STATE OF |
) |
|
BEFORE THE INDIANA
DEPARTMENT |
||
|
|||||
COMMISSIONER OF THE
DEPARTMENT Complainant, v. DARAMIC, LLC, Respondent. |
) |
|
|||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and Respondent
desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of
any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of
Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed
Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.
Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any
defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future
administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this
order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is
the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of
2.
Respondent is
Daramic, LLC (“Respondent”), which owns and operates a stationary battery
separator manufacturing facility with Plant I.D. No. 061-00012 located at 3430
Cline Road in Corydon, Harrison County, Indiana (the “Site”).
3.
IDEM has
jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC
13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) on October 31, 2007 via
Certified Mail to:
Frank Nasisi, President |
Corporation Service Company |
Daramic, LLC |
Registered Agent for Daramic, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Based on a Deviation
Occurrence Report submitted on October 19, 2006, the following violations were
found:
a. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition D.2.5, daily visible emission notations of
the five (5) silos, four (4) day bins, and two (2) transporters stack exhausts
shall be performed once per day during normal daylight operations when
exhausting to the atmosphere. A trained employee shall record whether emissions
are normal or abnormal.
Source failed to perform and record daily visible emissions for the silica transporter
identified as unit 3.1, since September 7, 1999, in violation of Part 70 Permit
No. 061-5983-00012, condition D.2.5.
b. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition D.2.6, the Permittee shall record the
total static pressure drops across the bin filters used in conjunction with the
five (5) silos, four (4) day bins, and two (2) transporters, at least once
weekly when the five (5) silos, four (4) day bins, and two (2) transporters are
in operation when venting to the atmosphere.
Source failed to perform weekly parametric monitoring on the bin filters from silos
transporters or day bins identified units 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 3.1, 7.1,
7.2, 5.1, 6.1, and 6.2, since September 7, 1999, in violation of Part 70 Permit
No. 061-5983-00012, condition D.2.6.
Source installed an automatic pressure monitoring
system to track pressure drop on equipment.
c. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition D.2.8, to document compliance with
condition D.2.5 and D.2.6, the Permittee shall maintain records in accordance
with Section C - General Record Keeping Requirements, of the permit.
Source failed to maintain records for the visual and parametric requirements
since September 7, 1999, in violation of Part 70 Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition
D.2.8.
d. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-12134-00012, condition D.6.2 and condition B.12(a)(2), a Preventive
Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan,
of this permit, is required for this facility and its control device.
Source failed to include required quarterly checks in the Preventative
Maintenance Plan for the control device, for the Dilute Phase Transporter
identified as unit 13 since May 1, 2000, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.
061-12134-00012, condition D.6.2.
Source submitted a Preventative Maintenance Plan on
February 22, 2008.
e. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-12134-00012, condition D.6.5, an inspection shall be performed
of the control devices at least once each calendar quarter.
Source failed to perform quarterly checks on the control device, for the Dilute
Phase Transporter identified as unit 13 since May 1, 2000, in violation of Part
70 Permit No. 061-12134-00012, condition D.6.5.
f. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-12134-00012, condition D.6.6, to document compliance, the
Permittee shall maintain a log of operation and preventive maintenance logs
(including work purchases orders), and those additional inspections prescribed
by the Preventative Maintenance Plan.
Source failed to maintain records of quarterly inspections for the Dilute Phase
Transporter identified as unit 13 since May 1, 2000, in violation of Part 70
Permit No. 061-12134-00012, condition D.6.6.
g. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-18443-00012, condition D.7.2 and condition B.12(a)(2), a Preventive
Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan,
of this permit, is required for these facilities and its control devices.
Source failed to include required quarterly checks in the Preventative
Maintenance Plan for the control device, for the day bins identified as units
F01.1, F01.2, F05.1, and F05.2, since February 20, 2004, in violation of Part
70 Permit No. 061-12134-00012, condition D.7.2.
Source submitted a Preventative Maintenance Plan on February 22, 2008.
h. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-18443-00012, condition D.7.4, visible emission notations of the
F01.1, F01.2, F05.1 and F05.2 baghouse stack exhausts shall be performed once
per shift during normal daylight operations when exhausting to the atmosphere.
Source failed to perform daily visible emission notations for the units
identified as F05.1 and F05.2 since February 20, 2004, in violation of Part 70
Permit No. 061-18443-00012, condition D.7.4.
i. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-18443-00012, condition D.7.5, the Permittee shall record the
total static pressure drop across each of the baghouses identified as, F01.1,
F01.2, F05.1, and F05.2 at least once per shift when the systems are in
operation.
Source failed to perform daily parametric monitoring on the baghouses
identified as F01.1, F01.2, F05.1, and F05.2 since February 20, 2004, in
violation of Part 70 Permit No. 061-18443-00012.
Source installed an automatic pressure monitoring
system to track pressure drop on equipment.
j. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-18443-00012, condition D.7.6, an inspection shall be performed
each calendar quarter of all bags controlling weigh bin lines 3 and 4.
Source failed to perform quarterly checks on the control device, for the baghouses identified as units F01.1, F01.2, F05.1, and
F05.2 since February 20, 2004, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.
061-18443-00012, condition D.7.6.
k. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-18443-00012, condition D.7.8, to document compliance with Condition
D.7.4, the Permittee shall maintain records of daily visible emission
notations, daily total static pressure drop during normal operation, and the
quarterly inspections of the bags for the baghouses identified as F05.1, F01.1,
F05.2, and F01.2.
Source failed to maintain records of daily visible emission notations, daily
total static pressure drop or quarterly inspections of the bags for the
baghouses identified as F05.1, F01.1, F05.2, and F01.2 since February 20, 2004,
in violation of Part 70 Permit No. 061-18443-00012, condition D.7.8.
Source installed an automatic pressure monitoring
system to track pressure drop on equipment.
l. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition B.11, the Permittee shall annually submit
a compliance certification report which addresses the status of the source’s
compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this permit, including
emission limitations, standards, or work practices. The certification shall
cover the time period from January 1 to December 31 of the previous year, and
shall be submitted in letter form no later than July 1 of each year.
Source failed to submit accurate Annual Compliance Certifications for each year
since July 1, 2000, in violation of Part 70 Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition
B.11.
Source
submitted revised Annual Compliance Certifications.
m. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition C.11, the Permittee shall be responsible
for installing any necessary equipment and initiating any required monitoring
related to that equipment, no more than ninety (90) days after receipt of this
permit.
Source failed to install necessary equipment or initiate required monitoring
within ninety (90) days after issuance of applicable permit, in violation of
Part 70 Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition C.11.
n. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition C.17(a), the Permittee is required to
implement a compliance monitoring plan to ensure that reasonable information is
available to evaluate its continuous compliance with applicable requirements.
Source failed to implement a compliance monitoring plan to ensure continuous
compliance with applicable requirements, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.
061-5983-00012, condition C.17.
o. Pursuant to Part 70 Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition
C.17(a), a Compliance Response Plan (CRP) for each compliance monitoring
condition of this permit. CRP’s shall be submitted to IDEM, OAM (now OAQ) upon
request and shall be subject to review and approval by IDEM, OAM. The CRP shall
be prepared within ninety (90) days after issuance of this permit by the
Permittee and maintained on site.
Respondent did not have a CRP for each compliance monitoring condition of Part
70 permit No. 061-5983-00012, in violation of Part 70 Permit No.
061-5983-00012, condition C.17(a).
p. Pursuant to Part 70
Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition C.22, to affirm that the source has met
all the compliance monitoring requirements stated in this permit the source
shall submit a Semi-Annual Compliance Monitoring Report. Any deviation from the
requirements and the date(s) of each deviation must be reported.
Respondent failed to submit accurate Semi-Annual Compliance Monitoring Reports
since 1999, in violation of Part 70 Permit No. 061-5983-00012, condition C.22.
Source
submitted revised Semi-Annual Compliance monitoring reports.
7.
In recognition
of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and
judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II.
ORDER
1.
This Agreed
Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant
or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent shall
comply with the Part 70 Permit Renewal No. 061-18304-00012, unless superseded
by subsequent modifications or approvals.
3.
All submittals
required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in
writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
Matthew
Chaifetz, Enforcement Case Manager |
Office
of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02 |
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
4.
Respondent is
assessed a civil penalty of One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable
to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date. In the event that the
civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall
continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
5.
Civil penalties
are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number of this
action and shall be mailed to:
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
Cashier
– Mail Code 50-10C |
|
|
6.
This Agreed
Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns.
Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed
Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and
legally bind the party they represent.
No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall
in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
7.
In the event
that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining
terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced
as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
8.
Respondent shall
provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or
successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
9.
This Agreed
Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of
an existing permit. This Agreed Order,
and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to
this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to
comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation.
10.
Complainant does
not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that
Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in
compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation. Additionally,
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or
penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply
with this Agreed Order.
11.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or
injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.
12.
Nothing in this
Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from
communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters
relating to this enforcement action.
IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with
the EPA or any other agency or entity.
13.
This Agreed
Order shall remain in effect until IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to
Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
|
RESPONDENT: |
|||||
Department of Environmental Management |
|
Daramic, LLC |
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
Craig Henry |
|
Printed: |
|
|||
|
Chief, Air Section |
|
Title: |
|
|||
|
Office of Enforcement |
|
|
|
|||
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: |
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
|||||
For the Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Deputy Attorney General |
|
|
|
|||
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||
MANAGEMENT THIS |
|
DAY
OF |
|
, 2008. |
|||
|
|||||||
|
For the Commissioner: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Signed on April 23, 2008 |
||||||
|
Robert B. Keene |
||||||
|
Assistant Commissioner |
||||||
|
Office of Legal Counsel and Enforcement |
||||||