STATE OF INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
) |
|
|
||||
COUNTY OF MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|||||||
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No. 2011-20438-H |
|||
|
|
) |
|
||||
pasquale
trucking company, inc., |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED
ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does
not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order
shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which
Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except
a proceeding to enforce this order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana
Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent
is Pasquale Trucking Company, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the
facility located at 960 West County Road 250 South, in Logansport, Cass County,
Indiana (“Site”).
3.
IDEM
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, on November 28, 2011, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”)
via Certified Mail to:
Mr. Tom Pasquale, President |
Mr. Tom Pasquale, Registered Agent |
Pasquale Trucking Company, Inc. |
Pasquale Trucking Company, Inc. |
4295 E. Penrod |
960 W. County Road 250 S |
Monticello, Indiana 47960 |
Logansport, Indiana 46947 |
5.
Respondent
operates a trucking logistics company.
6.
329
IAC 3.1 incorporates certain federal hazardous waste management requirements
found in 40 CFR Parts 260 through 270, and Part 273 including these identified
below.
7.
During
an investigation, including an inspection on September 1, 2011, conducted by a
representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:
a. Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”)
13-30-2-1(3), no person shall deposit any contaminants upon the land in a place
and manner that creates or would create a pollution hazard that violates or
would violate 329 IAC 10-4-2. Respondent
deposited contaminants, including, but not limited to used oil, upon the land
in a place and manner that that creates or would create a pollution hazard that
violates or would violate 329 IAC 10-4-2.
b. Pursuant to 329 Indiana Administrative Code
(“IAC”) 10-4-2, no person shall cause or allow the storage, containment,
processing, or disposal of solid waste in a manner which creates a threat to
human health or the environment, including the creating of a fire hazard,
vector attraction, air or water pollution, or other contamination. Respondent caused and/or allowed solid waste,
including, but not limited to used oil, to be
stored/disposed at the Site in a manner which creates a threat to human health
or the environment. Specifically, soil
contamination was documented at or near the two diesel fuel pumping stations,
the two used oil aboveground storage tanks and the used oil fifty-five gallon
horizontal tank located at the Site.
c. Pursuant to 329 IAC 13-4-3(e), upon
detection of a release of used oil to the environment, a generator must do the
following: stop the release; contain the release; clean up the release; and
report the spill if necessary.
Respondent failed to stop the release of used oil and failed to clean up
the used oil releases documented at the Site.
Specifically, the two used oil aboveground storage tanks and the used
oil fifty-five gallon horizontal tank were leaking and helped contribute to the
soil contamination at or near their location at the Site.
d. Pursuant to 329 IAC 13-4-3(c),
containers and aboveground tanks used to store used oil must be in good
condition and not leaking. Respondent's
two used oil aboveground storage tanks and the used oil fifty-five gallon
horizontal tank were not in good condition and were leaking.
e. Pursuant to 329 IAC 13-4-3(d),
generators must label all used oil containers and aboveground tanks with the
words “Used Oil.” Respondent did not
label two used oil aboveground storage tanks and the used oil fifty-five gallon
horizontal tank with the words “Used Oil.”
8. In recognition of the settlement
reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of
this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by
Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have
no force or effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent
shall comply with statutes and rules listed in the findings here and/or above
at issue.
3. Within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date of this Agreed Order, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a site
assessment plan. The purpose of the site
assessment plan shall be to conduct sampling and analysis in order to assess potential
contamination of different media (soil, ground water, and vapor) from the areas
of concern which includes those areas described in Finding of Fact No. 7.b.
and, if necessary, the nature and extent of contamination. The site assessment plan shall be based upon
the principles outlined in IDEM’s Remediation Closure Guide (RCG), dated March
22, 2012, which can be accessed at: http://www.IN.gov/idem/6683.htm. In addition, the site assessment shall:
a. Describe and evaluate all areas of
potential contamination in and around each area of concern.
b. Specify the method of determining the
number and location of samples to be taken to yield a representative assessment
of each media of concern. This method
shall be in accordance with Section 3, Conceptual Site Model of the RCG, to
address each media:
1. soil sampling,
pursuant to Sections 3 and 8 of the RCG; or
2. ground water
sampling, pursuant to Sections 3,4, and 9 of the RCG.
c. Specify how the soil samples will be
obtained and handled in order to minimize loss of volatile constituents. Respondent may composite samples of
non-volatiles (i.e., metals and semi-volatiles), but shall not composite
samples of volatiles, pursuant to Section 3.2.4 of the RCG.
d. Specify how the ground water samples,
pursuant to Section 3.3 of the RCG, will be obtained and describe the sampling
procedures.
e. Clearly define all sampling and
analytical protocols designed to identify hazardous waste or its constituents,
pursuant to 40 CFR 261, including Appendices I, II, III, and VIII. The site assessment plan shall include the
method of sample collection, pursuant to “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication SW-846. This includes, but is not limited to, sample
collection containers, preservatives, and holding times. Specify the analytical methods to be used and
the method’s reporting and detection limits.
f. Specify that chain-of-custody of the
samples shall be maintained and Quality Assurance and Quality Control (“QA/QC”)
procedures shall be followed, pursuant to Section 3.8 through 3.10 of the RCG
for all media.
g. Include within the site assessment plan
a supplemental contingent plan for determining the nature and extent of:
1. soil contamination, as specified
Sections 3 and 8 of the RCG, in the event that sampling and analysis indicates
soil contamination to exist above screening levels as specified in Table A-6 of
Appendix A of the RCG; and
2. ground water contamination in the event
that sampling and analysis indicates hazardous waste or its constituents are
detected in the ground water as specified in Sections 3, 4, and 9 of the RCG.
h. If soil or ground water contamination
is above screening levels, it is necessary to conduct a vapor intrusion
investigation. In regard to soil
contamination, professional judgment will dictate the necessity of a vapor
intrusion investigation.
i. Include within the site assessment
plan time frames for its implementation.
j. Be approved by IDEM prior to its
implementation.
4. Within fifteen
(15) days of receiving notice from IDEM of approval of the site assessment
plan, Respondent shall implement it as approved and in accordance with the
times frames contained therein.
5. Within fifteen (15) days of obtaining
the analytical results, Respondent shall submit said results, including
chain-of-custody information, and QA/QC records, pursuant to Section 3.8
through 3.10 of the RCG to IDEM.
6. Respondent shall submit within sixty
(60) days subsequent to the submittal of the analytical results, a remediation workplan which identifies potential contaminates,
potential receptors, and exposure pathways to IDEM for the purpose of
identifying all media contamination. The
remediation workplan shall:
a. In accordance with Section 7, Risk
Evaluation of the RCG, remediate each contaminated area to meet the remediation
objective(s). Remediation objectives
shall be one of the following:
1. screening
levels, pursuant to Table A-6 of Appendix A in the RCG; or
2. levels based
upon site specific risk assessment; or
3. levels based on site specific risk
assessment taking into account remedial measures that manage the risk and
controls completed and potential pathways; or
4. background
levels for inorganics, pursuant to the RCG, and/or
the analytical method’s estimated quantitation limits
(“EQLs”) for organics.
b. Include a sampling and analysis plan to
be performed after the remedial activities have been performed which verifies
that all contamination meets the remediation objective(s).
c. Include within the remediation workplan time frames of its implementation.
7. Within fifteen (15) days of approval by
IDEM of the remediation workplan, Respondent shall
implement the remedial action(s) within the plan as approved and in accordance
with the time frames contained therein.
8. Within thirty (30) days of completion
of the remedial action(s) conducted pursuant to the remediation workplan, Respondent shall submit to IDEM certification by
an independent registered professional engineer that the remedial action(s)
has/have been completed as outlined in the approved remediation workplan.
9. In the event IDEM determines that any
plan submitted by Respondent is deficient or otherwise unacceptable, Respondent
shall revise and resubmit the plan to IDEM in accordance with IDEM’s notice. After three (3) submissions of such plan by
Respondent, IDEM many modify and approve any such plan and Respondent must
implement the plan as modified by IDEM.
The approved plan shall be incorporated into this Agreed Order and shall
be deemed and enforceable part thereof.
10. All submittals required by this Agreed
Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be
sent to:
Linda L. McClure, Enforcement Case
Manager |
Office of Land Quality – Mail Code
60-02L |
Indiana Department of
Environmental Management |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
11. Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a
civil penalty of Sixteen Thousand Dollars ($16,000). Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of the
Agreed Order, Respondent shall pay a portion of this penalty in the amount of
Three Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($3,200).
Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental
Management Special Fund. In lieu of
payment of the remaining civil penalty, Respondent shall perform and complete a
Supplemental Environmental Project (“SEP”).
Respondent estimates that this SEP will cost over Sixteen Thousand
Dollars ($16,000). Within fifteen (15)
days of completing this SEP, Respondent shall submit written notice and
documentation to IDEM which substantiates all actions taken and costs incurred
with respect to the SEP. In the event
that the cost of the SEP is less than Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars
($12,800), Respondent shall pay the difference between the required cost of the
SEP ($12,800) and the actual cost of the SEP.
As a Supplemental Environmental
Project, Respondent shall construct a building to house waste oil tanks,
containers and other applicable equipment.
All filtering/draining of waste oil containers, tanks and other
applicable equipment will be conducted inside the building. A waste oil furnace may be installed if
feasible. Respondent shall complete the
SEP by no later than March 31, 2013.
Implementation of this SEP will move storage of waste oil containers,
tanks and other applicable equipment from storage outside in the elements to storage
inside an enclosed building. In
addition, adding and removing waste oil from the containers, tanks and other
applicable equipment will occur inside the building and not on an unpaved
surface.
12. Within fifteen (15) days of completing
this SEP, Respondent shall submit written notice and documentation to IDEM
which substantiates all actions taken and costs incurred with respect to the
SEP. In the event that the cost of the
SEP is less than Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($12,800), Respondent
shall pay the difference between the proposed cost of the SEP and the actual
cost of the SEP.
13. In the event that Respondent does not
complete the SEP by March 31, 2013, the full amount of the civil penalty as
stated in paragraph 14 above, plus interest established by IC 24-4.6-1-101 on
the remaining amount, less the portion of the civil penalty Respondent has
already paid, will be due within fifteen (15) days from Respondent's receipt of
IDEM’s notice to pay. Interest, at the
rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101, shall be calculated on the amount due from
the date which is thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this Agreed
Order until the full civil penalty is paid.
14.
In
the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated,
Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the
following amount:
Order # |
Requirement |
Penalty |
3 |
Failure to submit
Site Assessment Plan as required. |
$250 per week |
4 |
Failure
to implement Site Assessment Plan. |
$500 per week |
9 |
Failure
to submit a revised Site Assessment |
$250 per week |
|
Plan/Remediation
Workplan, if required, within the given time
period. |
|
15.
Stipulated
penalties shall be due and payable no later than the 30th day after
Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated
penalty is due; the 30th day being the “Due Date”. Complainant may notify Respondent at any time
that a stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a
timely manner of stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s
right to collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking
additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated
penalties shall preclude Complainant from seeking additional relief against Respondent
for a violation of this Agreed Order; such additional relief includes any
remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not
limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
16.
Civil
and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management
Special Fund.” Checks shall include the
Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
Indiana Department of
Environmental Management |
Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
17.
In
the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not
paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid
balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1.
The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until
the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. Such interest shall be payable to the
Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner
specified in Paragraph 11, above.
18.
This
Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors
and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to
this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed
Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or
partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities
under this Agreed Order.
19.
In
the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
20.
Respondent
shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent
owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
21.
This Agreed Order is not and shall not be
interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or
approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order,
shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the
requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State law
or regulation.
22.
Complainant does not, by its approval of this
Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with
any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions
of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or
regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone
acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties
Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this
Agreed Order.
23.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or
limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and
hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations
specified in the NOV.
24.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any
other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement
action. IDEM or anyone acting on its
behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur
as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.
25.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case
letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||
Department of
Environmental Management |
|
||||
|
|
||||
By:
_________________________ |
By: _________________________ |
||||
|
Nancy
Johnston, Section Chief |
|
|||
|
Enforcement
Section |
Printed:
______________________ |
|||
Office of
Land Quality |
|
||||
|
Title: ________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
Date: __________________ |
Date:
_______________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
By:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
Date:
_______________________ |
Date:
______________________ |
||||
|
|||||
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||
MANAGEMENT THIS |
_______ |
DAY OF |
_________________, |
20__. |
|
|
|||||
|
For
the Commissioner: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Signed
6/12/12 |
||||
|
Bruce H Palin |
||||
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
||||
|
Office
of Land Quality |
||||