STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

C & D TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2017-24434-A




 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.             Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.

 

2.             Respondent is C & D Technologies, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the stationary custom industrial battery manufacturing source with Plant ID No. 045-00008, located at 200 West Main Street, in Attica, Fountain County, Indiana (“Site”).

 

3.             IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.             Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) on September 21, 2017, via Certified Mail to:

Armand Lauzon, President & CEO

Corporation Service Co., Registered Agent

C & D Technologies, Inc.

135 North Pennsylvania Street

1400 Union Meeting Road

Suite 1610

Blue Bell, PA  19422

Indianapolis, IN 46204

 

5.             During an investigation on September 29, 2016, conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

a.       Pursuant to Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit (“FESOP”) 045-34583-00008, issued on August 15, 2014, condition D.1.15(b) as well as the requirement in previously issued permits, the Permittee shall record the water flow rate of the Sly Manufacturing scrubber (Stack 230) at least once per day.

Respondent intermittently monitored and/or recorded the water flow rate of the Sly Manufacturing scrubber since September 27, 2012, in violation of FESOP, condition D.1.15(b).

b.       Pursuant to FESOP, condition D.1.15(a), the Permittee shall record the pressure drop across the baghouses used in conjunction with the pasting, three process, and Central Vac operations, at least once per day when the pasting, three process and Central Vac processes are in operation.

Respondent intermittently recorded the pressure drop across the baghouses used in conjunction with the pasting, three process, and Central Vac operations, specifically the baghouses associated with stacks 232, 233, 231, and 247, since September 27, 2016, in violation of FESOP, condition D.1.15(a).

c.        Pursuant to FESOP, condition D.1.15(a) as well as the requirement in previously issued permits, the Permittee shall record the pressure drop across the baghouses used in conjunction with the pasting, three process, and Central Vac operations, at least once per day when the pasting, three process and Central Vac processes are in operation. When for any one reading, the pressure drop across a baghouse is outside the normal range, the Permittee shall take a reasonable response.

Respondent intermittently took corrective action for out of range pressure drop readings for baghouses used in conjunction with the pasting, three process, and Central Vac operations, since September 27, 2012, in violation of FESOP, condition D.1.15(a).

d.       Pursuant to FESOP, condition D.1.13, the particulate control device shall be in operation at all times when the associated facilities are in operation.

Pursuant to FESOP, condition D.1.11, a Preventative Maintenance Plan is required for facilities and any control devices.

During the inspection holes were observed in the ductwork for the Sly Manufacturing scrubber, impacting particulate control efficiency, in violation of FESOP, conditions D.1.13 and D.1.11.

e.       Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.372(7), as referenced by FESOP, condition D.1.2, no owner or operate subject to the provisions of this subpart shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility other than a lead reclamation facility any gases with greater than 0 percent opacity.

On November 13, 2015, Respondent reported a fire in the dust collection system exhausting to stack 195, resulting in opacity in excess of 0 percent, in violation of 40 CFR 60.372(7).

f.        Pursuant to FESOP, condition D.1.12, No later than two and one-half (2.5) years from the date of the most recent valid compliance demonstration of a group, the Permittee shall perform lead and opacity testing of one (1) of the stacks in each group as specified in the table.

Respondent was late in completing repeat stack testing within 2.5 years from the most recent compliance demonstration on nine different occasions within groups 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, in violation of FESOP, condition D.1.12.

g.       Pursuant to FESOP, condition C.17(b), a retest to demonstrate compliance shall be performed no later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the test.

Respondent failed to retest Stack 193 to demonstrate compliance, within 180 days of the test conducted on September 18, 2015, in violation of FESOP, condition C.17(b).

h        Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.11423(b)(2)(i), as referenced by FESOP, condition D.1.4, for any emissions point controlled by a fabric filter, you must perform semiannual inspections and maintenance to ensure proper performance of each fabric filter.  You must record the results of these inspections.

Respondent failed to conduct semiannual inspections of each affected fabric filter, in violation of 40 CFR 63.11423(b)(2)(i), as referenced by FESOP, condition D.1.4.

6.             Respondent updated its monitoring and recordkeeping program and has been monitoring and recording daily pressure drops and flow rates and documenting out of range readings for taking corrective actions, since October 2016.

 

7.             Respondent effected temporary repairs of the Sly Manufacturing scrubber duct in October 2016.

 

8.             Respondent had scheduled and completed stack tests in August 2017 to return to compliance with the 2.5 year schedule in groups 2 and 6.

9.             In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.             This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.             Respondent shall comply with Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit 045-34583-00008, unless superseded with a modification or renewal.

 

3.             Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit a permit application which accurately identifies and describes the equipment and control device(s) associated with Stack 247.

 

4.             Within fifteen (15) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit to IDEM an updated copy of the Dust Collector Activities spreadsheet, in Appendix A, detailing all observations requiring a response step.  The spreadsheet shall include a schedule indicating when all current issues identified requiring response steps will be completed.  Each issue shall be resolved no later than 90 days from the Effective Date.

 

5.             Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall conduct baghouse inspections on all fabric filter units.

 

6.             Within thirty (30) days of the inspection, referenced in paragraph 5 above, Respondent shall evaluate, repair and/or schedule repair of all issues discovered during the inspections.  No issues shall remain unaddressed for greater than 90 days of the Effective Date.

 

7.             Within ten (10) days of completing the evaluation, referenced in paragraph 6 above, Respondent shall report results to IDEM.

 

8.             Within ten (10) days of completing any repairs discovered in the inspections, referenced in paragraph 5 above, Respondent shall notify IDEM.

 

9.             All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Matthew Chaifetz, Compliance and Enforcement Manager

Compliance and Enforcement Branch – Mail Code 61-53

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

10.          Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Forty-Nine Thousand Dollars ($49,000).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.

 

11.          In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Paragraph

Violation

Stipulated Penalty

3

Fail to submit application modifying equipment/control device(s) associated with Stack 247.

$500/week or part thereof

4

Fail to submit schedule of corrective actions

$250/week or part thereof

5

Fail to conduct baghouse inspections

$500/week or part thereof

6

Fail to evaluate/repair/schedule repairs

$500/week or part thereof

7

Fail to report results to IDEM

$100/week or part thereof

8

Fail to report repairs completed

$100/week or part thereof

 

12.          Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable no later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.  Complainant may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due.  Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a timely manner of a stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.  Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against Respondent for a violation of this Agreed Order; such additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

13.          Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

IDEM Office of Legal Counsel

IGCN, Rm  N1307

100 N Senate Ave

Indianapolis, IN  46204

 

14.          This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and his/her/its successors and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

15.          In the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1.  The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance.  Such interest shall be payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 13, above.

 

16.          In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

17.          Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

18.          This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

19.          Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

20.          Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.

 

21.          Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

22.          This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.

 

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

C & D Technologies, Inc.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

David P. McIver, Chief

 

Printed:

 

 

Enforcement Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Air Quality

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 2018.

 

 

For the Commissioner

 

 

 

Signed on April 9, 2018

 

Keith Baugues, Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Air Quality

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management