 2004) in determining the fiscal impact of the rule:
The board conducted a comparison of fees assessed in surrounding states. The following states were surveyed: Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Not all of these states issue each type of license. For example, only four of the states surveyed require licensure for electrologists.
The current application fee for Indiana cosmetology schools is $400. The average application fee in the surveyed states is $510.50. The current renewal fee for cosmetology schools is $400 every four years or $100 per year. The average annual renewal fee in the surveyed states is $135.80.
The current application fee for Indiana cosmetology salons, manicuring salons, electrology salons, and esthetic salons is $40. The renewal fee for each of these business entities is $10 per year. The average application fee in the states surveyed is $56.44. The average annual renewal fee in the surveyed states is $30.90.

Posted: 08/09/2006 by Legislative Services Agency

DIN: 20060809-IR-820060151EIA
Composed: May 07,2024 9:38:52AM EDT
A PDF version of this document.