STATE OF INDIANA

)

SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF

 

)

 

 

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT

)

 

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Complainant,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

v.

 

)

Case No. 2010-19297-H(a)

 

 

 

 

UNITED TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Respondent.

 

)

 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.            Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.

 

2.          Respondent is United Transportation Group, Inc., which owns and/or operates a facility with U.S. EPA I.D. 981960313, located at 1150 E. 145th St. in East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana (the “Site”).

 

3.          Respondent operates a semi-trailer and rail car cleaning and repair service at the Site.  Respondent services five (5) to seven (7) rail cars and/or semi-trailers per day.

 

4.         Respondent notified the U.S. EPA of Large Quantity Generator hazardous waste activities on October 16, 1992.  Respondent also conducts transfer facility activities at the Site.

 

5.         Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued an amended Notice of Violation ("NOV") via Certified Mail on November 18, 2010, to:

 

Michael Pellin, President and Registered Agent

United Transportation Group, Inc.

1150 E. 145th St.

East Chicago, IN  46312

 

6.         329 IAC 3.1 incorporates certain federal hazardous waste management requirements found in 40 CFR Parts 260 through 270, and Part 273 including these identified below.

 

7.         During an investigation including an inspection on May 11, 2010, conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

a.            Pursuant to 40 CFR 270.1(c), a permit is required for the treatment, storage and disposal of any hazardous waste as identified or listed in 40 CFR Part 261.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent stored mineral spirits (later determined to be a hazardous waste identified or listed in 40 CFR Part 261) without a permit.  Respondent accepted a non-RCRA empty per 40 CFR 261.7 railcar containing greater than three (3) percent by weight of the total capacity of the railcar on or around December 8, 2009.   Respondent provided information to IDEM contending that the mineral spirits from the railcar were represented to the Respondent as a customer owned product and re-containerized into eight (8) drums on or around December 18, 2009.  Six (6) of these drums were transported off-site by the customer accompanied by a hazardous waste manifest on April 28, 2010, and two (2) of these drums were transported off-site by the customer accompanied by a hazardous waste manifest on June 22, 2010.  The mineral spirits which had been redesignated by the customer as hazardous wastes had been stored at the pad area for greater than ten (10) days at a transfer facility, thereby subjecting the facility to regulation under the applicable requirements of 40 CFR Parts 264, 265, 268, and 270 for a storage facility.

 

On July 25, 2011, Respondent’s consultant provided information to IDEM stating that Respondent had held discussions with the customer who was the original generator/transporter of the wastes noted above in this finding of fact.  Based on these discussions, any heel removed from rail cars which previously contained manifested waste are now being sent with a manifest listing Respondent as the 2nd transporter of customer owned waste.  This occurs even for RCRA empty cars.  In all cases where the cars are not RCRA empty, the waste is removed from Respondent’s site within ten (10) days of receipt.

 

b.            Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(10), a person may not commence or engage in the operation of a hazardous waste facility without having first obtained a permit from the department.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent stored two drums of customer owned mineral spirits which were later determined to be hazardous waste, for greater than 10 days, and therefore operated a hazardous waste facility without having first obtained a permit from the department.

 

c.         Pursuant to 329 IAC 3.1-1-10, every hazardous waste generator, transporter, or owner or operator of a hazardous waste facility shall notify the commissioner of its hazardous waste activity on the approved forms.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to notify the Commissioner of hazardous waste storage activities prior to storing two drums of customer owned mineral spirits, which were later determined to be hazardous waste, for greater than 10 days.

 

d.            Pursuant to 40 CFR 264, the owner or operator of a hazardous waste facility must follow all applicable requirements of 40 CFR 264.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent stored two drums of customer owned mineral spirits which were later determined to be hazardous waste on-site and did not follow the applicable requirements of 40 CFR 264.

 

e.         Pursuant to 40 CFR 264.73, the owner or operator of a hazardous waste facility must keep a written operating record at the facility.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent stored two drums of customer owned mineral spirits which were later determined to be hazardous waste on-site.  Respondent did not present its written operating record at the facility.

 

f.          Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.11, a person who generates a solid waste must determine if that waste is hazardous.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent did not make hazardous waste determinations on many drums of Sodium Hydrosulfide which were located on and off the pad.  At the time of the inspection, Respondent did not provide adequate documentation of the drums' contents, and some of the drums were unlabeled.  An exact number of drums requiring waste determinations was unable to be determined because of a lack of aisle space.

 

g.         Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2), a generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a permit, provided that the date when the accumulation begins is clearly marked and visible for inspection on each container.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent accumulated Sodium Hydrosulfide on-site, without a permit, and did not mark Sodium Hydrosulfide containers with accumulation start dates.  Thirty four (34) 55-gallon drums, located off of the pad area, did not have accumulation start dates placed on them because Respondent contends that at the time of the inspection the material was intended for recycling as a saleable product.

 

h.         Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(3), a generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a permit, provided that, while being accumulated on-site, each container and tank is labeled or marked clearly with the words "Hazardous Waste."

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent accumulated Sodium Hydrosulfide on-site, without a permit, and did not label or clearly mark all Sodium Hydrosulfide containers with the words "Hazardous Waste."  Thirty-four (34) 55-gallon drums, located off of the pad area, and approximately two hundred and seventy (270) 55-gallon drums, located on the pad area, were not labeled with the words "Hazardous Waste" because Respondent contends that at the time of the inspection the material was intended for recycling as a saleable product.

 

i.          Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(i) referencing 40 CFR 265.174, a generator must  inspect areas where containers are stored, at least weekly, looking for leaks and deterioration caused by corrosion or other factors.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to conduct weekly inspections of the pad area where approximately two hundred and seventy (270) drums of Sodium Hydrosulfide were located.

 

j.          Pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(a)(4) referencing 40 CFR 265.35, a generator must maintain aisle space to allow the unobstructed movement of personnel, fire protection, equipment, spill control equipment, and decontamination equipment to any area of facility operation in an emergency.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent failed to provide the required aisle space at the pad area where approximately two hundred and seventy (270) drums of Sodium Hydrosulfide were located.

 

k.        Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(3), no person shall deposit any contaminants upon the land in a place and manner that creates or would create a pollution hazard that violates or would violate 329 IAC 10-4-2.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent deposited contaminants, including, but not limited to, waste animal fats, greases, and oils, upon the land in a place and manner that that creates or would create a pollution hazard that violates or would violate 329 IAC 10-4-2.  A roll-off located on the west side of the property had its materials spilled on all sides of the container and was leaking upon the land.

l.          Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-4-2, no person shall cause or allow the storage, containment, processing, or disposal of solid waste in a manner which creates a threat to human health or the environment, including the creating of a fire hazard, vector attraction, air or water pollution, or other contamination.

 

As noted during the inspection, Respondent caused or allowed the disposal of solid waste in a manner which creates a threat to human health or the environment, including the creating of a fire hazard, vector attraction, air or water pollution, or other contamination.  A roll-off located on the west side of the property had its materials spilled on all sides of the container and was leaking waste animal fats, greases, and/or oils into the environment.

 

8.         No claim is being made by IDEM that Respondent knowingly committed violations as described in Findings 7a. thru 7e. above.

 

9.         In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.            This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.         Upon the Effective Date, while operating as a transfer facility, Respondent shall cease the storage of hazardous waste at the Site for greater than ten (10) days without first obtaining a permit from IDEM.  Any hazardous wastes generated by Respondent shall be removed from the Site within ninety (90) days of generation.

 

3.         Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit three (3) hard copies and one complete copy of the entire document on CD, in PDF format no greater than 100 megabytes per file, of a hazardous waste closure plan for the pad area where the drums which are the subject of Finding 7 a. above and which contained waste mineral spirits were stored to IDEM for approval.  This closure plan shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 264 Subpart G, as incorporated by 329 IAC 3.1-9-1.

 

4.         Within ten (10) days of notice of IDEM’s approval of the closure plan, Respondent shall implement the plan as approved and in accordance with the time frames contained therein.

 

5.         Upon the Effective Date, Respondent shall ensure compliance with 40 CFR 262.11.  Specifically, Respondent shall ensure that a hazardous waste determination is made on all solid wastes generated at the Site.

 

6.          Upon the Effective Date, Respondent shall ensure compliance with 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2).  Specifically, Respondent shall ensure that the date when the accumulation begins is clearly marked and visible for inspection on each container accumulating hazardous waste.

 

7.         Upon the Effective Date, Respondent shall ensure compliance with 40 CFR 262.34(a)(3).  Specifically, Respondent shall ensure that, while being accumulated on-site, each container holding hazardous waste is labeled or marked clearly with the words "Hazardous Waste."

 

8.          Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall comply with 40 CFR 265.174.  Specifically, Respondent shall conduct at least weekly inspections of all areas where containers are stored.  Respondent shall submit documentation of such to IDEM on a monthly basis for a one-year period from the Effective Date.

 

9.          Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall comply with 40 CFR 265.35.  Specifically, Respondent shall provide aisle space at all areas where containers of hazardous waste are stored in order to allow the unobstructed movement of personnel, fire protection, equipment, spill control equipment, and decontamination equipment to any area of facility operation in an emergency.  Respondent shall store fifty-five (55) gallon drums or similar containers in rows that are no more than two (2) drums high and two (2) drums wide.  Respondent shall submit documentation of such to IDEM on a monthly basis for a one-year period from the Effective Date.

 

10.       Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall, for the area impacted as a result of Finding 7 k. and l. above, remove all visible contamination and perform confirmatory sampling demonstrating that any contamination from the waste animal fats, greases, and oils has been adequately removed.  Within one hundred twenty (120) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit to IDEM for approval documentation of the work performed, including sampling results, demonstrating that any contamination which occurred as a result of Finding 7 k. and l. above has been adequately removed.

 

11.       In the event IDEM determines that any plan submitted by Respondent is deficient or otherwise unacceptable, Respondent shall revise and resubmit the plan to IDEM in accordance with IDEM's notice.  After three (3) submissions of such plan by Respondent, IDEM may modify and approve any such plan and Respondent must implement the plan as modified by IDEM.  The approved plan shall be incorporated into this Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part thereof.

 

12.       All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Brenda Lepter, Enforcement Case Manager

Office of Land Quality – Mail Code 60-02L

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

13.       Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Thirty Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($30,950).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.  In the event that the civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

14.       In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Failure to comply with Order Requirement No. 3

$1,000 per week

 

 

Failure to comply with Order Requirement No. 4

$1,000 per week

 

 

Failure to comply with Order Requirement No. 8

$500 per week

 

 

Failure to comply with Order Requirement No. 9

$500 per week

 

 

Failure to comply with Order Requirement No. 10

$500 per week

 

 

Failure to comply with Order Requirement No. 11

$500 per week

 

15.       Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due.  Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties shall not preclude Complainant from seeking any additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.  In lieu of any of the stipulated penalties set out above, Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of Respondent’s violation of this Agreed Order or Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

16.       Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

17.       This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns.  Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

18.       In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

19.       Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

20.       This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permit(s) or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

21.       Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

22.       Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.

 

23.       Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

24.       This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.

 


TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By: _________________________

By:  _________________________

 

Nancy Johnston, Section Chief

 

 

Enforcement Section

Printed: ______________________

Office of Land Quality

 

 

Title: ________________________

 

 

Date: __________________

Date: _______________________

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

For the Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By: ________________________

By: ________________________

 

Deputy Attorney General

 

 

 

Date: _______________________

Date: ______________________

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

_________

DAY OF

________________________,

20___.

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on April 5, 2012

 

Bruce H Palin

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Land Quality