STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC.,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2007-16895-W




 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

Complainant and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.         Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of the State of Indiana created by Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-13-1-1.

 

2.         Respondent is Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns and/or operates a steam electric generating plant located on West Road, Terre Haute, Vigo County, Indiana (the “Site”), and is authorized by NPDES Permit Number IN 0002810 (the "Permit") to discharge cooling water discharge from Outfall 001, and ash pond effluent from Outfall 002, into receiving waters named the Wabash River in accordance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES Permit.

 

3.         IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.         Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation on July 27, 2007 via Certified Mail to:

 

Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.

Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.

Kay E. Pashos, President

CT Corporation System, Registered Agent

139 E. Fourth Street

251 E. Ohio Street, Suite 1100

Cincinnati, OH  45202

Indianapolis, IN  46204

 

5.         Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1, a person may not discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment in any form that causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of Indiana; or cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters; any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under sections IC 13-18-4-1 and IC 13-18-4-3.

 

Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the state as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid NPDES permit obtained prior to the discharge.

 

Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-8(1) and Part II.A.1 of the Permit, Respondent is required to comply with all terms and conditions of its NPDES Permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and IC 13 and is grounds for enforcement action.

 

Pursuant to Part I.A of the Permit, Respondent is required to comply with the effluent limitations contained in the Permit that are applicable to the discharges from Outfalls 001 and 002.  The discharge shall not contain oil or other substances in amounts sufficient to create a visible film or sheen on the receiving waters.

 

Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6, all waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges that are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious or that produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance.

 

An investigation conducted by Indiana Department of Natural Resources ("IDNR") and IDEM staff, and related documents, including Incident Reports for Incident Numbers 2007-02-070 and 2007-02-129, indicate that a spill of petroleum product from the Site of such quantity as to cause a visible sheen upon the Wabash River occurred on February 11 and 12, 2007, with residual discharge causing visible sheen upon the waters on February 13, 23, 24, 2007, in violation of IC 13-30-2-1, IC 13-18-4-5, 327 IAC 5-2-2, 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), Part II.A.1 of the Permit, and Part I.A of the Permit.

 

Respondent estimates that a release of approximately 38 gallons of oil occurred to the Wabash River from the hydrogen seal oil cooler for Unit No. 2 of the Wabash River Station commencing on February 11, 2007 and continuing intermittently for a few subsequent days.  Respondent began checks of plant equipment for possible oil leaks on February 11, 2007, and confirmed that the source of the sheen on the river was Unit 2 of the Wabash River Station on February 12, 2007 and that unit was taken off line at approximately 7:00 PM that day.  The resultant oil sheen, while extending 3 to 4 miles downstream, was very thin and as such the impact on the water quality of the river and the resultant public nuisance was limited.

 

6.         Pursuant to Part II.C.4 of the Permit, Respondent shall report information on any noncompliance which may pose a significant danger to human health or the environment within 24 hours from the time Respondent becomes aware of such noncompliance, and a written submission shall also be provided within 5 days.

 

Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-5, spills of petroleum of such quantity as to cause a sheen upon the waters must be reported.

 

Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, any person who operates, controls, or maintains any mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the state, do the following:

 

A.        contain the spill, if possible, to prevent additional spilled material from entering the waters of the state.

B.        undertake or cause others to undertake activities needed to accomplish a spill response.

C.        as soon as possible, but within two hours of discovery, communicate a spill report to the Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response at 1-888-233-7745.

D.        submit to the Department of Environmental Management a written copy of the spill report, if requested in writing by the department.

E.        except from modes of transportation other than pipelines, exercise due diligence and document attempts to notify the following:

i.          for spills to surface water that cause damage, the nearest affected downstream water user located within ten miles of the spill and in the state of Indiana; and

ii.         for spills to soil outside the facility boundary, the affected property owner or owners, operator or operators, or occupant or occupants.

 

Pursuant to Part II.A.3 of the Permit, Respondent is required to take all reasonable steps to minimize or correct any adverse impact on the environment resulting from noncompliance with the Permit.

 

The investigation by IDNR and IDEM staff indicted that after the petroleum product release and oil sheen was discovered by IDNR and IDEM staff and communicated to Respondent on February 11, 2007, Respondent failed to take timely action to contain the spill, failed to undertake timely spill response, failed to timely communicate a spill report to IDEM, and failed to take all reasonable steps to minimize or correct any adverse impact on the environment resulting from the noncompliance with the Permit, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-5, 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, and Part II.A.3 of the Permit.

 

Respondent's personnel placed absorbent booms across #3/4 intakes and #5/6 intakes within 4 to 5 hours of notification of the sheen by IDNR, which was before sample results confirmed the Wabash River Station was the source of the sheen, and skirt booms were placed across the discharge by Respondent's emergency response contractor within 8 hours of notification of the sheen by IDNR.  For safety reasons, it was not feasible to install downriver booms during the dark and dangerous river conditions prevailing on the evening of February 11, 2007, however Respondent's emergency response contractor installed downriver booms the next morning.

 

After confirmation that the source of the sheen was turbine oil from the Wabash River Station, Respondent removed Unit 2 from service as promptly as possible and a leak in No. 2 hydrogen seal oil cooler was identified at 10:30 PM.  Respondent verified the clean river status of the Wabash River on February 13, 2007.

 

Respondent has indicated that it did not make an oral spill report to IDEM on February 11, 2007 concerning the sheen since IDEM's Office of Emergency Response staff had already received information about the sheen and suspected release from IDNR before IDNR contacted Duke and consequently, it would have been superfluous for Respondent to re-contact IDEM's Office of Emergency Response and repeat the same information.  Respondent kept IDEM apprised from that point on with information concerning the spill response.  Respondent did notify the National Response Center of the sheen and suspected release on February 11, 2007, before sample results confirmed that Respondent's Wabash River Station was the source.

 

Respondent took actions to respond to the release and to minimize or correct any adverse impacts, and has made plans to replace the hydrogen seal oil coolers for Units 2, 3, 4, and 5 as a precautionary measure to minimize any potential for future leaks from this equipment.  Respondent communicated at a August 22, 2007 meeting with IDEM staff that it believes that the corrective actions that it has already taken, its existing facility monitoring, and its implementation of its Spill Prevention Plan, are sufficient to prevent future releases of oil from its hydrogen seal oil cooler for its turbine generators at the Wabash River Station.

 

Respondent's October 12, 2007 submittal indicated that it had been performing daily visual inspections of the discharge from Outfall 001 since February 12, 2007, and no further evidence of a release of oil or oily substances has been found (other than the release of residual oils from impacted soils at the intakes on February 23, 2007), which the Respondent indicated confirms the effectiveness of the repairs to the hydrogen seal oil cooler for Unit 2 at the Wabash River Station.

 

7.         In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.         This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s delegate, and has been received by Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.         Respondent shall comply with IC 13-30-2-1, IC 13-18-4-5, 327 IAC 5-2-2, 327 IAC 5-2-8(1), Part II.A.1 of the Permit, Part I.A of the Permit, 327 IAC 2-6.1-5, 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, and Part II.A.3 of the Permit.

 

3.         Beginning on the Effective Date, and continuing until Respondent has completed replacing the hydrogen seal oil coolers for Units 2, 3, 4, and 5 as a precautionary measure to minimize any potential for future leaks from this equipment, Respondent shall inspect Outfall 001 and Outfall 002 at least once per day to determine if the discharge contains oil or other substances in amounts sufficient to create a visible film or sheen on the receiving waters.  If an inspection indicates an oil sheen, Respondent shall do further investigation and take a sample to determine if turbine oil is in the discharge.  Respondent shall document its inspections by recording the following:

 

A.        the date and time of the inspection;

B.        the name of the person(s) conducting the inspection;

C.        the outfall location inspected;

D.        the appearance of the discharge and receiving waters, specifically noting whether a discharge is creating a visible film or sheen on the receiving waters; and

E.        the remedial measures taken in the event that discharge is causing a visible film or sheen on the receiving waters.

 

Respondent shall retain copies of the required documentation of the inspections and samples if taken and shall allow IDEM representatives to inspect and copy these records upon request. Respondent will notify IDEM in writing within 15 days of its completion of the replacement of the hydrogen seal oil coolers for Units 2, 3, 4, and 5.

 

4.         Respondent shall fully implement its Spill Prevention Plan and at all times maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all facilities and systems for wastewater collection and treatment which are installed or used by Respondent and which are necessary for achieving compliance with the terms and conditions of the Permit in accordance with Part II.B.1 of the Permit and 327 IAC 5-2-8.

 

5.         All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:

 

Terry Ressler, Enforcement Case Manager

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Office of Enforcement – Mail Code 60-02

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

6.         Respondent shall reimburse the IDEM for the sample costs incurred during its investigation (Invoice Nos. 1343068 and 1341898 for sample nos. LQ4050, LQ4051, LQ4052, and LQ4053).  IDEM has determined this figure to be $1,600.  Payment shall be made to the IDEM Laboratory Contracts Account No. 3610 10110, within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Order, and sent to the address in Order Paragraph 10.

 

7.         Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($9,500).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.  In the event that the civil penalty is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

8.         In the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:

 

Paragraph

Violation

Stipulated Penalty

3

Failure to inspect the Outfalls at least once per day, failure to document the inspections as required, and/or failure to retain and allow access to these records upon request.

$1,000 per violation

3

Failure to notify IDEM in writing within 15 days of its completion of the replacement of the hydrogen seal oil coolers for Units 2, 3, 4, and 5.

$100 per day

 

9.         Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after Respondent receives written notice that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due.  Assessment and payment of stipulated penalties shall not preclude Complainant from seeking any additional relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order.  In lieu of any of the stipulated penalties set out above, Complainant may seek any other remedies or sanctions available by virtue of Respondent’s violation of this Agreed Order or Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.

 

10.       Civil and stipulated penalties and sample cost reimbursement payment are payable by check to the “Environmental Management Special Fund.”  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashier – Mail Code 50-10C

100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

11.       This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors and assigns.  Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

12.       In the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

13.       Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

14.       This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

15.       Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

16.       Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.

 

17.       Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM (or anyone acting on its behalf) from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

18.       This Agreed Order shall remain in until Respondent complies with the terms of Order Paragraph Nos. 3 through 10 and IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter.

 

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Mark W. Stanifer, Chief

 

Printed:

 

 

Water Enforcement Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Enforcement

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

For the Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deputy Attorney General

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 2008.

 

 

For the Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on February 14, 2008

 

Robert B. Keene

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Legal Counsel and Enforcement