STATE OF INDIANA

)

SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF

 

)

 

 

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT

)

 

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Complainant,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

 

v.

 

)

Case Nos. 2008-18179-H

 

 

)

2009-18525-H

lehigh cement company,

 

)

 

 

 

)

 

Respondent.

 

)

 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent’s entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this Order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  Respondent is Lehigh Cement Company (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the company with United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ID No. IND006054183 and Solid Waste Facility Permit No. 47-05 and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. IN0001775, located at 180 N. Meridian Road in Mitchell, Lawrence County, Indiana (“Site”).

 

3.                  IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued  Notices of Violation (NOVs) via Certified Mail on January 12, 2009 and June 12, 2009 to:

 

James Kitzmiller, President & CEO

 

Scott Quaas, Environmental Manager

Lehigh Cement Company

 

Lehigh Cement Company

8505 Freeport Parkway

 

121 North 1st Street

Irving, Texas 75063

 

Mitchell, Indiana 47446

 

 

 

CT Corporation System, Registered Agent

 

 

251 E. Ohio Street, Suite 1100

 

 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 

 

 

5.         IDEM granted Respondent’s Solid Waste Renewal Facility Permit No. 47-05 for a Restricted Waste Site Type 1 on June 26, 2007.

 

6.         During an investigation, including inspections on September 30, 2008 and March 26, 2009 conducted by a representative of IDEM, the following violations were found:

 

a.        Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-28-10(a) and Permit Condition D1, solid waste must not be deposited in standing or ponded water.  Respondent deposited solid waste directly into standing liquid on the landfill in Cell No. 2.

 

b.        Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-28-10(b) and Permit Conditions A3, A4, D1, D7 and D8, non-municipal solid waste landfills must divert surface water from the active fill area and must minimize surface water contact with solid waste.  Respondent failed to properly maintain its sedimentation basin drainage ditches which resulted in surface water contacting the solid waste landfill.

 

c.         Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-28-15(a) and Permit Conditions A3, A4, D1, D7 and D8, any leachate on the surface of the restricted waste site must be immediately managed or controlled to prevent off-site migration.  Respondent did not manage or control leachate which was migrating from the active cell into the clean surface water drainage ditch, sediment basin and into the unlined future Cell No.3.

 

d.        Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-28-16 and Permit Conditions A4 and D1, any discharge or disposal of collected leachate must be in accordance with all applicable laws and rules.  Respondent allowed collected leachate to be discharged from the active cell into the clean surface water drainage ditch, sediment basin and into the unlined future Cell No.3 in violation of applicable laws and rules.

 

e.        Pursuant to 329 IAC 10-28-20 and Permit Conditions A3, A4 and D1, leachate collection systems must be operated in such a manner as to comply with the design standards and plans.  Respondent failed to operate the leachate collection system as described in the Permit.  Respondent’s leachate collection pumps were not functional and the leachate basin was not being maintained and used to collect leachate.

 

f.          Pursuant to Permit Condition D15, the volume of the leachate generated shall be submitted to IDEM on an annual basis.  Respondent submitted annual leachate reports to IDEM which indicated the volume of leachate removed from the landfill and not the volume generated at the Site.

 

g.        Pursuant to Permit Condition D12, Respondent shall not cause a discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States, including wetlands, that violates the Clean Water Act, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the NPDES.  Respondent caused a discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States that violated the requirements of the NPDES Permit for the facility.  Respondent reported discharges which exceeded the NPDES discharge limits for chlorides, copper, pH and/or selenium at Outfall No. 005 in March, April and July of 2008.

 

7.         Respondent provided documentation to IDEM on October 7, 2008 that the sediment basin drainage ditches had been repaired to prevent leachate from going beyond the active cell.

 

8.         Respondent has not reported NPDES violations for chlorides, copper, pH or selenium from Outfall 005 since July, 2008.

 

9.         On July 15, 2009, Respondent collected and sampled storm water from its sedimentation basin for pH, total suspended solids, oil and grease, arsenic, cadmium, selenium, silver, chloride, fluoride, sulfate, and copper.  All samples were below Respondent’s Outfall 005 NPDES effluent limitations.

 

10.      On July 17, 2009, Respondent submitted a request to IDEM’s NPDES Section requesting a modification to allow Respondent to utilize more leachate from its restricted waste site in its non-contact cooling water system which discharges to Outfall 001.

 

11.        On October 1, 2009, representatives of IDEM inspected Respondent’s facility and noted that Respondent established a berm and storm water conveyances to redirect storm water away from the east portion of Cells 2 and 3 of the restricted waste site.

 

12.      Respondent has repaired and/or replaced leachate collection system components and has made its leachate collection system and leachate collection basin operable.

 

13.      In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  Respondent shall comply with rules and/or permit conditions listed in the findings here and/or above at issue.

 

3.         Respondent shall comply with 329 IAC 10-28-10(a) and Permit Condition D1.  Specifically, Respondent shall not deposit solid waste in standing or ponded water except for that water resulting from precipitation directly upon the working face of the restricted waste site.

 

4.         Respondent shall comply with Permit Conditions A3, A4, D7 and D8.  Specifically, Respondent shall maintain their sediment basin drainage ditches to prevent surface water from contacting the restricted waste site.

 

5.         Respondent shall comply with 329 IAC 10-28-15(a) and Permit Conditions A3, A4, D1, D7 and D8.  Specifically, Respondent shall manage or control leachate on the surface of the restricted waste site to prevent off-site migration.

 

6.         Respondent shall comply with 329 IAC 10-28-16 and Permit Conditions A4 and D1.

(a)       Specifically, Respondent shall discharge and/or dispose of 8,400 to 8,500 gallons of the collected leachate contained in the restricted waste site on each Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday occurring between March 16th and November 14th with the exception of federal holidays (subject to the force majeure provisions of paragraph 15 which would include but is not limited to excessive precipitation or other severe weather events) until such time as either:

(1)       all the collected leachate has been removed from the restricted waste site;or

(2)       until

 

IDEM issues a modified NPDES Permit which removes the restriction on the amount of leachate that can be utilized as non-contact cooling water, but otherwise retains approval for Respondent to supplement its non-contact cooling water supply with the leachate.

 

(b)       Upon the effective date of the above-described NPDES permit modification, Respondent shall have one-hundred and eighty (180) days (subject to the force majeure provisions of paragraph 15 which would include but is not limited to excessive precipitation or other severe weather events) to dispose of the collected leachate contained in its restricted waste site.  “Day” for purpose of this Order paragraph (6)(b) is defined as week days (Monday through Friday) occurring between March 16th  through November 14th.

 

IDEM will not consider Respondent’s inability to comply with this paragraph due to a pump malfunction/failure to be a violation of this Agreed Order as long as Respondent notifies the Enforcement Case Manager within a reasonable time from discovery of the malfunction/failure and Respondent remedies the malfunction/failure as soon as practicable.

 

7.         Respondent shall comply with 329 IAC 10-28-20 and Permit Conditions A3, A4 and D1.  Specifically, Respondent shall operate the leachate collection system as described in the Permit.

 

8.         Respondent shall comply with Permit Condition D15.  Specifically, Respondent shall continue to submit to IDEM the volume of the leachate generated that is removed from the restricted waste site and either sent to a wastewater treatment plant, other leachate disposal facility, or otherwise reused or disposed of on an annual basis.

 

9.                 Respondent shall comply with Permit Condition D12.  Specifically, Respondent shall not discharge pollutants into the waters of the United States, including wetlands, that violate the Clean Water Act, including but not limited to, the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).

 

10.      All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Sherri Bass, Enforcement Case Manager

Office of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

11.      Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Seven Thousand Dollars ($7,000).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date.  In the event that the civil penalty is not paid within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

12.      In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Paragraph

Penalty

Order # 6

$500 per week or part thereof

 

13.      Civil and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

14.      This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

15.      Force majeure, for purposes of this Agreed Order, is defined as any event arising from causes totally beyond the control and without fault of Respondent that delays or prevents the performance of any obligation under this Agreed Order despite Respondent’s best efforts to fulfill the obligation.  The requirement that Respondent exercise “best efforts to fulfill the obligation” includes using best efforts to anticipate any potential force majeure event and best efforts to address the effects of any potential force majeure event (1) as it is occurring and (2) following the potential force majeure event, such that the delay is minimized to the greatest extent possible.  Force majeure does not include (1) changed business or economic conditions; (2) financial inability to complete the work required by this Agreed Order; or (3) increases in costs to perform the work.

 

            Respondent shall notify IDEM by calling the case manager within three (3) calendar days and by writing no later than seven (7) calendar days after it has knowledge of any event which Respondent contends is a force majeure.  Such notification shall describe (1) the anticipated length of the delay; (2) the cause or causes of the delay; (3) the measures taken or to be taken by Respondent to minimize the delay; and (4) the timetable by which these measures will be implemented.  Respondent shall include with any notice all available documentation supporting its claim that the delay was attributable to a force majeure.  Failure to comply with the above requirements shall preclude Respondent from asserting any claim of force majeure for that event. Respondent shall have the burden of demonstrating that the event is a force majeure.  The decision of whether an event is a force majeure shall be made by IDEM.

 

            If a delay is attributable to a force majeure, IDEM shall extend, in writing, the time period for performance under this Agreed Order, by the amount of time that is directly attributable to the event constituting the force majeure.

 

16.      In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

17.      Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.   Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

18.      This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

19.        Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

20.      Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOVs.

 

21.      Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM, or anyone acting on its behalf, from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

22.      This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent complies with the terms of Order Paragraphs 6, 11, and 12.  IDEM will issue a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent thereafter.

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By: _________________________

By:  _________________________

 

Nancy Johnston, Section Chief

 

 

Enforcement

Printed: ______________________

 

 

 

Title: ________________________

 

 

Date: __________________

Date: _______________________

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

For the Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By: ________________________

 

 

Deputy Attorney General

 

 

 

Date: _______________________

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

____

DAY OF

________________

, 2010.

 

 

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed February 23, 2010

 

Bruce H Palin

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Land Quality