STATE OF
INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
) |
|
|
||||
COUNTY OF
MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|||||||
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No.
2013-21777-H |
|||
|
|
) |
|
||||
ARCELORMITTAL
INDIANA HARBOR LLC |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does
not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order
shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which
Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except
a proceeding to enforce this order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is the Commissioner
(“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”),
a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent is ArcelorMittal
Indiana Harbor LLC “Respondent”, which owns and/or operates a facility with
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ID No. IND 005462601
located at 3001 Dickey Road, in East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana (“Site”).
3.
IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and
the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a
Notice of Violation (NOV) on October 29, 2013 via Certified Mail to:
CT
Corporation System, Registered Agent |
Mr.
Kevin Lurtz, Environmental Engineer |
150
West Market Street, Suite 800 |
ArcelorMittal
LLC-Indiana Harbor West |
Indianapolis,
Indiana 46204 |
3001
Dickey Road, Station 001 |
|
East
Chicago, Indiana 46312 |
5. On November 14, 1980, Respondent
notified as a large quantity generator (LQG) of hazardous waste activities at
the Site.
6. Respondent produces flat rolled steel
products. Facility operations include blast
furnaces, basic oxygen furnaces, sinter plant, pickling, coating, and cold
rolling. Waste Chromic Acid
(D002/D007), Ladle Metallic Furnace Bag House Dust (D006/D007/D008/D010),
Wastewater Treatment Sludge (F006/F008), Universal Wastes, and Used Oil are the
primary waste streams generated at the facility.
7. 329 IAC 3.1 incorporates certain
federal hazardous waste management requirements found in 40 CFR 260 through
270, and Part 273 including these identified below.
8. During an investigation, including an inspection
on June 19, 2013, conducted by representatives of IDEM, the following
violations were found:
a. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.11, a person who
generates a solid waste must determine if that waste is hazardous.
As noted during inspection, Respondent
did not make a hazardous waste determination on Great Lakes Minerals Materials
in 2-cubic yard plastic yards stored outside west of the Roll-Off Storage Area.
Subsequent to the inspection,
Respondent conducted a proper waste determination on the Great Lakes Minerals Materials
and determined it to be non-hazardous.
b. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(i)
referencing 40 CFR 265.173(a), a container holding hazardous waste must always
be closed during storage, except when it is necessary to add or remove waste.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent did not store sixteen (16) 2-cubic yard plastic bags of LMF dust, a
D006/D007/D008/D010 hazardous waste, closed.
On November 5, 2013, IDEM conducted a
follow-up inspection and found all plastic bags of LMF dust closed.
c. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(i) referencing 40 CFR 265.174, a generator must inspect
areas where containers are stored, at least weekly, looking for leaks and
deterioration caused by corrosion or other factors.
As noted during the inspection, Respondent
failed to conduct weekly inspections of the LMF less than 90-day container
storage area located outside.
On November 5, 2013, IDEM conducted a
follow-up inspection and found Respondent conducting weekly inspections of the
LMF less than 90-day container storage area located outside.
d. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2), a
generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a
permit, provided that the date when the accumulation begins is clearly marked
and visible for inspection on each container.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent accumulated hazardous waste on-site, without a permit, and did not
mark eighty-two (82) 2-cubic yard plastic bags of LMF dust, a
D006/D007/D008/D010 hazardous waste, with accumulation start dates.
On November 5, 2013, IDEM conducted a
follow-up inspection and found all 2-cubic yard plastic bags of LMF dust marked
with accumulation start dates.
e. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(3), a
generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a
permit, provided that, while being accumulated on-site, each container and tank
is labeled or marked clearly hazardous waste containers with the words
“Hazardous Waste.”
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent accumulated hazardous waste on-site, without a permit, and did not
label or clearly mark seventy-one (71) 2-cubic yard plastic bags of LMF dust, a
D006/D007/D008/D010 hazardous waste, with the words “Hazardous Waste.”
On November 5, 2013, IDEM conducted a
follow-up inspection and found all 2-cubic yard plastic bags of LMF dust
labeled with the words “Hazardous Waste.”
f. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(4)
referencing 40 CFR 265.31, facilities must be maintained and operated to
minimize the possibility of a fire, explosion, or any unplanned sudden or
non-sudden release of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents to air,
soil, or surface water which could threaten human health or the environment.
As noted during the inspection,
Respondent failed to properly manage LMF dust, a D006/D007/D008/D010 hazardous
waste, in the LMF less than 90-day container storage area. Due to tears in the plastic bags, multiple
releases of LMF dust were observed in different areas of the LMF less than
90-day container storage area.
On November 5, 2013, IDEM conducted a
follow-up inspection and found all LMF dust release areas in the LMF less than
90-day container area properly cleaned up.
9. In recognition of the settlement
reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of
this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This Agreed Order shall be effective
(“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s
delegate, and has been received by Respondent.
This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective
Date.
2.
Respondent shall comply with statutes and
rules listed in the findings here at issue.
3. Upon the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 262.11.
Specifically, Respondent shall conduct adequate waste determinations on all
wastestreams at the facility.
4. Upon the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 265.173(a).
Specifically, Respondent shall keep containers holding hazardous waste
closed during storage, except when it is necessary to add or remove waste.
5. Upon the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 265.174.
Specifically, Respondent shall inspect areas where containers are stored,
at least weekly, looking for leaks and deterioration caused by corrosion or
other factors. Respondent shall maintain
copies of weekly inspection records on-site for period of one (1) year from the
Effective Date.
6. Upon the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2). Specifically, Respondent shall mark each
container holding hazardous waste with the accumulation start date.
7. Upon the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 262.34(a)(3). Specifically, Respondent shall label or clearly
mark each container holding hazardous waste with the words “Hazardous Waste.”
8. Upon the Effective Date, Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 265.31.
Specifically, Respondent shall minimize releases from bags of LMF dust
located in the LMF less than 90-day container storage area.
9. All submittals required by this Agreed
Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be
sent to:
Jennifer Reno, Enforcement Case
Manager |
Office of Land Quality – Mail Code
60-02L |
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
10. Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay
a civil penalty of sixteen thousand eight hundred dollars ($16,800). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date; the 30th day being the “Due Date”.
11. The civil penalty is payable by check to
the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”
Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed
to:
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
12. In the event that the monies due to IDEM
pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1. The interest shall be
computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date that Respondent
pays any unpaid balance. Such interest
shall be payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be
payable to IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 11, above.
13. This Agreed Order shall apply to and be
binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns. Respondent’s
signatories to this Agreed Order certify that he is fully authorized to execute
this Agreed Order and legally bind the party he represents. No change in ownership, corporate, or
partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter his status or
responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
14. In the event that any terms of this
Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full
force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order
did not contain the invalid terms.
15. Respondent shall provide a copy of this
Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership
rights are transferred. Respondent shall
ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this
Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
16. This
Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a
modification of an existing permit. This
Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent
pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its
obligation to comply with the requirements of his applicable permits or any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
17. Complainant
does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner
that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result
in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable
Federal or State law or regulation.
Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held
liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of
Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
18. Nothing in
this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or
injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.
19. Nothing in
this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from
communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters
relating to this enforcement action.
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with
the EPA or any other agency or entity.
20. This Agreed Order shall remain in effect
until Respondent complies with all terms and conditions of the Agreed Order. Thereafter, IDEM will issue a Resolution of
Case letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||
Department of Environmental
Management |
|
||||
|
|
||||
By: _________________________ |
By:
_________________________ |
||||
|
Nancy
Johnston, Section Chief |
|
|||
|
Enforcement
Section |
Printed: ______________________ |
|||
Office of
Land Quality |
|
||||
|
Title: ________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
Date: ______________________ |
Date: ________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
By: ________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Date: ______________________ |
||||
|
|||||
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||
MANAGEMENT
THIS |
______ |
DAY
OF |
________________________, |
20__. |
|
|
|||||
|
For the
Commissioner: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Signed on
5/1/14______ |
||||
|
Bruce H Palin |
||||
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
||||
|
Office of
Land Quality |
||||