STATE OF INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
) |
|
|
||||
COUNTY OF MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|||||||
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No. 2010-19298-H |
|||
|
|
) |
|
||||
nimet Industries,
Inc., |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED
ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does
not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order
shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which
Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except
a proceeding to enforce this order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana
Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent
is Nimet Industries, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns
and operates the facility with United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) ID No.IND005462890, located at 2424 North Foundation Drive, in South
Bend, St. Joseph County, Indiana (“Site”).
3.
IDEM
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) via Certified Mail to:
Mr. James S. Abbott, President and
Registered Agent |
Nimet Industries, Inc. |
2424 North Foundation Drive |
South Bend, Indiana 46628 |
5.
Respondent
notified EPA of Large Quantity Generator activities on June 11, 2010.
6.
Respondent
offers proprietary anodizing and electroless nickel
finishes to various industries.
7.
329
IAC 3.1 incorporates certain federal hazardous waste management requirements
found in 40 CFR Parts 260 through 270, and Part 273 including these identified
below.
8.
During
an investigation, including an inspection on June 2, 2010, conducted by a
representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:
a. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.11, a person who
generates a solid waste must determine if that waste is hazardous. Respondent did not make a hazardous waste determination
on two (2) fifty-five gallon containers located in the Chemical Storage Area, a
solid waste generated by Respondent, and on the still bottoms generated from
the distillation of Methyl Ethyl Ketone (“MEK”), a solid waste generated by Respondent.
Respondent completed the
required hazardous waste determination on June 16, 2010.
b. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.12(c), a
generator must not offer its hazardous waste to transporters or to treatment,
storage, or disposal facilities that have not received an EPA identification
number. Respondent sent its hazardous
waste to a disposal facility that did not have an EPA identification
number. Specifically, Respondent sent
still bottoms, a hazardous waste, to a disposal facility without an EPA identification
number.
Respondent
discontinued this method of disposal on June 16, 2010.
c. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.20, a generator
who transports, or offers for transportation, hazardous waste for offsite
treatment, storage, or disposal, must prepare a manifest. A generator must designate on the manifest
one facility which is permitted to handle the waste described on the
manifest. A generator may designate an
alternate facility to handle his waste in the event that an emergency prevents
delivery of the waste to the primary designated facility. Respondent offered hazardous waste for
transportation for offsite treatment, storage, or disposal without preparing a
manifest. Specifically, Respondent
allowed MEK distillation still bottoms to be transported off-site without
generating a manifest.
Respondent
discontinued this method of transportation on June 16, 2010.
d. Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(12), a person
may not cause or allow the transportation of a hazardous waste without a
manifest if a manifest is required by law.
Respondent caused or allowed the transportation of a hazardous waste
(MEK distillation still bottoms) without a manifest as required by law.
Respondent began
using manifests as required on June 16, 2010.
e. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2), a
generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a
permit, provided that the date when the accumulation begins is clearly marked
and visible for inspection on each container.
Respondent accumulated hazardous waste on-site, without a permit, and
did not mark hazardous waste containers with accumulation start dates. Specifically, one (1) two hundred and fifty
gallon tote and one (1) fifty-five gallon container were not marked with an
accumulation start date.
Respondent marked the
containers as required June 8, 2010.
f. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(3), a
generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a
permit, provided that, while being accumulated on-site, each container and tank
is labeled or marked clearly with the words "Hazardous Waste."
Respondent
accumulated hazardous waste on-site, without a permit, and did not label or
clearly mark a hazardous waste container with the words "Hazardous
Waste." Specifically, one (1)
fifty-five gallon container was not marked with the words "Hazardous
Waste.”
Respondent marked the
containers as required June 8, 2010.
g. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(4) referencing 40 CFR 265.51, a generator must have a
contingency plan for the facility. Respondent
did not have a contingency plan.
Respondent submitted
a Contingency Plan on August 2, 2010.
h. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(4)
referencing 40 CFR 265.16(a), (b), & (c), facility personnel must complete
a program of classroom instruction or on-the-job training that teaches them to
perform their duties in compliance with the hazardous waste management
rules. Employees must be trained within
six months after their date of hire and must take part in an annual review of
the initial training. Respondent did not
provide employees with initial and/or annual hazardous waste training.
Respondent completed
required training on or before July 9, 2010.
i. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(c)(1)(ii), a
generator may accumulate as much as 55 gallons of hazardous waste in containers
at or near the point of generation without a permit and without complying with
40 CFR 262.34(a), provided that the containers are marked with either the words
"Hazardous Waste" or with other words describing the contents. Respondent accumulated hazardous waste in
containers at or near the point of generation without a permit and did not
properly mark satellite accumulation containers with either the words
“Hazardous Waste” or with other words describing the contents. Specifically, one (1) thirty gallon container
was not marked as required.
Respondent marked the
containers as required June 8, 2010.
j. Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(c)(1)(i)
referencing 40 CFR 265.173(a), a container holding hazardous waste must always
be closed during storage, except when it is necessary to add or remove waste. Respondent did not store two (2) containers
of hazardous waste closed. Specifically,
one (1) fifty-five gallon container and one (1) thirty gallon container were
not stored closed.
Respondent closed
containers on June 2, 2010.
k. Pursuant to 40 CFR 268.7(a), with the
initial shipment of waste to each treatment, storage, or disposal facility, a
generator must send a one-time written notice to each facility receiving the
waste and place a copy in the file. Respondent
failed to provide the one-time written notice and place a copy in the file.
Respondent completed a one-time
written notice and placed a copy to file on June 22, 2010.
9. In recognition of the settlement
reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of
this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by
Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have
no force or effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent
shall comply with 40 CFR 262.11; 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2); 40 CFR 262.34(a)(3); 40
CFR 262.34(a)(4) referencing 40 CFR 265.16(a), (b), & (c); 40 CFR
262.34(c)(1)(ii); IC 13-30-2-1(12); 40 CFR 262.20; 40 CFR 268.7(a) and 40 CFR
262.34(c)(1)(i) referencing 40 CFR 265.173(a) and 40
CFR 262.34(a)(4) referencing 40 CFR 265.51.
3.
Respondent
is assessed a civil penalty of Thirty One Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty
Dollars ($31,840). Said penalty amount
shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.
In the event that the civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days
of the Effective Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at
the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.
The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in
full.
4.
Civil
penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special
Fund.” Checks shall include the Case
Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
Indiana Department of
Environmental Management |
Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
5.
This
Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors
and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to
this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed
Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership
status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities
under this Agreed Order.
6.
In
the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
7.
Respondent
shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent
owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.
Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing
work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
8.
This Agreed Order is not and shall not be
interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or
approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order,
shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the
requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State law
or regulation.
9.
Complainant does not, by its approval of this
Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with
any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions
of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or
regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone
acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties
Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this
Agreed Order.
10.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or
limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any
applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and
hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations
specified in the NOV.
11.
Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent
IDEM, or anyone acting on its behalf, from communicating with the EPA or any
other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement
action. IDEM or anyone acting on its
behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur
as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.
12.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case
letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||||
Department of Environmental
Management |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
By: _________________________ |
By:
_________________________ |
||||||
|
Nancy
Johnston, Section Chief |
|
|||||
|
Enforcement
Section |
Printed: ______________________ |
|||||
Office of
Land Quality |
|
||||||
|
Title: ________________________ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
Date: __________________ |
Date: _______________________ |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: |
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||||
For the Department of Environmental
Management |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
By: ________________________ |
By: ________________________ |
||||||
|
Deputy Attorney General |
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Date: _______________________ |
Date: ______________________ |
||||||
|
|||||||
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||
MANAGEMENT THIS |
_________ |
DAY OF |
_________________, |
20__. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
For
the Commissioner: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Signed
12/2/2010 |
||||||
|
Bruce H Palin |
||||||
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
||||||
|
Office
of Land Quality |
||||||