SEPTEMBER 1999 SITTING
OF THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT
SEPTEMBER 8
9:30 a.m. PAUL KENNER V. STATE OF INDIANA
The defendant in this case was charged with dealing and possession of marijuana. This interlocutory appeal raises questions about the admission of evidence seized after the defendant had initially been stopped for speeding. The case now comes before the Court from Marion Superior Court, and from the
Indiana Court of Appeals. See Kenner v. State, 703 N.E.2d 1122 (Ind.App.1999).Attorney for StateAttorney for Kenner John F. Crawford Indianapolis, IN
SEPTEMBER 14
1:15 p.m. EDWARD WILLIAMS V. STATE OF INDIANA
Attorneys for Williams
Danielle L. Gregory
Ann M. Skinner
Robert E. Lancaster
Office of Public Defender
Attorney for State
Rosemary L. Borek
Office of Attorney General
SEPTEMBER 14
2:25 p.m. LENHARDT TOOL & DIE CO., INC. V. DUANE LUMPE
After being injured in an industrial accident, Lumpe filed this product liability
lawsuit against Lenhardt Tool & Die. This appeal concerns the propriety of the trial
court's denial of Lenhardt's motion for summary judgment. The case comes before the
Court from the Marion Superior Court and from the Indiana Court of Appeals. See
Lenhardt Tool v. Lumpe, 703 N.E.2d 1079 (Ind.App. 1998).
Attorney for Lenhardt Tool & Die
Robert Anderson
Indianapolis, IN
Attorneys for Duane Lumpe
William L. O'Connor
Eric D. Johnson
Indianapolis, IN
SEPTEMBER 14
3:35 p.m. STATE OF INDIANA V. TIMOTHY DAVID LINCK
Linck was charged with possession of marijuana. The Howard Superior Court
granted Linck's motion to suppress his statements and the marijuana obtained from his
apartment because he was not first advised of his Miranda rights. This appeal
addresses the propriety of the trial court's granting of the motion to suppress and
dismissal. See State v. Linck, 708 N.E.2d (Ind. App. 1999).
Attorney for State
James A. Garrad
Office of Attorney General
Attorney for Linck
Mark A. Ryan
Kokomo, IN
SEPTEMBER 16
9:30 a.m. NICHOLE L. THOMPSON, ET AL V. JEFF OWENSBY, ET AL
Plaintiffs allege injury by a dog that broke away from its restraining cable. Their
complaint includes a count against an insurer who allegedly lost the cable. The insurer
moved to dismiss, asserting that Indiana does not recognize a claim for spoliation of
evidence. The Shelby Circuit Court granted the motion, but the Court of Appeals
reversed and remanded. See Thompson v. Owensby, 704 N.E.2d 134 (Ind. Ct. App.
1998).
Attorney for Thompson
Theodore Smith
Teresa Todd
Anderson, IN
Attorney for Owensby
Philip Linnemeier
Indianapolis, IN
SEPTEMBER 22 This argument will be held on the campus of
Indiana University -- Kokomo.
10:00 a.m. RONALD OMAN V. STATE OF INDIANA
The defendant is charged with operating a vehicle with a controlled substance in
his blood. This interlocutory appeal raises questions about the admission of evidence
relating to drug test results. The case comes before the Court from the Laporte
Superior Court and from the Indiana Court of Appeals.
See Oman v. State, 707 N.E.2d 325 (Ind. App. 1999).
Attorney for Oman
Attorney for State
James A. Garrard
Office of Attorney General
SEPTEMBER 27
9:30 a.m. STEPHENSON V. STATE OF INDIANA
Stephenson was convicted of murdering three people and was sentenced to
death by the Warrick Superior Court, the Honorable Edward A. Campbell. Stephenson
appeals his conviction and sentence.
Attorney for Stephenson
Janet S. Dowling
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Brent Westerfeld
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney for State
Michael A. Hurst
Office of Attorney General
o:\sept99.oa
Converted from WP6.1 by the Access Indiana Information Network