STATE OF
INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
) |
|
|
||||
COUNTY OF
MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|||||||
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No. 2016-24706-C |
|||
|
|
) |
|
||||
millennium agricultural services, LLC |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and Respondent desire to
settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue
of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and
Order. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry
into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any
violation contained herein. Respondent’s
entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense,
legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or
judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”)
of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of
the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent is Millennium Agricultural Services,
LLC (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the facility with Farm ID No. 604,
(“Approval”) located at 1819 N 230 W, in Frankfort, Clinton County, Indiana
(“Site”).
3.
IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the
subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice
of Violation (“NOV”) via Certified Mail to Matthew Neal, Registered Agent for
Millennium Agricultural Services, LLC.
5.
Respondent owns and operates a Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operation (“CAFO”) with fourteen production buildings, each with
a concrete pit beneath slatted floors for the storage of liquid manure from a total
of 6,000 finishing hogs.
6.
During an investigation including a spill
response on July 31, 2017 and an inspection on August 14, 2017, conducted by a
representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:
a.
Pursuant to 327 Indiana Administrative Code
(“IAC”) 2-1-6(a)(1), all surface waters at all times and at all places,
including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from
substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal,
industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges
that do any of the following:
(A)
will settle to form putrescent or otherwise
objectionable deposits;
(B)
are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or
deleterious;
(C)
produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or
other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;
(D)
are in concentrations or combinations that will
cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such degree as
to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses;
and
(E)
are in amounts sufficient to be acutely
toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals,
plants, or humans.
As noted during the spill response on
July 31, 2017, Respondent allowed manure to enter the unnamed creek at County
Road 200 N. The unnamed ditch discharges
in to the South Fork of Wildcat Creek, a water of the state. The discharge of manure was in an amount
sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious, that produced color, odor, or other
conditions in such a degree to create a nuisance and/or was in an amount to be
acutely toxic to, or otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, or other
animals, plants, or humans. The origin
of the spill was the Respondent’s manure management system located at the
Site. The discharge of the manure did
not cause any fish kill.
b.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 19-3-1(a), a Confined
Feeding Operation (“CFO”) shall be managed to avoid an unpermitted discharge
into waters of the state.
As noted during the spill response on
July 31, 2017 and an inspection on August 14, 2017, Respondent did not manage
the CFO in a manner to avoid an unpermitted discharge of manure into an unnamed
ditch that discharges in to the South Fork of Wildcat Creek, a water of the
state. Manure in a hog barn, identified
as building F1 at the Site, overflowed after insufficient storage and a water
line break caused a discharge to waters of the state.
c.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 19-3-1(d), all waste
management systems must be designed, constructed, and maintained to minimize
leaks and seepage and prevent manure releases or spills, as well as ensure
compliance with the water quality standards in 327 IAC 2.
As noted during the spill response on
July 31, 2017 and an inspection on August 14, 2017, Respondent’s hog barns
identified as F1 and F6, were not maintained to minimize leaks, seepage and
prevent manure releases or spills, as well as ensure compliance with water
quality standards in 327 IAC 2.
Specifically, manure in building F1 overflowed after insufficient
storage and a water line break in building F6 also caused a discharge. The discharge in building F6 did not reach
waters of the state. A broken pump out
port and the unmanaged storage in building F6 were also causing manure to leak
and seep from the containment structure.
d.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 19-13-1(b), management of
manure must be in compliance with this article, the CFO Approval, and all
applicable state and federal laws.
As noted during the spill response on
July 31, 2017 and an inspection on August 14, 2017, Respondent did not manage
the manure in compliance with 327 IAC 19 or the CFO Approval. Specifically, the manure in Respondent’s hog
barn identified as F1, overflowed after insufficient storage and a water line
break caused a discharge to waters of the state. Insufficient storage and a water line break
in building F6 also caused a discharge.
The discharge in building F6 did not reach waters of the state. A broken pump out port and the unmanaged
storage in building F6 were also causing manure to leak and seep from the
containment structure.
7.
In recognition of the settlement reached,
Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this
Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This Agreed Order shall be effective
(“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s
delegate, and has been received by Respondent.
This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective
Date.
2.
Respondent shall comply with the statutes,
rules, and/or Approval conditions listed in the findings above.
3.
Within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall comply with 327 IAC 19.
Specifically, Respondent shall bring all manure levels of the hog barns
to a manageable level and submit a plan describing the manure management
process going forward and the elimination of the potential for a spill to occur
in the future.
4.
Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall repair any pump out ports that have been broken, specifically
Respondent shall repair the pump out port noted during the August 14, 2017
inspection, on building F6.
5.
Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall submit documentation for the spill response implemented from
the spill noted in the August 14, 2017 inspection from building F6, as required
by 327 IAC 19-9-1(b)(9).
6.
Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall submit a Facility Change Notification describing the
construction, dimensions, and ongoing future maintenance of the constructed
berm that has been considered as part of the Supplemental Environmental Project
for this Agreed Order. The stabilization
of vegetation or alternative erosion control measures must be maintained to
allow for visual inspection and prevent growth of trees and shrubs.
7.
Respondent shall keep records of the use of
each tanker when used for emergency purposes at the Site, such as a water pipe
break that reduces the manure containment capacity, with the completed weekly
self-monitoring records.
8.
All submittals required by this Agreed Order,
unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
Trent Lindley, Enforcement Case
Manager |
Office of Land Quality |
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
9.
Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a
civil penalty of Fourteen Thousand Dollars ($14,000.00). Within thirty (30) days of the Effective date
of the Agreed Order, Respondent shall pay a portion of this penalty in the
amount of Two Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($2,800.00). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date; the 30th day being the “Due Date”. In lieu of payment of the remaining civil
penalty, Respondent shall perform and complete two Supplemental Environmental
Projects (“SEPs”). Respondent estimates
that the SEPs will cost a total of Eight-teen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars
($18,500.00). Within thirty (30) days of
the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit written notice and documentation to
IDEM which substantiates all actions taken and costs incurred with respect to
the two SEPs. In the event that the cost
of the SEPs are less than Eleven Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($11,200.00),
Respondent shall pay 100% of the difference between the actual cost of the SEPs
and the $11,200.00.
10.
As a Supplemental Environmental Project,
Respondent shall install a berm at the Site, which will require storm water to filter
and travel further over grass before possibly reaching waters of the
state. Construction of the berm started
on April 20, 2018. After
completion of the berm and a review of the Facility Change mentioned in
paragraph 6 above, the berm will be inspected by a representative of IDEM
before issuing a resolution of case letter.
11.
As a Supplemental Environmental Project,
Respondent has purchased two tanker trailers to be used in an emergency, such
as a water pipe break that reduces the manure containment capacity, creating an
option to avoid or when emergency land application of manure is not available.
12.
In the event the terms and conditions of the following
paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a
stipulated penalty in the following amount:
Paragraph |
Penalty |
Order Paragraph #’s 3, 4, 5, or 6 |
$100 per week late |
13.
Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable no
later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written notice
that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due; the 30th
day being the “Due Date”. Complainant
may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a
timely manner of stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s
right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking
additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated
penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against
Respondent for a violation of this Agreed Order; such additional relief
includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law,
including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
14.
Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by
check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number of this
action and shall be mailed to:
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
Office of Legal Counsel |
IGCN, Room N1307 |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204 |
15.
In the event that the monies due to IDEM
pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1. The interest shall be
computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent
pays any unpaid balance. Such interest
shall be payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be
payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 14, above.
16.
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding
upon Respondent and its successors and assigns.
Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are
fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or
partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or
responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
17.
In the event that any terms of this Agreed
Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force
and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not
contain the invalid terms.
18.
Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed
Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership
rights are transferred. Respondent shall
ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this
Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
19.
This Agreed Order is not
and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing
permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s
review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed
Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with
the requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State
law or regulation.
20.
Complainant does not, by
its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that
Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in
compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation.
Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held
liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of
Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
21.
Nothing in this Agreed
Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive
relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that
IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties
for the same violations specified in the NOV.
22.
This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until
IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||
Department of
Environmental Management |
|
||||
|
|
||||
By:
_________________________ |
By: _________________________ |
||||
|
Nancy
Johnston, Section Chief |
|
|||
|
Enforcement
Section |
Printed:
______________________ |
|||
Office of
Land Quality |
|
||||
|
Title:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
Date: __________________ |
Date:
_______________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
By:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Date:
______________________ |
||||
|
|||||
APPROVED AND
ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||
MANAGEMENT
THIS |
________ |
DAY
OF |
________________________, |
20__. |
|
|
|||||
|
For the
Commissioner: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
_Signed on
June 26, 2018____________ |
||||
|
Peggy Dorsey, Assistant Commissioner |
||||
|
Office of
Land Quality |
||||