STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

BEMIS COMPANY, INC,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2017-24324-A




 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.             Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.

 

2.             Respondent is Bemis Company, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the stationary polyethylene film plant including film production, printing, and converting operations with Plant I.D. No. 167-00033 located at 1350 North Fruitridge Ave in Terre Haute, Vigo County, Indiana (the “Site”).

 

3.             IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.             Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) on June 21, 2017via Certified Mail to:

William F. Austen, President

 

Corporation Service Company, Registered Agent

Bemis Company, Inc.

 

135 North Pennsylvania Street

PO Box 669

 

Suite 1610

Neenah, WI 54957

 

Indianapolis, IN 46204

 

5.             During an investigation, including an inspection on February 7, 2017, conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

a.       Pursuant to Part 70 Permit No. 167-34096-00033 (“Permit”), issued to Respondent on April 21, 2015, condition D.1.3(a), Cyrel, shall have a minimum capture efficiency of 100%.

Respondent failed to demonstrate one-hundred percent (100%) capture efficiency for the Cyrel plate making facility required by Permit condition D.1.7, in violation of Permit, condition D.1.7.

b.       Pursuant to Permit, condition D.1.14(a)(3), Permittee shall daily record the monitoring parameter value for each press and Cyrel, it shall include in its daily record when a pressure or fan amperage reading is not taken and the reason for the lack of a reading.

Respondent failed to record a daily monitoring parameter for the Cyrel plate making facility, in violation of Permit from December 2014 through February 2017, condition D.1.14(a)(3).

c.        Pursuant to Permit, condition D.1.14(a)(2), Permittee shall maintain records of the continuous combustion zone temperature for the oxidizers I13, I14, and I15 and the three (3) hour average combustion zone temperature used to demonstrate compliance during the most recent compliant performance test.  Permittee shall include in its daily record when a temperature reading is not taken and the reason for the lack of the temperature reading.

Respondent failed to maintain records of the continuous combustion zone temperature for the oxidizer I13 for 72 days between December 5, 2014 and February 9, 2017, in violation of Permit, condition D.1.14(a)(2).

d.       Pursuant to Permit, condition D.1.12(a), requires the Permittee to recalibrate differential pressure gages installed on the printing presses on an annual basis.

Respondent failed to annually recalibrate the differential pressure gages from 2014 through 2016, in violation of Permit, condition D.1.12(a).

e.       Pursuant to Permit, condition C.7(c), all test reports must be received by IDEM, OAQ not later than forty-five (45) days after the completion of the testing.

Respondent submitted stack testing reports for the six oxidizers, tested March 21-23, 2016, seventy-seven (77) days after the testing, in violation of Permit, condition C.7(c).

f.        Pursuant to Permit, condition E.2.2 and 40 CFR 63.6655(e), Respondent shall maintain records of the maintenance conducted on the stationary RICE in order to demonstrate that Respondent operated and maintained the stationary RICE and after-treatment control device (if any) according to your own maintenance plan.

Respondent did not have records immediately available for the emergency fire pump engine, in violation of Permit, condition E.2.2 and 40 CFR 63.6655(e).

6.             In order to demonstrate compliance with the 100% capture efficiency at the Cyrel plate making facility, Respondent conducted Method 204 testing on May 22, 2017.

 

7.             To insure a daily reading is taken, Respondent integrated the pressure differential monitoring for the Cyrel plate making facility into its Rockwell Monitoring and Logging system on May 22, 2017.

 

8.             Respondent reactivated logging for oxidizer I13 on February 8, 2016.  Respondent also upgraded its Rockwell Monitoring and Logging system to notify key personnel of the operational status daily.

 

9.             Respondent recalibrated gages on April 3, 2017, and incorporated recalibration into its Environmental Health and Safety calendar to scheduling future recalibration.

 

10.          Respondent located maintenance records and submitted to IDEM on April 7, 2017 and instituted a new record retention system for engine maintenance records

11.          In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.             This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.             Respondent shall comply with Part 70 Permit 167-34096-00033, unless superseded by a permit revision or renewal.

 

3.             All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Matthew Chaifetz, Compliance and Enforcement Manager

Compliance and Enforcement Branch – Mail Code 61-53

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

4.             Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Ten Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($10,600.00).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.

 

5.             Civil penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

IDEM Office of Legal Counsel

IGCN, Rm  N1307

100 N Senate Ave

Indianapolis, IN  46204

 

6.             This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and his/her/its successors and assigns.  Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter their status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

7.             In the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1.  The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance.  Such interest shall be payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 5, above.

 

8.             In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

9.             Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

10.          This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of their obligation to comply with the requirements of their applicable permit or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

11.          Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

12.          Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.

 

13.          Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

14.          This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.

 

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

Bemis Company, Inc.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

David P. McIver, Chief

 

Printed:

 

 

Enforcement Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Air Quality

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 2017.

 

 

For the Commissioner

 

 

 

Signed on August 24, 2017

 

Keith Baugues, Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Air Quality

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management